Time Dependent Correlation Between Sac Behaviour and Re-intervention after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and time to re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent EVAR at a single centre between January 2008 and November 2011 and who were followed up for a mean of 6.6 ± 2.9 years was conducted. Based on sac appearances on pre-operative imaging and imaging at the end of follow up, patients were stratified into two groups: (1) sac regression; and (2) no sac regression. The no sac regression group was further subdivided into stable sac group and sac expansion group. Sac regression and expansion throughout follow up were defined as a decrease or increase in the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter of ≥ 5 mm compared with the pre-operative size. A Cox proportional hazards model using multiple failure per subject data was used to identify sac behaviour as a predictor of re-intervention free time. RESULTS: Patients with sac regression had a higher probability of freedom from re-intervention compared with those with a stable or expanding aneurysm sac (94%, 57%, and 16% at 12 years, respectively; log rank, p < .001). Mean time to re-intervention was 11.3 years for the sac regression group, 8.8 years for the stable sac group, and 5.0 years for the sac expansion group (p < .001). In the stable sac group, the risk of re-intervention increased sharply six years after EVAR, whereas in the sac expansion group a sharp rise in re-intervention was noted 3.5 years after EVAR, reaching a plateau after year 6. CONCLUSION: A time dependent correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and re-intervention was found. Such findings have implications for surveillance strategies.

A Greek Multicentre Study Assessing the Outcome of Late Rupture After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Late rupture after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an increasing complication associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to analyse the causes and outcomes in patients with AAA rupture after EVAR. METHODS: A multi-institutional Greek study of late ruptures after EVAR between 2008 - 2022 was performed. Primary outcomes were intra-operative and in hospital death. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients presented with late rupture after EVAR (proportion of ruptured EVARs among all EVARs, 0.6%; 69 males; mean age 77.2 ± 6.7 years). The mean time interval between EVAR and late rupture was 72.3 months (range 6 - 180 months). In all cases the cause of rupture was the presence of an endoleak (type I, 73%) with sac enlargement. Moreover, 34% of subjects with rupture after EVAR had been lost to follow up and 32% underwent a secondary intervention. Additionally, 57 patients (81%) were treated by conversion to open surgical repair (COSR) and the remainder by endovascular correction of endoleak (ECE). Eleven intra-operative deaths (16%) were recorded. The overall in hospital mortality rate was 41% (23% ECE vs. 46% COSR; p = .21). Of the patients who presented as initially haemodynamically stable, 23% died during hospitalisation, while the respective mortality rate for patients who presented as unstable was 78% (odds ratio [OR] 11.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 - 39.1; p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that severity of haemodynamic shock was the most significant risk factor for intra-operative (OR 7.15, 95% CI 1.58 - 32.40; p = .010) and in hospital death (OR 9.53, 95% CI 2.79 - 32.58; p < .001). CONCLUSION: These data underline the devastating prognosis of late rupture after EVAR. Haemodynamic status at presentation was an important predictive factor for death both in the ECE and COSR groups. Rigorous follow up and prompt evaluation of an unstable patient in case of rupture after EVAR is recommended.

A Systematic Review Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression on Surgical and Endovenous Interventions for the Treatment of Lower Limb Venous Ulcer Disease.

BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcer (VLU) disease constitutes the most severe form of chronic venous insufficiency. We performed a network meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the efficacy and safety of the various available interventions in the treatment of VLU. METHODS: We conducted a systematic research corresponding to the instructions by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for studies reporting on surgical or endovenous interventions for the treatment of VLU. Following data extraction, we performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression. Primary endpoints included VLU healing and recurrence. The secondary endpoint was postintervention complications. RESULTS: Seventeen studies evaluating the impact of compression monotherapy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), sclerotherapy, and saphenous vein surgery on VLU treatment, consisting of 2156 patients (2186 VLU) were included. When compared to compression monotherapy, RFA was the only treatment displaying a statistically-significant impact on ulcer healing, odds ratio (OR) 5.80 (95% credibility interval (CI): 1.08-35.07), while EVLA, RR 0.06 (95% CI: 0.00-0.57), sclerotherapy, RR 0.07 (95% CI: 0.00-0.68) and RFA, RR 0.12 (95% CI: 0.01-0.91) were the 3 interventions reducing VLU recurrence. EVLA (SUCRA, 69.65) ranked as the most efficient intervention concerning ulcer recurrence reduction. Regarding postintervention complications, EVLA was the only intervention displaying a statistically-significant increased risk compared to compression monotherapy, RR 14.3 (95% CI: 2.03-172.56). Meta-regression analysis exploring the impact of perforator treatment on VLU failed to predict healing, ß = -0.27 (95% CI: -2.55 to 1.85), recurrence, ß = -0.02 (95% CI: -2.96 to 2.75) and complication outcomes, ß = -0.089 (95% CI: -3.13 to 2.85). During sensitivity analysis, RFA and sclerotherapy failed to sustain their effects on ulcer healing and ulcer recurrence, respectively. In addition, sclerotherapy displayed statistically-significant inferior outcomes compared to both EVLA and RFA regarding ulcer recurrence. CONCLUSION: This is the first network meta-analysis examining the effect of various interventions on VLU disease. While we have demonstrated the efficacy of RFA and ELVA in ulcer recurrence prevention, our results regarding the impact of RFA and sclerotherapy on VLU healing and recurrence, respectively, should be interpreted with caution. In addition, this review raises questions concerning the value of surgery and perforator interventions in the treatment of VLU. Further research through randomized controlled trials is required. CLINICAL IMPACT: Our review has revealed the significant efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in effectively reducing the incidence of ulcer recurrence when compared to compression monotherapy. These outcomes hold the potential to provide relevant insights to both medical practitioners and patients, thereby informing a more prudent and enlightened decision-making approach. Such informed decisions, aimed at mitigating the recurring occurrence of venous leg ulcers, carry profound significance given the considerable socioeconomic implications associated with this medical condition.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Post Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) after Endo-Vascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) is a highly uncommon clinical entity. With only a few case-reports available, its management strategy still remains enigmatic. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to retrieve, synthesize, and appraise all existing data for DIC after EVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All published articles regarding DIC post-EVAR were identified from 3 major databases and analyzed. Clinical parameters, predisposing factors, along with mortality and morbidly were assessed. RESULTS: The total number of publications included in the review was 15 describing 17 cases. DIC presented with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, while the time of diagnosis varied significantly. Endoleak was the main causative factor, with an incidence reaching 71%. The mortality of DIC after EVAR reached 29%, regardless of the therapeutic approach chosen. DIC was treated effectively in 47% of the patients (8/17), with better outcomes among patients who received conservative therapy or among those who were submitted to endovascular interventions. CONCLUSIONS: DIC after EVAR, although rare, is a potentially lethal clinical condition which requires prompt diagnosis and urgent medical consideration. Treatment of endoleak may help in quick restoration of normal parameters.

Tracheal resection in patients post-COVID-19 is associated with high reintervention rate and early restenosis.

Objectives: A remarkable increase in the number of patients presenting with tracheal complications after prolonged endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for the management of the severe COVID-19-associated respiratory failure has been observed. In this study, we assessed the postoperative outcomes of tracheal resection in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in which all patients with a history of prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19 infection, who were treated with tracheal resection and reconstruction, were included. The primary objective was in-hospital mortality and postoperative reintervention rate. The secondary objective was the time to tracheal restenosis. Results: During the 16-month study period, 11 patients with COVID-19 with tracheal complications underwent tracheal resection with end-to-end anastomosis. Mean patient age was 51.5 ± 9 years, and the majority were male (9 patients). Eight patients were referred for management of postintubation tracheal stenosis, and 3 patients were referred for tracheoesophageal fistula. Eight patients had a history of tracheostomy during the COVID-19 infection hospitalization. There was 1 in-hospital death (9.1%) due to septicemia in the intensive care unit approximately 2 months after the operation. Postoperatively, 32 reinterventions were required for tracheal restenosis due to granulation tissue formation. The risk for reintervention was higher during the first 3 months after the index operation. Four patients developed tracheal restenosis (36.4%), and 2 of them required endotracheal stent placement during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Tracheal resection and reconstruction after COVID-19 infection are associated with a high reintervention rate postoperatively. Such patients require close follow-up in expert interventional pulmonology units, and physicians should be on high alert for the early diagnosis and optimal management of tracheal restenosis.

