ABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivos La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es una patología compleja con una alta prevalencia, incidencia y mortalidad que conlleva un importante coste sanitario. En España existen unidades de IC (UIC) multidisciplinares, lideradas por cardiología y medicina interna. Nuestro objetivo era conocer su organización actual y adherencia a las últimas recomendaciones científicas. Materiales y métodos Un comité científico formado por cardiólogos e internistas elaboró una encuesta a finales de 2021, que fue enviada a 110 UIC. Setenta y tres de cardiología, acreditadas por SEC-Excelente, y 37 de medicina interna, integradas en el programa UMIPIC. Resultados Se recibieron 83 encuestas cumplimentadas (75,5%); 49 de cardiología y 34 de medicina interna. Los resultados mostraron que las UIC están integradas mayoritariamente por un cardiólogo, internista y enfermería especializada (34,9%). El perfil de paciente atendido en las UIC cardiológicas es muy diferente al paciente de las UMIPIC, siendo estos últimos mayores, con fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda conservada y más carga de comorbilidad. La mayoría de UIC actualmente realizan seguimiento mixto, presencial y telemático (73,5%). Los péptidos natriuréticos son los biomarcadores más utilizados (90%). Se titulan los cuatro grupos farmacológicos fundamentales de tratamiento de la IC a la vez mayoritariamente (85%). Solo 24% de las unidades mantienen una comunicación fluida con atención primaria. Conclusiones Los dos modelos de UIC liderados por cardiología y medicina interna son complementarios, disponen de enfermería especializada, y siguen al paciente de forma mixta, con una adherencia farmacológica muy alta a las últimas recomendaciones científicas. El principal punto de mejora es la coordinación con atención primaria (AU)
Background and objectives Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease with high prevalence, incidence and mortality rates leading to high healthcare burden. In Spain, there are multidisciplinary HF units coordinated by cardiology and internal medicine. Our objective was to describe its current organizational model and their adherence to the latest scientific recommendations. Materials and methods In late 2021, a scientific committee (with cardiology and internal medicine specialists) developed a questionnaire that was sent as an online survey to 110 HF units [73 from cardiology (accredited by SEC-Excelente) and 37 from internal medicine (integrated in UMIPIC program)]. Results We received 83 answers (75.5% total: 49 from cardiology and 34 from internal medicine). The results showed that HF units are mostly integrated by specialists from cardiology, internal medicine and specialized nurse practitioners (34.9%). Patient characteristics from HF units are widely different when comparing those in cardiology to UMIPIC, being the latter older, more frequently with preserved ejection fraction and higher comorbidity burden. Most HF units (73.5%) currently use a hybrid face-to-face/virtual model to perform patient follow-up. Natriuretic peptides are the biomarkers most commonly used (90%). All four disease-modifying drug classes are mainly implemented at the same time (85%). Only 24% of HF units hold fluent communication with primary care. Conclusions Both models from cardiology and internal medicine HF units are complementary, they include specialized nursing, they use hybrid approach for patient follow-up and they display a high adherence to the latest guideline recommendations. Coordination with primary care remains as the major improvement area (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Health Care Surveys , Heart Failure/therapy , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Internal Medicine , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
One of the core questions of quantum physics is how to reconcile the unitary evolution of quantum states, which is information-preserving and time-reversible, with evolution following the second law of thermodynamics, which, in general, is neither. The resolution to this paradox is to recognize that global unitary evolution of a multi-partite quantum state causes the state of local subsystems to evolve towards maximum-entropy states. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate this effect in linear quantum optics by simultaneously showing the convergence of local quantum states to a generalized Gibbs ensemble constituting a maximum-entropy state under precisely controlled conditions, while introducing an efficient certification method to demonstrate that the state retains global purity. Our quantum states are manipulated by a programmable integrated quantum photonic processor, which simulates arbitrary non-interacting Hamiltonians, demonstrating the universality of this phenomenon. Our results show the potential of photonic devices for quantum simulations involving non-Gaussian states.
