Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 105
Filter
1.
Bipolar Disord ; 2023 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have systematically examined the safety and effectiveness of antidepressant versus mood stabilizer monotherapy of bipolar II depression. To date, there are no aggregated or mega-analyses of prospective trials of individual participant-level data (IPD) to inform future treatment guidelines on the relative safety and effectiveness of antidepressant or lithium monotherapy. METHODS: Data from a series of four independent, similarly designed trials of antidepressant or lithium monotherapy (where longitudinal IPD were available) (n = 393) were aggregated into an IPD dataset (i.e., mega-analysis). Hierarchical log-linear growth models were used to analyze primary outcome of change over time in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores; while secondary outcomes examined Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI/S) and change (CGI/C) scores, and change over time in Young Mania Rating (YMR) scores. RESULTS: Relative to lithium monotherapy, antidepressant monotherapy demonstrated significantly greater symptom reduction on HRSD scores across time (b = -2.33, t = -6.68, p < 0.0001), significantly greater symptom reduction on the CGI/S across time (b = -0.414, t = -6.32, p < 0.001), and a significant improvement in CGI/C across time (b = -0.47, t = -7.43, p < 0.0001). No differences were observed in change over time for YMR scores between antidepressant and lithium monotherapy (b = 0.06, t = 0.49, p = 0.62). CONCLUSION: Findings from this IPD mega-analysis of bipolar II depression trials suggest a divergence from current evidence-based guidelines recommending combined mood stabilizer plus antidepressant therapy. The current mega-analysis suggests that antidepressant monotherapy may provide superior short-term effectiveness without clinically meaningful increase in treatment-emergent hypomanic symptoms compared to lithium monotherapy.

2.
BMJ Open ; 13(7): e063095, 2023 07 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491091

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Reanalyse the patient-level data set of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study with fidelity to the original research protocol and related publications. DESIGN: The study was open label and semirandomised examining the effectiveness of up to four optimised and increasingly aggressive, antidepressant therapies in depressed adults. Patients who failed to gain adequate relief from their level 1 trial on the SSRI citalopram could receive up to three additional treatment trials in levels 2-4. SETTING: 41 North American psychiatry and primary care treatment centres. PARTICIPANTS: 4041 adults screened positive for major depressive disorder. In contrast to most clinical trials, STAR*D enrolled patients seeking care (vs recruited) and included patients with a wide range of common comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions to enhance the generalisability of findings to real-world clinical practice. INTERVENTIONS: STAR*D evaluated the relative effectiveness of 13 antidepressants therapies in treatment levels 2-4 for depressed patients who failed to gain adequate benefit from their level 1 medication trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: According to the STAR*D protocol, the primary outcome was remission, defined as a score <8 on the blinded Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). Response was a secondary outcome defined as ≥50% reduction in HRSD scores. STAR*D's protocol specifically excluded all non-blinded clinic-administered assessments from use as research outcome measures. RESULTS: STAR*D investigators did not use the protocol-stipulated HRSD to report cumulative remission and response rates in their summary article and instead used a non-blinded clinic-administered assessment. This inflated their report of outcomes, as did their inclusion of 99 patients who scored as remitted on the HRSD at study outset as well as 125 who scored as remitted when initiating their next-level treatment. These patients should have been excluded from data analysis. In contrast to the STAR*D-reported 67% cumulative remission rate after up to four antidepressant treatment trials, the rate was 35.0% when using the protocol-stipulated HRSD and inclusion in data analysis criteria. CONCLUSION: STAR*D's cumulative remission rate was approximately half of that reported.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy
3.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 147(2): 198-204, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331516

