Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Phys Ther Educ ; 2024 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Entry-level physical therapist (PT) education programs play a critical role in inspiring future leaders to become moral change agents, capable of understanding and addressing evolving societal health needs. Social reconstructionism represents an educational philosophy focused on alleviating pervasive inequities and improving the health of society; however, its application in PT education is not well understood. The purpose of this article is to describe the approach 3 entry-level PT programs used to manifest social reconstructionism within their curricula to foster social consciousness and strengthen moral agency. METHOD/MODEL DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION: The Framework for Educating Health Professionals to Address the Social Determinants of Health informed the development of a conceptual framework that illustrates the role of PT education programs in creating transformative learning environments and preparing learners to meet societal health needs. Concepts within this framework were operationalized according to 5 domains put forth by Jensen et al. and related competencies put forth by the Association of American Medical Colleges. OUTCOMES: Narratives from each program demonstrate how the design and implementation of curricula, grounded in social reconstructionism, can be accomplished through 1) ongoing modifications, 2) thoughtful reconstruction, and 3) initial design. Sample learning activities, objectives, and assessment strategies are provided. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The proposed method was effective in guiding meaningful objectives, learning activities, and assessment strategies grounded in social reconstructionism. Such findings can inform the design of curricula that inspire the next generation of transformative leaders who work to alleviate pervasive inequities and improve the health of society.

3.
Phys Ther ; 100(4): 591-599, 2020 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31800062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growing student debt of physical therapists entering the workforce, coupled with the growth in projected need, raises concerns about where and how entry-level physical therapists will practice and if these choices will be affected by their debt burden. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the debt profile of entry-level physical therapists and explore relationships between student debt and clinical practice setting choices. METHODS: This study utilized a cross-sectional survey design to identify debt profiles and explore relationships between student debt and the clinical practice choices of entry-level physical therapists. RESULTS: The mean debt-to-income ratio based on the total reported educational debt was 197% (93%). The most frequently reported debt range for doctor of physical therapy (DPT) debt and total educational debt was $100,000 to $124,999. Despite the setting itself being rated as the most important factor (83%), 28% of participants reported debt as a barrier to their desired practice setting. In addition, when considering job choice overall, 57% of the participants reported that their student debt has had an effect on their decision. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its small sample size, originating from 1 state, and being taken by convenience from a special interest group. Data were collected via an anonymous survey, which increases the risk of selection bias. In addition, there are further personal, family, and institutional characteristics that were not collected in this study, which may influence the interaction between student debt and clinical practice choices. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that practice setting choice may be affected by physical therapist student debt, and student debt may be a barrier overall to practice and career choices in physical therapy.


Subject(s)
Income , Physical Therapists/economics , Professional Practice Location/economics , Training Support/economics , Adult , Career Choice , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sample Size , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
JBJS Rev ; 4(2)2016 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27490132

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limb-salvage surgery and segmental reconstruction for the treatment of lower extremity osseous tumors in the pediatric population have been described in the literature, but there is little consensus regarding the optimal surgical treatment for this patient population. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies focusing on limb-salvage procedures in pediatric patients who were managed with one of three reconstructions with use of a metallic endoprosthesis, allograft, or allograft-prosthesis composite. Data were segregated according to the excised and reconstructed anatomical location (proximal part of the femur, total femur, distal part of the femur, proximal part of the tibia) and were collated to assess modes of failure and functional outcomes of each reconstruction type for each anatomic location. RESULTS: Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria; all were Level-IV evidence, primarily consisting of small, retrospective case series. Infection was a primary mode of failure across all reconstruction types and locations, whereas allograft reconstructions were susceptible to structural failure as well. The rate of failure in the pediatric population correlated well with previously published results for adults. The incidence of subsequent amputation was lower in the pediatric population (5.2%) than has been reported in adults (9.5%) (p = 0.013). Meaningful growth of expandable metallic endoprostheses was reported in the literature, with an overall rate of leg-length discrepancy of 13.4% being noted at the time of the latest follow-up. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) questionnaire was the most consistently used outcome measure in the literature, with average scores ranging from 71.0% to 86.8%, depending on reconstruction type and anatomic location. CONCLUSIONS: The current state of the literature detailing the surgical and functional outcomes of segmental reconstruction for the treatment of pediatric bone tumors is limited to Level-IV evidence and is complicated by under-segregation of the data by age and anatomical location of the reconstruction. Despite these limitations, pediatric limb-salvage surgery demonstrates satisfactory initial surgical and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Limb Salvage , Lower Extremity , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Adolescent , Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Lower Extremity/physiology , Lower Extremity/surgery , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL