Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(5): 707-716, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709965

ABSTRACT

In July 2020, Hong Kong extended statutory paid maternity leave from ten weeks to fourteen weeks to align with International Labour Organization standards. We used the policy enactment as an observational natural experiment to assess the mental health implications of this policy change on probable postnatal depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scores of 10 or higher) and postpartum emotional well-being. Using an opportunistic observational study design, we recruited 1,414 survey respondents with births before (August 1-December 10, 2020) and after (December 11, 2020-July 18, 2022) policy implementation. Participants had a mean age of thirty-two, were majority primiparous, and were mostly working in skilled occupations. Our results show that the policy was associated with a 22 percent decrease in mothers experiencing postnatal depressive symptoms and a 33 percent decrease in postpartum emotional well-being interference. Even this modest change in policy, an additional four weeks of paid leave, was associated with significant mental health benefits. Policy makers should consider extending paid maternity leave to international norms to improve mental health among working mothers and to support workforce retention.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Mental Health , Mothers , Parental Leave , Humans , Hong Kong , Female , Adult , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Mothers/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women, Working/psychology , Women, Working/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Maternal Health
2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 2024 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older adults with severe dementia are at increased risk of being physically restrained in nursing homes and acute care settings, but little is known about restraint use among those cared for at home. This study explores caregiver-reported use of restraints among community-dwelling older adults with severe dementia. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from 215 family caregivers, we describe restraint use among older adults with severe dementia living at home. We then use multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with restraint use. RESULTS: Nearly half (47%) of caregivers reported on older adults who had been subject to restraints. Most caregivers reporting restraint use suggested safety reasons, such as prevention of falls (68%), wandering (30%), and removal of catheters or feeding tubes (29%); and 44% indicated doctors or other health care providers were involved in the decision to restrain. Feeding tubes (OR = 4.16, 95% CI: 1.27-13.59) and physically aggressive agitation behaviors (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.09-3.40) were associated with higher odds of restraint use among older adults with severe dementia. Caregivers who received strong emotional support from friends (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.95) were less likely to report restraint use while serving as a caregiver to others (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.36-5.63) increased the odds of restraint use. CONCLUSIONS: The pervasiveness of restraint use is concerning and suggests a lack of evidence-based guidance and support for both caregivers and healthcare providers to prevent restraint use among older adults with severe dementia cared for at home.

3.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 152: 104675, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Presenteeism is defined as a type of work behavior in which employees are physically present at work when ill, often with reduced performance. While organizational culture and leadership style are known to impact the organizational behavior of hospital staff, as indicated by increased burnout and decreased work engagement, their impact on nurse presenteeism and productivity has not been explored. Moreover, nursing studies often neglect the importance of using multi-level analysis, adopting aggregated unit-level scores to account for collective perceptions to evaluate culture and leadership. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of unit-level organizational culture and leadership style on individual-level nurse presenteeism and productivity in acute care hospitals using multilevel analysis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING(S): Three major acute care public hospitals in Hong Kong, where public hospitals provide over 90 % of inpatient services. PARTICIPANTS: All full-time nurses (N = 4657) in the three study hospitals were invited to participate in this study. A total of 2339 nurses responded to the survey for a 65 % response rate. METHODS: Organizational culture and leadership style are characterized using the competing values framework and a two-factor leadership style typology, respectively. Multilevel hierarchical linear modeling was applied with unit-level clustering in each hospital. RESULTS: Hierarchical culture was the dominant culture (M = 3.64, SD = 0.74) in our nurse sample. None of the unit-level organizational culture and leadership styles were associated with nurse presenteeism, however, rational organizational culture at the unit-level was significantly associated with increased productivity (regression coefficient: 0.17, 95 % CI: 0.04-0.31). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides hospital managers with improved understanding of the differential impact of unit-level organizational culture and leadership style on nurse presenteeism and productivity. Unit-level leadership style did not have a direct impact on nurse presenteeism and productivity in this study, while the externally focused rational organizational culture increased nurse productivity. Further research is needed to understand the impacts of modifiable work factors and nurse psychosocial emotions on presenteeism and productivity.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital , Organizational Culture , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Leadership , Presenteeism , Hong Kong , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Hospitals, Public
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35055590

