[Characteristics of cardiologist training in Latin America: a survey of the Interamerican Society of Cardiology]. / Características de la formación de los cardiólogos en América Latina: una encuesta de la Sociedad Interamericana de Cardiología.

Objectives: Describe the characteristics of the different cardiology medical residencies in Latin America. Method: Cross-sectional study that aims to evaluate the characteristics of cardiology residencies in Spanish-speaking countries of Latin America, through self-administered electronic surveys. Results: Three hundred seven residents of 147 residences were surveyed. Mean age was 31 years and 63% were male. Ninety eight percent carry out their training in the capital city. The average total training time is 4.8 years. Forty four percent complete their residency in internal medicine prior to starting cardiology, and 10% have no prior training. In cardiology training is 3 years in most countries. Fifty four percent present academic activities every day and 16% only once or less, consisting of theoretical classes (93%), clinical cases (85%), bibliographic workshops (69%), and writing scientific papers (68%). Supervision is carried out by the chief resident (45%), resident coordinator (44%), resident instructor (27%) or the department head (54%), while 2.6% do not present supervision. The main rotations were echocardiography (99%), hemodynamics (96%), coronary unit (93%), and electrophysiology (92%). Residents highlighted the need to improve academic activities (23%) and scientific production (12%). Conclusions: There are important differences in the academic and practical training between the residences of the different countries of America.

Objetivos: Describir las características de las diferentes residencias médicas de cardiología de Latinoamérica. Método: Estudio de corte transversal que tiene como objetivo evaluar las características de las residencias de cardiología en países hispanohablantes de América Latina, mediante encuestas electrónicas autoadministradas. Resultados: Se encuestó a 307 residentes de 147 residencias. La mediana de edad fue 31 años y el 63% era de sexo masculino. El 98% realiza su formación en la ciudad capital. El tiempo de formación total promedio es de 4.8 años. El 44% realiza la residencia completa en medicina interna previo al inicio de cardiología, y el 10% no tiene formación previa. En cardiología la formación es de tres años en la mayoría de los países. El 54% presenta actividades académicas todos los días y el 16% solo una vez o menos, consistente en clases teóricas (93%), casos clínicos (85%), ateneos bibliográficos (69%) y redacción de trabajos científicos (68%). La supervisión es realizada por el jefe de residentes (45%), coordinador de residentes (44%), instructor de residentes (27%) o el jefe de servicio (54%), mientras que el 2.6% no presenta supervisión. Las rotaciones principales fueron ecocardiografía (99%), hemodinamia (96%), unidad coronaria (93%) y electrofisiología (92%). El 23% resaltó la necesidad de mejorar las actividades académicas y 12% la producción científica. Conclusiones: Existen importantes diferencias en la formación académica y práctica entre las residencias de los diferentes países de América.

Comparación de la violencia y agresiones sufridas por el personal de salud durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en Argentina y el resto de Latinoamérica / Comparison of violence and aggressions suffered by health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina and the rest of Latin America

RESUMEN Objetivos. Explorar la frecuencia e impacto de la violencia contra los trabajadores de salud de Argentina y compararlo con el resto de sus pares de Latinoamérica en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. Estudio de corte transversal a través de una encuesta electrónica al personal médico y no médico de Latinoamérica que desempeño tareas asistenciales desde marzo de 2020. Se utilizó una regresión de Poisson para estimar las Razones de Prevalencia crudas (RP) y ajustadas (RPa) con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95%. Resultados. Un total de 3544 participantes de 19 países respondieron la encuesta; 1992 (56,0%) residían en Argentina. Entre los mismos, el 62,9% padeció al menos un hecho de violencia: 97,7% refirió violencia verbal y 11,8% violencia física. El 41,5% de los agredidos padecieron situaciones de violencia al menos una vez por semana. El personal de salud de Argentina vivenció más frecuentemente violencia que los de otros países (62,9% vs. 54,6%, p<0,001), siendo estos eventos más habituales y estresantes (p<0,05). Además, refirieron más frecuentemente haber considerado cambiar sus tareas asistenciales y/o deseos de abandonar su profesión (p<0,001). En la regresión de Poisson, los participantes de Argentina tuvieron una prevalencia de violencia mayor que los trabajadores de salud de la región (14,6%; p<0,001). Conclusiones. Existió una elevada prevalencia de violencia contra el personal de salud de Argentina durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Estos hechos tuvieron un alto impacto negativo entre quienes los padecieron. Nuestros datos sugieren que, esto podría haber sido más frecuente en Argentina respecto de otras regiones del continente.

