Cost Savings Analysis of Early Extubation Following Congenital Heart Surgery.

The clinical benefit of early extubation following congenital heart surgery has been demonstrated; however, its effect on resource utilization has not been rigorously evaluated. We sought to determine the cost savings of implementing an early extubation pathway for children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. We performed a cost savings analysis after implementation of an early extubation strategy among children undergoing congenital heart surgery at British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) over a 2.5-year period. All patients undergoing one of the eight Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) benchmark operations, ASD repair, or bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis were included in the analysis (n = 370). We compared our data to aggregate STS multi-institutional data from a contemporary cohort. We estimated daily costs for ICU care, ward care, medications, imaging, additional procedures, and allied health care using an administrative database. Direct costs, indirect costs, and cost savings were estimated. Simulation methods, Monte Carlo, and bootstrapping were used to calculate the 95% credible intervals for all estimates. The mean cost savings per procedure was $12,976 and the total estimated cost savings over the study period at BCCH was $4.8 million with direct costs accounting for 91% of cost savings. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated a mean cost savings range of $11,934-$14,059 per procedure. Early extubation is associated with substantial cost savings due to reduced hospital resource utilization. Implementation of an early extubation strategy following congenital heart surgery may contribute to improved resource utilization.

The cost of fall related presentations to the ED: a prospective, in-person, patient-tracking analysis of health resource utilization.

UNLABELLED: We prospectively collected data on elderly fallers to estimate the total cost of a fall requiring an Emergency Department presentation. Using data collected on 102 falls, we found the average cost per fall causing an Emergency Department presentation of $11,408. When hospitalization was required, the average cost per fall was $29,363. INTRODUCTION: For elderly persons, falls are a major source of mortality, morbidity, and disability. Previous Canadian cost estimates of seniors' falls were based upon administrative data that has been shown to underestimate the incidence of falls. Our objective was to use a labor-intensive, direct observation patient-tracking method to accurately estimate the total cost of falls among seniors who presented to a major urban Emergency Department (ED) in Canada. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from seniors (>70 years) presenting to the Vancouver General Hospital ED after a fall. We excluded individuals who where cognitively impaired or unable to read/write English. Data were collected on the care provided including physician assessments/consultations, radiology and laboratory tests, ED/hospital time, rehabilitation facility time, and in-hospital procedures. Unit costs of health resources were taken from a fully allocated hospital cost model. RESULTS: Data were collected on 101 fall-related ED presentations. The most common diagnoses were fractures (n = 33) and lacerations (n = 11). The mean cost of a fall causing ED presentation was $11,408 (SD: $19,655). Thirty-eight fallers had injuries requiring hospital admission with an average total cost of $29,363 (SD: $22,661). Hip fractures cost $39,507 (SD: $17,932). Among the 62 individuals not admitted to the hospital, the average cost of their ED visit was $674 (SD: $429). CONCLUSIONS: Among the growing population of Canadian seniors, falls have substantial costs. With the cost of a fall-related hospitalization approaching $30,000, there is an increased need for fall prevention programs.

Development of a population-based microsimulation model of osteoarthritis in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to develop a population-based simulation model of osteoarthritis (OA) in Canada that can be used to quantify the future health and economic burden of OA under a range of scenarios for changes in the OA risk factors and treatments. In this article we describe the overall structure of the model, sources of data, derivation of key input parameters for the epidemiological component of the model, and preliminary validation studies. DESIGN: We used the Population Health Model (POHEM) platform to develop a stochastic continuous-time microsimulation model of physician-diagnosed OA. Incidence rates were calibrated to agree with administrative data for the province of British Columbia, Canada. The effect of obesity on OA incidence and the impact of OA on health-related quality of life (HRQL) were modeled using Canadian national surveys. RESULTS: Incidence rates of OA in the model increase approximately linearly with age in both sexes between the ages of 50 and 80 and plateau in the very old. In those aged 50+, the rates are substantially higher in women. At baseline, the prevalence of OA is 11.5%, 13.6% in women and 9.3% in men. The OA hazard ratios for obesity are 2.0 in women and 1.7 in men. The effect of OA diagnosis on HRQL, as measured by the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), is to reduce it by 0.10 in women and 0.14 in men. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the development of the first population-based microsimulation model of OA. Strengths of this model include the use of large population databases to derive the key parameters and the application of modern microsimulation technology. Limitations of the model reflect the limitations of administrative and survey data and gaps in the epidemiological and HRQL literature.

