Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World Neurosurg ; 90: 123-132, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26926798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Meningeal tumors are neoplasms with different histologic manifestations of both benign and malignant types that determine the prognosis of tumor recurrence and its consistency. The risk of surgical treatment depends on the location, size, and consistency of the tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences can be used to identify the features of tumors, but these MRI characteristics are not well understood. The present study describes an advanced mathematical algorithm to analyze MRI data and distinguish histologic types of meningeal tumors before surgery. METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent surgical removal of meningeal brain tumor. All patients had preoperative MRI with a 1.5-T scanner. One radiologist and 2 neurosurgeons evaluated MRI histogram peaks of the whole tumor volume using the advanced computer algorithm. RESULTS: Three specialists received the following mean value of histogram peaks: 15.99 ± 0.23 (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) for meningoteliomatous meningiomas; 21.24 ± 0.3 (±SEM) for fibroplastic meningiomas; 19.0 ± 0.28 (±SEM) for transitional meningiomas; 10.7 ± 0.27 (±SEM) for anatypical, anaplastic meningiomas, 11.03 ± 0.51 (±SEM) for primary intracranial fibrosarcomas and 25.72 ± 0.29 (±SEM) for meningeal hemangiopericytomas. A one-way analysis of variance test proved the difference between group means: F = 70.138, P < 0.01. The Tukey test and the Games-Howell test indicated that the difference between the tumor groups was significant. Mean deviation in agreement index between specialists was 0.98 ± 0.007 (±SEM). CONCLUSIONS: The advanced algorithm proved high specificity, sensitivity, and interoperator repeatability.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Meningioma/diagnostic imaging , Meningioma/pathology , Software , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Machine Learning , Male , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/surgery , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Preoperative Care/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...