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 10-Year Follow-Up after Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal AorticAneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has conferred an early survival advantage compared to an open surgical repair (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). However, the long-term survival benefit after EVAR was not displayed among randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas many non-RCTs have provided conflicting results. We conducted a time-to-event individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis on long-term rAAA data. METHODS: All studies comparing mortality after EVAR versus OSR for rAAA were included. We used restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) as a measure of life expectancy for EVAR and OSR. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies, including 12,187 patients (4952 EVAR and 7235 OSR) were finally deemed eligible. A secondary IPD analysis included 725 (372 EVAR and 353 OSR) patients only from the 3 RCTs (Immediate Management of the Patient With Rupture : Open Versus Endovascular Repair, Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus and Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial trials). Among all studies, the median survival was 4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.70-4.58) years for EVAR and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.57-2.39) years for OSR. Although EVAR presented with increased hazard risk from 4 to 7 years, which peaked at 6 years after the operation, the RMST difference was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73; P < 0.001) years gained with EVAR at the end of the 10-year follow-up. IPD meta-analysis of RCTs did not demonstrate significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: At 10-years follow-up, EVAR was associated with a 6.5 month increase in life expectancy when compared to OSR after analyzing all eligible studies. Evidence from our study suggests that a strict follow-up program would be desirable, especially for patients with long-life expectancy.

Echocardiographic Changes in Cardiac Function After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests thoracic stent grafts increase the aortic stiffness postimplantation. Our objective was to examine the effect of thoracic aortic stenting on heart function, as demonstrated with echocardiography. METHODS: We considered nonrandomized studies examining echocardiographic parameters (left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricle end-diastolic (LVED) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD), posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), interventricular septal thickness (IVST), mass, and mass index) pre and poststent graft implantation in patients with thoracic aortic diseases (aneurysm, dissection, and blunt injury). MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched (up to March 2021) for eligible studies. The National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Echocardiographic data pre and postimplantation were compared using the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three of the studies were judged to be "good" quality and one "fair". Nonsignificant differences pre and postimplantation were found for ejection fraction (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI = -1.8 to 0.728, P = 0.406), IVST (SMD = -0.79, 95%, CI = -3.25 to 1.66, P = 0.52), EDD (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.48 to 0.28, P = 0.60), ESD (SMD = -0.66, 95% CI = -2.35 to 1.02, P = 0.44), and PWT (SMD = -2.20, 95% CI = -5.89 to 1.47, P = 0.24). A trend toward an increase in mass postimplantation was found (SMD = 0.28, 95%, CI = -0.03 to 0.60, P = 0.08), but there was no significant difference in mass index (SMD = 0, 95%, CI = -0.195 to 0.195, P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic stenting does not appear to significantly impact cardiac physiology as indicated by echocardiographic parameters.

A systematic review of the surgical management of secondary aortoduodenal fistula.

OBJECTIVE: Secondary aortoduodenal fistulae (SADF) are uncommon but life-threatening conditions that occur as complications of aortic reconstructive surgery. Data on the mortality and morbidity of procedures associated with SADF remain scarce. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search was conducted on the MedLine, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Knowledge databases for cases of SADF. Data regarding patient demographics, fistula anatomy and treatment interventions performed were extracted for further analysis. RESULTS: The study pool consisted of 127 case reports, 28 case series and 1 retrospective study published between 1973 and 2021. A total of 189 patients were operated for SADF. Among the 189 patients, 141 patients (74.6%) had aortic graft excision, 26 (13.8%) aortic primary repair, and 22 (11.6%) EVAR. Although patients undergoing EVAR were older with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, compared with patients who had graft excision and primary aortic repair these differences were not statistically significant (P = .12 and P = .22, respectively). Primary bowel repair was performed in 145 patients (76.7%), duodenectomy in 25 (13.2%), and no bowel repair in 19 (10.1%). Additional omentoplasty was performed in 65 patients (34.6%). Mortality was comparable with respect to the type of aortic and bowel repair, with no statistically significant differences recorded (P = .54 and P = .77, respectively). Omentoplasty significantly decreased the risk of death (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal operative management should address both the aortic and duodenal defects and be complemented with appropriate reconstructive procedures. Endovascular aortic approaches seem feasible in carefully select patients in whom duodenal repair may be omitted.