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with bipolar disorder spend most of their clinical lifetime in the depressive phase of their illness. However, antidepressants are discouraged in the treatment of bipolar depression due to concerns over manic induction and drug ineffectiveness. Some reports suggest that monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) may be safe and effective compared to other antidepressants in treating bipolar depression. The present study compared the safety and effectiveness of MAOI therapy in patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression. METHODS: Data were collected from approximately 2500 clinical research charts of patients treated with MAOI therapy at a university mood disorder clinic between 1983 and 2015. A mixed-effects model was created with patient entered as the random effect. The model included the primary diagnosis (i.e., either unipolar or bipolar depression) and other clinical covariates as fixed-effect predictors. RESULTS: Patients with bipolar depression demonstrated lower post-treatment clinical global impressions/severity scores versus patients with unipolar depression (p = 0.04). Neither group demonstrated a full syndromal manic or hypomanic episode. A higher proportion of patients with bipolar depression reported myoclonic tics and tremors, which may have resulted from concomitant lithium use. Amongst the covariates, only the number of prior antidepressant trials predicted poorer outcomes from MAOI therapy. CONCLUSION: MAOIs may be more effective-and as safe-for patients with bipolar depression versus unipolar depression. Future studies should explore this possible advantage using a larger sample size.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Depressive Disorder , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects
4.
CNS Spectr ; : 1-14, 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837681

ABSTRACT

This article is a clinical guide which discusses the "state-of-the-art" usage of the classic monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) antidepressants (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, and isocarboxazid) in modern psychiatric practice. The guide is for all clinicians, including those who may not be experienced MAOI prescribers. It discusses indications, drug-drug interactions, side-effect management, and the safety of various augmentation strategies. There is a clear and broad consensus (more than 70 international expert endorsers), based on 6 decades of experience, for the recommendations herein exposited. They are based on empirical evidence and expert opinion-this guide is presented as a new specialist-consensus standard. The guide provides practical clinical advice, and is the basis for the rational use of these drugs, particularly because it improves and updates knowledge, and corrects the various misconceptions that have hitherto been prominent in the literature, partly due to insufficient knowledge of pharmacology. The guide suggests that MAOIs should always be considered in cases of treatment-resistant depression (including those melancholic in nature), and prior to electroconvulsive therapy-while taking into account of patient preference. In selected cases, they may be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm than has previously been customary, and should not be regarded as drugs of last resort; they may prove decisively effective when many other treatments have failed. The guide clarifies key points on the concomitant use of incorrectly proscribed drugs such as methylphenidate and some tricyclic antidepressants. It also illustrates the straightforward "bridging" methods that may be used to transition simply and safely from other antidepressants to MAOIs.

5.
Can J Psychiatry ; 66(10): 849-862, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Plant-based medicines have had a long-standing history of use in psychiatric disorders. Highly quantified and standardized extracts or isolates may be termed "phytoceuticals," in a similar way that medicinal nutrients are termed as "nutraceuticals." Over the past 2 decades, several meta-analyses have examined the data for a range of plant-based medicines in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The aim of this international project is to provide a "meta-review" of this top-tier evidence. METHODS: We identified, synthesized, and appraised all available up to date meta-analyses... of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the efficacy and effectiveness of individual phytoceuticals across all major psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Our systematic search identified 9 relevant meta-analyses of RCTs, with primary analyses including outcome data from 5,927 individuals. Supportive meta-analytic evidence was found for St John's wort for major depressive disorder (MDD); curcumin and saffron for MDD or depression symptoms, and ginkgo for total and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Kava was not effective in treating diagnosed anxiety disorders. We also provide details on 22 traditional Chinese herbal medicine formulas' meta-analyses (primarily for depression studies), all of which revealed highly significant and large effect sizes. Their methodology, reporting, and potential publication bias were, however, of marked concern. The same caveat was noted for the curcumin, ginkgo, and saffron meta-analyses, which may also have significant publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: More rigorous international studies are required to validate the efficacy of these phytoceuticals before treatment recommendations can be made. In conclusion, the breadth of data tentatively supports several phytoceuticals which may be effective for mental disorders alongside pharmaceutical, psychological therapies, and standard lifestyle recommendations.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Mental Disorders , Anxiety Disorders , Humans , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Psychiatr Pol ; 54(6): 1067-1090, 2020 Dec 31.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33740797

