Correlation of Baseline Tumor Burden with Clinical Outcome in Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor burden is a frequently mentioned parameter; however, a commonly accepted definition is still lacking. METHODS: In this double-center prospective and retrospective study, 76 patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma treated with ipilimumab were included. We defined the baseline tumor burden (BTB) as the global sum of all metastases' longest diameters before treatment started and correlated the calculated BTB with disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and with the baseline levels of LDH, S100B, and sULPB2. RESULTS: BTB correlated significantly with DCR (p = 0.009), PFS (p = 0.002), OS (p = 0.032), and the occurrence of NRAS mutation (p = 0.006). BTB was also correlated to baseline serum levels of LDH (p = 0.011), S100B (p = 0.027), and SULBP (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that BPB and LDH were independently correlated with PFS and OS. With increasing BTB, disease control was less likely; no patient with a BTB >200 mm achieved disease control. For patients with brain metastasis, no correlation of BTB with DCR (p = 0.251), PFS (p = 0.059), or OS (p = 0.981) was observed. CONCLUSION: Calculated BTB is an independent prognostic factor for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab. Using calculated BTB as a definition of tumor burden may help increase comparability of outcome of therapies in future studies.

Comprehensive neurological evaluation of a cohort of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 from a single institution.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a phenotypically heterogenous multisystem cancer predisposition syndrome manifesting in childhood and adolescents. Central nervous system (CNS) manifestations include structural, neurodevelopmental, and neoplastic disease. We aimed to (1) characterize the spectrum of CNS manifestations of NF1 in a paediatric population, (2) explore radiological features in the CNS by image analyses, and (3) correlate genotype with phenotypic expression for those with a genetic diagnosis. We performed a database search in the hospital information system covering the period between January 2017 and December 2020. We evaluated the phenotype by retrospective chart review and imaging analysis. 59 patients were diagnosed with NF1 [median age 10.6 years (range, 1.1-22.6); 31 female] at last follow-up, pathogenic NF1 variants were identified in 26/29. 49/59 patients presented with neurological manifestations including 28 with structural and neurodevelopmental findings, 16 with neurodevelopmental, and 5 with structural findings only. Focal areas of signal intensity (FASI) were identified in 29/39, cerebrovascular anomalies in 4/39. Neurodevelopmental delay was reported in 27/59 patients, learning difficulties in 19/59. Optic pathway gliomas (OPG) were diagnosed in 18/59 patients, 13/59 had low-grade gliomas outside the visual pathways. 12 patients received chemotherapy. Beside the established NF1 microdeletion, neither genotype nor FASI were associated with the neurological phenotype. NF1 was associated with a spectrum of CNS manifestations in at least 83.0% of patients. Regular neuropsychological assessment complementing frequent clinical and ophthalmologic testing for OPG is necessary in the care of each child with NF1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1: A comparison of the 1997 NIH and the 2021 revised diagnostic criteria in 75 children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: Examining a cohort of patients suspicious of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) we compared the revised diagnostic criteria with the previous National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnostic criteria. We asked whether the refinement improved distinguishing between NF1, Legius syndrome, and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD). METHODS: A database search in the hospital information system of the University Children's Hospital Augsburg between 2017 and 2020 ascertained patients with International Classification of Diseases-10 code Q85.0; their clinical phenotype was evaluated by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were identified (median age 11.0 years [range 1.1-22.6 years]; 35 female). At first suspicion of NF1, 44 patients met the NIH criteria and 56 met the revised diagnostic criteria. In total, 12 patients were diagnosed with NF1 after performing molecular genetic testing. In 31 patients, only pigmentary findings were present, whereas nonpigmentary NF1 manifestations presented with time in 9 patients. In 1 patient a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance was identified in SPRED1. Requirements for CMMRD testing were fulfilled in another patient. A total of 3 patients presented with segmental clinical findings. Three additional patients did not meet the NIH criteria, 1 of them presented with 1 additional feature of CMMRD without fulfilling requirements for testing. CONCLUSION: In our pediatric cohort, the revised diagnostic criteria discovered more patients with proven NF1 than the NIH criteria.