Ascending Aorta Dissection Before 5.5 cm Diameter; "It Wasn't Raining When Noah Built the Ark".

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare mean maximum ascending aortic diameter at the time of acute aortic dissection with the current surgical threshold for elective ascending aortic operations on non-syndromic thoracic aortic aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive non-syndromic adult patients admitted for acute type A aortic dissection in a single tertiary centre were prospectively enrolled from April 2020 to March 2021. The primary endpoint was the difference between mean maximum aortic diameter at the time of dissection and the 5.5 cm threshold for elective repair. Secondary endpoints included 30-day/in-hospital mortality, aortic length and comparison with normal controls, length/height ratio index, "actual" preoperative Euroscore II and "predicted" Euroscore II if electively operated. RESULTS: Among 31 patients ageing 67.3±12.03 years on average, mean maximum aortic diameter at the time of dissection was 5.13±0.66 cm, significantly lower than the guidelines-derived surgical threshold of 5.5 cm (p=0.004). Mean aortic length was 11±1.47 cm, also significantly longer compared normal controls reported in the literature (p<0.001). The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 35.5%. Mean length/height ratio index was 6.18±0.76 cm/m. Finally, mean "actual" preoperative Euroscore II was 10.43±4.07 which was significantly higher than the 1.47±0.57 "predicted" Euroscore II (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum aortic diameter at the time of acute type A aortic dissection of non-syndromic cases was significantly lower than the current recommendation for elective repair. Lowering of the current diameter-based surgical threshold of 5.5 cm may be profitable in terms of prevention, but further investigations should be undertaken. Length-based thresholds could also add to timely aortic dissection prevention.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Stenting for Aortic Coarctation.

BACKGROUND: Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a congenital cardiovascular malformation involving narrowing of the thoracic aorta just distal to the left subclavian artery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of endovascular treatment for CoA by using invasive aortic catheterization. METHODS: All patients with CoA who underwent treatment by aortic stent implantation between September 1, 2003, and February 1, 2019, at the "Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center," in Athens, Greece, were evaluated. Patients were treated with either bare (uncovered) Cheatham-Platinum (bCP) or covered Cheatham-Platinum (cCP) stent implantations. Invasive aortic pressure measurements were recorded before and after the endovascular intervention. RESULTS: A total of 48, eight zig CP stents, comprising 24 bCP and 24 cCP stents were implanted in 47 patients. The mean aortic diameter (mm) at the CoA lesion increased from 9.7 ± 3.3 to 19.2 ± 2.9 mm (p <0.01) after the endovascular procedure. The invasive mean blood pressure (BP; mm Hg) from catheterization in the descending aorta increased (before = 114.2 ± 12.8 vs. after = 135.5 ± 28.1; p <0.01), while the invasive mean BP (mm Hg) from catheterization in the ascending aorta was decreased (before = 156.8 ± 25.0 vs. after = 138.4 ± 27.5; p <0.01) after the intervention. The mean aortic BP gradient decreased in both types of stents after intervention (BP gradient among patients with cCP stents = 30.9 +/- 23.6 mmHg and BP gradient among patients with bCP stents = 38.0 +/-23.1 mmHg). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of stents; p = 0.36. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive aortic catheterization provided evidence that endovascular stenting with either bare or covered stents is efficient in treating patients with CoA.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenting for the Treatment of Cervical Carotid Artery Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery dissection (CAD). DATA SOURCES: Systematic review using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis statement. Data from the eligible studies were extracted and meta-analysed. Primary endpoints included post-operative mortality, cerebrovascular events (CEs), and modified Rankin Score for neurological disability (mRS) at 90 days. Subgroup analyses were performed between stenting of spontaneous and traumatic CAD, primary stenting vs. stenting after failed medical therapy (FMT), and stenting of CAD in the presence of tandem occlusions vs. stenting of isolated extracranial CAD. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 1 224 patients were included. Pooled post-operative mortality, CE, and mRS 0 - 2 rates were 1.71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 - 2.80), 6.45% (95% CI 2.80 - 11.10), and 76.13% (95% CI 64.15 - 86.50), respectively. The pooled stroke rate was 2.16% (95% CI 0.0 - 6.64). Spontaneous vs. traumatic CAD mortality rates were 3.20% (95% CI 1.80 - 4.88) and 0.00% (95% CI 0.00 - 1.59) while CE rates were 14.26% (95% CI 6.28 - 24.36) and 1.64% (95% CI 0.0 - 6.08). Primary stenting and stenting after FMT mortality rates were 0.63% (95% CI 0.0 - 5.63) and 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 - 2.24), while CE rates were 5.02% (95% CI 0.38 - 12.63) and 3.33% (95% CI 0.12 - 9.03). Mortality rates for tandem occlusions and isolated extracranial CAD were 5.62% (95% CI 1.76 - 10.83) and 0.23% (95% CI 0.0 - 1.88), respectively, while CE rates were 15.28% (95% CI 6.23 - 26.64) and 1.88% (95% CI 0.23 - 4.51). The methodological index for non-randomised studies score was 8.66 (low). CONCLUSION: Both primary stenting and stenting of spontaneous CAD yielded unfavourable results with respect to stent thrombosis and stroke rates. Conversely, stenting following FMT had acceptable mortality and complication rates corroborating the use of stenting in the setting of CAD as a second line treatment. Due to the low quality of the included studies, definite conclusions cannot be drawn necessitating further research.