ABSTRACT

Antidepressants such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have complex temporal effects. They may worsen symptoms during early treatment, they may reduce depressive symptoms over several weeks of treatment, and they may lose effectiveness over more prolonged treatment or after repeated treatment trials. Conceptually, these effects fall within the domain of hormesis, which refers to a biphasic or multiphasic response to a drug or toxin. Hormetic effects are commonly triggered when a drug interacts with homeostatic mechanisms. We develop and evaluate a theoretical framework for understanding how adaptations to SSRIs that restore synaptic homeostasis may partially contribute to their hormetic effects. Specifically, the serotonin system adapts to SSRIs by suppressing the firing of serotonergic neurons, inhibiting the synthesis of serotonin, and reducing the overall content of serotonin in the brain. Moreover, rodent models such as inescapable shock show that serotonin neurotransmission to specific forebrain regions is a necessary, but insufficient cause of depressive symptoms. Our review suggests: (1) early worsening of symptoms may be related to the direct effects of SSRIs on synaptic serotonin; (2) the symptom-reducing effects could be related to the loss of serotonin content in the brain during SSRI exposure; (3) the loss of efficacy over prolonged exposure could be related to the central nervous system equilibrating to the SSRIs. The serotonin system's adaptations to SSRIs may play a clinically meaningful role in their hormetic effects on depressive symptoms. A complete understanding of SSRIs' hormetic effects will require exploring temporal dynamics in other neurotransmitter systems.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Hormesis/drug effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Drug Tolerance , Humans , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology
7.
J Altern Complement Med ; 26(9): 813-819, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31808709

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This exploratory analysis examined the putative antidepressant effect of Matricaria chamomilla L. (chamomile) extract in subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) with or without comorbid depression. It was hypothesized that chamomile extract would demonstrate similar anxiolytic activity in both subgroups, but superior antidepressant activity in GAD subjects with comorbid depression. Design: As part of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of chamomile extract for relapse prevention of GAD, 179 subjects received initial therapy with open-label chamomile extract 1500 mg daily for 8 weeks. Linear mixed-effect models were used to identify clinically meaningful changes in anxiety and depression symptoms between diagnostic subgroups. Settings/Location: The study took place at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA. Subjects: Subjects were ≥18 years old with a primary DSM IV-TR diagnosis of GAD. They were subcategorized into two diagnostic groups: GAD without comorbid depression (n = 100) and GAD with comorbid depression (n = 79). Interventions: Open-label chamomile extract 1500 mg was given daily for 8 weeks. Outcome measures: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7), Hamilton rating scale for anxiety, Beck anxiety inventory, Hamilton rating scale for depression (HRSD), the six-item core HRSD (items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 13), and the Beck depression inventory (BDI). Results: The authors observed similar anxiolytic effects over time in both diagnostic subgroups. However, there was a greater reduction in HRSD core symptom scores (p < 0.023), and a trend level reduction in HRSD total scores (p = 0.14) and in BPI total scores (p = 0.060) in subjects with comorbid depression. Conclusions: M. chamomilla L. may produce clinically meaningful antidepressant effects in addition to its anxiolytic activity in subjects with GAD and comorbid depression. Future controlled trials in subjects with primary major depressive disorder are needed to validate this preliminary observation.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety/drug therapy , Chamomile , Depression/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Matricaria , Phytotherapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/complications , Depression/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
8.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 77(3): 237-245, 2020 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31799993

ABSTRACT

Importance: Antidepressant medication (ADM) maintenance treatment is associated with the prevention of depressive recurrence in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) treatment is associated with recurrence prevention remains unclear. Objective: To determine the effects of combining CBT with ADM on the prevention of depressive recurrence when ADMs are withdrawn or maintained after recovery in patients with MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 292 adult outpatients with chronic or recurrent MDD who participated in the second phase of a 2-phase trial. Participants had recovered in the first phase of the trial receiving ADM, either alone or in combination with CBT. The trial was conducted in research clinics in 3 university medical centers in the United States. Patients in phase 2 were randomized to receive maintenance of or withdrawal from ADM and were followed up for 3 years. The first and last patients entered phase 2 in August 2003 and October 2009, respectively. The last patient completed phase 2 in August 2012. Data were analyzed from December 2013 to December 2018. Interventions: Maintenance of or withdrawal from treatment with ADM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recurrence of an MDD episode using longitudinal interval follow-up evaluations; sustained recovery across both phases. Results: A total of 292 participants (171 women, 121 men; mean [SD] age 45.1 [12.9] years) were included in analyses of depressive recurrence. Maintenance ADM yielded lower rates of recurrence compared with ADM withdrawal regardless of whether patients had achieved recovery in phase 1 with ADM alone (48.5% vs 74.8%; z = -3.16; P = .002; number needed to treat [NNT], 2.8; 95% CI, 1.8-7.0) or ADM plus CBT (48.5% vs 76.7%; z = -3.49; P < .001; NNT, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-5.9). Sustained recovery rates differed as a function of phase 2 condition, with maintenance ADM superior to ADM withdrawal (z = 2.90; P = .004; OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.37-4.84; NNT, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-6.4). Phase 1 condition was not associated with differential rates of sustained recovery (ADM alone vs ADM plus CBT; z = 0.22; P = .83; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.52-2.11; NNT, 26.0; 95% CI, number needed to harm 3.2 to NNT 2.8), nor was there a significant interaction of phase 1 condition and phase 2 condition (z = 0.30; P = .77; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.49-2.88). Conclusions and Relevance: Maintenance ADM treatment, but not previous exposure to CBT, was associated with reduced rates of depressive recurrence. In previous studies, when CBT has been provided without ADM, CBT has shown a preventive effect on depressive relapse. Whether CBT also has a preventive effect on depressive recurrence, or if adding ADM interferes with any such preventive effect, remains unclear. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00057577.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 39(6): 649-652, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688401

