Social Work in Outpatient Neurology at a Safety-Net Hospital: A 200-Hour Profile.

Social work plays a critical role in preventive health and mitigation of healthcare disparities, but few studies focus on its role in multi-specialty clinics serving marginalized populations. We aimed to characterize the role of outpatient neurology social work at an urban, safety-net hospital. In December 2021, we introduced a dedicated social worker to a neurology clinic primarily caring for an underserved patient population. We logged and characterized the first 200 consecutive hours of patient encounters, classifying interventions based on a recently popularized 10-category scheme in social work literature derived from natural language processing and machine learning algorithms. We characterized 125 encounters with neurology patients referred to social work. The neurology social worker spent the greatest amount of time on care coordination (40%), followed by housing insecurity (14%) and applications and reporting (11%). Interventions that required the most time per case included housing (129 min), applications and reporting (120 min), care coordination (96 min). The majority of interventions were directly related to the patient's underlying neurologic disorder, highlighting the importance of a neurology-specific social worker. Embedding a social worker in a multi-specialty neurology clinic may address many of the root causes of neurologic health disparities.

Strokes in Patients With Injection Drug Use and Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis - A Case Series.

Research Design: In this study, we describe patients from a tertiary care safety-net hospital endocarditis registry with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE), and concomitant acute or subacute ischemic stroke predominantly associated with injection drug use (IDU). We retrospectively obtained data pertinent to neurologic examinations, history of injection drug use (IDU), blood cultures, transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE), neuroimaging, and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge. Only those patients with bacteremia, tricuspid valve vegetations, and neuroimaging consistent with acute to subacute ischemic infarction and microhemorrhages in two cases were included in this series. Results: Of 188 patients in the registry, 66 patients had TVIE and 10 of these were complicated by ischemic stroke. Neurologic symptoms were largely non-specific, eight patients had altered mental status and only 3 had focal deficits. Nine cases were associated with IDU. Two patients had evidence of a patent foramen ovale on echocardiography. Blood cultures grew S. aureus species in 9 of the patients, all associated with IDU. Three patients died during hospitalization. The mRS score at discharge for survivors ranged 0-4. Conclusions: Patients with strokes from TVIE had heterogeneous presentations and putative mechanisms. We noted that robust neuroimaging is lacking for patients with TVIE from IDU and that such patients may benefit from neuroimaging as a screen for strokes to assist peri-operative management. Further inquiry is needed to elucidate stroke mechanisms in these patients.

Neuroimaging findings in 4342 hospitalized COVID-19 subjects: A multicenter report from the United States and Europe.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of acute neuroimaging (NI) findings and comorbidities in the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19)-infected subjects in seven U.S. and four European hospitals. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of COVID-19-positive subjects with the following inclusion criteria: age >18, lab-confirmed COVID-19 infection, and acute NI findings (NI+) attributed to COVID-19 on CT or MRI brain. NI+ and comorbidities in total hospitalized COVID-19-positive (TN) subjects were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 37,950 COVID-19-positive subjects were reviewed and 4342 underwent NI. NI+ incidence in subjects with NI was 10.1% (442/4342) including 7.9% (294/3701) in the United States and 22.8% (148/647) in Europe. NI+ incidence in TN was 1.16% (442/37,950). In NI (4342), incidence of ischemic stroke was 6.4% followed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (3.8%), encephalitis (0.5%), sinus venous thrombosis (0.2%), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (0.2%). White matter involvement was seen in 57% of NI+. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (54%) before cardiac disease (28.8%) and diabetes mellitus (27.7%). Cardiac disease (p < .025), diabetes (p < .014), and chronic kidney disease (p < .012) were more common in the United States. CONCLUSION: This multicenter, multinational study investigated the incidence and spectrum of NI+ in 37,950 hospitalized adult COVID-19 subjects including regional differences in incidences of NI+, associated comorbidities, and other demographics. NI+ incidence in TN was 1.16% including 0.95% in the United States and 2.09% in Europe. ICH, encephalitis, and ADEM were common in Europe, while ischemic strokes were more common in the United States. In this cohort, incidence and distribution of NI+ helped characterize the neurological complications of COVID-19.

