Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Life Sci ; 348: 122683, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702027

ABSTRACT

Although CAR-T cell therapy has emerged as a game-changer in cancer immunotherapy several bottlenecks limit its widespread use as a front-line therapy. Current protocols for the production of CAR-T cells rely mainly on the use of lentiviral/retroviral vectors. Nevertheless, according to the safety concerns around the use of viral vectors, there are several regulatory hurdles to their clinical use. Large-scale production of viral vectors under "Current Good Manufacturing Practice" (cGMP) involves rigorous quality control assessments and regulatory requirements that impose exorbitant costs on suppliers and as a result, lead to a significant increase in the cost of treatment. Pursuing an efficient non-viral method for genetic modification of immune cells is a hot topic in cell-based gene therapy. This study aims to investigate the current state-of-the-art in non-viral methods of CAR-T cell manufacturing. In the first part of this study, after reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of the clinical use of viral vectors, different non-viral vectors and the path of their clinical translation are discussed. These vectors include transposons (sleeping beauty, piggyBac, Tol2, and Tc Buster), programmable nucleases (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9), mRNA, plasmids, minicircles, and nanoplasmids. Afterward, various methods for efficient delivery of non-viral vectors into the cells are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Genetic Vectors , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/genetics , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , Animals , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Genetic Therapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy
2.
Mol Cancer ; 22(1): 169, 2023 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37814270

ABSTRACT

The use of nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize the detection and treatment of cancer. Developments in protein engineering and materials science have led to the emergence of new nanoscale targeting techniques, which offer renewed hope for cancer patients. While several nanocarriers for medicinal purposes have been approved for human trials, only a few have been authorized for clinical use in targeting cancer cells. In this review, we analyze some of the authorized formulations and discuss the challenges of translating findings from the lab to the clinic. This study highlights the various nanocarriers and compounds that can be used for selective tumor targeting and the inherent difficulties in cancer therapy. Nanotechnology provides a promising platform for improving cancer detection and treatment in the future, but further research is needed to overcome the current limitations in clinical translation.


Subject(s)
Nanoparticles , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nanotechnology/methods , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Carriers , Drug Compounding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...