ABSTRACT

Background-The workload of public hospital staff is heightened during seasonal influenza surges in hospitals serving densely populated cities. Such work environments may subject staff to increased risk of sickness presenteeism. Presenteeism is detrimental to nurses' health and may lead to downstream productivity loss, resulting in financial costs for hospital organizations. Aims-This study aims to quantify how seasonal influenza hospital occupancy surge impacts nurses' sickness presenteeism and related productivity costs in high-intensity inpatient metropolitan hospitals. Methods-Full-time nurses in three Hong Kong acute-care hospitals were surveyed. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was applied to account for clustering in small number of hospitals. Results-A total of 71.3% of nurses reported two or more presenteeism events last year. A 6.8% increase in hospital inpatient occupancy rate was associated with an increase of 19% (1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34) in nurse presenteeism. Presenteeism productivity loss costs between nurses working healthy (USD1983) and worked sick (USD 2008) were not significantly different, while sick leave costs were highest (USD 2703). Conclusion-Presenteeism prevalence is high amongst acute-care hospital nurses and workload increase during influenza flu surge significantly heightened nurse sickness presenteeism. Annual presenteeism productivity loss costs in this study of USD 24,096 were one of the highest reported worldwide. Productivity loss was also considerably high regardless of nurses' health states, pointing towards other potential risk factors at play. When scheduling nurses to tackle flu surge, managers may want to consider impaired productivity due to staff presenteeism. Further longitudinal research is essential in identifying management modifiable risk factors that impact nurse presenteeism and impairing downstream productivity loss.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human , Presenteeism , Absenteeism , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital , Seasons
5.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 197, 2021 01 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33482802

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hong Kong lacks comprehensive school-based sexuality education. Recent public health concerns have brought the inadequacies of sex education in Hong Kong to the forefront. The aim of the proposed study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive school-based sexuality education program in Hong Kong. METHODS: The proposed study is a prospective longitudinal study implemented in six secondary schools in Hong Kong over two academic years. The study adopts an ecological approach providing informational workshops for students, teachers and school management, social workers and guidance counsellors and parents. Study outcomes will be evaluated through pre- and post-tests. RESULTS: Key outcomes of interest among students include sexual health knowledge, awareness of values motivating healthy sexual decisions, understanding and efficacy of sexual communication and intention to use contraception. Among school employees and parents key outcomes include self-efficacy to engage in sexual health discussions with students/children, sexual health knowledge and awareness of Hong Kong community sexual health resources. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed study will result in the development of a tested school-based culturally relevant comprehensive sexual health education program. Ultimately, this program aims to not only empower adolescents and their trusted adults in building a supportive environment for sexual health promotion but also construct a learning network to generate longitudinal evidence for the effectiveness of comprehensive sexuality education in improving sexual health outcomes. The program has the potential for expansion through widespread adoption in Hong Kong schools to benefit more adolescents and reduce the medical and societal burdens related to crisis pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections and sexual abuse.


Subject(s)
Sex Education , Sexual Behavior , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Sexuality
6.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 9(1): 137, 2020 08 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and increases patients' length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges. Our goals were to calculate LOS and charges attributable to BSI and compare results among different models. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in 2017 in a large general hospital, in Beijing. Using patient-level data, we compared the attributable LOS and charges of BSI with three models: 1) conventional non-matching, 2) propensity score matching controlling for the impact of potential confounding variables, and 3) risk set matching controlling for time-varying covariates and matching based on propensity score and infection time. RESULTS: The study included 118,600 patient admissions, 557 (0.47%) with BSI. Six hundred fourteen microorganisms were cultured from patients with BSI. Escherichia coli was the most common bacteria (106, 17.26%). Among multi-drug resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) was the most common (42, 38.53%). In the conventional non-matching model, the excess LOS and charges associated with BSI were 25.06 days (P < 0.05) and US$22041.73 (P < 0.05), respectively. After matching, the mean LOS and charges attributable to BSI both decreased. When infection time was incorporated into the risk set matching model, the excess LOS and charges were 16.86 days (P < 0.05) and US$15909.21 (P < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to consider time-dependent bias in estimating excess LOS and charges attributable to BSI in a Chinese hospital setting. We found matching on infection time can reduce bias.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/economics , Cross Infection/economics , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Adult , Aged , Bacteremia/etiology , Beijing , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 623, 2019 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31481058