Characteristics and evolution of cerebral aneurysms among adults living with HIV: A retrospective, longitudinal case series.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research indicates an increased risk of cerebral aneurysm formation in adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (ALWH), however there are few longitudinal studies on the risk factors for and outcomes of cerebral aneurysms in this population. We aim to describe the characteristics and evolution of cerebral aneurysms in a large cohort of ALWH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chart review was completed for all adults evaluated at an urban, safety-net U.S. hospital between January 1, 2000, and October 22, 2021, with history of both HIV and at least one cerebral aneurysm. RESULTS: A total of 82 cerebral aneurysms were identified amongst 50 patients (52% female sex). Forty-six percent of patients with a nadir CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3 (N=13) and 44% of patients with maximum viral load >10,000 copies/mL (N=18) developed new aneurysms or were found to have aneurysm growth over time compared with 29% of patients with a CD4 nadir above 200 cells/mm3 (N=21) and 22% of patients with maximum viral load

Characteristics of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Associated With Sarcoidosis Without Therapeutic Immune Suppression.

Importance: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy can occur in the context of systemic sarcoidosis (S-PML) in the absence of therapeutic immune suppression and can initially be mistaken for neurosarcoidosis or other complications of sarcoidosis. Earlier recognition of S-PML could lead to more effective treatment of the disease. Objective: To describe characteristics of patients with S-PML. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this case series, records from 8 academic medical centers in the United States were reviewed from 2004 to 2022. A systematic review of literature from 1955 to 2022 yielded data for additional patients. Included were patients with S-PML who were not receiving therapeutic immune suppression. The median follow-up time for patients who survived the acute range of illness was 19 months (range, 2-99). Data were analyzed in February 2023. Exposures: Sarcoidosis without active therapeutic immune suppression. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features of patients with S-PML. Results: Twenty-one patients with S-PML not receiving therapeutic immune suppression were included in this study, and data for 37 patients were collected from literature review. The median age of the 21 study patients was 56 years (range, 33-72), 4 patients (19%) were female, and 17 (81%) were male. The median age of the literature review patients was 49 years (range, 21-74); 12 of 34 patients (33%) with reported sex were female, and 22 (67%) were male. Nine of 21 study patients (43%) and 18 of 31 literature review patients (58%) had simultaneous presentation of systemic sarcoidosis and PML. Six of 14 study patients (43%) and 11 of 19 literature review patients (58%) had a CD4+ T-cell count greater than 200/µL. In 2 study patients, a systemic flare of sarcoidosis closely preceded S-PML development. Ten of 17 study patients (59%) and 21 of 35 literature review patients (60%) died during the acute phase of illness. No meaningful predictive differences were found between patients who survived S-PML and those who did not. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series, patients with sarcoidosis developed PML in the absence of therapeutic immune suppression, and peripheral blood proxies of immune function were often only mildly abnormal. Systemic sarcoidosis flares may rarely herald the onset of S-PML. Clinicians should consider PML in any patient with sarcoidosis and new white matter lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging.

COVID19-associated new-onset movement disorders: a follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Neurological symptoms are common manifestation in acute COVID-19. This includes hyper- and hypokinetic movement disorders. Data on their outcome, however, is limited. METHODS: Cases with new-onset COVID-19-associated movement disorders were identified by searching the literature. Authors were contacted for outcome data which were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Movement disorders began 12.6 days on average after the initial onset of COVID-19. 92% of patients required hospital admission (mean duration 23 days). In a fraction of patients (6 of 27; 22%; 4 males/2 females, mean age 66.8 years) the movement disorder (ataxia, myoclonus, tremor, parkinsonism) was still present after a follow-up period of 7.5 ± 3 weeks. Severe COVID-19 in general and development of encephalopathy were risk factors, albeit not strong predictors, for the persistence. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of new-onset COVID-19-associated movement disorder appears to be generally good. The majority recovered without residual symptoms within several weeks or months. Permanent cases may be due to unmasking of a previous subclinical movement disorder or due to vascular/demyelinating damage. Given the relatively low response rate of one third only and the heterogeneity of mechanisms firm conclusions on the (long-term) outome cannot, however, be drawn.

