Endoscopic resection of enthesopathy via a direct midline transtendinous approach with associated reattachment of the Achilles tendon (endo-REDMTART): a cadaveric feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to determine the feasibility of an all-posterior endoscopic resection of enthesopathy via direct midline transtendinous approach with detachment and reattachment of the Achilles tendon (endo-REDMTART). MATERIALS & METHODS: Endo-REDMTART was performed in 10 ankles by two foot and ankle surgeons. Posterolateral and posteromedial portals were utilized. Three accessory, more distal portals were utilized (one posterolateral, one posteromedial, and one midline transtendinous). We measured the quality of the resection of the calcaneal spur and the length of tendon that was able to be reattached to the calcaneus. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all 10 cases. The mean minimum thickness of resected calcaneal spur was 7 mm (5-9 mm) thick, and the mean anteroposterior distance was 23 mm (20-25 mm). In all 10 cases, the maximum distance between the distal Achilles tendon and calcaneus was 1 mm (0-1 mm), with good tendon-bone contact. CONCLUSIONS: The data here suggest that endo-REDMTART is feasible. This procedure provides all of the advantages of endoscopic technique without compromising the efficacy of Haglund deformity resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No Clinical Trials Registration or IRB is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Anatomy study; cadaveric dissection.

Post traumatic medial instability of the MTP1 joint and ensuing surgical reconstruction: A case report.

Sport injuries of the first metatarsophalangeal joint are well described, especially with traumatic hallux valgus and turf toe reports. However, there is no description of infraclinical medial laxity and following articular disorders. We report the case of a thirty-year-old runner who suffered a sprain initially treated with retentive dressing and local injection. He developed microinstability of the first ray and quickly a bone cyst, pushing us to suggest surgical treatment. After one year of follow up after surgery, he returned to previous high-performance sport. This case highlights the probable undervaluation of post traumatic stability of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, and its potential consequences for the return to sport. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Mid-term outcomes of 77 modular radial head prostheses.

AIMS: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be used in the treatment of non-reconstructable radial head fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic results of RHA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2014, 77 RHAs were implanted in 54 men and 23 women with either acute injuries (54) or with traumatic sequelae (23) of a fracture of the radial head. Four designs of RHA were used, including the Guepar (Small Bone Innovations (SBi)/Stryker; 36), Evolutive (Aston Medical; 24), rHead RECON (SBi/Stryker; ten) or rHead STANDARD (SBi/Stryker; 7) prostheses. The mean follow-up was 74.0 months (standard deviation (sd) 38.6; 24 to 141). The indication for further surgery, range of movement, mean Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score, osteolysis and positioning of the implant were also assessed according to the design, and acute or delayed use. RESULTS: The mean MEP and quickDASH scores were 90.2 (sd 14; 45 to 100), and 14.0 points (sd 12; 1.2 to 52.5), respectively. There were no significant differences between RHA performed in acute or delayed fashion. There were 30 re-operations (19 with, and 11 without removal of the implant) during the first three post-operative years. Painful loosening was the primary indication for removal in 14 patients. Short-stemmed prostheses (16 mm to 22 mm in length) were also associated with an increased risk of painful loosening (odds ratio 3.54 (1.02 to 12.2), p = 0.045). Radiocapitellar instability was the primary indication for re-operation with retention of the implant (5). The overall survival of the RHA, free from re-operation, was 60.8% (sd 5.7%) at ten years. CONCLUSION: Bipolar and press-fit RHA gives unsatisfactory mid-term outcomes in the treatment of acute fractures of the radial head or their sequelae. The outcome may vary according to the design of the implant. The rate of re-operation during the first three years is predictive of the long-term survival in tight-fitting RHAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B1197-1203.

Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is the most widely used procedure to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Few studies have compared the outcomes of THA in femoral head AVN and primary hip osteoarthritis. Therefore we performed a case-control study to compare THA for femoral head AVN vs. primary hip osteoarthritis in terms of: (1) prosthesis survival, (2) complication rates, (3) functional outcomes and radiographic outcomes, (4) and to determine whether specific risk factors for THA failure exist in femoral head AVN. HYPOTHESIS: THA survival is similar in femoral head AVN and primary hip osteoarthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared two prospective cohorts of patients who underwent THA before 65 years of age, one composed of cases with femoral head AVN and the other of controls with primary hip osteoarthritis. In both cohorts, a cementless metal-on-metal prosthesis with a 28-mm cup and an anatomical stem was used. Exclusion criteria were THA with other types of prosthesis, posttraumatic AVN, and secondary osteoarthritis. With α set at 5%, to obtain 80% power, 246 patients were required in all. Prosthesis survival was assessed based on time to major revision (defined as replacement of at least one implant fixed to bone) and time to aseptic loosening. The other evaluation criteria were complications, Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score, and the Engh and Agora Radiographic Assessment (ARA) scores for implant osseointegration. RESULTS: The study included 282 patients, 149 with AVN and 133 with osteoarthritis. Mean age was 47.8±10.2 years (range, 18.5-65) and mean follow-up was 11.4±2.8 years (range, 4.5-18.3 years). The 10-year survival rates were similar in the two groups: for major revision, AVN group, 92.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 90.2-94.8) and osteoarthritis group, 95.3% (95% CI, 92.9-97.7); for aseptic loosening, AVN group, 98.6% (95% CI, 97.6-98.6) and osteoarthritis, 99.2% (95% CI, 98.4-100). The AVN group had higher numbers of revision for any reason (19 vs. 6, P=0.018) and for dislocation (8 vs. 1, P=0.031). Mean PMA scores at last follow-up were comparable in the AVN group (17.65±1.27 [range, 10-18]) and osteoarthritis group (17.59±1.32 [range, 14-18]) (P=0.139). Osseointegration was also similar in the two groups: global Engh score, 26.51±1.81 (range, 14-27) for AVN and 26.84±0.91 (range, 19.5-27) for osteoarthritis (P=0.065); femoral ARA score, 5.83±0.46 (range, 3-6) for AVN and 5.90±0.42 (range, 3-6) for osteoarthritis (P=0.064); and cup ARA score, 5.74±0.67 (range, 3-6) for AVN and 5.78±0.66 (range, 3-6) for osteoarthritis (P=0.344). DISCUSSION: Survival in this study was good and consistent with recent data on AVN, with no difference between AVN and osteoarthritis. Revisions for any cause or for dislocation were more common after THA for AVN. Functional outcomes were similar in the AVN and osteoarthritis groups. An anatomical cementless prosthesis combined with metal-on-metal 28-mm bearing provides durable good outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, non-randomized comparison of two prospective cohorts.