Valor pronóstico de la biopsia renal preimplante en donantes fallecidos de edad avanzada en la función renal al año del trasplante / Prognostic utility of preimplantation kidney biopsy from deceased older donors in first year post-transplant renal function

Antecedentes: La biopsia renal preimplante puede aportar información útil evolutiva postrasplante. Objetivo: Analizar el valor pronóstico de la biopsia renal de donantes de edad avanzada respecto al filtrado glomerular estimado MDRD-4 (FGe) al año del trasplante. Métodos: Estudiamos a 124 receptores de trasplante renal de donantes fallecidos de ≥60 años, con biopsia renal preimplante. Los trasplantes fueron realizados en nuestro centro, entre marzo del 2008 y mayo del 2012. Las biopsias se valoraron según el baremo propuesto por O’Valle et al. y se categorizaron en 3 grupos: 0-3, 4-5, 6-8 puntos. Se descartaron los riñones con una puntuación >8. El 77% de los donantes tenía ≥70 años. Resultados: El FGe medio (DE) del grupo 6-8 al año del trasplante: 38,5 (14,1) mL/min/1,73m2 fue menor que el del grupo 4-5: 46,3 (15,7) (p=0,03) y del grupo 0-3: 49,6 (12,5) (p=0,04). Se registraron 7 (19%) pacientes con FGe<30mL/min/1,73m2 en el grupo 6-8 vs. 8 (14%) en el grupo 4-5 y ninguno en el grupo 0-3 (p=0,17). En el análisis de regresión logística, OR (IC 95%), que valoró los pacientes con FGe<30mL/min/1,73m2 al año del trasplante, la función retrasada del injerto (6,3 [1,9-21,3]) y el rechazo agudo (5,8 [1,1-31]) fueron significativos. La puntuación del daño histológico de las biopsias, grupo 6-8 vs. 0-5, presentó un OR ajustado no significativo de 2,2 (0,7-7,3). Conclusiones: Los riñones con mayor afectación histológica presentaron un menor FGe al año del trasplante. La función renal retrasada del injerto y el rechazo fueron factores de riesgo significativos de un bajo FGe al año del trasplante (AU)

Background: Preimplantation renal biopsy provides potentially valuable information about post-transplant renal function. Objective: To assess the prognostic value of preimplantation kidney biopsy from older donors in determining 1-year post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate MDRD-4 (eGFR). Methods: We evaluated a cohort of 124 renal transplant recipients from deceased donors ≥60 years old, performed at our center between March 2008 and May 2012. Biopsies were assessed by applying the score proposed by O’Valle et al. The overall score was stratified into 3 levels: 0-3, 4-5 and 6-8 points. Kidneys scoring > 8 points were discarded. A total of 77% of the donors were ≥70 years. Results: One year post-transplant, mean eGFR (SD) was lower in transplant recipients with 6-8 points (38.5 [14.1] mL/min/1.73m2) than in the group scoring 4-5 points (46.3 [15.7] [p=0.03]) and the group scoring 0-3 (49.6 [12.5] [P=.04]). Seven patients (19%) had eGFR <30mL/min/1.73m2 1 year post-transplant in group 6-8 vs. 8 (14%) in group 4-5 and none in group 0-3. In the logistic regression, OR (95% IC), to determine patients with 1-year post-transplant eGFR (<30mL/min/1.73m2), delayed graft function (6.3 [1.9-21.3]) and acute rejection (5.8 [1.1-31]), were significant. The adjusted OR of biopsy score group 6-8 vs. 0-5, was 2.2 (0.7-7.3). Conclusions: Allografts with higher pathologic score in preimplantation renal biopsy were associated with a worse 1-year post-transplant eGFR. Delayed graft function and acute rejection were significant risk factors for 1-year post-transplant low eGFR (AU)

Prognostic utility of preimplantation kidney biopsy from deceased older donors in first year post-transplant renal function.

