ABSTRACT
Arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, hallux rigid, is a common and disabling source of foot pain in the adult population. Hallux rigidus is characterized by diseased cartilage and large, periarticular osteophytes that result in a stiff, painful joint. Activity modification, sensible shoes, orthotics, anti-inflammatory medications and occasional intra-articular steroid injections can be attempted to alleviate the discomfort associated with hallux rigidus. A number of surgical options exist for the treatment of recalcitrant hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is a useful treatment for dorsal impingement pain seen in mild hallux rigidus. A new polyvinyl alcohol hemi-arthroplasty implant has shown promising early and midterm results in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus; however, arthrodesis of the first MTP joint remains the gold standard treatment for advanced hallux rigidus because of unpredictable outcomes after early-generation joint replacement implants.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. More than 5 million children have been infected in the United States. Risk factors for more severe disease progression include obesity, pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal disorders, and neurologic comorbidities. Children with COVID-19 are admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit because of severe acute COVID-19 illness or COVID-19-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. The delta surge of 2021 was responsible for an increased disease burden in children and points to the key role of vaccinating children against this sometimes-deadly disease.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
When life-threatening, critical events occur in the operating room, the fast-paced, high-distraction atmosphere often leaves little time to think or deliberate about management options. Success depends on applying a team approach to quickly implement well-rehearsed, systematic, evidence-based assessment and treatment protocols. Mobile devices offer resources for readily accessible, easily updatable information that can be invaluable during perioperative critical events. We developed a mobile device version of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia 26 Pediatric Crisis paper checklists-the Pedi Crisis 2.0 application-as a resource to support clinician responses to pediatric perioperative life-threatening critical events. Human factors expertise and principles were applied to maximize usability, such as by clustering information into themes that clinicians utilize when accessing cognitive aids during critical events. The electronic environment allowed us to feature optional diagnostic support, optimized navigation, weight-based dosing, critical institution-specific phone numbers pertinent to emergency response, and accessibility for those who want larger font sizes. The design and functionality of the application were optimized for clinician use in real time during actual critical events, and it can also be used for self-study or review. Beta usability testing of the application was conducted with a convenience sample of clinicians at 9 institutions in 2 countries and showed that participants were able to find information quickly and as expected. In addition, clinicians rated the application as slightly above "excellent" overall on an established measure, the Systems Usability Scale, which is a 10-item, widely used and validated Likert scale created to assess usability for a variety of situations. The application can be downloaded, at no cost, for iOS devices from the Apple App Store and for Android devices from the Google Play Store. The processes and principles used in its development are readily applicable to the development of future mobile and electronic applications for the field of anesthesiology.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Checklist/standards , Mobile Applications/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Anesthesia/trends , Checklist/methods , Checklist/trends , Child , Humans , Mobile Applications/trends , Pediatrics/trends , Societies, Medical/trendsABSTRACT
Although most health care providers will go through their careers without experiencing a major disaster in their local communities, if one does occur, it can be life and career altering. The American Academy of Pediatrics has been in the forefront of providing education and advocacy on the critical importance of disaster preparedness. From experiences over the past decade, new evidence and analysis have broadened our understanding that the concept of preparedness is also applicable to addressing the unique professional liability risks that can occur when caring for patients and families during a disaster. Concepts explored in this technical report will help to inform pediatric health care providers, advocates, and policy makers about the complexities of how providers are currently protected, with a focus on areas of unappreciated liability. The timeliness of this technical report is emphasized by the fact that during the time of its development (ie, late summer and early fall of 2017), the United States went through an extraordinary period of multiple, successive, and overlapping disasters within a concentrated period of time of both natural and man-made causes. In a companion policy statement (www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2018-3892), recommendations are offered on how individuals, institutions, and governments can work together to strengthen the system of liability protections during disasters so that appropriate and timely care can be delivered with minimal fear of legal reprisal or confusion.