Obesity and overweight in Canada: an updated cost-of-illness study.

This study is to update the estimates of the economic burden of illness because of overweight and obesity in Canada by incorporating the increase in prevalence of overweight and obesity, findings of new related comorbidities and rise in the national healthcare expenditure. The burden was estimated from a societal perspective using the prevalence-based cost-of-illness methodology. Results from a literature review of the risks of 18 related comorbidities were combined with prevalence of overweight and obesity in Canada to estimate the extent to which each comorbidity is attributable to overweight and obesity. The direct costs were extracted from the National Health Expenditure Database and allocated to each comorbidity using weights principally from the Economic Burden of Illness in Canada. The study showed that the total direct costs attributable to overweight and obesity in Canada were $6.0 billion in 2006, with 66% attributable to obesity. This corresponds to 4.1% of the total health expenditures in Canada in 2006. The inclusion of newly identified comorbidities increased the direct cost estimates of obesity by 25%, while the rise in national healthcare expenditure accounted for a 19% increase. Policies to reduce being overweight and obese could potentially save the Canadian healthcare system millions of dollars.

Economic evaluation of systemic therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: New biologics have dramatically changed therapeutic options for psoriasis, albeit at additional cost. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness and optimal treatment sequence for moderate to severe psoriasis. METHODS: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response rates from 22 randomized controlled trials evaluating biologic (adalimumab, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab) and nonbiologic systemic (methotrexate, ciclosporin) agents were considered. Short-term efficacy was based on relative probabilities of achieving PASI response (50/75/90) in a meta-analysis of trials. Published evidence and assumptions were used to predict long-term efficacy. Treatment benefits were determined by the relationship between PASI response and the EuroQOL 5D health utility measure. Costs included therapy, administration, monitoring and hospitalization. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and treatments ranked relative to supportive care. RESULTS: Infliximab provided the most incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) vs. supportive care (0.18 QALYs; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.13-0.24), followed by adalimumab (0.16 QALYs; 95% CI 0.11-0.22). Methotrexate and ciclosporin were less beneficial (0.13 and 0.08 QALYs, respectively) but were cost saving and considered the first two treatments in the optimal sequence. Comparing biologics, adalimumab was most cost effective (ICER pound30 000 per QALY), followed by etanercept ( pound37 000 per QALY), efalizumab ( pound40 000 per QALY) and infliximab ( pound42 000 per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Methotrexate and ciclosporin are cost effective but require monitoring for toxicities. Of the biologics, adalimumab was most cost effective following conventional systemic treatment failure or inadequate response. Payers and policymakers will have to decide how to utilize their budgets effectively for treating patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Not all "quality-adjusted life years" are equal.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that utility elicitation methods used in the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) yield different results. It is not clear how these differences impact economic evaluations. METHODS: Using a mathematical model incorporating data on efficacy, costs, and utility values, we simulated the experiences of 100,000 hypothetical rheumatoid arthritis patients over 10 years (50,000 exposed to infliximab plus methotrexate [MTX] and 50,000 exposed to MTX alone). QALYs, were derived from the Health Utilities Index 2 and 3 (HUI2 and HUI3), the Short Form 6-D (SF-6D), and the Euroqol 5-D (EQ-5D). Incremental cost-utility ratios were determined using each instrument to calculate QALYs and the results were compared using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: Using the different utility measurement methods, the mean difference in QALYs between the infliximab plus MTX and MTX groups ranged from a high of 1.95 QALYs (95% CI=1.93-1.97) using the HUI3 to 0.89 QALYs (95% CI=0.88-0.91) using the SF-6D. Adopting the commonly cited value of society's willingness to pay for a QALY of $50,000, 91% of the simulations favored the cost utility of infliximab plus MTX when using the HUI3 to calculate QALYs. However, when using the EQ-5D, HUI2, or the SF-6D utility values to calculate QALYS, the proportion of simulations that favored the cost utility of infliximab were 63%, 45%, and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Depending on the method for determining utility values used in the calculation of QALYs, very different incremental cost-utility ratios are generated.

