ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of chronic pain, its physical and psychosocial impact on daily life, and the various therapies adopted to alleviate pain. METHODS: The cross-sectional population-based telephonic survey was conducted from May to July 2021 at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised patients of either gender aged at least 18 years suffering from chronic pain who visited the institutional laboratory collection centres. In the first phase, people who were suffering from chronic pain were screened, while in the second phase, data was collected using a detailed questionnaire exploring pain history, treatment and its effects. The data was compiled and analysed using Antlere's AI based software. RESULTS: Of the 4,801 patients contacted, 757(15.75%) were suffering from chronic pain. A total of 201(20%) subjects reported that their pain score was 5/10 on the numerical rating scale. Back pain was the major complaint (183, 18%) among the subjects. Of the total, 335(44.25%) were having active treatment, and 226 (67%) of them said the medication was effective. Overall, 706 (93%) patients had never visited a pain management specialist. Furthermore, 252 (33%) participants were diagnosed with depression, and 106 (14%) patients said that they were suicidal at some point in life. CONCLUSIONS: .The survey observed that a high percentage of unawareness existed on pain management among the Pakistani citizens.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Prevalence , Pakistan/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pain ManagementABSTRACT
One-lung ventilation (OLV) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be accomplished through several different techniques, including bronchial advancement of an endotracheal tube (ETT), use of a double-lumen tube (DLT), or placement of an endobronchial blocker. In most cases, a DLT is a mainstay of isolating and ventilating a single lung during cardiothoracic procedures. The reasons to deploy a DLT over other techniques include ease of placement, less chance of malposition, quick placement time, and quality of lung deflation. However, this case report highlights the importance of a bronchial blocker in a patient where a double-lumen tube failed to ventilate the lungs. Briefly, this young female patient had a right thoracic mass associated with ipsilateral lung collapse and moderate pleural effusion. CT-guided biopsy was planned but was deferred by the radiologist, as the patient was unable to lie in a prone position. The case was then referred to the cardiothoracic surgeon who planned a right VATS and biopsy of the lesion. In the operation theater, after induction of anesthesia, the patient could not be ventilated through a DLT, and high peak airway pressures were encountered. Initially, a size 37 left-sided DLT was used, and subsequently, sizes 35, 32, and 28 were also tried, but all these attempts to ventilate the patient remained futile. A bronchoscopy was done, which did not show any abnormality in the airway. The surgery was postponed due to an inability to ventilate the patient with a double-lumen tube. After a repeat CT scan and draining of 9.3 liters of pleural effusion over a week, the patient was again scheduled for the same procedure but with a changed anesthetic plan. This time around, the anesthetic plan was implemented successfully using a bronchial blocker to isolate the right lung. The surgery went ahead, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative period. The anesthetic management of this patient presented a unique set of challenges, which are shared in this case report.