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital accreditation is expected to improve health care quality and patient satisfaction. However, little and conflicting evidence is currently available to support its effect on patient outcomes, particularly patient experience. Hong Kong recently launched a pilot programme to test an infrastructure for accreditation of both private and public hospitals with the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. This study aims to evaluate the longitudinal impact of hospital accreditation on patient experience in a publicly-funded university teaching hospital in Hong Kong. METHODS: Three cross-sectional surveys were conducted at three time points: 9 months pre- accreditation as baseline (T1), three (T2) and fifteen months (T3) post-accreditation. Acute care inpatients aged 18 to 80 were recruited on the second day of hospital admission to complete the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire-15 (PPE-15). Baseline data was first compared to the 2005 Hong Kong average for public hospitals using t-tests. Data was then analyzed using ANOVA and multiple linear regression to evaluate differences across the three cross-sections and examine the effect of accreditation over time while controlling for covariates. RESULTS: 3083 patients (T1 = 896, T2 = 1093, T3 = 1094) completed the survey for a response rate of 83.5, 86.1, and 83.8%, respectively. The hospital baseline domain and summary patient experience scores differed from the Hong Kong public hospital average obtained from the 2005 Thematic Household Survey. All domain and summary patient experience scores declined (improved) over the study period (T1 to T3). The multiple regression results confirmed the time point score comparisons with declining (improving) parameter estimates for T2 and T3 for all domain and summary scores except the 'continuity and transition' domain, for which the declining coefficient was only significant at T3. CONCLUSIONS: While hospital accreditation has not been shown to improve patient outcomes, this study suggests the accreditation exercise may enhance patient experience. Moreover, it suggests the quality improvement initiatives associated with accreditation may address areas of concern emphasized by Hong Kong patients, such as involvement in care and emotional support from providers.


Subject(s)
Accreditation/standards , Hospitals, Public/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Hong Kong , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Quality Improvement/standards , Young Adult
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31467671