Subject(s)
Photons , Physics , Thermodynamics , Entropy , Computer SimulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease with high prevalence, incidence and mortality rates leading to high healthcare burden. In Spain, there are multidisciplinary HF units coordinated by cardiology and internal medicine. Our objective is to describe its current organizational model and their adherence to the latest scientific recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In late 2021, a scientific committee (with cardiology and internal medicine specialists) developed a questionnaire that was sent as an online survey to 110 HF units. 73 from cardiology (accredited by SEC-Excelente) and 37 from internal medicine, (integrated in UMIPIC program). RESULTS: We received 83 answers (75.5% total: 49 from cardiology and 34 from internal medicine). The results showed that HF units are mostly integrated by specialists from cardiology, internal medicine and specialized nurse practitioners (34.9%). Patient characteristics from HF units are widely different when comparing those in cardiology to UMIPIC, being the latter older, more frequently with preserved ejection fraction and higher comorbidity burden. Most HF units (73.5%) currently use a hybrid face-to-face/virtual model to perform patient follow-up. Natriuretic peptides are the biomarkers most commonly used (90%). All four disease-modifying drug classes are mainly implemented at the same time (85%). Only 24% of HF units hold fluent communication with primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Both models from cardiology and internal medicine HF units are complementary, they include specialized nursing, they use hybrid approach for patient follow-up and they display a high adherence to the latest guideline recommendations. Coordination with primary care remains as the major improvement area.
Subject(s)
Cardiology , Heart Failure , Humans , Spain , Internal Medicine , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
Los quistes óseos aneurismáticos (QOA) son tumores benignos, expansivos, osteolíticos y localmente agresivos que se localizan principalmente en la metáfisis de los huesos largos. Aparecen predominantemente en niños y adultos jóvenes. La eliminación del QOA mediante cirugía conlleva altas tasas de recurrencia por lo que se emplean otras técnicas no quirúrgicas como las inyecciones intralesionales con doxiciclina. Se presenta el caso clínico de un niño de 7 años diagnosticado de quiste óseo aneurismático acetabular que fue tratado exitosamente con una dosis de 200 mg de doxiciclina intralesional previa aspiración de las cavidades para despresurizarlas. El paciente mostró reducción de la lesión y mejoría clínica tras la intervención, sin manifestaciones de recurrencia tras 34 semanas de seguimiento. (AU)
Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are benign, expansile, osteolytic and locally aggressive tumors. Typically, ABCs arise in metaphysis of long bones. They often appear in children and young adults. Wide en bloc resection is associated with high recurrence rates. Other non-surgical treatment methods include intralesional injections of doxycycline. We present the case of a 7-year-old male with acetabular ABC who was successfully treated with 200 mg of intralesional doxycycline. During surgery, one needle was used for aspiration to lower the injection pressure. At 34 weeks follow up, we observed a lesion volume reduction and the patient presented an improvement of symptoms without recurrence. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Bone Cysts, Aneurysmal/drug therapy , Bone Cysts, Aneurysmal/prevention & control , Bone Cysts, Aneurysmal/therapy , Acetabularia , Neoplasms , Doxycycline , RecurrenceABSTRACT
La actual pandemia por COVID-19 está generando un impacto sin precedentes en las distintas esferas de la vida, al mismo tiempo que ha puesto en valor la importancia que la disciplina Bioética tiene para el análisis y la deliberación de los desafíos éticos emergentes, previo a la adopción de decisiones razonables y prudentes. Un tema insuficientemente tratado en el curso de esta crisis, cuyos negativos efectos, se consideran, pueden llevar no sólo a interferir los canales de comunicación con la ciudadanía sino a afectar la adherencia esperada de la población a las indicaciones que se necesita que sigan, es la relativa al manejo y comunicación de la información. Asunto especialmente complejo cuando se vive un período de explosión informativa, caracterizada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud como «infodemia¼. Este artículo, reivindicando el imperativo ético y jurídico de actuar responsable en la obtención, uso y difusión de la información que asiste a toda autoridad que desempeña una función social, propone una serie de recomendaciones para alcanzar su efectividad en la práctica.