The effect of homelessness on hospitalisation among patients with HIV/AIDS.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of homelessness on the costs and patterns of hospitalisation in patients with HIV/AIDS. A retrospective longitudinal study design, based on medical records data covering 2,768 person-years of observation between 1997 and 2003 on patients with HIV/AIDS, was employed. A contextual measure of neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) was also used to uncover differences among low- and high-SES neighbourhood dwellers. The association of homelessness and neighbourhood SES with total annual hospitalisation costs, length of stay, numbers of hospital and emergency department admissions and the probability of an operating room procedure, controlling for other covariates, was assessed using multivariate regression analysis. Our results suggest that the homeless and low-SES neighbourhood residents had a large proportion of total costs attributable to admissions for acute events related to the progression of disease. Hospitalisations for planned operating room procedures comprised a relatively larger proportion of hospitalisation costs for high-SES neighbourhood residents. One implication of our findings is that improvements in the continuity of care and cost savings on inpatient care may be realised through further development of social assistance programs aimed at reaching the homeless and residents of low-SES neighbourhoods.

The impact of low family income on self-reported health outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis within a publicly funded health-care environment.

OBJECTIVE: Self-rated health (SRH) is an independent, strong predictor of morbidity and mortality. Socio-economic status (SES) is strongly associated with SRH. This study investigated the relationship between SES and SRH outcomes in a sample of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Canada. METHODS: Both generic preference-based [Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and Short Form 6D (SF-6D)] and non-preference-based [disease-specific (Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life, RAQoL) and a functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire, HAQ)] SRH questionnaires were administered to 313 RA patients. Both proximate (education and annual household income) and contextual (neighbourhood income, education and unemployment) measures of SES were captured. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was used to adjust for RA severity while assessing the relationship between SRH and SES measures. Two-stage least-squares (TSLS) regression was used to determine if there was an inter-relationship between SES and SRH measures. RESULTS: The sample was well distributed across RA severity and SES measures. Contextual and proximate measures of SES were poorly correlated. Lower levels of proximate SES measures (but not contextual) were associated with poorer SRH outcomes. The OLS regressions showed significant associations between the HUI3 and the SF-6D overall scores and the HAQ for self-reported income. The RAQoL did not differ significantly across SES. TSLS regression confirmed the finding that self-reported income was similarly associated with the SRH measures. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a country with universal access to health-care, the impact of a chronic disease such as RA on SRH is associated with self-reported income. The finding that preference-based measures vary with income independently of RA severity could bias economic evaluation.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of thiopurine methyltransferase polymorphism screening by polymerase chain reaction for treatment with azathioprine in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of genotype-based dosing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based polymorphism screening in terms of cost-effectiveness for treatment with azathioprine in Korea. METHODS: Decision analysis was employed to compare a genotype-based dosing strategy with the conventional weight-based dosing strategy using a hypothetical cohort composed of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. The time horizon was set up as 1 yr. Direct medical costs were used. Data used were obtained from previous reports, except for PCR and admission costs, which were from real cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were measured as a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effective ratio. RESULTS: In the base case model, total expected cost and the probability of not dropping out owing to serious adverse events of the conventional weight-based dosing and the genotype-based dosing strategy were 1339 x 10(3) Korean won (1,117 US dollars) and 1109 x 10(3) Korean won (926 US dollars), and 97.06 and 99.90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that a genotype-based dosing strategy through PCR-based thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphism screening is less costly and more effective than the conventional weight-based dosing strategy in Korea, as it was associated with a marked reduction in the number of serious adverse events.