Subject(s)
Disaster Planning/methods , Disasters , Liability, Legal , Pediatrics/methods , Physicians , Disaster Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Disaster Planning/standards , Disasters/prevention & control , Humans , Pediatrics/legislation & jurisprudence , Pediatrics/standards , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians/standards , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Although most health care providers will go through their careers without experiencing a major disaster in their local communities, if one does occur, it can be life and career altering. The American Academy of Pediatrics has been at the forefront of providing education and advocacy on the critical importance of disaster preparedness. From experiences over the past decade, new evidence and analysis have broadened our understanding that the concept of preparedness is also applicable to addressing the unique professional liability risks that can occur when caring for patients and families during a disaster. In our recommendations in this policy statement, we target pediatric health care providers, advocates, and policy makers and address how individuals, institutions, and government can work together to strengthen the system of liability protections during disasters so that appropriate and timely care can be delivered with minimal fear of legal reprisal or confusion.
Subject(s)
Disaster Planning/methods , Disasters , Health Resources , Liability, Legal , Pediatrics/methods , Physicians , Disaster Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Disaster Planning/standards , Disasters/prevention & control , Health Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Resources/standards , Humans , Pediatrics/legislation & jurisprudence , Pediatrics/standards , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians/standards , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:: The knee scooter is a commonly used mobility device in the setting of unilateral below-knee immobilization. The bent-knee posture has been shown to decrease venous flow in a seated position, but the knee scooter differs as the patient is weightbearing through the affected extremity. Our goal was to investigate the effects of knee scooter positioning on popliteal venous flow. METHODS:: Duplex ultrasonography was performed to obtain venous diameter and flow velocity of the popliteal vein on healthy subjects over the age of 18 without immobilization. Measurements were performed on the left knee of each subject while standing and with the same knee flexed on the knee scooter, by 2 physicians trained in ultrasound techniques. Mean velocity, peak velocity, vessel diameter, and volumetric flow rate were calculated and t tests were performed for each variable. A power analysis was performed, determining that 9 subjects would provide 80% power with an alpha of 0.05. A total of 13 subjects participated in the study. Mean age was 33 (range 20-56) years, with 6 females and 7 males. RESULTS:: Measurements of subjects while standing and on the knee scooter demonstrated a significant decrease in mean velocity (6.5 vs 3.2 cm/s, P < .01) and volumetric flow rate (227.8 vs 106.2 mL/min, P < .01) while subjects were using the scooter. Vessel diameter (0.82 vs 0.78 cm, P = .15) and peak velocities (19.8 vs 14.7 cm/s, P = .19) were not significantly different between standing and kneeling positions. CONCLUSION:: Our findings demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in volumetric flow rate in subjects using a knee scooter device with a flexed knee. Although venous stasis is a known risk factor for DVT, flow rate thresholds for increased thrombus formation are not well defined. The duration of scooter use, or flexed knee positioning, may have some effect on the degree of stasis. This finding should caution orthopedists to consider the risk attributed to the knee scooter as part of their overall patient assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level II, therapeutic, comparative study.
Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/blood supply , Orthopedic Equipment , Popliteal Vein/physiology , Adult , Blood Flow Velocity , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Knee/blood supply , Knee/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Popliteal Vein/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background. Achilles tendinopathy is a common clinical disorder. Utilizing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, we aim to determine clinical response to nonoperative achilles tendinopathy rehabilitative care of insertional achilles tendinopathy compared to non-insertional achilles tendinopathy. Methods. Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression scores were collected for patients with achilles tendinopathy at presentation and following a standard course of nonoperative care. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference. Descriptive statistics were reported and bivariate analysis was used to compare insertional achilles tendinopathy and non-insertional achilles tendinopathy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to predict clinical improvement. Results. A total of 102 patients with an average follow-up of 68 days were included. For the non-insertional achilles tendinopathy group: Fifteen (46%), 12 (36%) and 9 (27%) patients reached clinical improvement for Physical Function, Pain Interference and Depression, respectively. For the insertional achilles tendinopathy group: Seventeen (25%), 20 (29%) and 22 (32%) patients reached clinical improvement for Physical Function, Pain Interference and Depression, respectively. Physical Function scores improved more in non-insertional achilles tendinopathy patients (4.0 vs. -0.046; p = 0.035) and more patients clinically improved (45.5% vs. 24.6%; p = 0.034). Patients with non-insertional and insertional achilles tendinopathy clinically improved functionally when initial Physical Function scores were equal to or lower than 40.25 and 38.08, respectively. Conclusions. Nonoperative care in achilles tendinopathy is often successful. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System can be used to evaluate and help determine clinical success. Levels of Evidence: Level II: Prospective comparative study.
Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon , Conservative Treatment , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Tendinopathy/rehabilitation , Tendinopathy/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Tendinopathy/physiopathology , Tendinopathy/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As the role of generic patient-reported outcomes (PROs) expands, important questions remain about their interpretation. In particular, how the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) t score values correlate with the patients' perception of success or failure (S/F) of their surgery is unknown. The purposes of this study were to characterize the association of PROMIS t scores, the patients' perception of their symptoms (patient acceptable symptom state [PASS]), and determination of S/F after surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study contacted patients after the 4 most common foot and ankle surgeries at a tertiary academic medical center (n = 88). Patient outcome as determined by phone interviews included PASS and patients' judgment of whether their surgery was a S/F. Assessment also included PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scales. The association between S/F and PASS outcomes was evaluated by chi-square analysis. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluated the ability of PROMIS to discriminate PASS and/or S/F outcomes. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of pre- (n = 63) and postoperative (n = 88) PROMIS scores to predict patient outcomes (S/F and PASS). Finally, the proportion of individuals classified by the identified thresholds were evaluated using chi-square analysis. RESULTS: There was a strong association between PASS and S/F after surgery (chi-square <0.01). Two-way ANOVA demonstrated that PROMIS t scores discriminate whether patients experienced positive or negative outcome for PASS ( P < .001) and S/F ( P < .001). The ROC analysis showed significant accuracy (area under the curve > 0.7) for postoperative but not preoperative PROMIS t scores in determining patient outcome for both PASS and S/F. The proportion of patients classified by applying the ROC analysis thresholds using PROMIS varied from 43.0% to 58.8 % for PASS and S/F. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who found their symptoms and activity at a satisfactory level (ie, PASS yes) also considered their surgery a success. However, patients who did not consider their symptoms and activity at a satisfactory level did not consistently consider their surgery a failure. PROMIS t scores for physical function and pain demonstrated the ability to discriminate and accurately predict patient outcome after foot and ankle surgery for 43.0% to 58.8% of participants. These data improve the clinical utility of PROMIS scales by suggesting thresholds for positive and negative patient outcomes independent of other factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective comparative series.
Subject(s)
Ankle/surgery , Foot/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Talar head fractures represent a rare subtype of injury to the talus. Clinical series of talar head fractures are nonexistent in the current literature, and treatment of these injuries is based on expert opinion. Many authors recommend a single-incision approach to open reduction and internal fixation of talar head fractures; however, we have found that a 2-incision approach allows for optimal visualization while facilitating proper implant placement. We present a description of our technique and our clinical experience treating 8 of these rare injuries.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Talus/injuries , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Talus/diagnostic imaging , Talus/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A recent publication reported preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) scores to be highly predictive in identifying patients who would and would not benefit from foot and ankle surgery. Their applicability to other patient populations is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the validation and generalizability of previously published preoperative PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) threshold t scores as predictors of postoperative clinically meaningful improvement in foot and ankle patients from a geographically unique patient population. METHODS: Prospective PROMIS PF and PI scores of consecutive patient visits to a tertiary foot and ankle clinic were obtained between January 2014 and November 2016. Patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery were identified and PROMIS values obtained at initial and follow-up visits (average, 7.9 months). Analysis of variance was used to assess differences in PROMIS scores before and after surgery. The distributive method was used to estimate a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine thresholds for achieving and failing to achieve MCID. To assess the validity and generalizability of these threshold values, they were compared with previously published threshold values for accuracy using likelihood ratios and pre- and posttest probabilities, and the percentages of patients identified as achieving and failing to achieve MCID were evaluated using χ2 analysis. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in PF ( P < .001) and PI ( P < .001) after surgery. The area under the curve for PF (0.77) was significant ( P < .01), and the thresholds for achieving MCID and not achieving MCID were similar to those in the prior study. A significant proportion of patients (88.9%) identified as not likely to achieve MCID failed to achieve MCID ( P = .03). A significant proportion of patients (84.2%) identified as likely to achieve MCID did achieve MCID ( P < .01). The area under the curve for PROMIS PI was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS PF threshold scores from published data were successful in classifying patients from a different patient and geographic population who would improve with surgery. If functional improvement is the goal, these thresholds could be used to help identify patients who will benefit from surgery and, most important, those who will not, adding value to foot and ankle health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective Comparative Study.
