Severe Hypoxemia in Muskoxen ( Ovibos moschatus ) Immobilized with Etorphine and Xylazine Corrected with Supplemental Nasal Oxygen.

Twenty-three muskoxen ( Ovibos moschatus ) housed in a captive facility for rewilding in Sweden were chemically immobilized for annual health evaluations and hoof trimming. The muskoxen were darted in May to September (2012-15) in their holding pen with etorphine (0.015 mg/kg) and xylazine (0.1 mg/kg) intramuscularly. Twenty-two of the 23 animals were immobilized with a single dart injection. The mean (SD) induction time was 4 (2) min. Arterial blood gases were collected from 18 animals. All animals were severely hypoxemic with varying degrees of respiratory acidosis. The hypoxemia resolved in 17 of 18 animals with intranasal oxygen supplementation at 1 L/min per 100 kg. Relative arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry was significantly higher than the arterial oxygen saturation calculated from the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (SaO2) obtained by a blood gas analyzer. Based on these findings, muskox can be immobilized successfully with etorphine (0.015 mg/kg) and xylazine (0.1 mg/kg) but should receive supplemental oxygen.

LEUKOCYTE COPING CAPACITY AS A TOOL TO ASSESS CAPTURE- AND HANDLING-INDUCED STRESS IN SCANDINAVIAN BROWN BEARS (URSUS ARCTOS).

Brown bears (Ursus arctos) are often captured and handled for research and management purposes. Although the techniques used are potentially stressful for the animals and might have detrimental and long-lasting consequences, it is difficult to assess their physiological impact. Here we report the use of the leukocyte coping capacity (LCC) technique to quantify the acute stress of capture and handling in brown bears in Scandinavia. In April and May 2012 and 2013, we collected venous blood samples and recorded a range of physiological variables to evaluate the effects of capture and the added impact of surgical implantation or removal of transmitters and sensors. We studied 24 brown bears, including 19 that had abdominal surgery. We found 1) LCC values following capture were lower in solitary bears than in bears in family groups suggesting capture caused relatively more stress in solitary bears, 2) ability to cope with handling stress was better (greater LCC values) in bears with good body condition, and 3) LCC values did not appear to be influenced by surgery. Although further evaluation of this technique is required, our preliminary results support the use of the LCC technique as a quantitative measure of stress.