Consensus Competencies for Postgraduate Fellowship Training in Global Neurology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Use a modified Delphi approach to develop competencies for neurologists completing ≥1 year of advanced global neurology training. METHODS: An expert panel of 19 United States-based neurologists involved in global health was recruited from the American Academy of Neurology Global Health Section and the American Neurological Association International Outreach Committee. An extensive list of global health competencies was generated from review of global health curricula and adapted for global neurology training. Using a modified Delphi method, United States-based neurologists participated in 3 rounds of voting on a survey with potential competencies rated on a 4-point Likert scale. A final group discussion was held to reach consensus. Proposed competencies were then subjected to a formal review from a group of 7 neurologists from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with experience working with neurology trainees from high-income countries (HICs) who commented on potential gaps, feasibility, and local implementation challenges of the proposed competencies. This feedback was used to modify and finalize competencies. RESULTS: Three rounds of surveys, a conference call with United States-based experts, and a semistructured questionnaire and focus group discussion with LMIC experts were used to discuss and reach consensus on the final competencies. This resulted in a competency framework consisting of 47 competencies across 8 domains: (1) cultural context, social determinants of health and access to care; (2) clinical and teaching skills and neurologic medical knowledge; (3) team-based practice; (4) developing global neurology partnerships; (5) ethics; (6) approach to clinical care; (7) community neurologic health; (8) health care systems and multinational health care organizations. DISCUSSION: These proposed competencies can serve as a foundation on which future global neurology training programs can be built and trainees evaluated. It may also serve as a model for global health training programs in other medical specialties as well as a framework to expand the number of neurologists from HICs trained in global neurology.

Clinical Reasoning: A 23-Year-Old Man With Progressive Asymmetric Weakness and Numbness.

We report a case of a 23-year-old man who presented with progressive asymmetric weakness and numbness in his distal extremities over 4 months, with initial symptoms starting days after a coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine booster. Initial neurologic examination was notable for distal weakness of both upper and lower extremities that was more pronounced on the left, complete areflexia, and decreased distal sensation to pinprick and vibration without loss of proprioception. Nerve conduction studies demonstrated a generalized, non-length-dependent, sensorimotor, demyelinating polyneuropathy, with conduction block seen in multiple compound muscle action potentials. Sensory nerve action potentials were normal in absolute terms but had asymmetric amplitudes.Based on the patient's nerve conduction studies, he was diagnosed with a specific immune-mediated neuromuscular disorder. He was started on intravenous immunoglobulin, but within days of the first infusions experienced a rare and potentially life-threatening complication. He received appropriate treatment and was started on alternative immunotherapy, after which his symptoms improved.Our case exemplifies the features of a specific subtype of a more common immune-mediated neuromuscular diagnosis with unique elements of history, examination, and nerve conduction studies that required interpretation in the clinical context. We also discuss a rare side effect of a commonly used immunotherapy and its risk factors and comment on the likelihood that this diagnosis may be related to a preceding COVID-19 vaccine booster.

Challenging Cases in Neurology: Neurologic Complications of COVID-19.

Since the first reported cases of pneumonia in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly become recognized as a multisystem illness, with known effects on virtually every organ system. In particular, neurologic complications of COVID-19 have been reported since the beginning of the pandemic in both ambulatory patients with mild disease and critically ill patients. Although it remains unclear whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has the potential to directly invade the central nervous system, strokes and other neurovascular complications, sequelae of critical illness and metabolic derangements, parainfectious inflammatory disorders, and a poorly understood post-COVID syndrome have all been reported in patients with COVID-19. Here, we describe cases representing a diverse range of neurologic complications in patients infected with COVID-19.

Disparities in Telehealth use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The coronavirus 2019 pandemic led to rapid expansion of outpatient telemedicine. We sought to characterize patient factors influencing outpatient teleneurology utilization at an urban safety-net hospital. We reviewed all neurology televisits scheduled between June 15, 2020 to April 15, 2021. We used the chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression to characterize patient demographic factors associated with televisit completion and video use. Of 8875 scheduled televisit encounters, 7530 were completed successfully, 44% via video. Non-English speaking patients, Black patients, Latinx patients, and those with a zip code-linked annual income less than $50,000 were less likely to successfully complete a scheduled televisit. The same demographic groups other than Latinx ethnicity were also less likely to use the video option. Our study found unequal telehealth utilization based on patients' demographic factors. Currently declining telemedicine reimbursement rates asymmetrically affect audio-only visits, which may limit telehealth access for vulnerable patient populations.

Two-Year Profile of Preventable Errors in Hospital-Based Neurology.