The current COVID-19 pandemic is producing an unprecedented impact in the different spheres of life, at the same time that it has highlighted the importance that the Bioethics discipline has in analyzing and deliberating of emerging ethical challenges, before making reasonable and prudent decisions. The management and communication of information on this crisis has not been properly addressed, where it is considered that its negative effects may lead not only to interfere with the communication channels with citizens but also affect the expected adherence of the population to the indications that they need to follow. This issue is especially complex when experiencing a period of information explosion, a phenomenon called 'infodemic' by the World Health Organization. This article, claiming the ethical and legal imperative to act responsibly in collecting, using, and disse minating the information that helps any authority that plays a social function, proposes a series of recommendations to achieve its effectiveness in practice.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bioethical Issues , Information Dissemination/ethics , COVID-19 , Bioethics , Communication , Decision Making , Information Dissemination/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
The current COVID-19 pandemic is producing an unprecedented impact in the different spheres of life, at the same time that it has highlighted the importance that the Bioethics discipline has in analyzing and deliberating of emerging ethical challenges, before making reasonable and prudent decisions. The management and communication of information on this crisis has not been properly addressed, where it is considered that its negative effects may lead not only to interfere with the communication channels with citizens but also affect the expected adherence of the population to the indications that they need to follow. This issue is especially complex when experiencing a period of information explosion, a phenomenon called 'infodemic' by the World Health Organization. This article, claiming the ethical and legal imperative to act responsibly in collecting, using, and disse minating the information that helps any authority that plays a social function, proposes a series of recommendations to achieve its effectiveness in practice.
Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues , COVID-19 , Information Dissemination/ethics , Bioethics , Communication , Decision Making , Humans , Information Dissemination/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Conocer el grado de correlación entre el diagnóstico clínico previo al proceso de cirugía menor y su concordancia con los resultados de anatomía patológica, al igual que conocer los datos de cirugía de escasa trascendencia clínica frente a la realmente necesaria y coste-efectiva. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Para ello realizamos un estudio descriptivo, observacional, retrospectivo y transversal de las actividades de cirugía menor de una consulta del Centro de Salud Ciudad Real I. RESULTADOS: Se remiten 124 piezas para su diagnóstico histológico, de las cuales los principales diagnósticos clínicos son: nevus melanocíticos intradérmicos (34,67%), queratosis seborreica (11,30%) y quistes epidermoides o sebáceos (10,48%). Se obtiene una correlación clinicopatológica del 68%. Se han seguido los protocolos del centro de trabajo para la realización de este estudio en relación con la confidencialidad de los datos. CONCLUSIONES: Analizamos estos resultados y los comparamos con otros trabajos similares realizados en el ámbito de la cirugía menor en atención primaria, pudiendo afirmar que existe una buena correlación entre el diagnóstico clínico inicial y los resultados anatomopatológicos
OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of correlation between the clinical diagnosis prior to the minor surgery process and its concordance with the results of histopathology report, as well as to determine the surgical data of little clinical importance compared to that which is really necessary and cost-effective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive, observational, retrospective and transversal study was conducted of the Minor Surgery Activities of a clinic in the Ciudad Real Health Centre I. RESULTS: A total of 124 surgical specimens were sent for clinical diagnostic comparison, of which, the main clinical diagnoses were: intradermal melanocytic nevi (34.67%), seborrheic keratosis (11.30%), and epidermoid or sebaceous cysts (10.48%). A correlation of 68% was obtained. The protocols of the work centre have been followed to carry out this study in relation to the confidentiality of the data. CONCLUSIONS: These results were analysed and compared with other similar works performed in the field of minor surgery in Primary Care, being able to affirm that there is a good correlation between the initial clinical diagnosis and the histopathology results
