Revisión de revisiones sistemáticas de factores pronóstico para infección protésica / Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection

Introducción: La infección protésica es una de las complicaciones más graves en cirugía ortopédica, por lo que es importante detectar factores relacionados con su aparición. Las revisiones sistemáticas (RS) pronósticas detectan y evalúan factores relacionados con enfermedades, lo que permite una mejor predicción de los riesgos y la implementación de medidas preventivas. Aunque estas RS pronósticas son cada vez más frecuentes, su campo metodológico presenta algunas lagunas de conocimiento. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión de RS de factores pronósticos para infección protésica y describir la evidencia sintetizada. Secundariamente, evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad metodológica. Material y métodos: Búsqueda bibliográfica en 4bases de datos (en mayo de 2021) para identificar RS pronósticas que evaluaran factores pronósticos para infección protésica. Evaluamos el riesgo de sesgo mediante ROBIS y la calidad metodológica con la herramienta modificada AMSTAR-2. Se realizó un estudio de solapamiento entre RS. Resultados: Incluimos 23 RS que valoraban 15 factores asociados con la infección protésica; de ellos, 13 mostraron asociación significativa. Los más estudiados fueron obesidad, corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El solapamiento entre RS fue elevado para obesidad y muy alto para corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El riesgo de sesgo fue considerado bajo en 8 RS (34,7%), pero la herramienta de evaluación metodológica demostró una baja calidad en general. Conclusiones: La identificación de factores procedimentales modificables ofrecen mejores resultados a los pacientes. Sin embargo, muchas RS son redundantes. La evidencia en factores pronósticos en cirugía ortopédica es débil debido al alto riesgo de sesgo y a la calidad metodológica limitada.(AU)

Background: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SR) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SR are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. Purpose: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. Material and methods: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. Results: Twenty-three SR were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. Conclusions: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SR are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.(AU)

[Translated article] Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection / Revisión de revisiones sistemáticas de factores pronóstico para infección protésica

Introducción: La infección protésica es una de las complicaciones más graves en cirugía ortopédica, por lo que es importante detectar factores relacionados con su aparición. Las revisiones sistemáticas (RS) pronósticas detectan y evalúan factores relacionados con enfermedades, lo que permite una mejor predicción de los riesgos y la implementación de medidas preventivas. Aunque estas RS pronósticas son cada vez más frecuentes, su campo metodológico presenta algunas lagunas de conocimiento. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión de RS de factores pronósticos para infección protésica y describir la evidencia sintetizada. Secundariamente, evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad metodológica. Material y métodos: Búsqueda bibliográfica en 4bases de datos (en mayo de 2021) para identificar RS pronósticas que evaluaran factores pronósticos para infección protésica. Evaluamos el riesgo de sesgo mediante ROBIS y la calidad metodológica con la herramienta modificada AMSTAR-2. Se realizó un estudio de solapamiento entre RS. Resultados: Incluimos 23 RS que valoraban 15 factores asociados con la infección protésica; de ellos, 13 mostraron asociación significativa. Los más estudiados fueron obesidad, corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El solapamiento entre RS fue elevado para obesidad y muy alto para corticoides intraarticulares, tabaquismo y glucemia elevada. El riesgo de sesgo fue considerado bajo en 8 RS (34,7%), pero la herramienta de evaluación metodológica demostró una baja calidad en general. Conclusiones: La identificación de factores procedimentales modificables ofrecen mejores resultados a los pacientes. Sin embargo, muchas RS son redundantes. La evidencia en factores pronósticos en cirugía ortopédica es débil debido al alto riesgo de sesgo y a la calidad metodológica limitada.(AU)

Background: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SR) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SR are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. Purpose: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. Material and methods: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. Results: Twenty-three SR were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. Conclusions: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SR are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.(AU)

[Translated article] Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SRs) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SRs are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. PURPOSE: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4 databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. RESULTS: Twenty-three SRs were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8 SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SRs are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.

Overview of systematic reviews of risk factors for prosthetic joint infection. / Revisión de revisiones sistemáticas de factores pronóstico para infección protésica.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection is one of the most serious complications in orthopedics. Prognostic systematic reviews (SR) detecting and assessing factors related to prosthetic joint infection, allow better prediction of risk and implementation of preventive measures. Although prognostic SR are increasingly frequent, their methodological field presents some knowledge gaps. PURPOSE: To carry out an overview of SR assessing risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, describing and synthesizing their evidence. Secondarily, to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a bibliographic search in 4databases (May 2021) to identify prognostic SR evaluating any risk factor for prosthetic joint infection. We evaluated risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and methodological quality with a modified AMSTAR-2 tool. We computed the overlap degree study between included SR. RESULTS: Twenty-three SR were included, studying 15 factors for prosthetic joint infection, of which, 13 had significant association. The most frequently studied risk factors were obesity, intra-articular corticosteroids, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Overlapping between SR was high for obesity and very high for intra-articular corticoid injection, smoking and uncontrolled diabetes. Risk of bias was considered low in 8SRs (34.7%). The modified AMSTAR-2 tool showed important methodological gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of procedural-modifiable factors, such as intra-articular corticoids use, can give patients better results. Overlapping between SR was very high, meaning that some SR are redundant. The evidence on risk factors for prosthetic joint infection is weak due to high risk of bias and limited methodological quality.

Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool-Systematic Reviews-2 and Participation-To-Prevalence Ratio assessed to whom the evidence applies in sepsis reviews.

OBJECTIVES: To revise a sex and gender appraisal tool for systematic reviews (SGAT-SR) and apply it to Cochrane sepsis reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The revision process was informed by existing literature on sex, gender, intersectionality, and feedback from an expert advisory board. We revised the items to consider additional factors associated with health inequities and appraised sex and gender considerations using the SGAT-SR-2 and female Participation-to-Prevalence Ratio (PPR) in Cochrane sepsis reviews. RESULTS: SGAT-SR-2 consists of 19 questions appraising the review's sections and use of the terms sex and gender. amongst 71 SRs assessed, 50.7% included at least one tool item, the most frequent being the number of participants by sex or gender at included study-level (24/71 reviews). Only four reviews provided disaggregated data for the full set of included trials, while two considered other equity-related factors. Reviews rarely appraised possible similarities and differences across sex and gender. In half of a subset of reviews, female participants were under-represented relative to their share of the sepsis population (PPR<0.8). CONCLUSION: The SGAT-SR-2 tool and the PPR can support the design and appraisal of systematic reviews to assess sex and gender considerations, address to whom evidence applies, and determine future research needs.

Efficacy of systemic oncological treatments in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancers at high risk of dying in the middle and short term: an overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal and gastric cancers are a significant public health problem worldwide, with most patients presenting with advanced-stage disease and, consequently, poor prognosis. Systemic oncological treatments (SOT) have been widely used over more conservative approaches, such as supportive care. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in this scenario is not sufficiently clear. This paper provides an overview of systematic reviews that assessed the effectiveness of SOT compared with the best supportive care (BSC) or placebo in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancers in an end-of-life context. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, and PROSPERO for eligible systematic reviews (SRs) published from 2008 onwards. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), functional status, and toxicity. Two authors assessed eligibility and extracted data independently. We evaluated the methodological quality of included SRs using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the overlap of primary studies (corrected covered area, CCA). Also, we performed a de novo meta-analysis with data reported for each primary study when it was possible. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 16 SRs (19 included trials) for inclusion within this overview. Most reviews had a critically low methodological quality, and there was a very high overlap of primary studies. It is uncertain whether SOT improves OS and PFS over more conservative approaches due to the very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is very uncertain about the effectiveness of SOT for advanced esophageal or gastric cancers. High-quality SRs and further randomized clinical trials that include a thorough assessment of patient-centered outcomes are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6 .

Managing Ruptured Splenic Ectopic Pregnancy Without Splenectomy: Case Report and Literature Review.

Splenic ectopic pregnancy is extremely rare but carries a high risk of uncontrollable life-threatening bleeding. Our aim is to try to diagnose those cases earlier and to include splenic preservation as good alternative for selected cases. Extensive review of the literature has been performed. Thirty-one case reports were identified, of which 4 have been excluded because they were not written in English. A 36-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department with haemorrhagic shock. Despite the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) being in situ for 4 months, urinary and serum tests were both positive for pregnancy, and an ultrasound scan revealed haemoperitoneum suggestive of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. An emergency Pfannenstiel laparotomy was performed and a diagnosis of spontaneous tubal abortion was made and the abdomen was subsequently closed. Following a period of cardiovascular instability on the Intensive Care Unit postoperatively, an urgent CT scan was performed which revealed bleeding from the spleen. A midline laparotomy was performed by the general surgeon, which involved resection of the gestational sac and splenorrhaphy. Twenty-seven cases were reviewed, and 73% of them presented as an emergency and 21 cases (81%) had been managed with splenectomy. CT scan had been used in eight of the previous case reports of splenic ectopic pregnancy with 100% diagnostic accuracy rate. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies are very rare. Splenorrhaphy is a safe alternative to splenectomy in cases of splenic ectopic pregnancy. CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast can be very helpful in relatively stable patients with a vaginal ultrasound demonstrating an empty uterus, no clear adnexal masses or free fluid.

Improved distribution of pulmonary flush solution to the tracheobronchial wall in pulmonary transplantation.

This report describes the experimental results obtained with conventional (pulmonary artery, PA) flushing versus retrograde perfusion (via left atrium, LA) using 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA-99mTc) to ascertain the distribution throughout the tracheobronchial (TB) tree in 10 Large-White pigs. Lung preservation was achieved with 4 degrees C Euro-Collins solution (60 ml/kg) instilled via PA (n = 5) or LA (n = 5). Simultaneously, MAA-99mTc was given using the same respective route and the isotope uptake quantified at different TB levels after heart-lung block harvest and dissection of all tissue adjacent to TB: proximal and distal trachea and right and left main bronchi. Retrograde distribution resulted in a significantly higher 99mTc count compared to the PA route (p < 0.01).