ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare cancer of the connective tissues requiring invasive treatment. Due to the complexity of treatment, STS patients experience more functional impairment and disability than other oncologic populations. Given that extant literature is unclear and exclusively focused on physical function, the objectives of this study were to use the Wilson-Cleary Model of HRQL to evaluate the extent to which biological function (tumor site, depth and size), symptoms (fatigue, pain, anxiety/depression), and functional status are associated with the health perceptions of soft-tissue sarcoma patients 12 months post-op. METHODS: Data were drawn from an inception cohort study at the McGill University Health Centre. Inclusion criteria included 18 years of age and a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of STS. Those with evidence of metastasis at diagnosis or less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded. Statistical analyses included T-tests, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: 331 patients were included (185 males, 146 females) with mean (SD) ages of 56 (17). Significantly more females reported pain and anxiety/depression. Self-reported function was significantly higher in males. Overall, the regression model explained 53 % of the variance in health perceptions in males, and 48 % in females. Only self-reported function was significantly associated with health perceptions in males (B = 0.34) and females (B = 0.48). Further, compared to females without pain, females with pain perceived their health as significantly worse. CONCLUSION: Evaluating health perceptions with a multidimensional lens revealed new information about the STS patient experience. Findings suggest that key targets include routine psychosocial distress monitoring and addressing rectifiable disability-related barriers promptly.
Subject(s)
Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Male , Female , Humans , Cohort Studies , Quality of Life , Pain , Sarcoma/therapy , Depression , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: & Objectives: Virtual Reality (VR) refers to an artificial, immersive three-dimensional environment with interactive sensory stimuli. VR is typically incorporated into the psychotherapeutic process as a means of providing exposure therapy. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesize the most up-to-date evidence on the outcomes, acceptability, and side effects of VR interventions for treating anxiety disorders in adults. METHODS: This scoping review is grounded in the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). The databases searched were PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. RESULTS: The search process identified 112 unique citations. 52 (46%) of the eligible articles examined participants with specific phobias, 25 (22%) with PTSD, 21 (19%) with social anxiety disorder, 12 (10%) with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, and 3 (3%) with generalized anxiety disorder. VR interventions often led to statistically significant and meaningful reductions in symptoms for people with anxiety disorders. Additionally, they were acceptable to clients and associated with minimal side effects for all types of anxiety disorders, except for Combat-Related PTSD in Vietnam veterans. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included the fact that the studies in this review were of varying quality, and that articles in languages other than English and French were excluded. CONCLUSION: VR interventions appeared to be a viable alternative to conventional exposure therapy. Future research should include more male participants and have a stronger emphasis on acceptability and side effects. Increased traction for VR interventions for generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder is also important.