Colour Duplex and/or Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared with Computed Tomography Angiography for Endoleak Detection after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aims to assess the role of Color Duplex Ultrasound with or without contrast media for surveillance following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A systematic search of the literature published until April 2022 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The pooled rates of endoleak detection through Contrast-Enhanced or Color Duplex Ultrasound (CEUS or CDUS) and Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effect analysis. Thirty-eight studies were considered eligible for inclusion. The total number of patients in the included studies was 5214 between 1997 and 2021. The overall pooled rate of endoleak detection using CDUS and CTA was 82.59% and 97.22%, while the rates for CEUS and CTA were 96.67% and 92.82%, respectively. The findings of the present study support the use of the CEUS for endoleak detection. However, it should be integrated into institutional protocols for EVAR surveillance to further evaluate its clinical utility in the post-EVAR period before it can be recommended as the sole imaging modality after EVAR.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After Operative Treatment of Aberrant Subclavian Artery Pathologies and Suggested Reporting Items.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesise and present all available evidence regarding the surgical treatment of patients with aberrant subclavian artery (aSA) pathologies during the last 30 years. The study also aimed to create a checklist of suggested reporting items to help increase reporting homogeneity. METHODS: A systematic search of medical databases was performed to identify all studies published between 1990 and 2020 reporting on the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for an aSA pathology. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A included patients undergoing open or hybrid surgery through sternotomy/thoracotomy and Group B included patients undergoing endovascular or hybrid treatment without chest access. The % crude rates (CR) of all variables of interest were calculated. A proportion meta-analysis was performed reporting pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen studies were identified reporting on the surgical outcomes of 732 patients (60.1% males; 440/732). The quality of evidence was generally low, with 286 studies including fewer than four patients and 28 studies with five or more cases. Aberrant right subclavian artery (aRSA) in a left sided aortic arch was present in 71.4% of the patients and a Kommerell's diverticulum was present in 50.1% of the cases. A total of 68% of the patients were symptomatic on presentation, with the majority complaining of dysphagia (49.6%). Group A included 453 and Group B 279 patients. Studies reporting on five or more patients were included in the main meta-analysis. The pooled early mortality rate was 1.62% (95% CI 0.05% - 4.53%) in Group A and 1.96% (95% CI 0 - 6.34%) in Group B. Pooled rates of symptom relief were 99.52% (95% CI 92.05% - 100.00%) in Group A and 95.79% (95% CI 83.96% - 100.00%) in Group B. CONCLUSION: The surgical techniques used to treat aSA and aortic pathologies involving an aSA had remarkably low mortality rates and high clinical success, regardless of the technique used.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of stroke rates in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the stroke rates after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms and/or dissections. METHODS: A systematic search of all the literature reported until September 2021 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. The pooled perioperative stroke rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods. RESULTS: A total of 878 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 43 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 5764 patients (63.5% male) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled any stroke rate was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.60%-5.28%). However, after procedures without left subclavian artery (LSA) ostial coverage (eg, TEVAR deployed within or distal to zone ≥3), the stroke rate was 3.15% (95% CI, 2.21%-4.22%). For the patients with LSA coverage, the pooled stroke rate was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.69%-4.14%) for patients receiving left subclavian artery revascularization. However, the patients without LSA revascularization had a pooled estimated stroke incidence of 11.8% (95% CI, 5.85%-19.12%). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke has been a common finding after TEVAR, especially with LSA coverage without revascularization, validating current clinical practice guidelines recommending routine revascularization, when feasible. Additional studies with larger patient numbers that provide separate data regarding the aortic pathology treated, the anatomic location of the stroke and their association with functional recovery and survival are needed.