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Clinical Competence , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/economics , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Minor Surgical Procedures/economics , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Skin Diseases/economics , Skin Diseases/pathology , Skin Diseases/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Recientes estudios con datos en vida real sobre el uso de anticoagulantes de acción directa (ACOD) en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular, aportan datos del empleo de los diferentes ACOD según las características de los pacientes. El objetivo de este trabajo fue elaborar un documento sobre las sugerencias de uso de los ACOD en función de la evidencia existente en la literatura y de la experiencia clínica. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Un panel multidisciplinar de 8 expertos consensuó y desarrolló el contenido. El documento elaborado fue completado en 10 reuniones regionales con expertos de distintas especialidades. El panel valoró las aportaciones de los expertos regionales y elaboró las sugerencias definitivas. RESULTADOS: El documento final recoge las aportaciones generadas a lo largo de todo el proceso en 3 apartados. Se detallan las conclusiones/sugerencias generales sobre el empleo de los ACOD. Se proponen sugerencias concretas de empleo de cada ACOD en función de características clínicas específicas de los pacientes. Por último, se definen las limitaciones al empleo de los ACOD y se proponen acciones para mejorar el manejo de la anticoagulación. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario superar las barreras clínicas y administrativas que dificultan el óptimo empleo de los ACOD con el fin de mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular que precisan anticoagulación
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent real-world data studies on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, provide data on the use of different DOAC according to patient characteristics. The objective of this work was to elaborate on the suggestions on the use of DOAC based on evidence and clinical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of 8 experts developed the agreed content. The document was completed in 10 regional meetings with experts from different specialties. According to these contributions, the panel prepared the final suggestions. RESULTS: The final document includes the contributions generated throughout the entire process in 3 sections. The general conclusions / suggestions on the use of DOAC are detailed. Specific tips on the use of each DOAC are proposed, based on the specific clinical profiles of the patients. Finally, the limitations on the use of DOAC are defined, and a group of actions are proposed to improve the management of anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to overcome the clinical and administrative barriers that hinder the optimal use of DOAC, in order to improve the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Stroke/prevention & control , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Stroke/etiology , Administration, Oral , SpainABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of correlation between the clinical diagnosis prior to the minor surgery process and its concordance with the results of histopathology report, as well as to determine the surgical data of little clinical importance compared to that which is really necessary and cost-effective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive, observational, retrospective and transversal study was conducted of the Minor Surgery Activities of a clinic in the Ciudad Real Health Centre I. RESULTS: A total of 124 surgical specimens were sent for clinical diagnostic comparison, of which, the main clinical diagnoses were: intradermal melanocytic nevi (34.67%), seborrheic keratosis (11.30%), and epidermoid or sebaceous cysts (10.48%). A correlation of 68% was obtained. The protocols of the work centre have been followed to carry out this study in relation to the confidentiality of the data. CONCLUSIONS: These results were analysed and compared with other similar works performed in the field of minor surgery in Primary Care, being able to affirm that there is a good correlation between the initial clinical diagnosis and the histopathology results.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Minor Surgical Procedures , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/economics , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Minor Surgical Procedures/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Skin Diseases/economics , Skin Diseases/pathology , Skin Diseases/surgery , SpainABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent real-world data studies on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, provide data on the use of different DOAC according to patient characteristics. The objective of this work was to elaborate on the suggestions on the use of DOAC based on evidence and clinical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of 8 experts developed the agreed content. The document was completed in 10 regional meetings with experts from different specialties. According to these contributions, the panel prepared the final suggestions. RESULTS: The final document includes the contributions generated throughout the entire process in 3 sections. The general conclusions / suggestions on the use of DOAC are detailed. Specific tips on the use of each DOAC are proposed, based on the specific clinical profiles of the patients. Finally, the limitations on the use of DOAC are defined, and a group of actions are proposed to improve the management of anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to overcome the clinical and administrative barriers that hinder the optimal use of DOAC, in order to improve the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Stroke/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spain , Stroke/etiologySubject(s)