ABSTRACT Objectives. To explore the frequency and impact of violence against healthcare workers in Argentina and to compare it with the rest of their Latin American peers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted by applying an electronic survey on Latin American medical and non-medical personnel who carried out health care tasks since March 2020. We used Poisson regression to estimate crude (PR) and adjusted (aPR) Prevalence Ratios with their respective 95% confidence intervals. Results. A total of 3544 participants from 19 countries answered the survey; 1992 (56.0%) resided in Argentina. Of these, 62.9% experienced at least one act of violence; 97.7% reported verbal violence and 11.8% physical violence. Of those who were assaulted, 41.5% experienced violence at least once a week. Health personnel from Argentina experienced violence more frequently than those from other countries (62.9% vs. 54.6%, p<0.001), and these events were more frequent and stressful (p<0.05). In addition, Argentinean health personnel reported having considered changing their healthcare tasks and/or desired to leave their profession more frequently (p<0.001). In the Poisson regression, we found that participants from Argentina had a higher prevalence of violence than health workers from the region (14.6%; p<0.001). Conclusions. There was a high prevalence of violence against health personnel in Argentina during the COVID-19 pandemic. These events had a strong negative impact on those who suffered them. Our data suggest that violence against health personnel may have been more frequent in Argentina than in other regions of the continent.

Comparison of violence and aggressions suffered by health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina and the rest of Latin America. / Comparación de la violencia y agresiones sufridas por el personal de salud durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en Argentina y el resto de Latinoamérica.

OBJECTIVES.: Motivation for the study. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused profound repercussions at different socio-environmental levels. Its impact on violence against healthcare team workers in Argentina has not been well documented. Main findings. The present study evidenced high rates of aggression, particularly verbal aggression. In addition, almost half of the participants reported having suffered these events on a weekly basis. All participants who experienced violence reported having experienced post-event symptoms, and up to one-third reported having considered changing their profession after these acts. Implications. It is imperative to take action to prevent acts of violence against health personnel, or to mitigate its impact on the victims. . To explore the frequency and impact of violence against healthcare workers in Argentina and to compare it with the rest of their Latin American peers during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: A cross-sectional study was conducted by applying an electronic survey on Latin American medical and non-medical personnel who carried out health care tasks since March 2020. We used Poisson regression to estimate crude (PR) and adjusted (aPR) Prevalence Ratios with their respective 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS.: A total of 3544 participants from 19 countries answered the survey; 1992 (56.0%) resided in Argentina. Of these, 62.9% experienced at least one act of violence; 97.7% reported verbal violence and 11.8% physical violence. Of those who were assaulted, 41.5% experienced violence at least once a week. Health personnel from Argentina experienced violence more frequently than those from other countries (62.9% vs. 54.6%, p<0.001), and these events were more frequent and stressful (p<0.05). In addition, Argentinean health personnel reported having considered changing their healthcare tasks and/or desired to leave their profession more frequently (p<0.001). In the Poisson regression, we found that participants from Argentina had a higher prevalence of violence than health workers from the region (14.6%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS.: There was a high prevalence of violence against health personnel in Argentina during the COVID-19 pandemic. These events had a strong negative impact on those who suffered them. Our data suggest that violence against health personnel may have been more frequent in Argentina than in other regions of the continent.

OBJETIVOS.: Explorar la frecuencia e impacto de la violencia contra los trabajadores de salud de Argentina y compararlo con el resto de sus pares de Latinoamérica en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS.: Estudio de corte transversal a través de una encuesta electrónica al personal médico y no médico de Latinoamérica que desempeño tareas asistenciales desde marzo de 2020. Se utilizó una regresión de Poisson para estimar las Razones de Prevalencia crudas (RP) y ajustadas (RPa) con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95%. RESULTADOS.: Un total de 3544 participantes de 19 países respondieron la encuesta; 1992 (56,0%) residían en Argentina. Entre los mismos, el 62,9% padeció al menos un hecho de violencia: 97,7% refirió violencia verbal y 11,8% violencia física. El 41,5% de los agredidos padecieron situaciones de violencia al menos una vez por semana. El personal de salud de Argentina vivenció más frecuentemente violencia que los de otros países (62,9% vs. 54,6%, p<0,001), siendo estos eventos más habituales y estresantes (p<0,05). Además, refirieron más frecuentemente haber considerado cambiar sus tareas asistenciales y/o deseos de abandonar su profesión (p<0,001). En la regresión de Poisson, los participantes de Argentina tuvieron una prevalencia de violencia mayor que los trabajadores de salud de la región (14,6%; p<0,001). CONCLUSIONES.: Existió una elevada prevalencia de violencia contra el personal de salud de Argentina durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Estos hechos tuvieron un alto impacto negativo entre quienes los padecieron. Nuestros datos sugieren que, esto podría haber sido más frecuente en Argentina respecto de otras regiones del continente.

