Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 70(1): 29-38, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36764745

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the degree of compliance with the European ESC/EAS 2016 and 2019 dyslipidaemia guidelines in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted in 380 adults with T2DM and dyslipidaemia in 7 Spanish health areas. INCLUSION CRITERIA: minimum follow-up of one year in Endocrinology Units, at least one visit in 2020 and a lipid profile measurement in the last 3 months. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: familial hypercholesterolaemia, recent hospitalisation, active oncological pathology and dialysis. RESULTS: According to the 2016 and 2019 guidelines the majority of patients were classified as being at very high cardiovascular risk (86.8% vs. 72.1%, respectively). LDL-c compliance was adequate in 62.1% of patients according to the 2016 guidelines and 39.7% according to the 2019 guidelines (p<0.001). Clinical conditions such as history of cardiovascular disease and therapy-related aspects (use of statins, especially high-potency statins, combination therapies and good adherence) were significantly associated with greater achievement of lipid targets. CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between dyslipidaemia guideline recommendations and the reality of lipid control in patients with T2DM, despite most of these patients being at very high cardiovascular risk. Strategies to optimise lipid-lowering treatments need to be implemented.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dyslipidemias , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Adult , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Spain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Cholesterol, LDL , Dyslipidemias/complications
2.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 69(10): 852-858, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36526355

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with an increased risk of perinatal complications and obesity in the offspring. However, the impact of gestational weight gain (GWG) on maternal and foetal outcomes is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 220 women with GDM and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI)>30kg/m2. Pregnant women were classified according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations regarding their prior BMI and GWG. We evaluated the impact of GWG on perinatal and obstetric outcomes. RESULTS: Mean maternal age was 34.7±5.3 years. Pre-pregnancy obesity was classified as class I in 55.3% of the cases, class II in 32.0% and class III in 12.7%. GWG was adequate (5-9kg) in 24.2%, insufficient (<5kg) in 41.8% and excessive (>9kg) in 34.2%. Birth weight was within normal range in 81.9%, 3.6% were small for gestational age (microsomia) and 14.4% were large for gestational age (macrosomia). Insufficient GWG was associated with a higher rate of microsomal offspring, excessive GWG was associated to macrosomia and adequate GWG with normal birth weight. CONCLUSION: GWG in women with pre-pregnancy obesity and GDM impacts neonatal birthweight. Insufficient GWG is associated with microsomia and excessive GWG is associated with macrosomia. Women with adequate GWG according to the IOM guidelines obtained better perinatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Gestational Weight Gain , United States , Infant, Newborn , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Adult , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Fetal Macrosomia/epidemiology , Fetal Macrosomia/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Outcome , Weight Gain , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Fetal Growth Retardation
3.
Endocrine ; 55(1): 231-238, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27704480

ABSTRACT

Giant prolactinomas are rare tumors characterized by their large size, compressive symptoms, and extremely high prolactin secretion. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with a series of 16 giant prolactinomas cases in terms of clinical presentation, therapeutic decisions, and final outcomes. Retrospective analysis of adult patients diagnosed with giant prolactinomas at the endocrine departments of three university tertiary hospitals. We included 16 patients (43.7 % women); mean age at diagnosis: 42.1 ± 21 years. The most frequent presentation was compressive symptoms. The delay in diagnosis was higher in women (median of 150 months vs. 12 in men; p = 0.09). The mean maximum tumor diameter at diagnosis was 56.9 ± 15.5 mm, and mean prolactin levels were 10,995.9 ± 12,157.8 ng/mL. Dopamine agonists were the first-line treatment in 11 patients (mean maximum dose: 3.9 ± 3.2 mg/week). Surgery was the initial treatment in five patients and the second-line treatment in six. Radiotherapy was used in four cases. All patients but one, are still with dopamine agonists. After a mean follow-up of 9 years, prolactin normalized in 7/16 patients (43.7 %) and 13 patients (81 %) reached prolactin levels lower than twice the upper limit of normal. Mean prolactin level at last visit: 79.5 ± 143 ng/mL. Tumor volume was decreased by 93.8 ± 11.3 %, and final maximum tumor diameter was 18.4 ± 18.8 mm. Three patients are actually tumor free. Giant prolactinomas are characterized by a large tumor volume and extreme prolactin hypersecretion. Multimodal treatment is frequently required to obtain biochemical and tumor control.


Subject(s)
Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Pituitary Gland/surgery , Pituitary Neoplasms/therapy , Prolactinoma/therapy , Radiotherapy , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pituitary Neoplasms/blood , Prolactin/blood , Prolactinoma/blood , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 26(4): 461-9, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22863388

ABSTRACT

The presence of subclinical or minor pituitary hormone deficiencies could be recognised in clinical practice and might represent intermediate situations among normal pituitary hormone secretion and clinical hypopituitarism. However, this entity has not been correctly identified and associated clinical impairment and even more, long-term consequences regarding to morbidity and mortality, strongly related to clinical hypopituitarism, has not been correctly settled. Furthermore, best test or methods for diagnosis and the cut off to define these intermediate situates are also unknown. With this purpose, long-term controlled studies are needed to define correctly this entity, the appropriate methods for diagnosis and the potential benefits of substitutive hormone therapy in detected cases. The present review will focus on the available evidence concerning the prevalence, clinical features and diagnosis of subclinical hypopituitarism.


Subject(s)
Hormone Replacement Therapy , Hypopituitarism/diagnosis , Humans , Hypopituitarism/drug therapy , Hypopituitarism/etiology , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...