Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900241273212, 2024 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39185751

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Aminoglycosides possess activity against aerobic gram-negative organisms and are often used in combination with beta-lactam antibiotics. Previous studies evaluating combination therapy in gram-negative bacteremia have not shown clear benefits, however antimicrobial resistance was not prevalent in these studies. Our objective is to elucidate potential benefits of adding a single dose of an aminoglycoside to a beta-lactam in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study including patients 18 years old or older and treated for at least 24 hours for a confirmed gram-negative bacteremia. Patients were divided into two groups: receipt of beta-lactam monotherapy (n = 164) and receipt of a beta-lactam in addition to a single dose of an aminoglycoside (n = 79) within 24 hours of bacteremia onset. The primary endpoint was infection-related 30-day mortality per provider documentation. Key secondary outcomes include incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and time to improvement of AKI. Data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, student's T test, and descriptive statistics as appropriate. Results: The primary outcome occurred in 13/164 vs 2/79 patients in the monotherapy and combination groups (P = 0.10). Incidence of AKI (14% vs. 12%) and time to recovery from AKI (90 hours; IQR [50 - 133] vs 78 hours; IQR [42 - 128]) were comparable between groups (P = 1.00 and P = 0.73, respectively). Conclusions: The addition of a single-dose aminoglycoside was not significantly associated with reduced mortality or increased time to recovery from AKI in our patient population. Larger studies, particularly in more severely ill patient populations, are needed.

2.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(1): e0235123, 2024 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018984

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, especially MDR Gram-negatives, poses a significant challenge to clinicians and public health. These resilient bacteria have rendered many traditional antibiotics ineffective, underscoring the urgency for innovative therapeutic solutions. Eravacycline, a broad-spectrum fluorocycline tetracycline antibiotic approved by the FDA in 2018, emerges as a promising candidate, exhibiting potential against a diverse array of MDR bacteria, including Gram-negative, Gram-positive, anaerobic strains, and Mycobacterium. However, comprehensive data on its real-world application remain scarce. This retrospective cohort study, one of the largest of its kind, delves into the utilization of eravacycline across various infectious conditions in the USA during its initial 4 years post-FDA approval. Through assessing clinical, microbiological, and tolerability outcomes, the research offers pivotal insights into eravacycline's efficacy in addressing the pressing global challenge of MDR bacterial infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Tetracyclines , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tetracyclines/therapeutic use , Tetracyclines/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Gram-Negative Bacteria
3.
Hosp Pharm ; 58(4): 368-375, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37360205

ABSTRACT

Introduction: There are currently limited published data for a pharmacist-led multidrug-resistant (MDR) culture follow-up program through a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreement in the emergency department (ED). Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a pharmacist-led culture follow-up program for MDR microbiology results on ED revisit rate. Methods: A single-center quasi-experimental retrospective study was conducted comparing the outcomes before (December 2017 to March 2019) and after (April 2019 to July 2020) implementation of the ED MDR Culture program. Patients 18 years of age or older; with confirmed positive microbiology culture of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) at any site; and discharged from the ED were included. The primary outcome was to evaluate ED revisit within 30 days due to antimicrobial treatment failure, defined as lack of resolution or worsening of infection. A statistical analysis was performed for categorical data using Fisher's exact test, and for continuous data using unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U Test, when applicable. Results: A total of 130 patients were included in the analysis. Patients in the post-implementation group (n = 70) had a significant reduction in ED revisits compared to the pre-implementation group (n = 60); 9 [12.9%] versus 17 [28.3%], respectively; P = .046. Conclusion: Implementation of an ED MDR culture program was associated with significantly less ED revisits within 30 days due to antimicrobial treatment failure, thus demonstrating the expanded role of ED pharmacists in antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting.

4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e1436-e1443, 2023 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36062367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by Candida auris and those with BSIs caused by other Candida spp. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective case-control study was performed at 3 hospitals in Brooklyn, New York, between 2016 and 2020. The analysis included patients ≥18 years of age who had a positive blood culture for any Candida spp. and were treated empirically with an echinocandin. The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were 14-day clinical failure, 90-day mortality rate, 60-day microbiologic recurrence, and in-hospital mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the final analysis, including 83 patients with candidemia caused by C. auris. After inverse propensity adjustment, C. auris BSI was not associated with increased 30-day (adjusted odds ratio, 1.014 [95% confidence interval, .563-1.828]); P = .96) or 90-day (0.863 [.478-1.558]; P = .62) mortality rates. A higher risk for microbiologic recurrence within 60 days of completion of antifungal therapy was observed in patients with C. auris candidemia (adjusted odds ratio, 4.461 [95% confidence interval, 1.033-19.263]; P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: C. auris BSIs are not associated with a higher mortality risk than BSIs caused by other Candida spp. The rate of microbiologic recurrence was higher in the C. auris group.