Subject(s)
Ankle Joint/surgery , Foot/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Adult , Aged , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Pain Threshold , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Achilles Tendon/injuries , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Tendon Transfer , Foot , HumansABSTRACT
Recent public health emergencies including Hurricane Katrina (2005), the influenza H1N1 pandemic (2009), and the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa (20142015) have demonstrated the importance of multiple-level emergency planning and response. An effective response requires integrating coordinated contributions from community-based health care providers, regional health care coalitions, state and local health departments, and federal agency initiatives. This is especially important when planning for the needs of children, who make up 23% of the U.S. population (1) and have unique needs that require unique planning strategies.
Subject(s)
Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Emergencies , Public Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Child , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the psychometric outcomes of patients participating in an extensive patient-centered verification process before receiving sedation for regional anesthesia. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Perioperative areas of university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred eligible patients scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery undergoing peripheral nerve blockade. INTERVENTIONS: Postoperative survey evaluating patient perception, experience, and satisfaction with the anesthetic timeout before regional anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: Measures using numeric rating scales were obtained on patient perceptions of safety, confidence in anesthesia provider, anxiety, and positive sentiments during participation in block timeout. These variables were analyzed using logistic regression models to correlate with reported pain and satisfaction perioperatively. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five patients (93% enrollment) completed the study. More than 90% of patients reported agreeing strongly to feeling safe, confident, relaxed, and positive about their participation in the block timeout. These sentiments are associated with less reported perioperative pain and higher overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of confidence and safety in regional anesthesia providers were enhanced by a preprocedural timeout process. These positive attitudes are associated with a superior perioperative experience and patient satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Patient Satisfaction , Patient-Centered Care , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Perception , Peripheral NervesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: System-level planning involves uniting hospitals and health systems, local/regional government agencies, emergency medical services, and other health-care entities involved in coordinating and enabling care in a major disaster. We reviewed the literature and sought expert opinions concerning system-level planning and engagement for mass critical care due to disasters or pandemics and offer suggestions for system-planning, coordination, communication, and response. The suggestions in this chapter are important for all of those involved in a pandemic or disaster with multiple critically ill or injured patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, and public health or government officials. METHODS: The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) consensus statement development process was followed in developing suggestions. Task Force members met in person to develop nine key questions believed to be most relevant for system-planning, coordination, and communication. A systematic literature review was then performed for relevant articles and documents, reports, and other publications reported since 1993. No studies of sufficient quality were identified upon which to make evidence-based recommendations. Therefore, the panel developed expert opinion-based suggestions using a modified Delphi process. RESULTS: Suggestions were developed and grouped according to the following thematic elements: (1) national government support of health-care coalitions/regional health authorities (HC/RHAs), (2) teamwork within HC/RHAs, (3) system-level communication, (4) system-level surge capacity and capability, (5) pediatric patients and special populations, (6) HC/RHAs and networks, (7) models of advanced regional care systems, and (8) the use of simulation for preparedness and planning. CONCLUSIONS: System-level planning is essential to provide care for large numbers of critically ill patients because of disaster or pandemic. It also entails a departure from the routine, independent system and involves all levels from health-care institutions to regional health authorities. National government support is critical, as are robust communication systems and advanced planning supported by realistic exercises.