Background and Objectives: Medical errors are estimated to cause 7,000 deaths and cost 17-29 billion USD per year, but there is a lack of published real-world data on preventable errors, in particular in hospital-based neurology. We sought to characterize the profile of errors that occur on the inpatient neurology services at our institution to inform strategies on future error prevention. Methods: We reviewed all cases of preventable errors occurring on the inpatient neurology services from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, logged in institutional error reporting systems and reviewed at departmental morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MC). Each case was characterized by primary category of error, level of harm as determined by the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Common Format Harm Scale version 1.2, primary intervention, and recurrence within 1 year, with a final censoring date of June 30, 2021. Results: Of 72 cases, 43 (60%) were attributed to errors in clinical decision making and 20 (28%) to systems or electronic health record-related errors. The majority of cases resulted in in-conference education on systems-based errors (29%) at departmental M&MCs followed by in-conference education on clinical neurology (25%). Among errors classified primarily as clinical, 28% were addressed via systems-based interventions including in-conference education on systems issues and changes in written protocol. In 23 cases (32%), a similar error recurred within 1 year of the presentation. In total, 7 cases (10%) resulted in a change in written protocol, none with recurrences. Discussion: Systems-based interventions may reduce both clinical and systems-based errors, and protocol changes are effective when feasible. Given the important goal of optimizing care for every patient, quality leaders should conduct continuous audits of preventable errors and quality improvement systems in their clinical areas.

Neurologic Manifestations of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To describe the prevalence, associated risk factors, and outcomes of serious neurologic manifestations (encephalopathy, stroke, seizure, and meningitis/encephalitis) among patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: One hundred seventy-nine hospitals in 24 countries within the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study COVID-19 Registry. PATIENTS: Hospitalized adults with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Of 16,225 patients enrolled in the registry with hospital discharge status available, 2,092 (12.9%) developed serious neurologic manifestations including 1,656 (10.2%) with encephalopathy at admission, 331 (2.0%) with stroke, 243 (1.5%) with seizure, and 73 (0.5%) with meningitis/encephalitis at admission or during hospitalization. Patients with serious neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 were older with median (interquartile range) age 72 years (61.0-81.0 yr) versus 61 years (48.0-72.0 yr) and had higher prevalence of chronic medical conditions, including vascular risk factors. Adjusting for age, sex, and time since the onset of the pandemic, serious neurologic manifestations were associated with more severe disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; p < 0.001) as defined by the World Health Organization ordinal disease severity scale for COVID-19 infection. Patients with neurologic manifestations were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (OR, 1.45; p < 0.001) and require critical care interventions (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: OR, 1.78; p = 0.009 and renal replacement therapy: OR, 1.99; p < 0.001). Hospital, ICU, and 28-day mortality for patients with neurologic manifestations was higher (OR, 1.51, 1.37, and 1.58; p < 0.001), and patients had fewer ICU-free, hospital-free, and ventilator-free days (estimated difference in days, -0.84, -1.34, and -0.84; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Encephalopathy at admission is common in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and is associated with worse outcomes. While serious neurologic manifestations including stroke, seizure, and meningitis/encephalitis were less common, all were associated with increased ICU support utilization, more severe disease, and worse outcomes.

Isolated High-Grade Malignancy of the Spinal Cord Presenting as Longitudinally Extensive Transverse Myelitis.

This article characterizes 2 cases of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) that did not respond to immunotherapy and were diagnosed by biopsy as primary central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. Diffuse H3 K27M-mutant glioma is a recently described entity with very few cases of isolated spinal disease described in adults. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor is similarly uncommon in the spinal cord. Malignancies should be considered in patients who fail to improve with immunomodulatory therapy. We believe the experiences of our center will raise awareness about that point, broaden the existing understanding of the diagnostic approach to LETM, and highlight the need for additional studies.

Approach to Neurologic Complications in the Immunocompromised Patient.

Neurologic complications are common in immunocompromised patients, including those with advanced human immunodeficiency virus, transplant recipients, and patients on immunomodulatory medications. In addition to the standard differential diagnosis, specific pathogens and other conditions unique to the immunocompromised state should be considered in the evaluation of neurologic complaints in this patient population. A thorough understanding of these considerations is critical to the inpatient neurologist in contemporary practice, as increasing numbers of patients are exposed to immunomodulatory therapies. In this review, we provide a chief complaint-based approach to the clinical presentations and diagnosis of both infectious and noninfectious complications particular to immunocompromised patients.

