Left Atrial Volumes and Function, and Long-Term Incidence of Ischemic Stroke in the General Population.

Background Left atrial (LA) volumes and emptying fraction in the general population may address structural and functional aspects of atrial cardiomyopathy associated with long-term risk of ischemic stroke in the absence of atrial fibrillation or prior stroke. We investigated the association between LA volumes and function and ischemic stroke. Methods and Results In a community-based cohort, we measured LA minimal volume, LA maximal volume, and LA emptying fraction by transthoracic echocardiography. The primary end point was ischemic stroke. Participants with known atrial fibrillation or prior ischemic stroke were excluded, which resulted in 1866 participants. The mean age was 58±16 years, and 57% were women. During a median follow-up of 16.5 years (interquartile range: 11.4-16.8 years), 176 (9.4%) ischemic strokes occurred. In multivariable cause-specific regression models and competing risk models with death as a competing risk, LA emptying fraction was associated with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 per 10% decrease [95% CI, 1.02-1.28]) and (subdistribution HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.29]). This association remained when adjusting for participants who developed atrial fibrillation during follow-up (HR, 1.12 per 10% decrease [95% CI, 1.00-1.26]). Indexed LA volumes were not associated with ischemic stroke in the same models. LA emptying fraction and indexed LA volumes were not associated with all-cause mortality. Conclusions Lower LA emptying fraction measured by transthoracic echocardiography was associated with future ischemic stroke independently of incident atrial fibrillation. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02993172.

Measures of left atrial function predict incident heart failure in a low-risk general population: the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

AIMS: This study investigated left atrial (LA) parameters as measured on transthoracic echocardiography as predictors of incident heart failure (HF) in a community cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a large general population study (n = 2221), participants underwent a health examination with echocardiography. The maximum and minimum LA volumes indexed to body surface area (LAVImax and LAVImin) were measured and the LA emptying fraction (LAEF) and LA expansion index (LAEI) were calculated. Among 1951 participants without atrial fibrillation or significant valve disease, the mean age was 59 ± 16 years and 58% were women. At baseline, 1% (n = 16) had a left ventricular ejection fraction of <50%, 44% had hypertension, and 10% had diabetes. During follow-up (median 15.8 years, interquartile range: 11.3-16.2 years), 187 (10%) participants were diagnosed with incident HF. Participants who were diagnosed with HF during follow-up had a larger LAVImax and LAVImin and a lower LAEF and LAEI compared to participants without HF. In unadjusted analysis, LAVImax, LAVImin, LAEF and LAEI were predictors of incident HF. After multivariable adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic parameters, only LAVImin remained an independent predictor of incident HF (hazard ratio per 1 standard deviation increase: 1.22 [95% confidence interval 1.01-1.47], p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: In the general population, LAVImin is an independent predictor of incident HF. LAVImax, currently the only LA measure in a routine echocardiographic examination, was not an independent predictor of incident HF.

Usefulness of echocardiography for predicting ventricular tachycardia detected by implantable loop recorder in syncope patients.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may lead to syncope and sudden cardiac death. Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are recommended in the clinical work-up of patients with unexplained syncope. Our aim was to evaluate if echocardiographic parameters assessed prior to ILR implantation in patients with unexplained syncope may aid in identifying individuals with an increased risk of VT. The present study included 288 ambulatory patients (mean age 58 ± 19 years, 51% women) with syncope (90%) and presyncope (10%) who had an ILR implanted in the diagnostic workup. All patients underwent an echocardiographic examination prior to device implantation (median 3 months [IQR 1 to 6 months]). We examined incident VT, defined as a first-time episode of VT (> 30 s) or non-sustained VT (< 30 s) detected by the ILR. During median follow-up of 2.9 years [IQR 1.3 to 3.5 years] of continuous rhythm monitoring, 36 patients (13%) were diagnosed with incident VT (n = 25 non-sustained VT, n = 11 sustained VT). In unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models, left ventricular (LV) mass index (HR: 1.04 per 1 g/m2 increase [1.00 to 1.08], P = 0.047), mean LV wall thickness (HR: 1.36 per 1 mm increase [1.08 to 1.71], P = 0.009), and global longitudinal strain (HR: 1.15 per 1% decrease [1.05 to 1.25], P = 0.002) were significantly associated with VT. After adjusting for age, sex, implantable loop recorder indication and known heart failure, the above-mentioned parameters remained significantly associated with incident VT. LV mass index, LV wall thickness, and GLS may aid in identifying patients with increased risk of incident VT among patients with syncope. Echocardiography may potentially help select patients who can benefit from ILR.