Hospital utilization and costs in a cohort of injection drug users.

BACKGROUND: Many injection drug users (IDUs) seek care at emergency departments and some require hospital admission because of late presentation in the course of their illness. We determined the predictors of frequent emergency department visits and hospital admissions among community-based IDUs and estimated the incremental hospital utilization costs incurred by IDUs with early HIV infection relative to costs incurred by HIV-negative IDUs. METHODS: The Vancouver Injection Drug User Study (VIDUS) is a prospective cohort study involving IDUs that began in 1996. Our analyses were restricted to the 598 participants who gave informed consent for our study. We used the participants' responses to the baseline VIDUS questionnaire and, from medical records at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, we collected detailed information about the frequency of emergency department visits, hospital admissions and the primary diagnosis for all visits or hospital stays between May 1, 1996, and Aug. 31, 1999. The incremental difference in hospital utilization costs by HIV status was estimated, based on 105 admissions in a subgroup of 64 participants. RESULTS: A total of 440 (73.6%) of the 598 IDUs made 2763 visits to the emergency department at St. Paul's Hospital during the study period. Of these 440, 265 (160.2%) made frequent visits (3 or more). The following factors were associated with frequent use: HIV-positive status (seroprevalent: adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.6; seroconverted during study period: adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6-5.7); more than 4 injections daily (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1); cocaine use more frequent than use of other drugs (adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.6); and unstable housing (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). During the study period 210 of the participants were admitted to hospital 495 times; 118 (56.2%) of them were admitted frequently (2 or more admissions). The 2 most common reasons for admission were pneumonia (132 admissions among 79 patients) and soft-tissue infections (cellulitis and skin abscess) (90 admissions among 59 patients). The following factors were independently associated with frequent hospital admissions: HIV-positive status (seroprevalent: adjusted OR 5.4, 95% CI 3.4-8.6; seroconverted during study period: adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-6.0); and female sex (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). The incremental hospital utilization costs incurred by HIV-positive IDUs relative to the costs incurred by HIV-negative IDUs were $1752 per year. INTERPRETATION: Hospital utilization was significantly higher among community-based IDUs with early HIV disease than among those who were HIV negative. Much of the hospital use was related to complications of injection drug use and may be reduced with the establishment of programs that integrate harm reduction strategies with primary care and addiction treatment.

The effectiveness and toxicity of cyclosporin A in rheumatoid arthritis: longitudinal analysis of a population-based registry.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with response or toxicity to cyclosporin A (CSA) in a population-based inception cohort with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Prospectively collected longitudinal measures including tender joint count (JC), duration of morning stiffness (MS), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and serum creatinine (SCr) were modeled using generalized estimating equations. Survival methods were used to estimate CSA continuation time and its determinants. RESULTS: Of 133 patients (75% female, median RA duration 13 years), 37 discontinued CSA because of ineffectiveness (19) or because of toxicity (18) including increased SCr in 10, hypertension in 4, infections in 3, and gingival hyperplasia in 1. Patients remained on CSA a median of 75 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 38-112). Those receiving concomitant methotrexate (MTX) were more than 4 times as likely to continue on CSA therapy (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.94). A lower final JC was predicted by a longer CSA treatment duration (relative risk [RR] 0.99 per month, 95% CI 0.98-0.99) and concomitant MTX therapy (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99); decreased MS was predicted only by longer CSA treatment duration (reduction of 2.0 minutes per month, 95% CI 1.1-3.0). Each previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) exposure predicted a rise in SCr (35 micromole/liter, 95% CI 22-48), SBP (7.2 mm Hg, 95% CI 2.7-11.7), and DBP (3.8 mm Hg, 95% CI 3.0-6.4). CONCLUSIONS: Combination CSA/MTX prolongs therapy and reduces JC. Long-term CSA treatment was fairly well tolerated. Previous DMARD use appears to be a determinant for the development of toxicity.

A dog's breakfast: prescription drug coverage varies widely across Canada.