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: We examined the relative safety and effectiveness of adding a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) to a failed tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) trial versus adding a TCA to a failed MAOI trial or adding a TCA to a failed TCA trial in treatment-resistant depression. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Data were retrospectively harvested from approximately 2500 treatment charts of subjects with treatment-resistant depression who attended a university mood disorders clinic between 1983 and 2015. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the effectiveness of treatment condition on outcome. Relative adverse event profiles were also examined. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Eighty-four treatment outcome observations were made from 54 subjects who received combination therapy: TCA plus TCA (n = 22), TCA plus MAOI (n = 44), and MAOI plus TCA (n = 18). Treatment condition predicted a poorer (albeit not statistically significant) outcome for TCA plus TCA compared with TCA plus MAOI, or MAOI plus TCA therapy (P = 0.098). Specific adverse events occurred with significantly greater frequency between treatment groups; that is, impotence was more frequent with TCA plus MAOI therapy; headaches and insomnia were more frequent with MAOI plus TCA therapy; and constipation was more frequent with TCA plus TCA therapy. There were no reported or observed hypertensive or serotonergic events. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to conventional wisdom that combined TCA and MAOI therapy should be avoided, the judicious use of this combination may be relatively safe and effective compared with combined TCA plus TCA therapy. However, sample sizes were limited, and the analysis was nonrandomized and retrospective.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/pharmacology , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
10.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 39(4): 344-350, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31205190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined the influence of prior antidepressant treatment trials on the likelihood of depressive relapse, and time to depressive relapse, during maintenance therapy of bipolar II disorder in treatment-responsive subjects who had recovered from a major depressive episode. METHODS: Data were derived from a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of 148 adult subjects with bipolar II major depressive episode who were initially administered open-label fluoxetine monotherapy for 12 weeks. Remitters with a final Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of 8 or lower were then randomized to continuation therapy with either fluoxetine (n = 28), lithium (n = 26), or placebo (n = 27) for 50 additional weeks. RESULTS: An increase in the number of prior antidepressant treatment trials was significantly associated with a greater likelihood of depressive relapse for all treatment conditions taken together [odds ratio (OR) = 1.42, z = 2.49, P = 0.01] and for the 2 active treatment conditions together (OR = 1.51, z = 2.28, P = 0.02). An increase in the number of prior antidepressant trials was also associated with a trend-level shortening in the time to relapse for all treatment conditions taken together (hazard ratio = 1.15; confidence interval, 0.99-1.35; P = 0.07) and a significantly shorter time to relapse for subjects in the 2 active treatment conditions (hazard ratio = 1.30; confidence interval, 1.05-1.62; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support prior evidence of a negative influence of the number of prior antidepressant treatment trials on the likelihood of response and suggest that the number of prior antidepressant trials may also be associated with a greater odds of depressive relapse, and a shorter time to relapse, during antidepressant maintenance therapy in recovered depressed subjects with bipolar II disorder.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Tolerance , Female , Humans , Lithium/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Secondary Prevention , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Affect Disord ; 250: 199-203, 2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30861462

