Cognitive impairment and frailty screening in older surgical patients: a rural tertiary care centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a clear association between cognitive impairment and physical frailty and poor postoperative outcomes in older adults, preoperative rates are rarely assessed. We sought to implement a preoperative cognitive impairment and frailty screening programme to meet the unique needs of our rural academic centre. METHODS: Through stakeholder interviews, we identified five primary drivers underlying screening implementation: staff education, technology infrastructure, workload impact, screening value and patient-provider communication. Based on these findings, we implemented cognitive dysfunction (AD8, Mini-Cog) and frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale) screening in our preoperative care clinic and select surgical clinics. RESULTS: In the preoperative care clinic, many of our patients scored positive for clinical frailty (428 of 1231, 35%) and for cognitive impairment (264 of 1781, 14.8%). In our surgical clinics, 27% (35 of 131) and 9% (12 of 131) scored positive for clinical frailty and cognitive impairment, respectively. Compliance to screening improved from 48% to 86% 1 year later. CONCLUSION: We qualitatively analysed stakeholder feedback to drive the successful implementation of a preoperative cognitive impairment and frailty screening programme in our rural tertiary care centre. Preliminary data suggest that a clinically significant proportion of older adults screen positive for preoperative cognitive impairment and frailty and would benefit from tailored inpatient care.

Surgical intervention for late gastric conduit obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Gastric emptying delay after oesophagectomy may occur in conduits exposed to pleural forces of respiration or anatomic obstruction. Remedial operations addressing both causes are rarely reported. The study aim was to categorize severe gastric conduit obstruction (GCO) and report the outcome of surgical revision. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective study of gastric conduit revision following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer investigated incidence, risk factors and categories of conduit obstruction. Evaluation consisted of contrast studies, computed tomogram and endoscopy. Interventions were categorized according to obstructive cause and included pyloroplasty, hiatal hernia reduction and thoraco-abdominal conduit repositioning. RESULTS: Among 1246 oesophagectomies over a 17-year period, 14 patients (1.1%) required post-oesophagectomy relief of GCO. Two additional patients presented after oesophagectomy elsewhere. Before oesophagectomy, 18.8% (3/16) and 62.5% (10/16) of patients were on chronic opioid and psychotropic medications, respectively. Distinct anatomic features separated obstruction into 3 categories: pyloric in 31% (5/16), extrinsic in 12.5% (2/16) and combined in 56.3% (9/16). Operative revision led to complete symptom resolution in 50% (8/16) of patients and symptom improvement in 43.8% (7/16) of patients. One patient (1/16, 6.25%) in the combined obstruction group did not improve with surgical revision. CONCLUSIONS: GCO after oesophagectomy rarely requires surgical revision. Potential association with medications affecting oesophageal and gastric motility requires further investigation. Classification of obstruction identifies a patient subset with lower success after surgical revision.