Predictores de uso de anticoagulantes orales directos en tromboembolia pulmonar aguda / Predictors of use of direct oral anticoagulants in acute pulmonary embolism

Resumen Introducción: En la última década los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se incorporaron como herramienta para la anticoagulación en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) aguda. Aunque tienen un mejor perfil farmacológico que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), el uso de estos fármacos no es masivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el uso de ACOD en pacientes con TEP aguda y detectar determinantes de su indicación. Metodología: Análisis preespecificado del registro CONAREC XX que incorporó pacientes con TEP aguda en 64 centros de Argentina. Se realizó un análisis para detectar predictores de prescripción de ACOD al alta. Resultados: Se analizaron 579 pacientes que recibieron anticoagulación al alta hospitalaria: el 60% recibió AVK, el 21% heparinas y el 19% ACOD (de ellos, un 49% rivaroxabán, un 34% apixabán y un 17% dabigatrán). Los pacientes que recibieron ACOD tenían TEP de menor gravedad, menor riesgo de hemorragia y menos complicaciones intrahospitalarias. En el seguimiento a 30 días no hubo diferencias en mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrados. La cobertura de salud por un seguro social (odds ratio [OR] 7.45; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.74-31.9; p < 0.01) o por cobertura privada (OR 10.5; IC 95%: 2.4-45.9; p < 0.01) fueron predictores independientes de la prescripción de ACOD al alta, y el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (OR 0.19; IC 95%: 0.04-0.84; p = 0.028) y de enfermedad oncológica (OR 0.49; IC 95%: 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) fueron predictores de no prescribirlos. Conclusiones: Uno de cada cinco supervivientes de TEP aguda recibió ACOD al egreso hospitalario en Argentina, y esto fue determinado por variables clínicas y económicas

Abstract Introduction: In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been incorporated as an anticoagulation tool in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Although they have a better pharmacological profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), the use of these drugs is not massive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of DOACs in patients with acute PE and to detect determinants of its use. Methodology: Prespecified analysis of the CONAREC XX registry that included patients with acute PE in 64 centers in Argentina. An analysis was performed to detect predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge. Results: 579 patients who received anticoagulation at hospital discharge were analyzed: 60% received VKA, 21% heparin and 19% DOAC (of them, 49% Rivaroxaban, 34% Apixaban, and 17% Dabigatran). Patients receiving DOACs had less severe PE, lower risk of bleeding, and fewer in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or bleeding. Health coverage by social insurance (OR 7.45, CI 95% 1.74-31.9, p < 0.01) or by private coverage (OR 10.5, CI 95% 2.4-45.9, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge, and history of heart failure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84, p = 0.028) and oncological disease (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) were predictors not prescribe them. Conclusions: One in five survivors of acute PE received DOACs at hospital discharge in Argentina, and this was determined by clinical and economic variables.

Predictors of use of direct oral anticoagulants in acute pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been incorporated as an anticoagulation tool in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Although they have a better pharmacological profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), the use of these drugs is not massive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of DOACs in patients with acute PE and to detect determinants of its use. METHODOLOGY: Prespecified analysis of the CONAREC XX registry that included patients with acute PE in 64 centers in Argentina. An analysis was performed to detect predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge. RESULTS: 579 patients who received anticoagulation at hospital discharge were analyzed: 60% received VKA, 21% heparin and 19% DOAC (of them, 49% Rivaroxaban, 34% Apixaban, and 17% Dabigatran). Patients receiving DOACs had less severe PE, lower risk of bleeding, and fewer in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or bleeding. Health coverage by social insurance (OR 7.45, CI 95% 1.74-31.9, p < 0.01) or by private coverage (OR 10.5, CI 95% 2.4-45.9, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge, and history of heart failure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84, p = 0.028) and oncological disease (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) were predictors not prescribe them. CONCLUSIONS: One in five survivors of acute PE received DOACs at hospital discharge in Argentina, and this was determined by clinical and economic variables.

