Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(2): e14793, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480148

ABSTRACT

The use of combined systemic retinoids and intralesional immunotherapy in the management of warts is still debatable without straightforward evidence. Through network meta-analysis, the current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of systemic retinoids alone or combined with other remedies in the treatment of warts. We searched six literature databases for clinical trials that compared systemic retinoids to local treatments or placebo in wart management. Outcomes were calculated as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence-interval. We used the R software to perform conventional and network meta-analyses (with a frequentist approach). Network meta-analysis of eight trials showed that oral acitretin plus intralesional Candida Ag (OR = 367.71), INF-α plus oral isotretinoin (OR = 223.77), oral acitretin (OR = 117), Candida Ag (OR = 91.93), oral isotretinoin (OR = 62.26) and topical isotretinoin (OR = 17.69) had higher complete recovery rates than placebo. Regarding the P-score, oral acitretin plus intralesional Candida Ag had the highest efficacy in achieving complete response (P-score = 0.88), followed by INF-α plus oral isotretinoin (P-score = 0.79), then oral acitretin (P-score = 0.60). Variable baseline characteristics and lack of data on some outcomes. The current study shows the efficacy for systemic retinoids in the treatment of warts, especially reluctant or recurrent types. Moreover, combinations of systemic retinoids with intralesional immunotherapy yield higher rates of complete clearance with lower recurrence.


Subject(s)
Warts , Acitretin/adverse effects , Humans , Immunotherapy , Isotretinoin/adverse effects , Network Meta-Analysis , Warts/drug therapy
2.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e13861, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32558137

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune blistering diseases can eventually cause life-threatening complications if left untreated. Although there is no cure for these bullous diseases; their therapy is based on suppressing the immune system to cease the de novo formation of the generated antibodies. The current study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of using standing alone alternative therapies beyond systemic steroids for management of autoimmune bullous diseases. We searched six literature databases for both randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of drugs other than systemic steroids in autoimmune bullous diseases. Outcomes were calculated as odds ratios with 95% confidence-interval. We used the R software to perform conventional and network meta-analyses with a frequentist approach. The network ranking order for 629 bullous pemphigoid patients, from the best to the worst was, clobetasol propionate cream (40 mg; (P-score = .87), clobetasol propionate cream (10-30 mg; P-score = .77), nicotinamide plus tetracycline (P-score = .56), steroids (P-score = .29) and doxycycline (P-score = .01). Limitations of this study are the small sample of the included studies except for blister trial and lack of randomization in most trials. To conclude, Combined doxycycline and nicotinamides are safer and more effective option for extensive bullous pemphigoid patients than the usual use of systemic steroids. For limited disease, topical corticosteroid (40 mg/d) use provides a safer and better response modality than the other proposed treatments.


Subject(s)
Pemphigoid, Bullous , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Pemphigoid, Bullous/diagnosis , Pemphigoid, Bullous/drug therapy , Steroids , Tetracycline
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 80(4): 922-930.e4, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30003983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Without clear evidence, selecting among the existing immunotherapeutic options for warts remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: Through network meta-analyses, we aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different intralesional immunotherapeutic modalities. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials comparing intralesional immunotherapeutic modalities to cryotherapy, placebo, or imiquimod. All outcomes were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Both conventional and network meta-analyses (with a frequentist approach) were conducted on R software. The P-score was used to rank different treatments. RESULTS: Network meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials (1676 patients) showed that PPD (purified protein derivative vaccine, OR 39.56), MMR (measles, mumps, rubella vaccine, OR 17.46) and interferon ß (OR 15.55) had the highest efficacy in terms of complete recovery at the primary site compared with placebo. Regarding complete recovery at the distant site, autoinoculation (OR 79.95), PPD (OR 42.95), and MMR (OR 15.39) were all statistically superior to placebo. According to the P-score, MMR was more effective than other modalities in reducing the recurrence rate at the same site. LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size in some comparisons and variability in baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION: PPD and MMR were the most effective in achieving complete primary and distant recovery (along with autoinoculation for distant recovery) and reducing the recurrence rate at the same site compared with cryotherapy and other immunotherapeutic modalities.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Warts/therapy , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cryotherapy/adverse effects , Humans , Imiquimod/adverse effects , Imiquimod/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Injections, Intralesional , Interferon-beta/adverse effects , Interferon-beta/therapeutic use , Network Meta-Analysis , Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccines/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...