BACKGROUND: Each province in Canada independently assesses drugs for their reimbursement eligibility. Publicly funded access to specific drugs is therefore dependent on province of residence. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the variability of access and its determinants for publicly available prescription drugs across Canada, and discuss the feasibility of implementing a national plan. METHODS: For a sample of 58 drugs receiving Health Protection Branch approval in Canada between 01/01/1996 and 12/31/1997, all provinces were surveyed about their formulary inclusion/exclusion decision. Kappa values were estimated to measure concordance between provincial coverage decisions. Logistic analysis using Generalized Estimating Equations was used to assess the impact of key features of provincial plans on the decision. RESULTS: Among the 58 drugs, 5 (9%) were included in all 10 and 14 (24%) by at least 8 provincial formularies. None were excluded by all the provinces. Concordance rates among provinces were low (overall kappa-like statistic = 0.20 and range of pairwise kappa = -0.11 to 0.64). Logistic regression showed that therapeutic category, price ratio to comparator, the integration of public with private coverage, and the existence of ability-to-pay criteria were significant determinants of the inclusion decision. CONCLUSIONS: Findings show that public access to the same prescription medications differs widely across provinces. If Canada were to adopt a "National" plan without disrupting current individual prescriptions, all currently funded drugs in each province would have to be "grandfathered" and included in the new National formulary. Such an all-inclusive list would also make such a plan unaffordable.

Introduction of a practice guideline for penicillin skin testing improves the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy.

We hypothesized that the introduction of a practice guideline for penicillin skin testing would increase the appropriateness of skin testing and reduce antibiotic costs for patients with a history of penicillin allergy who have infections caused by penicillin-susceptible pathogens. We measured the appropriateness of skin testing and daily antibiotic costs before and after the introduction of a guideline for penicillin skin testing. For patients who had negative results of skin testing and were subsequently treated with a penicillin instead of an alternative antibiotic, we calculated the difference between the actual costs and the projected costs of continuing alternative antibiotics without skin testing. After the guideline was introduced, appropriateness of skin testing increased from 17% to 64%, but daily antibiotic costs did not change. For patients who had negative results of skin testing and who were subsequently treated with a penicillin, there was no difference between actual costs and the projected costs if they had not been skin tested. We conclude that introduction of a guideline for penicillin skin testing increases the percentage of eligible patients who have a skin test, and it does so without increasing costs.

Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation : a Canadian multicenter randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sedation with propofol would lead to shorter times to tracheal extubation and ICU length of stay than sedation with midazolam. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, open label. SETTING: Four academic tertiary-care ICUs in Canada. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients requiring continuous sedation while receiving mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Random allocation by predicted requirement for mechanical ventilation (short sedation stratum, < 24 h; medium sedation stratum, > or = 24 and < 72 h; and long sedation stratum, > or = 72 h) to sedation regimens utilizing propofol or midazolam. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to receive propofol in the short sedation stratum (propofol, 21 patients; midazolam, 26 patients) and the long sedation stratum (propofol, 4 patients; midazolam, 10 patients) were extubated earlier (short sedation stratum: propofol, 5.6 h; midazolam, 11.9 h; long sedation stratum: propofol, 8.4 h; midazolam, 46.8 h; p < 0.05). Pooled results showed that patients treated with propofol (n = 46) were extubated earlier than those treated with midazolam (n = 53) (6.7 vs 24.7 h, respectively; p < 0.05) following discontinuation of the sedation but were not discharged from ICU earlier (94.0 vs 63.7 h, respectively; p = 0.26). Propofol-treated patients spent a larger percentage of time at the target Ramsay sedation level than midazolam-treated patients (60.2% vs 44.0%, respectively; p < 0.05). Using a treatment-received analysis, propofol sedation either did not differ from midazolam sedation in time to tracheal extubation or ICU discharge (sedation duration, < 24 h) or was associated with earlier tracheal extubation but longer time to ICU discharge (sedation duration, > or = 24 h, < 72 h, or > or = 72 h). CONCLUSIONS: The use of propofol sedation allowed for more rapid tracheal extubation than when midazolam sedation was employed. This did not result in earlier ICU discharge.

