GEC-ESTRO survey of 106Ru eye applicator practice for ocular melanoma - Physicist survey.

AIM: 106Ru eye plaque brachytherapy (BT, interventional radiotherapy) is an eye-preserving treatment for uveal melanoma performed in about 100 clinics worldwide. Despite this relatively low number, there is a considerable variation in clinical practice. In 2022, the BRAPHYQS and Head & Neck and Skin GEC-ESTRO working groups conducted a survey to map the current clinical practice. The survey consisted of a physicist and a physician part. This paper describes the physicist results. However, three physician questions with overlapping interest are included here as well. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey questions pertained to commissioning and quality control (QC) of the plaques, treatment planning, radiobiological correction, as well as more general questions on practice improvement. The questions overlapping with the physician survey were related to dose prescription and margins. RESULTS: Sixty-five physicist responses were included. A majority of the centres do not perform an independent measurement of the absorbed dose at reference depth, percentage depth dose (PDD) and off-axis data. A lack of calibration services and suitable equipment are the main reasons. About one third of the centres indicated that they do image based treatment planning. The use of margins and dose prescription showed a large variability, despite the availability of guidelines [1]. Many respondents expressed a strong wish for improvement in a wide range of aspects of clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The physics survey showed a wide variability regarding quality control of the 106Ru sources and treatment planning practice.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations on calibration and traceability of LE-LDR photon-emitting brachytherapy sources at the hospital level.

Prostate brachytherapy treatment using permanent implantation of low-energy (LE) low-dose rate (LDR) sources is successfully and widely applied in Europe. In addition, seeds are used in other tumour sites, such as ophthalmic tumours, implanted temporarily. The calibration issues for LE-LDR photon emitting sources are specific and different from other sources used in brachytherapy. In this report, the BRAPHYQS (BRAchytherapy PHYsics Quality assurance System) working group of GEC-ESTRO, has developed the present recommendations to assure harmonized and high-quality seed calibration in European clinics. There are practical aspects for which a clarification/procedure is needed, including aspects not specifically accounted for in currently existing AAPM and ESTRO societal recommendations. The aim of this report has been to provide a European wide standard in LE-LDR source calibration at end-user level, in order to keep brachytherapy treatments with high safety and quality levels. The recommendations herein reflect the guidance to the ESTRO brachytherapy users and describe the procedures in a clinic or hospital to ensure the correct calibration of LE-LDR seeds.

The Bebig Valencia-type skin applicators: Dosimetric study and implementation of a dosimetric hybrid technique.

PURPOSE: To determine the relative dose rate distribution in water for the Bebig 20 mm and 30 mm skin applicators and report results in a form suitable for potential clinical use. Results for both skin applicators are also provided in the form of a hybrid Task Group 43 (TG-43) dosimetry technique. Furthermore, the radiation leakage around both skin applicators from the radiation protection point of view and the impact of the geometrical source position uncertainties are studied and reported. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the MCNP 6.1 general purpose code, which was benchmarked against published dosimetry data for the Bebig Ir2.A85-2 high-dose-rate iridium-192 source, as well as the dosimetry data for the two Elekta skin applicators. Both Bebig skin applicators were modeled, and the dose rate distributions in a water phantom were calculated. The dosimetric quantities derived according to a hybrid TG-43 dosimetry technique are provided with their corresponding uncertainty values. The air kerma rate in air was simulated in the vicinity of each skin applicator to assess the radiation leakage. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results from the Monte Carlo simulations of both skin applicators are presented in the form of figures and relative dose rate tables, and additionally with the aid of the quantities defined in the hybrid TG-43 dosimetry technique and their corresponding uncertainty values. Their output factors, flatness, and penumbra values were found comparable to the Elekta skin applicators. The radiation shielding was evaluated to be adequate. The effect of potential uncertainties in source positioning on dosimetry should be investigated as part of applicator commissioning.