Subject(s)
Consensus , Critical Illness/therapy , Disasters , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Health Planning Organizations/organization & administration , Pandemics , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Critical Care/organization & administration , HumansABSTRACT
Over 1,500 years ago, the St. Benedictine Monks used planning and strict schedules to increase their productivity. Since then, surgeons have developed several different strategies to manage our time effectively. Finding a balance among career, family, and hobbies is essential for maintaining satisfaction and optimizing productivity. Several recurring themes throughout the medical literature offer potential solutions to help maximize the little time surgeons possess. In this article, we will explore some of the methods and strategies available to help surgeons minimize waste and make the most of the most precious commodity we have-our time.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric emergency mass critical care during disasters requires modifications to standard healthcare operations. Modification of standards for pediatric emergency mass critical care should include incorporation of family-centered care principles. Family-centered care, which is an integral aspect of current pediatric practice, encourages active participation of the child's family in medical care delivery. While family-centered care should be practical in most disasters, whether we can operationalize it in pediatric emergency mass critical care is unknown. However, every effort to adhere to the principles should be made. This manuscript addresses some of the basic tensions that exist between creating efficient disaster-related standards and offering family-centered care by augmenting the concepts outlined elsewhere in the supplement with practical suggestions on incorporating family-centered care. In addition, this manuscript demonstrates how family-centered care benefits not only children and families, but also the staff providing care to pediatric patients in disasters. METHODS: In May 2008, the Task Force for Mass Critical Care published guidance on provision of mass critical care to adults. Acknowledging that the critical care needs of children during disasters were unaddressed by this effort, a 17-member Steering Committee, assembled by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education with guidance from members of the American Academy of Pediatrics, convened in April 2009 to determine priority topic areas for pediatric emergency mass critical care recommendations.Steering Committee members established subgroups by topic area and performed literature reviews of MEDLINE and Ovid databases. The Steering Committee produced draft outlines through consensus-based study of the literature and convened October 6-7, 2009, in New York, NY, to review and revise each outline. Eight draft documents were subsequently developed from the revised outlines as well as through searches of MEDLINE updated through March 2010.The Pediatric Emergency Mass Critical Care Task Force, composed of 36 experts from diverse public health, medical, and disaster response fields, convened in Atlanta, GA, on March 29-30, 2010. Feedback on each manuscript was compiled and the Steering Committee revised each document to reflect expert input in addition to the most current medical literature. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS: This paper offers a list of practical suggestions for incorporating family-centered care principles into each of the following healthcare settings during a disaster, including a pediatric emergency mass critical care event: emergency medical services transport, emergency departments, pediatric intensive care units, general pediatric wards, and alternative sites. Disaster and pediatric emergency mass critical care responses must incorporate family-centered care principles to the extent possible in a variety of healthcare settings.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Family , Mass Casualty Incidents , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Planning Councils , Humans , InfantABSTRACT
Ultrasound guidance is associated with improved efficiency and success of peripheral nerve blockade and a decreased incidence of vascular puncture, making these interventions safer. Patients with peripheral nerve blocks report decreased pain and increased satisfaction scores. We present the development of a mobile ultrasound-guided block service that allows for the safe and efficient placement of nerve blocks and perineural catheters at the nontraditional location of the patient's bedside and in the emergency department.
Subject(s)
Catheterization/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Peripheral Nerves/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Aged , Catheters, Indwelling , Elbow Joint/surgery , Female , Humans , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Intractable/drug therapy , Patient Care TeamABSTRACT
When planning an anesthetic for patients undergoing orthopedic oncologic surgeries, numerous factors must be considered. Preoperative evaluation may elucidate significant co-morbidities or side effects secondary to chemotherapy or radiation, which can affect anesthetic choices. Procedures vary in length and complexity and pose challenges in both positioning and in planning to minimize blood loss. Many anesthetic techniques are available to provide both intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, while the type of thromboprophylaxis and analgesic adjuvants that will be administered needs to be defined. This review focuses on approaches to use when caring for patients undergoing orthopedic oncologic procedures.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Anesthetics/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Humans , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Osteosarcoma/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Preoperative CareABSTRACT
This policy statement is a revision of a 2001 statement and articulates the positions of the American Academy of Pediatrics on nondiscrimination in pediatric health care. It addresses both pediatricians who provide health care and the infants, children, adolescents, and young adults whom they serve.