Benzazepines , Heart Failure , Cardiovascular Agents , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , IvabradineABSTRACT
Objetivos. Las pautas de profilaxis de endocarditis infecciosa recomendadas por las guías de práctica clínica han cambiado recientemente. Se desconoce en nuestro medio si se siguen correctamente las pautas actuales. Nuestro objetivo es describir las actitudes de diferentes profesionales sanitarios ante ellas. Material y métodos. Hemos realizado una encuesta en Córdoba, mediante un cuestionario online con 16 ítems sobre este tema. Se seleccionó aleatoriamente una muestra de 180 profesionales (20 cardiólogos, 80 dentistas, 80 médicos de atención primaria), de la cual contestaron 173. Resultados. La mitad eran varones, teniendo más de 20 años de ejercicio profesional el 52%. El 88,3% consideró que la profilaxis de endocarditis es efectiva (cardiólogos, 77,8%, dentistas, 93,7%, p=0,086). En general, se realiza profilaxis en las situaciones de riesgo claramente establecidas (>90% de los encuestados), pero también en una alta proporción de casos sin riesgo de endocarditis, que oscila entre el 30 y el 60% según los procedimientos (más los dentistas, entre el 36 y 67%, seguidos de los médicos de atención primaria, entre el 28 y 59%). Las pautas antibióticas usadas son muy variadas, siendo los médicos de primaria los que se alejan más de lo recomendado (solo un 25,8% usaban la pauta recomendada, frente a un 54,4% de dentistas y un 72,2% de cardiólogos, p=0,002). Conclusiones. El seguimiento de las recomendaciones sobre profilaxis de endocarditis debe mejorarse en nuestro medio, observándose una tendencia, sobre todo en no cardiólogos, a una «sobreindicación» de la misma (AU)
Objectives. The prophylaxis regimens for infectious endocarditis recommended by the clinical practice guidelines have recently changed. We do not know whether the current regimens are correctly followed in our setting. Our objective was to describe the approaches of various health professionals concerning these guidelines. Material and methods. We conducted a survey in Cordoba, using a 16-item online questionnaire on this topic. We randomly selected a sample of 180 practitioners (20 cardiologists, 80 dentists and 80 primary care physicians), of whom 173 responded. Results. Half of the participants were men; 52% had more than 20 years of professional experience. Some 88.3% of the participants considered that prophylaxis of endocarditis is effective (77.8% of the cardiologists, 93.7% of the dentist; p=.086). In general, prophylaxis is performed in conditions of clearly established risk (>90% of those surveyed). However, prophylaxis is also performed in a high proportion of cases with no risk of endocarditis, varying between 30 and 60% according to the procedure (mostly the dentists, between 36 and 67%, followed by the primary care physicians, between 28 and 59%). The antibiotic regimens employed varied significantly. The primary care physicians were furthest from the recommended regimen (only 25.8% used the recommended regimen vs. 54.4% of dentists and 72.2% of cardiologists; p=.002). Conclusions. Compliance with the recommendations on prophylaxis for endocarditis should be improved in our setting. We observed a tendency, especially among noncardiologists, to 'overindicate' the prophylaxis (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Endocarditis/complications , Endocarditis/epidemiology , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/ethics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/instrumentation , Professional Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Perception , Endocarditis/prevention & control , Heart Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Troponin/administration & dosage , Troponin/analysis , Prognosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Biomarkers/analysisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The prophylaxis regimens for infectious endocarditis recommended by the clinical practice guidelines have recently changed. We do not know whether the current regimens are correctly followed in our setting. Our objective was to describe the approaches of various health professionals concerning these guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a survey in Cordoba, using a 16-item online questionnaire on this topic. We randomly selected a sample of 180 practitioners (20 cardiologists, 80 dentists and 80 primary care physicians), of whom 173 responded. RESULTS: Half of the participants were men; 52% had more than 20 years of professional experience. Some 88.3% of the participants considered that prophylaxis of endocarditis is effective (77.8% of the cardiologists, 93.7% of the dentist; p=.086). In general, prophylaxis is performed in conditions of clearly established risk (>90% of those surveyed). However, prophylaxis is also performed in a high proportion of cases with no risk of endocarditis, varying between 30 and 60% according to the procedure (mostly the dentists, between 36 and 67%, followed by the primary care physicians, between 28 and 59%). The antibiotic regimens employed varied significantly. The primary care physicians were furthest from the recommended regimen (only 25.8% used the recommended regimen vs. 54.4% of dentists and 72.2% of cardiologists; p=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the recommendations on prophylaxis for endocarditis should be improved in our setting. We observed a tendency, especially among noncardiologists, to "overindicate" the prophylaxis.
ABSTRACT
No disponible
