Waste analysis and energy use estimation during MR-HIFU treatment: first steps towards calculating total environmental impact.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the environmental impact of the non-invasive Magnetic Resonance image-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment of uterine fibroids, we aimed to perform a full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, as a full LCA was not feasible at this time, we evaluated the CO2 (carbon dioxide) emission from the MRI scanner, MR-HIFU device, and the medication used, and analyzed solid waste produced during treatment. METHODS: Our functional unit was one uterine fibroid MR-HIFU treatment. The moment the patient entered the day care-unit until she left, defined our boundaries of investigation. We retrospectively collected data from 25 treatments to assess the CO2 emission based on the energy used by the MRI scanner and MR-HIFU device and the amount and type of medication administered. Solid waste was prospectively collected from five treatments. RESULTS: During an MR-HIFU treatment, the MRI scanner and MR-HIFU device produced 33.2 ± 8.7 kg of CO2 emission and medication administered 0.13 ± 0.04 kg. A uterine fibroid MR-HIFU treatment produced 1.2 kg (range 1.1-1.4) of solid waste. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental impact should ideally be analyzed for all (new) medical treatments. By assessing part of the CO2 emission and solid waste produced, we have taken the first steps towards analyzing the total environmental impact of the MR-HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids. These data can contribute to future studies comparing the results of MR-HIFU LCAs with LCAs of other uterine fibroid therapies. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In addition to (cost-) effectiveness, the environmental impact of new treatments should be assessed. We took the first steps towards analyzing the total environmental impact of uterine fibroid MR-HIFU. KEY POINTS: • Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) should be performed for all (new) medical treatments. • We took the first steps towards analyzing the environmental impact of uterine fibroid MR-HIFU. • Energy used by the MRI scanner and MR-HIFU device corresponded to 33.2 ± 8.7 kg of CO2 emission.

Increased MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) sonication efficiency of uterine fibroids after carbetocin administration.

Purpose: We investigated whether administration of the long-acting uterus stimulant carbetocin increased intra-subject sonication efficiency during Magnetic Resonance image guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment of uterine fibroids. Method: In this prospective cohort study, thirty women with symptomatic uterine fibroids undergoing MR-HIFU treatment were included between January 2018 and January 2019. Treatment started with three sonications on one side of the uterine fibroid. Subsequently, one ampoule of 1 mL carbetocin (100 µg/mL) was administered intravenously and treatment continued with three sonications on the other side of the uterine fibroid. We compared the intra-subject sonication efficiency, in terms of Energy Efficiency Factor (EEF), thermal dose volume and sonication time to ablate one cm3 of fibroid tissue, before and after carbetocin administration. Adverse events that occurred within 30 min after carbetocin administration were recorded. Results: Sonication efficiency improved after carbetocin administration as indicated by a significant decrease in EEF and sonication time (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001 respectively), and a significant increase in thermal dose volume reached (p = <0.001). Five women (16.7%) experienced temporary tachycardia, one women in combination with headache, within 30 min after carbetocin administration. Conclusion: Administration of the long-acting uterus stimulant carbetocin improved the MR-HIFU treatment intra-subject sonication efficiency in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE).

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance image-guided high-intensity-focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is a rather new, noninvasive option for the treatment of uterine fibroids. It is safe, effective, and has a very short recovery time. However, a lack of prospectively collected data on long-term (cost-)effectiveness of the MR-HIFU treatment compared with standard uterine fibroid care prevents the MR-HIFU treatment from being reimbursed for this indication. Therefore, at this point, when conservative treatment for uterine fibroid symptoms has failed or is not accepted by patients, standard care includes the more invasive treatments hysterectomy, myomectomy, and uterine artery embolization (UAE). Primary outcomes of currently available data on MR-HIFU treatment often consist of technical outcomes, instead of patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life (QoL), and do not include the use of the latest equipment or most up-to-date treatment strategies. Moreover, data on cost-effectiveness are rare and seldom include data on a societal level such as productivity loss or use of painkillers. Because of the lack of reimbursement, broad clinical implementation has not taken place, nor is the proper role of MR-HIFU in uterine fibroid care sufficiently clear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study is to determine the long-term (cost-)effectiveness of MR-HIFU compared with standard (minimally) invasive fibroid treatments. METHODS: The MYCHOICE study is a national, multicenter, open randomized controlled trial with randomization in a 2:1 ratio to MR-HIFU or standard care including hysterectomy, myomectomy, and UAE. The sample size is 240 patients in total. Women are included when they are 18 years or older, in premenopausal stage, diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids, conservative treatment has failed or is not accepted, and eligible for MR-HIFU. Primary outcomes of the study are QoL 24 months after treatment and costs of treatment including direct health care costs, loss of productivity, and patient costs. RESULTS: Inclusion for the MYCHOICE study started in November 2020 and enrollment will continue until 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed in 2026. CONCLUSIONS: By collecting data on the long-term (cost-)effectiveness of the MR-HIFU treatment in comparison to current standard fibroid care, we provide currently unavailable evidence about the proper place of MR-HIFU in the fibroid treatment spectrum. This will also facilitate reimbursement and inclusion of MR-HIFU in (inter)national uterine fibroid care guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL8863; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8863. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29467.