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation renal biopsy provides potentially valuable information about post-transplant renal function. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of preimplantation kidney biopsy from older donors in determining 1-year post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate MDRD-4 (eGFR). METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of 124 renal transplant recipients from deceased donors ≥60 years old, performed at our center between March 2008 and May 2012. Biopsies were assessed by applying the score proposed by O'Valle et al. The overall score was stratified into 3 levels: 0-3, 4-5 and 6-8 points. Kidneys scoring > 8 points were discarded. A total of 77% of the donors were ≥70 years. RESULTS: One year post-transplant, mean eGFR (SD) was lower in transplant recipients with 6-8 points (38.5 [14.1] mL/min/1.73m(2)) than in the group scoring 4-5 points (46.3 [15.7] [p=0.03]) and the group scoring 0-3 (49.6 [12.5] [P=.04]). Seven patients (19%) had eGFR <30mL/min/1.73m(2) 1 year post-transplant in group 6-8 vs. 8 (14%) in group 4-5 and none in group 0-3. In the logistic regression, OR (95% IC), to determine patients with 1-year post-transplant eGFR (<30mL/min/1.73m(2)), delayed graft function (6.3 [1.9-21.3]) and acute rejection (5.8 [1.1-31]), were significant. The adjusted OR of biopsy score group 6-8 vs. 0-5, was 2.2 (0.7-7.3). CONCLUSIONS: Allografts with higher pathologic score in preimplantation renal biopsy were associated with a worse 1-year post-transplant eGFR. Delayed graft function and acute rejection were significant risk factors for 1-year post-transplant low eGFR.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in renal transplantation between 1990 and 2002 in Spain.

Background. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) decrease cardiovascular mortality and slow the progression of renal disease in non-transplant patients, but their impact on kidney transplant outcome has not been well established.Methods. Patients receiving a renal allograft in Spain in 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 were considered for the present study. Only adult (>/=18 years) recipients of a single kidney transplant functioning at the end of the first year were considered. A total of 4842 patients with clinical data about ACEI/ARB therapy were included.Results. During the initial 2 years after transplant, ACEI/ARB were less frequently used in the 1990 and 1994 cohorts than in 1998 and 2002 (15.1%, 24.6%, 33.5% and 45.1%, respectively; P < 0.001). During the first year, a total of 1063 patients (22.8%) received ACEI/ARB treatment, and graft survival (50.0% for treated patients and 51.4% for untreated, P = ns), death-censored graft survival (60.6% versus 63.5%, P = ns) and patient survival (68.8% versus 66.6%, P = ns) were not different. During the initial 2 years, 1472 patients (31.4%) received treatment with ACEI/ARB, and graft survival tended to be higher in treated patients (54.4% and 50.9%, P = 0.063). Since there was an interaction between ACEI/ARB treatment and year of transplant, graft survival was analysed in each cohort. Cox regression analysis including the propensity score for ACEI/ARB treatment showed an association between ACEI/ARB treatment and graft survival in the 2002 cohort (relative risk 0.36 and 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.75, P = 0.007). Death-censored graft survival (63.8% versus 63.1%, P = ns) and patient survival (68.1% and 66.5%, P = ns) were not significantly different.Conclusions. The use of ACEI/ARB during the initial 2 years after transplantation was associated with a better graft survival, but this effect was only observed in the 2002 cohort.

Long-term efficacy of hyperuricaemia treatment in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Although hyperuricaemia and gout are frequently found in renal transplant recipients, little has been published on the efficacy of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in this patient population. We therefore examine the effects of allopurinol and benziodarone therapy in a cohort of renal transplant patients. METHODS: We reviewed files from a cohort of 1328 patients that received renal transplantation. The selection criteria included: functioning allograft, hyperuricaemia for >12 months or gout, ULT lasting at least 1 year and at least two control measurements after the onset of ULT. Patients on azathioprine were treated with benziodarone to avoid azathioprine-allopurinol interactions. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seventy-nine patients fulfilled the criteria for review. They were treated with 289 courses of ULT: 100 with allopurinol (mean dose: 376 mg/day/dl/min of creatinine clearance) and 189 with benziodarone (mean dose: 73 mg/day). The mean follow-up was 38 months. Both drugs were effective for the control of hyperuricaemia, but benziodarone caused greater reductions in serum uric acid levels, especially when used at mean doses of >75 mg/day. Severe side effects were uncommon, in both the allopurinol and benziodarone groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both allopurinol and benziodarone were effective for the control of hyperuricaemia in renal transplantation. Benziodarone at doses >75 mg/day was more effective than allopurinol in reducing serum uric acid levels and also reduced the risk of azathioprine-allopurinol interactions.