INTRODUCCIÓN: En la última década los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se incorporaron como herramienta para la anticoagulación en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) aguda. Aunque tienen un mejor perfil farmacológico que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), el uso de estos fármacos no es masivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el uso de ACOD en pacientes con TEP aguda y detectar determinantes de su indicación. METODOLOGÍA: Análisis preespecificado del registro CONAREC XX que incorporó pacientes con TEP aguda en 64 centros de Argentina. Se realizó un análisis para detectar predictores de prescripción de ACOD al alta. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 579 pacientes que recibieron anticoagulación al alta hospitalaria: el 60% recibió AVK, el 21% heparinas y el 19% ACOD (de ellos, un 49% rivaroxabán, un 34% apixabán y un 17% dabigatrán). Los pacientes que recibieron ACOD tenían TEP de menor gravedad, menor riesgo de hemorragia y menos complicaciones intrahospitalarias. En el seguimiento a 30 días no hubo diferencias en mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrados. La cobertura de salud por un seguro social (odds ratio [OR] 7.45; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.74-31.9; p < 0.01) o por cobertura privada (OR 10.5; IC 95%: 2.4-45.9; p < 0.01) fueron predictores independientes de la prescripción de ACOD al alta, y el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (OR 0.19; IC 95%: 0.04-0.84; p = 0.028) y de enfermedad oncológica (OR 0.49; IC 95%: 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) fueron predictores de no prescribirlos. CONCLUSIONES: Uno de cada cinco supervivientes de TEP aguda recibió ACOD al egreso hospitalario en Argentina, y esto fue determinado por variables clínicas y económicas.

Impact of Reperfusion on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

The prognosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) depends on its correct stratification, and reperfusion in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is controversial yet. Our aim is to explore variables associated with the decision of reperfusion in patients with intermediate-high risk PE and its impact on clinical outcomes. An analysis of a multicenter PE registry was performed. Patients with intermediate-high risk (classification of the European Society of Cardiology) were selected, and factors associated with the reperfusion decision and its impact on clinical outcomes were explored. From 684 consecutive patients of acute PE, 178 (26%) were intermediate-high risk cases and constituted the study population. Sixteen percent (n = 28) of this cohort received reperfusion treatment, either systemic thrombolysis (89%) or endovascular treatments. Differences were observed between the patients who received reperfusion or not, mainly in terms of age (57±17 years vs 68±14; P <0.001) and location of thrombi in both pulmonary arteries (78% vs 43.7%, respectively; OR 4.72; 95% CI 1.8-12.3; P <0.001). No significant differences were observed in total bleeding and major bleeding. Total mortality was 3.6% in the reperfusion group and 14% in the non-reperfusion group (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.02-1.76; P = 0.1). Among patients with intermediate-high risk PE from Argentina, the decision of reperfusion has been influenced by age and the location of thrombi. The difference of 10 absolute points in mortality, with a similar rate of bleeding, favors the indication of reperfusion.

Aggression, Micro-aggression, and Abuse Against Health Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Latin American Survey.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had tremendous consequences globally. Notably, increasing complaints of verbal and physical violence against health care providers have been reported. A cross-sectional electronic survey was conducted between January 11 and February 28, 2022 to delineate the violent behavior against front-line health professionals in Latin America. A total of 3544 participants from 19 countries were included. There were 58.5% women, 70.8% were physicians, 16% were nurses, and 13.2% were other health team members. About 54.8% reported acts of abuse: 95.6% verbal abuse, 11.1% physical abuse, and 19.9% other types. Nearly half of those who reported abuse experienced psychosomatic symptoms after the event, 56.2% considered changing their care tasks, and 33.6% considered quitting their profession. In a logistic regression model, nurses (odds ratio (OR) 1.90, P < 0.001), doctors (OR 2.11, P < 0.001), and administrative staff (OR 3.53, P = 0.005) experienced more abuse than other health workers. Women more frequently reported abuse (OR 1.56, P < 0.001), as well as those who worked directly with COVID-19 patients (OR 3.66, P < 0.001). A lower probability of abuse was observed at older ages (OR 0.95, P < 0.001). There has been a high prevalence of abuse against health personnel in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic. Those caring for COVID-19 patients, younger staff, and women were found to be at elevated risk. It is imperative to develop strategies to mitigate these acts and their repercussions on the patient-provider relationship and outcomes.

Uso de agentes hipolipemiantes y cumplimiento de metas terapéuticas en pacientes de alto riesgo cardiovascular en la República Argentina / Use of Lipid-Lowering Agents and Therapeutic Goal Achievement in Cardiovascular High-Risk Patients in Argentina

RESUMEN Introducción: Uno de los pilares fundamentales para la reducción del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes en prevención secundaria es el correcto manejo del tratamiento hipolipemiante. Las estatinas en altas dosis, el ezetimibe, y más recientemente los inhibidores de PCSK9 (iPCSK9) son las principales herramientas farmacológicas con las que contamos para que estos pacientes cumplan metas terapéuticas de colesterol LDL (C-LDL). A pesar de la contundente evidencia a favor de estas terapéuticas, existe una gran subutilización de las mismas a nivel mundial, con bajos niveles de adherencia e inercia terapéutica. En Argentina existe escasa evidencia sobre la calidad del tratamiento hipolipemiante, y qué porcentaje de pacientes en prevención secundaria se encuentran con un perfil lipídico controlado acorde a guías nacionales e internacionales. Material y métodos: Diseñamos un estudio de corte transversal en pacientes en prevención secundaria de eventos cardiovasculares incluidos de forma prospectiva, consecutiva y multicéntrica en hospitales de la República Argentina que poseen sistema de Residencia Médica afiliados al Consejo Argentino de Residentes de Cardiología (CONAREC). Se realizó la recolección de datos durante los meses de marzo a agosto del año 2020. Se relevó el tratamiento hipolipemiante que recibían, los motivos detrás de la no utilización de estatinas en dosis adecuadas, y los valores de perfil lipídico en caso de contar con un registro en los últimos 6 meses previos a la inclusión. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1000 pacientes consecutivos de 24 centros, correspondientes a 11 provincias. Un 85,9% se encontraba bajo tratamiento con estatinas; un 4,8%, con ezetimibe; un 2,4% con fibratos; y un 13%, sin tratamiento. De aquellos pacientes en tratamiento con estatinas, un 67% recibía estatinas en altas dosis (58% del total de pacientes). Un total de 509 pacientes presentaban medición del C-LDL dentro de los últimos 6 meses. El valor promedio de C-LDL fue de 94 (90,6-97,8) mg/dL; el de C-LDL, 41 (40,7-42,6) mg/dL; y el de triglicéridos, 151 (142,9-159,8) mg/dL. Un 30% se encontraba con valores por debajo del corte de 70 mg/dL. Un 16% se encontraba con valores por debajo de 55 mg/dL. Un 37% de los pacientes presentaba C-LDL >100 mg/dL. Conclusiones: En este estudio multicéntrico de pacientes en prevención secundaria desarrollado en la República Argentina, poco más de la mitad presentaba tratamiento con estatinas en altas dosis, con una escasa utilización de ezetimibe. El subtratamiento se reflejó en los valores de C-LDL, con más de dos tercios de los pacientes fuera de rango terapéutico y, por lo tanto, lejos de las recomendaciones de las guías clínicas.

ABSTRACT Background: The correct management of lipid-lowering treatment is one of the key factors for the reduction of cardiovascular risk in secondary prevention patients. High-dose statins, ezetimibe, and more recently PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are the main tools available to meet LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in these patients. Despite the overwhelming evidence in their favor, these therapies are greatly underutilized worldwide, with low levels of adherence and therapeutic inertia. In Argentina, there is scarce evidence on the quality of lipid-lowering treatment and the rate of patients in secondary prevention with a controlled lipid profile according to national and international guidelines. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study including consecutive patients in secondary prevention for cardiovascular events from hospitals of Argentina with a Medical Residency system affiliated to CONAREC, was carried out from March to August 2020. Data was collected on the lipid-lowering treatment received, the reasons behind the non-use of statins in adequate doses and the lipid profile levels in case of having a record from the last 6 months prior to inclusion. Results: Among 1000 consecutive patients included from 24 centers corresponding to 11 provinces, 85.9% was treated with statins, 4.8% with ezetimibe, 2.4% with fibrates, and 13% was without treatment. In the case of patients treated with statin therapy, 67% was receiving high-dose statins (58% of the total number of patients). A total of 509 patients presented LDL-C assessment within the last 6 months. Mean LDL-C was 94 (90.6-97.8) mg/dl, HDL cholesterol 41 (40.7-42.6) mg/dl, and triglycerides 151 (142.9-159.8) mg/dl. In 30% of cases, LDL-C was below the cut-off value of 70 mg/dl and in 16% below 55 mg/ dl. In 37% of patients, LDL-C was >100 mg/dl. Conclusions: In this multicenter secondary prevention study performed in Argentina, just over half of the patients presented high-dose statin treatment, with scarce use of ezetimibe. Undertreatment was reflected in LDL-C values, with more than two-thirds of patients outside the therapeutic range, and therefore far from clinical guideline recommendations.