Subject(s)
Candidemia , Humans , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida auris , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Candida , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
5.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900221147584, 2022 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36537083

ABSTRACT

Since the issuance of the emergency use authorization (EUA) of 3 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, there have been over 180 million individuals fully vaccinated in the United States (US). With the increasing administration of COVID-19 vaccinations, there have been over 550,000 adverse events reported in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) with approximately 230,000 experienced after receipt of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine as of September 23rd 2021. Audio-vestibular symptoms (including Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL)) secondary to immunizations has previously been evaluated. However, this report describes the first case of bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss potentially due to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. We further review the available literature regarding the treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss, and the association of SSNHL with previous immunizations and COVID-19 infection. Lastly, we hypothesize the underlying potential mechanisms between SSNHL and the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

6.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(5): e0047922, 2022 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36190427

ABSTRACT

Forty-six patients were treated with eravacycline (ERV) for Acinetobacter baumannii infections, where 69.5% of isolates were carbapenem resistant (CRAB). Infections were primarily pulmonary (58.3%), and most patients received combination therapy (84.4%). The median (IQR) ERV duration was 6.9 days (5.1 to 11.1). Thirty-day mortality was 23.9% in the cohort and 21.9% in CRAB patients. One patient experienced an ERV-possible adverse event. IMPORTANCE Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly when carbapenem resistant (CRAB), is one of the most challenging pathogens in the health care setting. This is complicated by the fact that there is no consensus guideline regarding management of A. baumannii infections. However, the recent Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections provided expert recommendations for CRAB management. The panel suggest using minocycline among tetracycline derivatives rather than eravacycline (ERV) until sufficient clinical data are available. Therefore, we present the largest multicenter real-world cohort in patients treated with ERV for A. baumannii, where the majority of isolates were CRAB (69.5%). Our analysis demonstrate that patients treated with ERV-based regimens achieved a 30-day mortality of 23.9% and had a low incidence of ERV-possible adverse events (2.1%). This study is important as it fills the gap in the literature regarding the use of a novel tetracycline (i.e., ERV) in the treatment of this challenging health care infection.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Acinetobacter baumannii , Humans , Minocycline/pharmacology , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
8.
J Med Virol ; 93(5): 3184-3193, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595120

ABSTRACT

As of December 2020, there were over 450,000 confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in New York City (NYC) with approximately 25,000 deaths. Previous literature identified advanced age, higher severity of illness, elevated inflammatory biomarkers, acute organ dysfunction, comorbidities, and presentation from long-term care facility as risk factors for mortality in patients from Wuhan, China, and the United States. Additional studies conducted in NYC are warranted to confirm these findings. The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infections. This was a retrospective case-control study at The Brooklyn Hospital Center, a 464-bed community teaching hospital. Adult patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection and who received at least 24 h of COVID-19 therapy were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Two-hundred and eighty four patients were included, of whom 95 (33.5%) were nonsurvivors and 189 (66.5%) patients were survivors. Multivariate analysis showed higher in-hospital mortality with advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 6.476; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.827-22.953), presentation from long-term care facility (OR 4.259; 95% CI 1.481-12.250), elevated total bilirubin (OR 4.947; 95% CI 1.048-23.350), vasopressor initiation (OR 36.262; 95% CI 5.319-247.216), and development of renal failure (OR 36.261; 95% CI 2.667-493.046). Risk factors associated with mortality for patients with COVID-19 in a community teaching hospital included advanced age, vasopressor initiation, development of renal failure, elevated total bilirubin, and presentation from long-term care facility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Hospitals, Community , Hospitals, Teaching , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
9.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(5): ofaa071, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32411809

ABSTRACT

Eravacycline (ERV) was used in 35 patients for various infections. The most common pathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 30-day survival was 74%. Absence of 30-day recurrence and resolution of signs and symptoms of infection were 91% and 57%, respectively. ERV was well-tolerated, with adverse events leading to drug discontinuation in one patient.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL