Effectiveness and safety of computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate HDR) brachytherapy in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2022, 38 patients (mean age, 70.1 years; SD ± 9.0 years) with 79 nodular and four diffuse intrahepatic HCC recurrences not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation underwent CT-guided HDR brachytheapy in our department. Tumor response was evaluated by cross-sectional imaging 6 weeks after CT-guided HDR brachytherapy and every 3 months thereafter. Local tumor control (LTC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves (KPCs). Severity of procedure-related complications (PRCs) was classified as recommended by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). RESULTS: Patients were available for MRI evaluation for a mean follow-up of 33.1 months (SD, ±21.6 mm, range 4-86 months; median 29 months). Patients had a mean of 2.3 (SD, ±1.4) intrahepatic tumors. Mean tumor diameter was 43.2 mm (SD, ±19.6 mm). 13 of 38 (34.2%) patients showed local tumor progression after CT-guided HDR brachytherapy. Mean LTC was 29.3 months (SD, ±22.1). Distant tumor progression was seen in 12 patients (31.6%). The mean PFS was 20.8 months (SD, ±22.1). Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 65.1%, 35.1% and 22.5%, respectively. 13 patients died during the follow-up period. Mean OS was 35.4 months (SD, ±21.7). Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 91.5%, 77.4% and 58.0%, respectively. SIR grade 1 complications were recorded in 8.6% (5/38) and SIR grade 2 complications in 3.4% (2/58) of interventions. CONCLUSION: CT-guided HDR brachytherapy is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for managing large or critically located HCC recurrences in the remaining liver after prior hepatic resection.

CT-guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background CT-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (hereafter, HDR brachytherapy) has been shown to be safe and effective for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but studies comparing this therapy with other local-regional therapies are scarce. Purpose To compare patient outcomes of HDR brachytherapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods This multi-institutional retrospective study included consecutive treatment-naive adult patients with unresectable HCC who underwent either HDR brachytherapy or TACE between January 2010 and December 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients matched for clinical and tumor characteristics by propensity score matching. Not all patients who underwent TACE had PFS available; thus, a different set of patients was used for PFS and OS analysis for this treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results After propensity matching, 150 patients who underwent HDR brachytherapy (median age, 71 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 117 males) and 150 patients who underwent TACE (OS analysis median age, 70 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 119 male; PFS analysis median age, 68 years [IQR: 63-76 years]; 119 male) were analyzed. Hazard of death was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 4.04; P < .001). Median estimated PFS was 32.8 months (95% CI: 12.5, 58.7) in the HDR brachytherapy group and 11.6 months (95% CI: 4.9, 22.7) in the TACE group. Hazard of disease progression was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 2.23; P < .001). Conclusion In selected treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC, treatment with CT-guided HDR brachytherapy led to improved OS and PFS compared with TACE. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chapiro in this issue.

Body computed tomography in sepsis: predictors of CT findings and patient outcomes in a retrospective medical ICU cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that requires immediate focus identification and control. However, international sepsis guidelines do not provide information on imaging choice. PURPOSE: To identify predictors of CT findings and patient outcomes in a population of septic patients from a medical ICU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A full-text search in the radiological information system (RIS) retrieved 227 body CT examinations conducted to identify infectious sources in 2018. CT reports were categorized according to identified foci and their diagnostic certainty. Diagnostic accuracy of CT was compared to microbiological results. Clinical and laboratory information was gathered. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: CT revealed more positive infectious foci 52.4% (n = 191/227) than microbiological tests 39.3% (n = 79/201). There were no significant differences between focus-positive CT scans with regard to positive microbiological testing (p = 0.32). Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were slightly but nonsignificantly higher in patients with a focus-positive CT, odds ratio (OR) = 0.999 (95% CI 0.997-1.001) with p = 0.52. Among C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and leukocytes, in focus-positive versus focus-negative CT scans, CRP showed a minor but statistically significant elevation in the group with focus-positive CT scans (OR = 1.004, 95% CI = 1.000-1.007, p = 0.04). No significant association was found for PCT (OR = 1.007, 95% CI = 0.991-1.023; p = 0.40) or leukocytes (OR = 1.003, 95% CI = 0.970-1.038; p = 0.85). In 33.5% (n = 76/227) of cases, the CT findings had at least one therapeutic consequence. In 81.6% (n = 62/76), the CT findings resulted in one consequence, in 14.5% (n = 11/76) in two consequences, and in 3.9% (n = 3/76) in three consequences. There was no significant association between focus-positive CT scans and mortality (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: In this population of septic patients in medical intensive care, microbiological analysis complemented CT findings. Both clinical and laboratory parameters were not predictive of CT findings. While therapeutic consequences of CT findings in this study population underline the role of CT for decision making in septic patients, CT findings do not predict patient outcomes in this retrospective analysis.