Double trouble: impact of inappropriate use of asthma medication on the use of health care resources.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy about the regular use of short-acting beta-agonists for the treatment of asthma. Although case-control studies have suggested that excessive use of these drugs may worsen asthma control and increase the risk of fatal or near-fatal asthma, the controversy remains unresolved because of the confounding that exists among disease control, disease severity and the use of short-acting beta-agonists. Whatever the cause-and-effect relation between the use of short-acting beta-agonists and disease severity, we hypothesized that their excessive use, in conjunction with underuse of inhaled corticosteroids, would be a marker for poorly controlled asthma and excessive use of health care resources. METHODS: To characterize the pattern of health services utilization among asthmatic patients taking various doses of inhaled beta-agonists and corticosteroids in British Columbia, we linked the relevant health administrative databases. All patients between 5 and 50 years of age for whom a prescription for a short-acting beta-agonist was filled in 1995 and whose prescription data were captured through the provincial drug plan were included in a retrospective analysis of prescriptions for asthma drugs, physician prescribing patterns and health services utilization. Patients' use of asthma medication was classified as appropriate (low doses of short-acting beta-agonist and high doses of inhaled corticosteroid) or inappropriate (high doses of short-acting beta-agonist and low doses of inhaled corticosteroid), and the 2 resulting groups were compared, by means of logistic, Poisson and gamma regression, for differences in prescribing patterns, physician visits and use of hospital resources. RESULTS: A total of 23,986 patients were identified as having filled a prescription for a short-acting beta-agonist (for inhalation) in 1995. Of these, 3069 (12.8%) filled prescriptions for 9 or more canisters of beta-agonist, and of this group of high-dose beta-agonist users, 763 (24.9%) used no more than 100 micrograms/day of inhaled beclomethasone. On average, those with inappropriate use of beta-agonists visited significantly more physicians for their prescriptions (1.8 v. 1.4), and each of these physicians on average wrote significantly more prescriptions for asthma medications per patient than the physicians who prescribed to appropriate users (5.2 v. 2.5 prescriptions). Patients with inappropriate use were more likely to be admitted to hospital (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.26), were admitted to hospital more frequently (adjusted RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.41-2.32) and were more likely to require emergency admission (adjusted RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.35-2.77). INTERPRETATION: Despite the widespread distribution of guidelines for asthma pharmacotherapy, inappropriate use of asthma medications persists (specifically excessive use of inhaled short-acting beta-agonists combined with underuse of inhaled corticosteroids). Not only are patients who use medication inappropriately at higher risk for fatal or near-fatal asthma attacks, but, as shown in this study, they use significantly more health care resources than patients with appropriate medication use.

Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.

BACKGROUND: It is mandatory for drug manufacturers requesting formulary inclusion under the British Columbia (BC) provincial drug plan to submit a pharmacoeconomic analysis according to published guidelines. These submissions are reviewed by the Pharmacoeconomic Initiative (PI) of BC. OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance of submitted studies with specific criteria outlined in the guidelines, to assess the methodological quality of individual submissions, and to demonstrate the importance of submitting guidelines-compliant pharmacoeconomic analyses. DATA AND METHODS: All submissions between January 1996 and April 1999 assessed by the PI of BC were included. Submissions were reviewed according to a checklist to establish compliance with respect to choice of comparator drug, study perspective, sensitivity analysis, analytical horizon and discounting. Submissions were examined for association between analytical technique and author, and between source of submission and compliance. Association between compliance and recommendation for approval was also examined. RESULTS: 95 applications were reviewed. Seven submitted no analyses. There were 25 cost-comparison/consequence, 14 cost-effectiveness, 11 cost-minimisation, 9 cost-utility/benefit and 29 budget-impact analyses. 65 of these 88 submissions failed to comply with guidelines. Of these, 45% used an inappropriate comparator drug, 61% lacked a sensitivity analysis, 73% used a third-party payer and excluded a societal perspective, 66% did not provide a long term evaluation and 25% did not specify any time horizon. 80% of noncompliant studies were cost-comparison/consequence or budget-impact analyses (p < 0.001, Fisher's Exact). Of 25 cost-comparison/consequence and 29 budget-impact analyses, 19 (76%) and 24 (83%), respectively, were industry-conducted, whereas cost-effectiveness (11 of 14) and cost-utility/benefit (6 of 9) analyses were mostly subcontracted to private consultants or academics (p < 0.001, Fisher's Exact). 74% of all submissions (compliant and noncompliant) were not recommended by the PI for listing as a provincial drug plan benefit, 16% received approval for restricted benefit and 9% were recommended as full benefit. 80% of the noncompliant submissions were not recommended (p = 0.06, Fisher's Exact test). Moreover, a strong association between type of analysis and type of recommendation was found (p = 0.03, Fisher's Exact test). Cost-comparison/consequence and budget-impact analyses were less likely to be recommended. IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: Our findings show poor compliance with guidelines, especially among industry-conducted studies. Possible explanations are lack of expertise in pharmacoeconomics and/or scepticism regarding the importance of guidelines and submission quality in decision making. As corroborated by the strong associations between type of recommendation and compliance, and between type of recommendation and type of analysis, these 2 characteristics have a significant impact on decision making.