Neurologic Infections in Patients on Immunomodulatory and Immunosuppressive Therapies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Both broadly immunosuppressive medications and selective immunomodulatory agents that act on particular components of the immune system are increasingly used in the treatment of neurologic and non-neurologic diseases. These therapies predispose patients to particular infections, some of which may affect the nervous system. Therefore, familiarity with the clinical and radiologic features of neurologic infections associated with specific immunomodulatory therapies is of importance for the practicing neurologist. This article reviews these neuroinfectious conditions, as well as other neurologic complications unique to transplant recipients and other patients who are immunocompromised. RECENT FINDINGS: Diagnosis of infectious pathogens in patients who are immunocompromised may be particularly challenging because a decreased immune response can lead to atypical imaging or laboratory findings. Next-generation sequencing and other novel diagnostic modalities may improve the rate of early identification of neurologic infections in patients who are immunocompromised and ultimately ameliorate outcomes in this vulnerable population. SUMMARY: A broad range of bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections of the nervous system can complicate solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation as well as other forms of immunocompromise. In addition to neurologic infections, such patients are at risk of neurotoxic and neuroinflammatory complications related to immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapies. Early recognition of infectious and noninfectious complications of immunocompromise is essential to guide appropriate treatment, which can include antimicrobial therapy and, in some cases, withdrawal of the predisposing medication with a transition to an alternative regimen.

Shortcomings of Rapid Clinical Information Dissemination: Lessons From a Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an acceleration of clinical information dissemination to unprecedented speeds, a phenomenon only partially explained by formal efforts of the scientific community. These have ranged from the establishment of open-source platforms for review of article preprints to the elimination of journal paywalls for COVID-19-related publications. In addition, informal efforts that rely on various modern media platforms that promote, repackage, and synthesize information have played substantial adjunctive roles, many of which did not exist during the severe acute respiratory syndrome pandemic of 2003. Although these latter efforts have greatly bolstered the speed of knowledge dissemination, their unregulated nature subjects them to risk for facilitating the spread of misinformation. In our opinion, the role of modern media in influencing clinical knowledge dissemination was not adequately examined even before the pandemic and therefore remains largely unchecked. In this article, we examine the spread of information in the field of COVID-19 and neurologic disorders, develop a simple model that maps various modern media tools on to the dissemination pipeline, and critically examine its components. Through this exercise, we identify opportunities for the scientific community to regulate and safeguard the clinical knowledge dissemination process, with implications both for the pandemic and beyond.

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in Patients with Coronavirus Disease: A Multicenter Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: RCVS (Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstrictive Syndrome) is a condition associated with vasoactive agents that alter endothelial function. There is growing evidence that endothelial inflammation contributes to cerebrovascular disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In our study, we describe the clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of RCVS in a multicenter case series of patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective case series. We collected clinical characteristics, imaging, and outcomes of patients with RCVS and COVID-19 identified at each participating site. RESULTS: Ten patients were identified, 7 women, ages 21 - 62 years. Risk factors included use of vasoconstrictive agents in 7 and history of migraine in 2. Presenting symptoms included thunderclap headache in 5 patients with recurrent headaches in 4. Eight were hypertensive on arrival to the hospital. Symptoms of COVID-19 included fever in 2, respiratory symptoms in 8, and gastrointestinal symptoms in 1. One patient did not have systemic COVID-19 symptoms. MRI showed subarachnoid hemorrhage in 3 cases, intraparenchymal hemorrhage in 2, acute ischemic stroke in 4, FLAIR hyperintensities in 2, and no abnormalities in 1 case. Neurovascular imaging showed focal segment irregularity and narrowing concerning for vasospasm of the left MCA in 4 cases and diffuse, multifocal narrowing of the intracranial vasculature in 6 cases. Outcomes varied, with 2 deaths, 2 remaining in the ICU, and 6 surviving to discharge with modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0 (n=3), 2 (n=2), and 3 (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that patients with COVID-19 may be at risk for RCVS, particularly in the setting of additional risk factors such as exposure to vasoactive agents. There was variability in the symptoms and severity of COVID-19, clinical characteristics, abnormalities on imaging, and mRS scores. However, a larger study is needed to validate a causal relationship between RCVS and COVID-19.