Sex differences in echocardiographic predictors of bradycardia detected by implantable loop recorder in patients with syncope and palpitations.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate whether echocardiography may aid in identifying patients, specifically men, at risk of bradycardia as detected by implantable loop recorders (ILR) in patients evaluated for syncope and palpitations. METHODS: We included ambulatory patients undergoing ILR implantation for syncope (84%), presyncope (9%), and palpitations (8%). Echocardiographic examination was performed prior to implantation (2.9 months [IQR 1.0-6.0 months]). Echocardiograms were analyzed for conventional and speckle tracking parameters. We examined time to first event of bradycardia, defined as (a) heart rate <30 beats/min and (b) ≥4 beats, including sinus arrest, asystole, sinoatrial block, and second- and third-degree atrioventricular nodal block. We applied Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 285 patients we enrolled, and during a median time of 2.7 years [IQR 1.0, 3.3 years] of continuous heart rhythm monitoring, 84 (29%) had bradycardia detected by ILR. Patients with bradycardia were older (61 ± 19 years vs 55 ± 18 years, P = .01) and more frequently men (62% vs 44%, P = .01). Sex modified the association between echocardiographic parameters and bradycardia (P interaction <0.05 for all), such that left ventricular LV mass index (HR: 1.02 per 1g/m2 increase [1.01-1.04], P < .001), LV ejection fraction (HR: 1.04 per 1% decrease [1.01-1.08], P = .02), and global longitudinal strain (HR: 1.09 per 1% decrease [1.01-1.19], P = .03) were associated with bradycardia in men but not women (P > .05 for all in female). After adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics, medical therapy, and loop indication, the abovementioned parameters remained significantly associated with incident bradycardia in men. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic parameters of LV structure and function may potentially be more useful for predicting bradycardia in men than women, among patients undergoing ILR implantation for syncope, presyncope, and palpations.

The prognostic value of left atrial dyssynchrony measured by speckle tracking echocardiography in the general population.

LA dyssynchrony is a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity in various patient populations. However, the prognostic value of LA dyssynchrony as evaluated by two-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-STE) in the general population is unknown. A cohort of 375 participants without atrial fibrillation (AF), ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure (HF) or previous ischemic stroke (IS) had an echocardiogram, including LA 2D-STE, performed. LA dyssynchrony was defined as the standard deviation of the time to peak regional LA reservoir strain values. The endpoints were all-cause mortality, a combined endpoint of AF and IS, and a combined endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), HF or cardiovascular death (CVD). During a median follow up of 16.1 years (IQR 15.0-16.3 years), 83 (22%) participants died, 60 (15%) reached the composite endpoint of AF and IS, and 38 (10%) reached the composite MACE endpoint. LA dyssynchrony was a univariable predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, p = 0.001) but was not significantly associated with the combined endpoint of AF and IS (HR 1.05, p = 0.064) nor MACE (HR 1.04, p = 0.22). However, when adjusted for age, LA dyssynchrony did not predict all-cause mortality (HR 1.03, p = 0.28). Similarly, after further adjustments for clinical and echocardiographic parameters LA dyssynchrony did not predict any of the study outcomes. In this general population study, LA dyssynchrony was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and did not predict MACE nor a composite outcome consisting of AF and IS.

Right Ventricular Function Evaluated by Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion Predicts Cardiovascular Death in the General Population.