ABSTRACT

Background: To quantify the five year incidence trend of all healthcare-associated infections (HAI) using a real-time HAI electronic surveillance system in a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China. Methods: The real-time surveillance system scans the hospital's electronic databases related to HAI (e.g. microbiological reports and antibiotics administration) to identify HAI cases. We conducted retrospective secondary analyses of the data exported from the surveillance system for inpatients with all types of HAIs from January 1st 2013 to December 31st 2017. Incidence of HAI is defined as the number of HAIs per 1000 patient-days. We modeled the incidence data using negative binomial regression. Results: In total, 23361 HAI cases were identified from 633990 patients, spanning 6242375 patient-days during the 5-year period. Overall, the adjusted five-year HAI incidence rate had a marginal reduction from 2013 (4.10 per 1000 patient days) to 2017 (3.62 per 1000 patient days). The incidence of respiratory tract infection decreased significantly. However, the incidence rate of bloodstream infections and surgical site infection increased significantly. Respiratory tract infection (43.80%) accounted for the most substantial proportion of HAIs, followed by bloodstream infections (15.74%), and urinary tract infection (12.69%). A summer peak in HAIs was detected among adult and elderly patients. Conclusions: This study shows how continuous electronic incidence surveillance based on existing hospital electronic databases can provide a practical means of measuring hospital-wide HAI incidence. The estimated incidence trends demonstrate the necessity for improved infection control measures related to bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, non-intensive care patients, and non-device-associated HAIs, especially during summer months.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , China/epidemiology , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Incidence , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Population Surveillance , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 467, 2019 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence supports the link between hospital organisational culture and health outcomes. Organisational culture is thus an essential consideration for hospital accreditation, a practice of systematically assessing the quality of hospital care against accepted standards. This study assesses the interplay between accreditation and hospital professional staff perception of organisational culture. METHODS: A prospective cohort study design was used to explore the influence of accreditation on organisational culture within a large, publicly-funded, university teaching hospital in Hong Kong. All full-time hospital and academic physicians, nurses and allied health professionals were invited to participate. Organisational culture was evaluated using the Competing Values Framework through the Quality Improvement Implementation Survey. Organisational culture was assessed longitudinally at 9 months prior to accreditation, 3 months following and 15 months after accreditation. To capture potential shifts in staff perception of organisational culture through the accreditation process, we conducted a between time-point comparison using a linear trend model. RESULTS: 545 clinical staff completed the organisational culture survey pre-accreditation, 378 three- months post-accreditation and 141 15-months post-accreditation. Hierarchical culture was the dominant organisational culture domain pre-accreditation, followed by rational, developmental and group culture, respectively. Following accreditation, hierarchical culture declined but remained dominant, while group and developmental culture increased. However, the decline in hierarchical culture was U-shaped with scores increasing at 15-months post-accreditation, though not to pre-accreditation levels. When stratified by professional group, hierarchical culture declined following accreditation with corresponding increases in group culture and developmental culture among physicians and nurses, respectively. While allied health professionals did not perceive any significant cultural differences directly following accreditation, a significant increase in hierarchical culture and corresponding decrease in group culture was found 15-months post-accreditation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the hospital accreditation process may contribute to shifts in staff perception of organisational culture. Our findings also indicate differential views of organisational culture across professional groups. Finally, we note the striking dominance of hierarchical culture in this Hong Kong hospital across all time points, far surpassing other studies, even those in which hierarchical culture prevailed.


Subject(s)
Accreditation , Hospitals , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Accreditation/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Culture , Prospective Studies , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement/standards , Young Adult
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 985, 2018 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30567547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Presenteeism is a behavior in which an employee is physically present at work with reduced performance due to illness or other reasons. Hospital doctors and nurses are more inclined to exhibit presenteeism than other professional groups, resulting in diminished staff health, reduced team productivity and potentially higher indirect presenteeism-related medical costs than absenteeism. Robust presenteeism intervention programs and productivity costing studies are available in the manufacturing and business sectors but not the healthcare sector. This systematic review aims to 1) identify instruments measuring presenteeism and its exposures and outcomes; 2) appraise the related workplace theoretical frameworks; and 3) evaluate the association between presenteeism, its exposures and outcomes, and the financial costs of presenteeism as well as interventions designed to alleviate presenteeism amongst hospital doctors and nurses. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in ten electronic databases from 1998 to 2017 and screened by two reviewers. Quality assessment was carried out using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool. Publications meeting predefined assessment criteria were selected for data extraction. RESULTS: A total of 275 unique English publications were identified, 38 were selected for quality assessment, and 24 were retained for data extraction. Seventeen publications reported on presenteeism exposures and outcomes, four on financial costing, one on intervention program and two on economic evaluations. Eight (39%) utilized a theoretical framework, where the Job-Demands Resources (JD-R) framework was the most commonly used model. Most assessed work stressors and resources were positively and negatively associated with presenteeism respectively. Contradictory and limited comparability on findings across studies may be attributed to variability of selected scales for measuring both presenteeism and its exposures/outcomes constructs. CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity of published research and limited quality of measurement tools yielded no conclusive evidence on the association of presenteeism with hypothesized exposures, economic costs, or interventions amongst hospital healthcare workers. This review will aid researchers in developing a standardized multi-dimensional presenteeism exposures and productivity instrument to facilitate future cohort studies in search of potential cost-effective work-place intervention targets to reduce healthcare worker presenteeism and maintain a sustainable workforce.