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Antidepressants may be less effective in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). In this exploratory study, we examined the widely held hypothesis that monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) therapy may be superior to tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) therapy for TRD. We also examined the influence of the number of prior treatment trials on TCA versus MAOI effectiveness in TRD. METHODS: Data were retrospectively extracted from approximately 2,500 treatment charts of patients with TRD who were attending a university mood disorder clinic between 1983 and 2015. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the efficacy of drug class on outcome as well as the interaction between drug class and the number of prior antidepressant trials. RESULTS: 147 treatment outcome observations were made from 94 unipolar, depressed patients who either received TCA (N = 47) or MAOI (N = 100) monotherapy for TRD. For patients unresponsive to at least one prior trial, drug class significantly predicted end-of-treatment CGI/S scores, with TCAs showing worse (i.e., higher) end-of-treatment CGI/S scores relative to MAOI therapy (b = 1.04, t = 4.98, p < 0.0001). When examining the interaction between drug class and the number of prior antidepressant trials, the interaction effect was significant (b = -0.50, t = -2.43, p = 0.02); however, the advantage for MAOI versus TCA therapy decreases with more prior, failed, antidepressant trials. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that MAOIs may be more effective than TCAs for early stage TRD. This difference in effectiveness between MAOIs and TCAs diminished as the number of prior treatment trials increased. However, the TCA sample size was limited and the analysis was retrospective with non-randomized conditions.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
13.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 52(12): 1173-1182, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30378461

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To derive new criteria sets for defining manic and hypomanic episodes (and thus for defining the bipolar I and II disorders), an international Task Force was assembled and termed AREDOC reflecting its role of Assessment, Revision and Evaluation of DSM and other Operational Criteria. This paper reports on the first phase of its deliberations and interim criteria recommendations. METHOD: The first stage of the process consisted of reviewing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and recent International Classification of Diseases criteria, identifying their limitations and generating modified criteria sets for further in-depth consideration. Task Force members responded to recommendations for modifying criteria and from these the most problematic issues were identified. RESULTS: Principal issues focussed on by Task Force members were how best to differentiate mania and hypomania, how to judge 'impairment' (both in and of itself and allowing that functioning may sometimes improve during hypomanic episodes) and concern that rejecting some criteria (e.g. an imposed duration period) might risk false-positive diagnoses of the bipolar disorders. CONCLUSION: This first-stage report summarises the clinical opinions of international experts in the diagnosis and management of the bipolar disorders, allowing readers to contemplate diagnostic parameters that may influence their clinical decisions. The findings meaningfully inform subsequent Task Force stages (involving a further commentary stage followed by an empirical study) that are expected to generate improved symptom criteria for diagnosing the bipolar I and II disorders with greater precision and to clarify whether they differ dimensionally or categorically.


Subject(s)
Affective Symptoms/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , International Classification of Diseases , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , International Cooperation , Patient Selection , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/standards
14.
Psychiatr Pol ; 52(6): 957-969, 2018 Dec 29.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659559

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the presence of increased pharmacodynamic tolerance with reduced effectiveness following repeated antidepressant trials over the course of the affective illness in subjects with treatment-responsive bipolar II depression. METHODS: Data were derived from the open-label phase of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of long-term fluoxetine versus lithium monotherapy in 148 subjects >=18 years old with treatment-responsive bipolar II depression, who were initially administered open-label fluoxetine monotherapy for 12 weeks. Response was defined as >=50% reduction in baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score, and remission was defined as a final HRSD score =<8. RESULTS: Subjects reported a mean (SD) total of 1.61 (1.85) (range: 0-9) prior adequate, antidepressant trials over the course of their affective illness, before study enrollment. There was a 25% reduction in the likelihood of fluoxetine response (p < 0.01) and a 22% lower likelihood of remission (p = 0.02), respectively, with each increase in the number of prior antidepressant treatment trials over the illness course. There was no clinically meaningful correlation between fluoxetine response or remission and any other baseline clinical or demographic variable. Thus, only the number of prior antidepressant trials meaningfully impacted the likelihood of fluoxetine response or remission. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations. This was an exploratory study of post hoc, analyses, and the trial was not specifically powered to test the development of increased pharmacodynamic tolerance. Disease heterogeneity or inter-individual differences in antidepressant responsiveness may have influenced fluoxetine effectiveness. Conclusion. These results confirm prior observations of an increased pharmacodynamic tolerance after repeated antidepressant administration, resulting in a step-wise loss of antidepressant effectiveness over the course of the illness.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Drug Tolerance , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
J Psychiatr Res ; 96: 189-195, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29080520