Background Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death. Right ventricular ( RV ) function is a strong predictor of outcome in many cardiovascular diseases, but its significance is often neglected. Little is known about the prognostic value of RV systolic function in the general population. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of RV systolic function, evaluated by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion ( TAPSE ), in predicting cardiovascular death ( CVD ) in the general population. Methods and Results A total of 1039 participants from the general population without heart failure or atrial fibrillation had an echocardiogram performed and TAPSE measured. The end point was CVD . During a median follow-up of 12.7 years (interquartile range, 12.0-12.9 years), 69 participants (6.6%) experienced CVD , whereas 162 participants (15.6%) experienced non-CVD. Decreasing RV systolic function, assessed as TAPSE , was a univariable predictor of CVD (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI , 1.07-1.20; P<0.001, per 1-mm decrease). TAPSE remained an independent predictor of CVD after adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic parameters (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI , 1.01-1.15; P=0.017, per 1-mm decrease). Furthermore, in net reclassification analysis, decreasing RV systolic function, assessed as TAPSE, significantly improved risk classification with respect to CVD when added to established cardiovascular risk factors from the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation chart or a modified version of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Pooled Cohort Equation. Decreasing RV systolic function, assessed as TAPSE , did not predict non-CVD, indicating specificity for CVD . Conclusions RV systolic function, as assessed by TAPSE , is associated with CVD in the general population. In the general population, assessment of RV systolic function may provide novel prognostic information about the risk of CVD .

Prognostic Value of Left Atrial Functional Measures in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of LA functional measures in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the prognostic value of left atrial (LA) functional measures such as the left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF) and the minimal LA volume compared with left atrial volume index (LAVI) in HFrEF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 818 HFrEF patients with left ventricular ejection fractions <45% underwent echocardiography. LA volumes were determined by the area-length method from the apical 2-chamber and apical 4-chamber views. LAEF, minimal LA volume indexed to body surface area (MinLAVI), and LAVI were calculated. The end point was all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.8-4.6 years), 121 patients died (14.8%). Follow-up was 100%. In a final multivariable model adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic parameters, LAEF, but not MinLAVI or LAVI, was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients: LAEF: hazard ratio (HR) 1.11 (P = .033) per 5% decrease; MinLAVI: HR 1.03 (P = .57) per 5 mL/m2 increase; LAVI: HR 1.06 (P = .16) per 5 mL/m2 increase. CONCLUSIONS: LAEF is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients after multivariable adjustment. LAEF provides incremental prognostic value over LAVI in risk stratification of HFrEF patients.

Echo and heart failure: when do people need an echo, and when do they need natriuretic peptides?

Heart failure (HF) is a threat to public health. Heterogeneities in aetiology and phenotype complicate the diagnosis and management of HF. This is especially true when considering HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which makes up 50% of HF cases. Natriuretic peptides may aid in establishing a working diagnosis in patients suspected of HF, but echocardiography remains the optimal choice for diagnosing HF. Echocardiography provides important prognostic information in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF. Traditionally, emphasis has been put on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). LVEF is useful for both diagnosis and prognosis in HFrEF. However, echocardiography offers more than this single parameter of systolic function, and for optimal risk assessment in HFrEF, an echocardiogram evaluating systolic, diastolic, left atrial and right ventricular function is beneficial. In this assessment echocardiographic modalities such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) by 2D speckle-tracking may be useful. LVEF offers little value in HFpEF and is neither helpful for diagnosis nor prognosis. Diastolic function quantified by E/e' and systolic function determined by GLS offer prognostic insight in HFpEF. In HFpEF, other parameters of cardiac performance such as left atrial and right ventricular function evaluated by echocardiography also contribute with prognostic information. Hence, it is important to consider the entire echocardiogram and not focus solely on systolic function. Future research should focus on combining echocardiographic parameters into risk prediction models to adopt a more personalized approach to prognosis instead of identifying yet another echocardiographic biomarker.