Subject(s)
Medical Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Presenteeism/statistics & numerical data , Absenteeism , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Efficiency , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans , Medical Staff, Hospital/economics , Nursing Staff, Hospital/economics , Physicians , Presenteeism/economics , Workplace/economics , Workplace/statistics & numerical data
11.
Online J Public Health Inform ; 10(2): e205, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30349623

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review user signal rating activity within the Canadian Network for Public Health Intelligence's (CNPHI's) Knowledge Integration using Web-based Intelligence (KIWI) technology by answering the following questions: (1) who is rating, (2) how are users rating, and (3) how well are users rating? METHODS: KIWI rating data was extracted from the CNPHI platform. Zoonotic & Emerging program signals with first rating occurring between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017 were included. Krippendorff's alpha was used to estimate inter-rater reliability between users. A z-test was used to identify whether users tended to rate within 95% confidence interval (versus outside) the average community rating. RESULTS: The 37 users who rated signals represented 20 organizations. 27.0% (n = 10) of users rated ≥10% of all rated signals, and their inter-rater reliability estimate was 72.4% (95% CI: 66.5-77.9%). Five users tended to rate significantly outside of the average community rating. An average user rated 58.4% of the time within the signal's 95% CI. All users who significantly rated within the average community rating rated outside the 95% CI at least once. DISCUSSION: A diverse community of raters participated in rating the signals. Krippendorff's Alpha estimate revealed moderate reliability for users who rated ≥10% of signals. It was observed that inter-rater reliability increased for users with more experience rating signals. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity was observed between user ratings. It is hypothesized that rating diversity is influenced by differences in user expertise and experience, and that the number of times a user rates within and outside of a signal's 95% CI can be used as a proxy for user expertise. The introduction of a weighted rating algorithm within KIWI that takes this into consideration could be beneficial.

12.
Can J Public Health ; 108(2): e152-e161, 2017 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28621651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of the population that meets or exceeds Canada's Food Guide (CFG) recommendations regarding the number of daily servings of fruits and vegetables (F/V), to assess trends in this proportion between 2000 and 2013, to estimate the annual economic burden attributable to inadequate F/V consumption within the context of other important risk factors, and to estimate the short- and long-term costs that could be avoided if modest improvements were made to F/V consumption in Canada. METHODS: We used a previously developed methodology based on population-attributable fractions and a prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach to estimate the economic burden associated with low F/V consumption. RESULTS: Over three quarters of Canadians are not meeting CFG recommendations regarding the number of daily servings of F/V, leading to an annual economic burden of $4.39 billion. If a 1% relative increase in F/V consumption occurred annually between 2013 and 2036, the cumulative reduction in economic burden over the 23-year period would reach $8.4 billion. Consumption levels of F/V, and the resulting economic burden, varied by sex, age and province. CONCLUSION: A significant majority of Canadians are not consuming the recommended daily servings of F/V, with important consequences to their health and the Canadian economy. Programs and policies are required to encourage F/V consumption in Canada.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Fruit , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Nutrition Policy , Vegetables , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Young Adult
13.
Can J Public Health ; 107(1): e37-e42, 2016 06 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27348108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patterns of survival among brain cancer patients in Canada. METHODS: Canadian Cancer Registry data were obtained for all patients with first-ever primary malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 1992 and 2008 (n = 38,095). Follow-up ended with patient death or December 31, 2008, whichever occurred first. Crude Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated at one, two and five years post-diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to obtain adjusted hazard ratios by region for major histology types. A time-specific generalized linear model was used to obtain 5-year survival estimates for specific age group, sex and region for major histology types. RESULTS: The overall five-year survival rate was 27%. No significant difference in survival rate over time is observed. The highest 5-year survival rate was 65% (95% CI: 62.5%-67.4%) for oligodendrogliomas and the lowest was 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7%-4.3%) for glioblastomas. Compared to Ontario, the adjusted 5-year glioblastoma survival estimates were lower in British Columbia, Alberta and the Prairie provinces (Manitoba and Saskatchewan), while the survival estimates were lower in all other regions for diffuse astrocytoma, and lower in Manitoba and Saskatchewan for anaplastic astrocytomas. Estimates were significantly higher for oligodendrogliomas in Alberta, and for anaplastic oligodendrogliomas in Alberta and Quebec (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with previous literature in observing higher survival rates at younger ages, in female patients and for tumours with mixed oligo components. There is a need to further explore the underlying reasons for the observed variation in survival rates by region in an effort to improve the prognosis of brain cancer in the Canadian patient population.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Astrocytoma/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Glioblastoma/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oligodendroglioma/mortality , Registries , Sex Distribution , Survival Rate , Young Adult
14.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 42(3): 115-21, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26892700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efforts on reducing hospital readmissions, which are intended to improve quality and reduce costs, tend to focus on elderly Medicare beneficiaries without recognition of another high-risk population--adult nonmaternal Medicaid patients. This study was undertaken to understand the complexity of Medicaid readmission issues at the patient, provider, and system levels. METHODS: Multiple qualitative methods, including site visits to nine safety-net hospitals, patient/family/caregiver inter views, and semistructured interviews with health plans and state Medicaid agencies, were used in 2012 and 2013 to obtain information on patient, provider, and system issues related to Medicaid readmissions; strategies considered or currently used to address those issues; and any perceived financial, regulatory or, other policy factors inhibiting or facilitating readmission reduction efforts. RESULTS: Significant risk factors for Medicaid readmissions included financial stress, high prevalence of mental health and substance abuse disorders, medication nonadherence, and housing instability. Lacking awareness on Medicaid patients' high risk, a sufficient business case, and proven strategies for reducing readmissions were primary barriers for providers. Major hurdles at the system level included shortage of primary care and mental health providers, lack of coordination among providers, lack of partnerships between health plans and providers, and limited data capacity for realtime monitoring of readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The intertwining of behavioral, socioeconomic, and health factors; the difficulty of accessing appropriate care in the outpatient setting; the lack of clear financial incentives for health care providers to reduce readmissions; and the fragmentation of the current health care system warrant greater attention and more concerted efforts from all stakeholders to reduce Medicaid readmissions.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Housing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medication Adherence , Risk Factors , Social Work/organization & administration , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States
15.
Matern Child Health J ; 20(6): 1178-92, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26676977

