Thoracoscopic approach as surgical management of esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Management of diverticulum of the lower esophagus or epiphrenic diverticulum can be performed using the abdominal or thoracic approach. In some cases, the thoracic approach is preferred, but few studies have described thoracoscopic resection. The objective of the present study was to investigate the thoracoscopic approach for management of epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2018, all patients undergoing surgery for epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum by the thoracoscopic approach were included in this single-center, retrospective, observational study. Data on diverticulum, surgery and follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 14 patients underwent surgery. Two patients had two diverticula. The mean location of the superior edge of the diverticulum was 7cm (2-14cm) above the gastro-esophageal junction. The mean size of the diverticulum was 39 millimeters (20-60). Thoracoscopic approach was used in all patients. No conversion to thoracotomy was required. Mean operative time was 168min (120-240). No postoperative mortality occurred. The overall complication rate was 40% (6 complications out of 15 resections), with three major complications including leaks (n=2) and a case of bronchoesophageal fistula (n=1). Median length of hospital stay was 12 days (8-40). At a mean postoperative follow-up of 20.7 months (5-71), 85% of patients had complete disappearance of preoperative symptoms without recurrence of the diverticulum on the barium swallow study test. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic approach as management of epiphrenic diverticulum is feasible, with acceptable short-term morbidity. The thoracoscopic approach is also effective in resolving preoperative symptoms.

Which differences do elderly patients present in single-stage treatment for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis?

Patients with symptomatic gallstones present common bile duct stones in approximately 10% of cases. It is possible to resolve both gallbladder and bile duct stones with a single procedure. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a single stage procedure for gallbladder and bile duct stones in the elderly patients and to expose the differences between the various techniques. From January 2008 to December 2013, we treated 1540 patients with gallbladder stones. In 152 cases, we also found bile duct stones. 150 of these were treated in a single stage procedure. We divided our patients into 2 groups: Group A was younger than 65 (104 patients); Group B was 65 or older (46 patients). We retrospectively compared sex, ASA score, conversion rate, success rate, post-operative complications, hospital stay, and treatment method. We had no intra-operative mortality. 1 patient in Group B, heart condition (ASA 4), died with multiple organ failure (MOF) 10 days after his operation. ASA score: 3.5 ± 0.5 in A vs 2 ± 0.9 in B (P 0.001), post-operative complications 6% in A vs 18.1% in B (P 0.0325) and hospital stay 4.1 ± 2.3 in A vs 9.5 ± 5.5 in B (P 0.0001) were significantly higher in Group B. No differences were found in term of success rate: 94% in A vs 90% in B (P 0.4944). The procedure used to obtain the clearance of the bile duct showed a different success rate across the two groups: for the patients under 65 years old, trans-cystic clearance (TC-CBDE) was successful in 90% of cases, and only 51% for those older than 65, where we had to recall 49% for laparo-endoscopic rendez-vous (RV-IOERC) (P 0.0014). In conclusion, single stage treatment is safe and effective also to elderly patients. The methods used in patients being younger than 65 years old is what appeared to be significantly different.

Multimodal approach to mild biliary pancreatitis based on a risk stratification of choledocholithiasis.

AIM: The management of acute mild biliary pancreatitis is multidisciplinary and still presents controversies in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The aim of this retrospective study is to establish if a risk stratification of choledocholithiasis can optimize the employment of technological resources and medical competence in the treatment of individual patients in a tailored way. Our personal experience has then been compared with international literature. The main end-point was to evaluate the incidence of recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Secondary end point was to propose an affordable diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for this relatively common disease. METHODS: One hundred and one (101) patients affected by acute mild biliary pancreatitis were admitted in the Department of Patologia Chirurgica of "Ospedale SS. Annunziata" of Chieti from January 2004 to June 2011. Patients were divided in three groups; high (I), medium (II) and low risk (III) of choledocholithiasis (CBDS) according to clinical, laboratory and instrumental criteria. On the base of this division, patients in group I were subjected to ERCP with endoscopic sphinterotomy (ES) and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Group II patients underwent to MRCP, if positive for CBDS followed by ES and subsequently LC, if negative for CBDS directly LC. Group III patients underwent directly to LC associated with intra-operative cholangiography in selected cases. RESULTS: No recurrence of acute pancreatitis was observed in patients who completed the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. CONCLUSION: We believe that the application of a patient stratification in risk groups for choledocholithiasis can optimize the use of medical and technological resources and helps to address a patient for a specific and more appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic investigation allowing, at the same time, to identify patients who can usefully undergo to a simplified diagnostic and therapeutic approach.