Volunteer responder provision of support to relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Smartphone dispatch of volunteer responders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is implemented worldwide. While basic life support courses prepare participants to provide CPR, the courses rarely address the possibility of meeting a family member or relative in crisis. This study aimed to examine volunteer responders' provision of support to relatives of cardiac arrest patients and how relatives experienced the interaction with volunteer responders. DESIGN: In this qualitative study, we conducted 16 semistructured interviews with volunteer responders and relatives of cardiac arrest patients. SETTING: Interviews were conducted face to face and by video and recorded and transcribed verbatim. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer responders dispatched to cardiac arrests and relatives of cardiac arrest patients were included in the study. Participants were included from all five regions of Denmark. RESULTS: A thematic analysis was performed with inspiration from Braun and Clarke. We identified three themes: (1) relatives' experiences of immediate relief at arrival of assistance, (2) volunteer responders' assessment of relatives' needs and (3) the advantage of being healthcare educated. CONCLUSIONS: Relatives to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients benefited from volunteer responders' presence and support and experienced the mere presence of volunteer responders as supportive. Healthcare-educated volunteer responders felt confident and skilled to provide care for relatives, while some non-healthcare-educated volunteer responders felt they lacked the proper training and knowledge to provide emotional support for relatives. Future basic life support courses should include a lesson on how to provide emotional support to relatives of cardiac arrest patients.

Citizen Responder Activation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Time of Day and Day of Week.

Background We aim to examine diurnal and weekday variations in citizen responder availability and intervention at out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. Methods and Results We included confirmed OHCAs where citizen responders were activated by a smartphone application in the Capital Region of Denmark between September 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018. OHCAs were analyzed by time of day (daytime: 07:00 am-03:59 pm, evening: 4:00-11:59 pm, and nighttime: 12:00-06:59 am) and day of week (Monday-Friday or Saturday-Sunday/public holidays). We included 438 OHCAs where 6836 citizen responders were activated. More citizen responders accepted alarms in the evening (mean 4.8 [95% CI, 4.4-5.3]) compared with daytime (3.7 [95% CI, 3.4-4.4]) and nighttime (1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]) (P<0.001), and more accepted alarms during weekends (4.3 [95% CI, 3.8-4.9]) compared with weekdays (3.4 [95% CI, 3.2-3.7]) (P<0.001). Proportion of OHCAs where at least 1 citizen responder arrived before Emergency Medical Services were significantly different between day (42.9%), evening (50.3%), and night (26.1%) (P<0.001), and between weekdays (37.2%) and weekends (53.5%) (P=0.002). When responders arrived before Emergency Medical Services, there was no difference of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation or defibrillation between daytime, evening, and nighttime (P=0.75 and P=0.22, respectively) or between weekend and weekdays (P=0.29 and P=0.12, respectively). Conclusions Citizen responders were more likely to accept OHCA alarms during evening and weekends, with the highest proportion of responders arriving before Emergency Medical Services in the evening. However, there was no significant difference in delivering cardiopulmonary resuscitation or early defibrillation among cases where citizen responders arrived before Emergency Medical Services. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03835403.

Bystander interventions and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at Copenhagen International Airport.

AIM: To examine incidence and outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac (OHCA) arrest in a high-risk area characterised by high density of potential bystanders and easy access to nearby automated external defibrillators (AEDs). METHODS: This retrospective observational study investigated pre-hospital and in-hospital treatment, as well as survival amongst persons with OHCA at Copenhagen International Airport between May 25, 2015 and May 25, 2019. OHCA data from pre- and in-hospital medical records were obtained and compared with public bystander witnessed OHCAs in Denmark. RESULTS: Of the 23 identified non-traumatic OHCAs, 91.3% were witnessed by bystanders, 73.9% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and 43.5% were defibrillated by a bystander. Survival to hospital discharge was 56.5%, with 100% survival among persons with an initial shockable heart rhythm. Compared with nationwide bystander witnessed OHCAs, persons with OHCA at the airport were less likely to receive bystander CPR (73.9% vs. 89.4%, OR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86), more likely to receive bystander defibrillation (43.5% vs. 24.8%, OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.01-5.31), to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (78.2% vs. 50.6%, OR 3.51; 95% CI, 1.30-9.49), and survive to hospital discharge (56.5% vs. 45.2%, OR 1.58; 95% CI, 0.69-3.62). CONCLUSION: We found a high proportion of bystander defibrillation indicating that bystanders will quickly apply an AED, when accessible. Importantly, 56% of all persons, and all persons with a shockable heart rhythm survived. These findings suggest increased potential for survival following OHCA and support current guidelines to strategically deploy accessible AEDs in high-risk OHCA areas.