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Dysfunctions in stress biology are hypothesized to contribute to anxiety disorders, and to be ameliorated during successful treatment, but limited clinical data exist to support this hypothesis. We evaluated whether increases in morning cortisol and the diurnal cortisol slope, markers of stress biology, are associated with clinical response to chamomile therapy among subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). METHODS: Among 45 subjects with DSM-IV diagnosed GAD in an open-label clinical trial of chamomile, salivary cortisol was assessed for three days each pre- and post-treatment, at 8am, 12pm, 4pm, and 8pm. Mixed model analyses assessed whether GAD symptom change predicted the degree to which cortisol levels changed during treatment. RESULTS: Symptom improvement during treatment was significantly associated with pre-to-post treatment changes in cortisol. Subjects who experienced more symptomatic improvement experienced significant increases in their morning salivary cortisol (ß = 0.48, p < 0.001), and a greater decrease in cortisol from morning to the rest of the day (ß = 0.55, p < 0.001). In addition, at baseline a lower cortisol level (ß = -0.24, p = 0.023) and a lesser decrease in cortisol after morning (ß = 0.30, p = 0.003) were associated with greater symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Increases in morning salivary cortisol and the diurnal cortisol slope are associated with symptom improvement in chamomile treatment of GAD. Response to treatment for GAD could partially stem from normalization of stress biology dysfunction, but further work involving establishing abnormalities within-sample, ruling out of confounds (e.g., sleep), and a placebo control is necessary to conclude an amelioration effect. REGISTRATION CODE: NCT01072344. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01072344.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Chamomile , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Saliva/metabolism , Anxiety Disorders/metabolism , Biomarkers/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Middle Aged , Photoperiod , Phytotherapy , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Psychiatry Res ; 259: 455-459, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29136600

ABSTRACT

Bipolar disorder is associated with decreased quality of life, especially during depressive episodes. There are few studies that have examined whether quality of life improves following pharmacological treatments of bipolar depression. In this exploratory study, we examined the effects of antidepressant versus mood stabilizer monotherapy on quality of life ratings in bipolar II subjects during acute (12 week) treatment. Data were derived from a randomized double-blind comparison of venlafaxine (n = 65) versus lithium (n = 64) monotherapy. The Quality of Life Index (QLI) was administered at baseline (n = 126; 98%) and again at the end of treatment. We explored treatment differences in continuous changes on the QLI using last-observation carried forward. Additionally, we explored the likelihood of experiencing clinically-significant improvements as well as baseline correlates of QLI and changes in QLIe. Venlafaxine was superior to lithium in reducing symptoms of depression during acute treatment. However, there were no significant differences between treatments in QLI ratings. Changes in symptoms of depression were correlated to, but not redundant, with improvements in QLI ratings. These findings suggest that quality of life may be an important secondary outcome to target and measure as a part of comparative clinical trials of pharmacotherapy for bipolar II depression.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Lithium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Quality of Life/psychology , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
17.
J Affect Disord ; 227: 379-383, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29149756

