Heterogeneous physical phantom for I-125 dose measurements and dose-to-medium determination.

PURPOSE: In this paper we present a further step in the implementation of a physical phantom designed to generate sets of "true" independent reference data as requested by TG-186, intending to address and mitigate the scarcity of experimental studies on brachytherapy (BT) validation in heterogeneous media. To achieve this, we incorporated well-known heterogeneous materials into the phantom in order to perform measurements of 125I dose distribution. The work aims to experimentally validate Monte Carlo (MC) calculations based on MBDCA and determine the conversion factors from LiF response to absorbed dose in different media, using cavity theory. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The physical phantom was adjusted to incorporate tissue equivalent materials, such as: adipose tissue, bone, breast and lung with varying thickness. MC calculations were performed using MCNP6.2 code to calculate the absorbed dose in the LiF and the dose conversion factors (DCF). RESULTS: The proposed heterogeneous phantom associated with the experimental procedure carried out in this work yielded accurate dose data that enabled the conversion of the LiF responses into absorbed dose to medium. The results showed a maximum uncertainty of 6.92 % (k = 1), which may be considered excellent for dosimetry with low-energy BT sources. CONCLUSIONS: The presented heterogeneous phantom achieves the required precision in dose evaluations due to its easy reproducibility in the experimental setup. The obtained results support the dose conversion methodology for all evaluated media. The experimental validation of the DCF in different media holds great significance for clinical procedures, as it can be applied to other tissues, including water, which remains a widely utilized reference medium in clinical practice.

A versatile physical phantom design and construction for I-125 dose measurements and dose-to-medium determination.

PURPOSE: In this paper we present a phantom designed to provide conditions to generate set of "true" independent reference data as requested by TG-186, and mitigating the scarcity of experimental studies on brachytherapy validation. It was used to perform accurate experimental measurements of dose of 125I brachytherapy seeds using LiF dosimeters, with the objective of experimentally validating Monte Carlo (MC) calculations with model-based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA). In addition, this work intends to evaluate a methodology to convert the experimental values from LiF into dose in the medium. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The proposed PMMA physical phantom features cavities to insert a LiF dosimeter and a 125I seed, adjusted in different configurations with variable thickness. Monte Carlo calculations performed with MCNP6.2 code were used to score the absorbed dose in the LiF and the dose conversion parameters. A sensitivity analysis was done to verify the source of possible uncertainties and quantify their impact on the results. RESULTS: The proposed phantom and experimental procedure developed in this work provided precise dose data within 5.68% uncertainty (k = 1). The achieved precision made it possible to convert the LiF responses into absorbed dose to medium and to validate the dose conversion factor methodology. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed phantom is simple both in design and as in its composition, thus achieving the demanded precision in dose evaluations due to its easy reproducibility of experimental setup. The results derived from the phantom measurements support the dose conversion methodology. The phantom and the experimental procedure developed here can be applied for other materials and radiation sources.

Monte Carlo studies on water and LiF cavity properties for dose-reporting quantities when using x-ray and brachytherapy sources.

Model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) are the current tools to estimate dose in brachytherapy, which takes into account heterogeneous medium, therefore, departing from water-based formalism (TG-43). One aspect associated to MBCDA is the choice of dose specification medium since it offers two possibilities to report dose: (a) dose to medium in medium, D m,m; and (b) dose to water in medium, D w,m. The discussion about the preferable quantity to be reported is underway. The dose conversion factors, DCF, between dose to water in medium, D w,m, and dose to medium in medium, D m,m, is based on cavity theory and can be obtained using different approaches. When experimental dose verification is desired using, for example, thermoluminescent LiF dosimeters, as in in vivo dose measurements, a third quantity is obtained, which is the dose to LiF in medium, D LiF,m. In this case, DCF to convert from D LiF,m to D w,m or D m,m is necessary. The objective of this study is to estimate DCFs using different approaches, present in the literature, quantifying the differences between them. Also, dose in water and LiF cavities in different tissue media and respective conversion factors to be able to convert LiF-based dose measured values into dose in water or tissue were obtained. Simple cylindrical phantoms composed by different tissue equivalent materials (bone, lung, water and adipose) are modelled. The phantoms contain a radiation source and a cavity with 0.002 69 cm3 in size, which is a typical volume of a disc type LiF dosimeter. Three x-rays qualities with average energies ranging from 47 to 250 keV, and three brachytherapy sources, 60Co, 192Ir and 137Cs, are considered. Different cavity theory approaches for DCF calculations and different cavity/medium combinations have been considered in this study. DCF values for water/bone and LiF/bone cases have strong dependence with energy increasing as the photon energy increases. DCF values also increase with energy for LiF/lung and water/lung cases but, they are much less dependent of energy. For LiF/adipose, water/adipose and LiF/water cases, the DCF values are also dependent of photon energy but, decreases as the energy increases. Maximum difference of 12% has been found compared to values in literature.