Systematic review of reproductive outcomes after High Intensity Focused Ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids.

PURPOSE: Myomectomy is currently the gold standard for the treatment of uterine fibroids in women who desire pregnancy. However, this surgical fibroid removal has a long convalescence. Promising alternatives may be non-invasive High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) under either MRI (MR-HIFU) or ultrasound guidance (USgHIFU). In this systematic review, an overview is provided of reproductive outcomes after these two relatively new ablation techniques. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting reproductive outcomes after HIFU treatment of fibroids. Only peer reviewed, full papers were included. Outcomes included pregnancy-, live-birth- miscarriage and caesarian section rate, time to conceive, reported complications, and possible prognostic factors. RESULTS: In total 21 studies were included. Fourteen studies reported 124 pregnancies after MR-HIFU. Two placenta previas and no uterus ruptures were reported. Pregnancy rates were only retrospectively collected and ranged between 7% and 36%. Miscarriage rate in the oldest and largest prospective registry was 39%. After USgHIFU 366 pregnancies were reported with one fetal intrauterine death, six placenta previas and no uterus ruptures. The only prospective study reported a pregnancy rate of 47% and a miscarriage rate of 11%. Possible prognostic factors like age were not available in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the heterogeneous data currently available, reproductive outcomes after HIFU appear non-inferior to outcomes after the current standard of care. However, a (randomized) controlled trial comparing reproductive outcomes after HIFU and standard care is necessary to provide sufficient evidence on the preferred fibroid treatment for women with a pregnancy wish.

Use of multiparametric MRI to characterize uterine fibroid tissue types.

BACKGROUND: Although the biological characteristics of uterine fibroids (UF) have implications for therapy choice and effectiveness, there is limited MRI data about these characteristics. Currently, the Funaki classification and Scaled Signal Intensity (SSI) are used to predict treatment outcome but both screening-tools appear to be suboptimal. Therefore, multiparametric and quantitative MRI was studied to evaluate various biological characteristics of UF. METHODS: 87 patients with UF underwent an MRI-examination. Differences between UF tissues and myometrium were investigated using T2-mapping, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps with different b-value combinations, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging. Additionally, the Funaki classification and SSI were calculated. RESULTS: Significant differences between myometrium and UF tissue in T2-mapping (p = 0.001), long-TE ADC low b-values (p = 0.002), ADC all b-values (p < 0.001) and high b-values (p < 0.001) were found. Significant differences between Funaki type 3 versus type 1 and 2 were observed in SSI (p < 0.001) and T2-values (p < 0.001). Significant correlations were found between SSI and T2-mapping (p < 0.001; ρs = 0.82), ADC all b-values (p = 0.004; ρs = 0.31), ADC high b-values (p < 0.001; ρs = 0.44) and long-TE ADC low b-values (p = 0.004; ρs = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative MR-data allowed us to distinguish UF tissue from myometrium and to discriminate different UF tissue types and may, therefore, be a useful tool to predict treatment outcome/determine optimal treatment modality.

Magnetic resonance-high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) therapy of symptomatic uterine fibroids with unrestrictive treatment protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Reevaluation of the effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance-High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) therapy for uterine fibroids by excluding studies with restrictive treatment protocols that are no longer used. METHODS: The National Guideline Clearinghouse, Cochrane Library, TRIP, MEDLINE, EMBASE and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) databases were searched from inception until the 22nd of June 2018. Keywords included "MR-HIFU", "MRgFUS", and "Leiomyoma". Only studies about MR-HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids with at least three months of clinical follow-up were evaluated for inclusion. Treatments with ultrasound-guided HIFU devices or protocols not aiming for complete ablation were eliminated. The primary outcome was the improvement in fibroid-related symptoms. Technical outcomes included screening and treatment failures, treatment time, application of bowel-interference mitigation strategies and the Non-Perfused Volume (NPV) percentage. Other secondary outcomes were the quality of life, fibroid shrinkage, safety, re-interventions, reproductive outcomes, and costs. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird). RESULTS: A total of 18 articles (1323 treated patients) met the inclusion criteria. All selected studies were case series except for one cross-over trial. Overall, the quality of the evidence was poor to moderate. The mean NPV% directly post-treatment was 68.1%. The use of bowel-interference mitigation strategies may lead to increased NPV%. The mean symptom reduction at 12-months was 59.9% and fibroid shrinkage was 37.7%. The number of adverse events was low (8.7%), stratification showed a difference between HIFU systems. The re-intervention percentage at 3-33.6 months follow-up ranged from 0 to 21%. Longer follow-up was associated with a higher risk at re-interventions. Reproductive outcomes and costs couldn't be analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment guidelines aiming for complete ablation enhanced the effectiveness of MR-HIFU therapy. However, controlled trials should define the role of MR-HIFU in the management of uterine fibroids.