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms are common in bipolar disorder. We explored the effect of anxiety on the outcome of acute and continuation pharmacotherapy of bipolar II depression. METHODS: Data were derived from a randomized double-blind 12-week acute (N = 129) and 6-month continuation (N = 55) comparison of venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy in bipolar II depression in adults. We distinguished between the items of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) that capture depression vs. anxiety (i.e., psychomotor agitation, psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, hypochondriasis, and obsessive-compulsive concerns) and examined the effect of treatment on depression and anxiety. Additionally, we explored whether baseline anxiety or depression predicted changes over time in depression and anxiety ratings or moderated treatment outcomes. We also explored whether residual depressive and anxious symptoms predicted relapse during continuation therapy. RESULTS: Venlafaxine was superior to lithium in reducing both depression and anxiety, though its effects on anxiety were more modest than those on depression. Baseline anxiety predicted change over time in anxiety, but not depression. By contrast, baseline depression did not predict change over time in depression or anxiety. Residual anxiety, specifically uncontrollable worry, was a stronger predictor of relapse than residual depression. CONCLUSION: Successful treatment of symptoms of anxiety in bipolar depression may protect against depressive relapse.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety/complications , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
18.
Bipolar Disord ; 19(1): 6-12, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28160351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in treatment outcome between Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)-defined rapid cycling and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling in subjects with bipolar II disorder. We hypothesized that, compared with the DSM-IV definition, the average lifetime definition of rapid cycling may better identify subjects with a history of more mood lability and a greater likelihood of hypomanic symptom induction during long-term treatment. METHODS: Subjects ≥18 years old with a bipolar II major depressive episode (n=129) were categorized into DSM-IV- and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling and prospectively treated with either venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy for 12 weeks. Responders (n=59) received continuation monotherapy for six additional months. RESULTS: These exploratory analyses found moderate agreement between the two rapid-cycling definitions (κ=0.56). The lifetime definition captured subjects with more chronic courses of bipolar II depression, whereas the DSM-IV definition captured subjects with more acute symptoms of hypomania. There was no difference between rapid-cycling definitions with respect to the response to acute venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy. However, the lifetime definition was slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying subjects who went on to experience hypomanic symptoms during continuation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although sample sizes were limited, the findings suggest that the lifetime definition of rapid cycling may identify individuals with a chronic rapid-cycling course and may also be slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying individuals with hypomania during relapse-prevention therapy. These findings are preliminary in nature and need replication in larger, prospective, bipolar II studies.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Bipolar Disorder , Secondary Prevention/methods , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Antimanic Agents/administration & dosage , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodicity , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
19.
J Psychiatr Res ; 84: 90-97, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27716513

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patient expectancies are hypothesized to contribute to the efficacy and side effects of psychiatric treatments, but little research has investigated this hypothesis in the context of psychopharmacological therapies for anxiety. We prospectively investigated whether expectancies predicted efficacy and adverse events in oral therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), controlling for confounding patient characteristics correlating with outcomes. METHODS: Expectancies regarding treatment efficacy and side effects were assessed at baseline of an eight week open-label phase of a trial of chamomile for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The primary outcome was patient-reported GAD-7 scores, with clinical response and treatment-emergent side-effects as secondary outcomes. Expectancies were used to predict symptomatic and side-effect outcomes. RESULTS: Very few baseline patient characteristics predicted either type of expectancy. Controlling for a patient's predicted recovery based on their baseline characteristics, higher efficacy expectancies at baseline predicted greater change on the GAD-7 (adjusted ß = -0.19, p = 0.011). Efficacy expectancies also predicted a higher likelihood of attaining clinical response (adjusted odds ratio = 1.69, p = 0.002). Patients with higher side effect expectancies reported more side effects (adjusted log expected count = 0.26, p = 0.038). Efficacy expectancies were unrelated to side effect reports (log expected count = -0.05, p = 0.680), and side effect expectancies were unrelated to treatment efficacy (ß = 0.08, p = 0.306). CONCLUSIONS: Patients entering chamomile treatment for GAD with more favorable self-generated expectancies for the treatment experience greater improvement and fewer adverse events. Aligning patient expectancies with treatment selections may optimize outcomes. REGISTRATION: Trial Number NCT01072344 at ClinicalTrials.gov.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Chamomile , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Anticipation, Psychological , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phytotherapy/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
20.
Psychiatr Pol ; 51(6): 993-1008, 2017 Dec 30.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432499

ABSTRACT

The goal of this paper is to expose the research misconduct of pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical trials via three short case studies of corrupted psychiatric trials that were conducted in the United States. We discuss the common elements that enable the misrepresentation of clinical trial results including ghostwriting for medical journals, the role of key opinion leaders as co-conspirators with the pharmaceutical industry and the complicity of top medical journals in failing to uphold standards of science and peer review. We conclude that the corruption of industry-sponsored clinical trials is one of the major obstacles facing evidence-based medicine.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/trends , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Drug Industry , Research Support as Topic/trends , Humans , Peer Review, Research , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...