Extensive Foreign Body Reaction to Synthetic Dural Replacement After Decompressive Craniectomy with Radiological and Histopathology Evidence: Observational Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Though the indications are quite varied, decompressive craniectomy is considered a life-saving procedure. Maximal effectiveness of craniectomy is achieved when, in addition to bone removal, the dura mater is opened properly and is augmented with duraplasty. Different synthetic materials have been used over the decades to replace the dura during decompressive craniectomy. We have used different synthetic dural replacements at our institution, including Neuro-Patch, DuraGen, and Lyoplant. In this case series, we described 4 cases that had excessive granulation tissue formation in response to a newly used synthetic dural substitute (ReDura) after emergent decompressive craniectomy. During follow-up brain imaging at different intervals, these cases were found to have foreign body reaction in the form of excessive granulation tissue formation; additionally, 1 case had a sterile pus-like collection. The granulation tissue diagnosis was affirmed by histopathology in all 4 cases. METHODS: This study was an observational retrograde case series, with data obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS: The study showed extensive foreign body giant cell reactions on preoperative computed tomography scans, indicating a very high occurrence rate of 72.4%, when ReDura was used as dural replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that patients are prone to develop severe foreign body giant cell reactions with ReDura. Neurosurgical centers using this material should monitor patients for possible abnormal foreign body reaction and report it to establish the safety and efficacy profile of this material.

Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Cranioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure and autologous grafts are preferred due to their aesthetic and biocompatibility benefits. Multiple risk factors are implicated as predictors for neurologic outcome. This study focuses on risk factors that may be associated with complications and analyzes the predictors of neurologic outcomes after autologous cranioplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care center between 2015 and 2021. Adults with autologous cranioplasty (n = 132) were recruited from procedure logs and the hospital electronic health record. Clinicodemographic parameters, risk factors, and complications were recorded. Neurologic outcomes were measured using the dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Primary outcome measure was pre- and post-cranioplasty GOS at the last follow up. Secondary outcome measures were the predicting factors that contributed to enhanced neurologic outcome post-cranioplasty. RESULTS: Mean age was 41.4 (standard deviation ± 13.5) years with male predominance (12.2:1). Complications developed in 12.9% (n = 17), with infections in 3.8% (n = 5) and hydrocephalus in 2.3% (n = 3). In bivariate analysis, pre-cranioplasty GOS good grades 4 and 5 (P < 0.001), trauma as an indication for decompressive craniectomy (DC) (P < 0.001), and early cranioplasty ≤12 weeks (P = 0.023) were statistically significant predictors for post-cranioplasty neurologic recovery at follow-up. In a multiple logistic regression model, adjusted odds ratio for pre-cranioplasty GOS was 28.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.21-114.74, P < 0.001), for trauma as indication for DC was 5.15 (95% CI 1.65-16.05, P = 0.003), and for early cranioplasty ≤12 weeks was 3.04 (95% CI 1.12-8.27 P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous cranioplasty contributes to a quantifiable neurologic outcome. Pre-cranioplasty neurologic status, cranioplasty done for traumatic DC and early cranioplasty may have potential for enhanced neurologic recovery. Further clinical studies with better evidence may expound upon these findings.