The costs of cardiorespiratory disease episodes in a study of emergency department use.

OBJECTIVE: The average per person direct cost of illness of cardiorespiratory disease episodes was estimated based on a prospective study of emergency department visits. METHODS: Economic modelling of health care costs using prospectively collected resource utilization data (9/1/94 to 8/31/95) from hospital emergency department visitors assigned a diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory infections or cardiac conditions. RESULTS: The total direct costs (1997 CDN$) [95% C.I.] per patient were $1,043.55 [$922.65, $1,164.47] for asthma, $1,690.11 [$1,276.92, $2,103.30] for COPD, $676.50 [$574.46, $778.54] for respiratory infections, and $3,318.74 [$2,937.72, $3,699.76] for cardiac conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that on average, patients diagnosed with a cardiac condition had the highest total direct cost. Hospitalization cost was the largest component of costs for all diagnoses except asthma, for which medications were the single largest component of direct costs.

Beyond administrative data: characterizing cardiorespiratory disease episodes among patients visiting the emergency department.

We attempted to address deficiencies in administrative health service data during a study of cardiorespiratory emergency department visits. From 1994-1996, we obtained data on 9,264 visits and conducted 1,772 follow-up interviews. The median interval between symptoms and visit ranged from 0.8 days (95% CI 0-1.7) for cardiac conditions to 4.0 days for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (95% CI 2.7-5.3) and respiratory infections (95% CI 3.5-4.5). Infection was the most common trigger of respiratory visits. Although most had improved at follow-up, symptoms persisted following the visit for a mean of 4.5 days (95% CI 3.8-5.4) for cardiac conditions to 8.4 days (95% CI 7.2-9.5) for COPD. Among adults aged < 70, the mean number of reduced activity days per episode ranged from 4.7 (95% CI 3.9-5.4) for asthma to 6.6 (95% CI 5.9-7.4) for respiratory infections. Our data assist in interpreting epidemiological studies based on administrative data, and illustrate the broad impacts of cardiorespiratory disease episodes.

Pharmaceutical policies in Canada: another example of federal-provincial discord.

Pharmaceutical policy in Canada is set at both the federal and provincial levels of government. The federal government is responsible for intellectual property rights of manufacturers (patents) and the initial approval and labelling of prescription drugs and for ensuring overall market competitiveness. The provincial government has responsibility and jurisdiction over the funding of all health care services, including pharmaceuticals. Various interactions between the pharmaceutical industry, the federal and provincial governments and consumers have shaped the current landscape for prescription drugs in Canada. One key failing of the system is that the federal government is almost completely insulated from the impact of its policies because, although it regulates drug prices, it does not buy any drugs. In contrast, provincial governments have no jurisdiction over market competitiveness or pricing, yet end up paying for most of the drug expenditures incurred.