ABSTRACT

Background Maternity leave is integral to postpartum maternal and child health, providing necessary time to heal and bond following birth. However, the relationship between maternity leave and health outcomes has not been formally and comprehensively assessed to guide public health research and policy in this area. This review aims to address this gap by investigating both the correlates of maternity leave utilization in the US and the related health benefits for mother and child. Methods We searched the peer-reviewed scholarly literature using six databases for the years 1990 to early 2015 and identified 37 studies to be included in the review. We extracted key data for each of the included studies and assessed study quality using the "Weight of the Evidence" approach. Results The literature generally confirms a positive, though limited correlation between maternity leave coverage and utilization. Likewise, longer maternity leaves are associated with improved breastfeeding intentions and rates of initiation, duration and predominance as well as improved maternal mental health and early childhood outcomes. However, the literature points to important disparities in access to maternity leave that carry over into health outcomes, such as breastfeeding. Synthesis We present a conceptual framework synthesizing what is known to date related to maternity leave access and health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Mothers/psychology , Parental Leave , Postpartum Period , Women, Working , Breast Feeding/psychology , Employment , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Time Factors
16.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 25(4): 2003-18, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25418255

ABSTRACT

Much of the information we have about the delivery of language services for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) relates to interpreter services. Very little is known about hospitals' experiences responding to LEP patients' needs for written materials in their preferred languages. This study describes the translation practices of 35 hospitals with large interpreter services programs to inform guidance for the effective delivery of translation services in health care settings. We conducted in-depth telephone interviews with hospital staff members responsible for overseeing translation services at their hospitals. Translation practices varied considerably among study participants, with participants relying on a combination of interpreters serving as translators and contract translators to translate between 5 and 5,000 documents per year. This study showcases examples of hospitals with surprisingly robust translation service programs despite limited external funding. The variance in translation practices underscores a lack of guidance in this area.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Translating , Hospital Costs , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Organizational Policy , Transitional Care/organization & administration , Transitional Care/statistics & numerical data , United States
17.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 23(4): 203-25, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25260099

