ABSTRACT
One of the most frequent genes affected in pediatric ALL is the CDKN2A/2B gene, acting as a secondary cooperating event and playing an important role in cell-cycle regulation and chemosensitivity. Despite its inclusion in combined CNA (copy-number alterations) classifiers, like the IKZF1plus entity and the UKALL CNA profile, the prognostic impact of the individual gene deletions outside the context of a combined CNA evaluation remains controversial. Addressing the CDKN2A/2B deletions' additive prognostic effect in current risk-stratification algorithms, we present a retrospective study of a Greek pediatric ALL cohort comprising 247 patients studied over a 24-year period (2000-2023). Herein, we provide insight regarding the correlation with disease features, MRD clearance, and independent prognostic significance for this ALL cohort treated with contemporary BFM-based treatment protocols. Within an extended follow-up time of 135 months, the presence of the CDKN2A/2B deletions (biallelic or monoallelic) was associated with inferior EFS rates (65.1% compared to 91.8% for the gene non-deleted subgroup, p < 0.001), with the relapse rate accounting for 22.2% and 5.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The presence of the biallelic deletion was associated with the worst outcomes (EFS 57.2% vs. 89.6% in the case of any other status, monoallelic or non-deleted, p < 0.001). Survival differences were demonstrated for B-ALL cases (EFS 65.3% vs. 93.6% for the non-deleted B-ALL subgroup, p < 0.001), but the prognostic effect was not statistically significant within the T-ALL cohort (EFS 64.3 vs. 69.2, p = 0.947). The presence of the CDKN2A/2B deletions clearly correlated with inferior outcomes within all protocol-defined risk groups (standard risk (SR): EFS 66.7% vs. 100%, p < 0.001, intermediate risk (IR): EFS 77.1% vs. 97.9%, p < 0.001, high risk (HR): EFS 42.1% vs. 70.5% p < 0.001 for deleted vs non-deleted cases in each patient risk group); additionally, in this study, the presence of the deletion differentiated prognosis within both MRD-positive and -negative subgroups on days 15 and 33 of induction. In multivariate analysis, the presence of the CDKN2A/2B deletions was the most important prognostic factor for relapse and overall survival, yielding a hazard ratio of 5.2 (95% confidence interval: 2.59-10.41, p < 0.001) and 5.96 (95% confidence interval: 2.97-11.95, p < 0.001), respectively, designating the alteration's independent prognostic significance in the context of modern risk stratification. The results of our study demonstrate that the presence of the CDKN2A/2B deletions can further stratify all existing risk groups, identifying patient subgroups with different outcomes. The above biallelic deletions could be incorporated into future risk-stratification algorithms, refining MRD-based stratification. In the era of targeted therapies, future prospective controlled clinical trials will further explore the possible use of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) in CDKN2A/2B-affected ALL pediatric subgroups.
ABSTRACT
We present our data of a novel proposed CNA-profile risk-index, applied on a Greek ALLIC-BFM-treated cohort, aiming at further refining genomic risk-stratification. Eighty-five of 227 consecutively treated ALL patients were analyzed for the copy-number-status of eight genes (IKZF1/CDKN2A/2B/PAR1/BTG1/EBF1/PAX5/ETV6/RB1). Using the MLPA-assay, patients were stratified as: (1) Good-risk(GR)-CNA-profile (n = 51), with no deletion of IKZF1/CDKN2A/B/PAR1/BTG1/EBF1/PAX5/ETV6/RB1 or isolated deletions of ETV6/PAX5/BTG1 or ETV6 deletions with a single additional deletion of BTG1/PAX5/CDKN2A/B. (2) Poor-risk(PR)-CNA-profile (n = 34), with any deletion of ΙΚΖF1/PAR1/EBF1/RB1 or any other CΝΑ. With a median follow-up time of 49.9 months, EFS for GR-CNA-profile and PR-CNA-profile patients was 96.0% vs. 57.6% (p < 0.001). For IR-group and HR-group patients, EFS for the GR-CNA/PR-CNA subgroups was 100.0% vs. 60.0% (p < 0.001) and 88.2% vs. 55.6% (p = 0.047), respectively. Among FC-MRDd15 + patients (MRDd15 ≥ 10-4), EFS rates were 95.3% vs. 51.7% for GR-CNA/PR-CNA subjects (p < 0.001). Similarly, among FC-MRDd33 + patients (MRDd33 ≥ 10-4), EFS was 92.9% vs. 27.3% (p < 0.001) and for patients FC-MRDd33 - (MRDd33 < 10-4), EFS was 97.2% vs. 72.7% (p = 0.004), for GR-CNA/PR-CNA patients, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the CNA-profile was the most important outcome predictor. In conclusion, the CNA-profile can establish a new genomic risk-index, identifying a distinct subgroup with increased relapse risk among the IR-group, as well as a subgroup of patients with superior prognosis among HR-patients. The CNA-profile is feasible in BFM-based protocols, further refining MRD-based risk-stratification.