E-Vita OPEN NEO Hybrid Stent Graft: A New Frontier for Total Arch Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The ever-changing landscape of aortic arch surgery necessitates a constant update on the available devices and technologies for the contemporary management of complex aortic diseases. The E-Vita OPEN NEO hybrid stent graft system offers a unique approach for aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. In contrast to its predecessors and other commercially available devices, it fits to each individual patient's needs by allowing for more proximal graft anastomosis. We sought to present our initial experience with the novel E-Vita OPEN NEO hybrid stent graft system focusing on its description, optimal graft selection, operative technique, and results in a clinical setting. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on all patients in whom the E-Vita OPEN NEO device was used between October 2020 and May 2021. The primary outcome was perioperative or with 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of neurologic complications (stroke and spinal cord ischemia) and endoleak on a postoperative computed tomography angiography. RESULTS: During the study period, six patients received the novel hybrid stent device. The mean patient age was 59.3 ± 13.3 years and 83% were male. Two patients were operated on an emergent setting due to acute Stanford type A aortic dissection and there were two reoperations in patients with a history of previous repaired type A dissection. There was no perioperative or 30-day mortality and none of the patients exhibited adverse neurologic events. Two patients required completion thoracic endovascular repair due to type Ib endoleak. One patient died after a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit due to pneumonia and multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: This novel device adapts to each patient's characteristics and offers a curative option for acute and chronic aortic arch and descending aortic conditions such as aneurysmal disease and aortic dissection. In addition, it offers an excellent landing station for potential endovascular therapies and allows for complete aortic remodeling.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Supera interwoven nitinol stents for the treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease.

INTRODUCTION: Stenting of infrainguinal lesions can be rather challenging due to the mechanical stress applied on the arteries during motion. We assessed the short-term and mid-term safety and efficacy of Supera interwoven nitinol stent for the treatment of infrainguinal arterial disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic review for articles published from December 2011 up to May 2021 regarding studies assessing the safety and efficacy of Supera interwoven nitinol stents for the treatment of infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease. Studies that involved synchronous application of the Supera stent and drug delivering devices, or any alternative endoprosthesis were excluded. Pooled Kaplan-Meier survival curves and smoothed hazard estimates were generated. Data were meta-analyzed using a random effects model. Primary endpoints included primary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TRL). Secondary endpoints included technical success and major amputation at 1 year post intervention. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seventeen studies with 2015 patients (65.3% males) and a mean lesion length of 137.2 mm were included. Of the total treated lesions, 44.9% involved femoropopliteal artery and 37.4% the popliteal artery. Chronic total occlusions made up 49% of the treated lesions. There were no stent fractures reported. The pooled technical success rate is 99.84% (95% CI: 99.26-100). Pooled major amputation rate at 1 year is 1.48% (95% CI: 0.47-2.87). Pooled primary patency and freedom from TLR rates at 1 year are 83.5% (95% CI: 80.24-86.54) and 90.32% (95% CI: 88.75-91.79), respectively. Pooling of individual patient data produced primary patency and freedom from TLR rates of 84.48% (95% CI: 82.66-86.11) and 90.81% (95% CI: 88.64-92.58) respectively. According to the smoothed hazard ratio estimate the risk for losing primary patency peaked between 4 and 5 months while the risk for TLR peaked between 7 and 8 months after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This review and meta-analysis indicated the safety and efficacy of Supera stents for the treatment of challenging infrainguinal lesions in the short-term and mid-term periods, with acceptable primary patency and freedom from TLR rates. Clinicians should be aware that between 4 and 5 months patients face a higher risk for event occurrence.