ABSTRACT

Reducing hospital readmissions is a key approach to curbing health care costs and improving quality and patient experience in the United States. Despite the proliferation of strategies and tools to reduce readmissions in the general population and among Medicare beneficiaries, few resources exist to inform initiatives to reduce readmissions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Patients covered by Medicaid also experience readmissions and are likely to experience distinct challenges related to socioeconomic status. This review aims to identify factors related to readmissions that are unique to Medicaid populations to inform efforts to reduce Medicaid readmissions. Our search yielded 254 unique results, of which 37 satisfied all review criteria. Much of the Medicaid readmissions literature focuses on patients with mental health or substance abuse issues, who are often high utilizers of health care within the Medicaid population. Risk factors such as medication noncompliance, postdischarge care environments, and substance abuse comorbidities increase the risk of readmission among Medicaid patients.

18.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 23(1): 20-42, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24368719

ABSTRACT

Reducing hospital readmissions is a key approach to curbing health care costs and improving quality and patient experience in the United States. Despite the proliferation of strategies and tools to reduce readmissions in the general population and among Medicare beneficiaries, few resources exist to inform initiatives to reduce readmissions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Patients covered by Medicaid also experience readmissions and are likely to experience distinct challenges related to socioeconomic status. This review aims to identify factors related to readmissions that are unique to Medicaid populations to inform efforts to reduce Medicaid readmissions. Our search yielded 254 unique results, of which 37 satisfied all review criteria. Much of the Medicaid readmissions literature focuses on patients with mental health or substance abuse issues, who are often high utilizers of health care within the Medicaid population. Risk factors such as medication noncompliance, postdischarge care environments, and substance abuse comorbidities increase the risk of readmission among Medicaid patients.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Medicaid/economics , Patient Readmission/economics , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Risk Assessment , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , United States
19.
Med Care Res Rev ; 71(1): 61-84, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24288366

ABSTRACT

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has gained significant interest as a delivery system model that can improve health care quality while reducing costs. This study uses focus groups to investigate underserved, chronically ill patients' preferences for care and develops a patient-centered framework of priorities. Seven major priorities were identified: (a) communication and partnership, (b) affordable care, (c) coordinated care, (d) personal responsibility, (e) accessible care, (f) education and support resources, and (g) the essential role of nonphysician providers in supporting their care. Using the framework, we analyzed the PCMH joint principals as developed by U.S. medical societies to identify where the PCMH model could be improved to better meet the needs of these patients. Four of the seven patient priorities were identified as not present in or supported by current PCMH joint principles. The study discusses how the PCMH model can better address the needs of low-income, disadvantaged patients.


Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand , Patient-Centered Care , Primary Health Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Focus Groups , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Young Adult
20.
Womens Health Issues ; 23(5): e273-80, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23993475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medicaid is a major source of public health care financing for pregnant women and deliveries in the United States. Starting in 2014, some states will extend Medicaid to thousands of previously uninsured, low-income women. Given this changing landscape, it is important to have a baseline of current levels of Medicaid financing for births in each state. This article aims to 1) provide up-to-date, multiyear data for all states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico and 2) summarize issues of data comparability in view of increased interest in program performance and impact assessment. METHODS: We collected 2008-2010 data on Medicaid births from individual state contacts during the winter of 2012-2013, systematically documenting sources and challenges. FINDINGS: In 2010, Medicaid financed 45% of all births, an increase of 4% [corrected] in the proportion of all births covered by Medicaid in 2008. Percentages varied among states. Numerous data challenges were found. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND POLICY: Consistent adoption of the 2003 birth certificate in all states would allow the National Center for Health Statistics Natality Detail dataset to serve as a nationally representative source of data for the financing of births in the United States. As states expand coverage to low-income women, women of childbearing age will be able to obtain coverage before and between pregnancies, allowing for access to services that could improve their overall and reproductive health, as well as birth outcomes. Improved birth outcomes could translate into substantial cost savings, because the costs associated with preterm births are estimated to be 10 times greater than those for full-term births.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Reform/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Poverty , Birth Rate , District of Columbia , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medicaid/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pregnancy , Puerto Rico , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...