Characteristics of abdominal vein thrombosis in children and adults.

The demographic and clinical characteristics of adults and children with lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (LE DVT/PE) may differ from those with abdominal vein thrombosis (abdominal VT). Abdominal VT can be a presenting sign of an underlying prothrombotic state, and its presence in the setting of known disease might have prognostic implications different from LE DVT/PE. This study describes clinical presentations of abdominal VT compared to LE DVT/PE in adults and children. We analysed prospectively-collected data from consecutive consenting patients enrolled in one of seven Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Centers from August 2003 to April 2011 to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of adults and children with abdominal VT. Both adults and children with abdominal VT tended to be younger and have a lower body mass index (BMI) than those with LE DVT/PE. Of patients with abdominal VT, children were more likely to have inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis than adults. For adults with venous thromboembolism (VTE), relatively more women had abdominal VT than LE DVT/PE, while the proportions with LE DVT/PE and abdominal VT by sex were similar in children. Children with abdominal VT were more likely to have diagnosed inherited thrombophilia, while trauma was more common in children with LE DVT/PE. In conclusion, both children and adults with abdominal VT were younger with a lower BMI than those with LE DVT/PE. Significant differences exist between children and adults in respect to abdominal VT compared to LE DVT/PE.

Advances in anticoagulation therapy: the role of selective inhibitors of factor Xa and thrombin in thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery.

A new generation of antithrombotic agents that target a single enzyme within the procoagulant cascade is making its way into mainstream clinical practice. Borrowing selectively from the properties of their parent anticoagulant, unfractionated heparin, as well as from those of peptide anticoagulants from reptile or insect venoms, designers of the new drugs have created targeted inhibitors of thrombin, factor Xa, or other specific factors in the procoagulant pathways. These new agents promise efficacy and safety profiles far more favorable than those of conventional anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery and require no laboratory monitoring of drug efficacy in this setting. Ximelagatran, the oral "prodrug" of the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran, is in phase III of clinical development. Clinical trials using various dosages of ximelagatran, sometimes preceded by subcutaneous melagatran, as thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement surgery have suggested efficacy equal to or better than that of warfarin and enoxaparin. The best dosing regimen and optimal timing of first dose for melagatran and ximelagatran remain to be determined, as do the mechanism and impact of drug disturbance of hepatic function. Fondaparinux, a selective, synthetic inhibitor of factor Xa, has been shown in large clinical trials to be superior to low-molecular-weight heparins and is approved as a fixed once-daily subcutaneous 2.5-mg dose for thromboprophylaxis for hip or knee replacement surgery and after hip fracture repair. Fixed-dose fondaparinux 2.5 mg initiated 6 to 8 hours after surgery achieved superior efficacy and comparable safety in head-to-head comparisons with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery. Fondaparinux is the only agent approved for use in hip fracture patients in the United States at this time and has recently gained approval for extended prophylaxis in this patient population.

Improved cancer mortality with low-molecular-weight heparin treatment: a review of the evidence.

Work with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) continues to provide suggestions for survival advantages among patients with cancer diagnoses. Momentum is building in support of this theory through reports, the vast majority of which are derived from secondary analyses of clinical trials on the treatment of thromboembolism. The data retrieved from such studies that compare unfractionated heparin (UFH) with LMWH indicate that LMWH is equally beneficial if not more beneficial to cancer patients in terms of survival. In retrospective analysis, this improved life expectancy is not considered a result of reduced complications from thromboembolism. Thus, theories of antitumor effects of LMWH have developed, supported by evidence that most of the survival benefits are during long-term comparisons. Reports describing the effects of heparin in the setting of cancer have existed for over a half-century, although specific mechanisms for the marginal results seen thus far have yet to surface. Proposals for the most likely targets of the effective heparins include enzyme interaction, cellular growth modifications, and antiangiogenesis.