Systematic review with pooled data analysis reveals the need for a standardized reporting protocol including the visceral vessels during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR).

OBJECTIVES: To collect and analyse the available evidence in the outcomes of patients treated with fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR) technique focusing specifically on visceral vessel outcomes. METHODS: The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the studies reporting the f-EVAR technique for the management of degenerative pararenal and/or type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. The main study outcomes (technical success, type I endoleaks, fracture or occlusion of the bridging stents, overall aneurysm-related mortality, and the reintervention rate) were subsequently expressed as proportions and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with a total of 1804 patients were included in a pooled analysis. The technical success of the procedure was 95.97% (95%CI = 92.35-98.60). Intraoperatively, the pooled proportion of reported type I endoleak was 7.6% (95%CI = 2.52-14.60) while during a median follow-up of 41 months (range 11-96) follow-up period the pooled rate of fracture and occlusion of the bridging stents was 2.79% (95%CI = 0.00-8.52) and 4.46% (95%CI = 1.93-7.77), respectively. The overall aneurysm-related mortality was detected to be 0.63% (95%CI = 0.04-1.63), and the pooled estimate for re-intervention rate was 15.69%. CONCLUSIONS: Fenestrated endovascular repair for p-AAA is an effective and safe treatment. Target vessel complications and endoleaks remain the two most important concerns for fenestrated endovascular procedures, contributing to most of the secondary interventions. The lack of computed tomography angiography follow-up evaluation does not allow us to draw robust conclusions about the complication rates for the superior mesenteric artery during f-EVAR. Due to the potential implications of SMA complications on aneurysm-related mortality, standardized reporting of short- and long-term target visceral vessel outcomes is required.

Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Promotes the Healing of Non-Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: DFU (diabetic foot ulcer) represents a major global health and socioeconomic problem and a leading cause of lower limb amputation. Although many therapies have been tested, none has been proposed as a dominant wound healing treatment. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study in order to assess the role of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) for the promotion of non-ischemic DFU healing. METHODS: After full vascular assessment, a total of 80 patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either PRP injection in the healing edge and the floor of the targeted DFU (Group A), or have usual standard care with moist dressing with or without collagenase ointment (Group B). We calculated the total surface area (TSA) for the ulcer in both groups (cm2) before, after treatment and every week up to 12 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 4 patients (10%) experienced major amputation in group B, while no major amputation was performed in patients of Group A (P< 0.001). A ≥ 50% reduction in TSA occurred earlier in Group A (at 2.5 weeks), compared to Group B (4.5 weeks); P < 0.001. Complete wound healing rate was 95% (n = 38) and it was achieved earlier (6th week) for patients of group A, contrary to 77.8% (n = 28) of patients (9th week) for Group B (P < 0.001). Superficial wound infection was noted in 10% (n = 4) of the cases in the PRP arm, while in group B, 45% (n = 18) of cases had a variable degree of infection ranging from superficial to deep wound infection and cellulites (P < 0.001). PRP treatment was cost-effective, with 247.50$ vs. 437.50$ for the total cost of treatment for patients of Group B. CONCLUSION: PRP is a cost-beneficial novel modality of treatment that can accelerate wound healing and decrease the rate of local infection in DFU, compared to other conventional treatment modalities.