ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early pain control after lumbar fusion presents a challenge to patients and providers. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been used at the end of these procedures with limited benefit, but recent data suggest low-dose ITM at case initiation may be effective. This study aims to evaluate the use of preoperative ITM during lumbar fusion to determine whether there is a benefit for these patients. METHODS: One hundred and eighty lumbar fusion patients between 1 January 2018 and 31 May 2022 were evaluated. Patients were grouped by whether they received preoperative, low-dose ITM or not. Outcomes of interest included hospital narcotic consumption, pain scores, opioid-related complications, and complications within the first 90 days. RESULTS: Sixty-five study patients received 200 µg ITM at case initiation and 115 did not. No differences in length of stay, discharge disposition, or complications in the first 90 days were noted. ITM patients received fewer milligram morphine equivalents in the postanesthesia care unit (9.7 ± 31.23 vs 21.83 ± 21.07; P = 0.006) and on postoperative day 0 (18.60 ± 35.47 vs 35.47 ± 28.51; P = 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the ITM group both in the postanesthesia care unit and on postoperative day 0, with a decrease in extreme pain scores (>7; 35.4% vs 53.0%; P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: ITM appears to be safe and effective for reducing early pain and narcotic consumption on the day of surgery for lumbar fusion patients and may hold value for incorporation into rapid recovery protocols and for improving pain-related patient satisfaction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ITM appears to be safe and effective for reducing early pain and narcotic consumption on the day of surgery for lumbar fusion patients and may hold value for incorporation into rapid recovery protocols and for improving pain-related patient satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
Background: Disparities among social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact overall well-being and surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify SDoH for patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery and evaluate their relationship to the postoperative outcomes of length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and readmissions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery from July 2017 to January 2021. We used a self-reported SDoH survey in conjunction with the electronic medical record to gather patient information. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between patient demographics, SDoH, and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 951 patients underwent lumbar spine surgery: 484 (50.9%) had decompressive laminectomy alone without fusion, and 467 (49.1%) had decompressive laminectomy with instrumented posterolateral fusion. When controlling for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and surgery type, the SDoH of being currently married or having a life partner was associated with shorter LOS and decreased likelihood of discharge to a skilled nursing facility. Financial strain was associated with longer LOS, while attending church was associated with a decreased likelihood of 30-day emergency department (ED) return. Conclusion: This study identified various SDoH that may influence postoperative lumbar spine surgery outcomes of LOS, discharge disposition, 30-day ED return, and 30-day readmission. Patients at risk for suboptimal outcomes appear to be those with lower financial resources, less in-home support, and lower social connectivity. Routine screening of SDoH may enable care teams to effectively allocate resources for at-risk patients.
ABSTRACT
Beyond the spine-specific pathology, patient factors such as associated medical and psychosocial conditions, understanding of the treatment process, and the degree of patient activation-defined as the ability of the individual to utilize the available information and actively engage in making their healthcare decisions-can influence outcomes after posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery. A retrospective observational cohort study of 177 patients undergoing PLF at a single institution was conducted. Patient demographics, medical and psychosocial risk factors, and outcomes were compared between patients who attended a nurse navigator-led group preoperative education course and those who did not. Patients attending the course were younger, more likely to undergo one-level fusion, less likely to undergo 5- or more-level fusion, and had less comorbidity burden as measured by the hierarchical condition categories score. No differences in psychosocial risk factors were observed between groups. Course attendees had a significantly shorter length of stay (2.12 vs. 2.60 days, p = .042) and decreased average hospital cost (U.S. $10,149 vs. U.S. $14,792, p < .001) than those who did not attend; no differences in other outcomes were observed. After controlling for differences in risk factors, patients enrolled in a preoperative education course demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in hospital cost (ß=-4,143, p < .001). Preoperative education prior to PLF surgery may reduce hospital cost, possibly through increased patient activation. Given the relatively high prevalence of psychosocial risk factors in this and similar patient populations, optimizing patient activation and engagement is important to achieve high value care. Based on our findings, nurse navigator-led preoperative education appears to be valuable in this patient population and should be included in enhanced recovery protocols.
Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Hospitals , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbosacral Region , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has had considerable impacts on research projects, particularly those adopting participatory approaches. This paper reflects on the methodological adaptations employed by the European research project TRIPS to facilitate co-design and open innovation practices towards the development of accessible mobility solutions. The article reports how the methods were adapted to facilitate participatory research with almost no physical meetings. In doing so, the paper presents the alternative 'distanced-based' participatory approaches employed to engage users with disabilities and institutional stakeholders in the transport ecosystem, like online workshops, social media content analysis, online surveys and peer-to-peer telephone interviews. Lessons learnt and practical guidelines for distance-based participatory research are presented and discussed with the aim of increasing resilience in the light of future changes.
