ABSTRACT
Radiographic measurements are frequently used to classify deformity and determine treatment options. Correlation coefficients can be used to determine inter- and intrarater reliability. Reliability is a required feature of any measurement if the measurement is to provide valid information. We calculated correlation coefficients for standard radiographic measurements used to categorize foot deformities: this was done for 52 sets of radiographs assessed by 5 raters. We aimed for generalizability, and kept rater instructions to match what was originally published for each measurement of interest with schematic illustration. Overall, our results mostly showed a lack of inter-rater reliability (correlation coefficients <0.4), and strong intrarater reliability (correlation coefficients >0.6), for 12 forefoot and 12 rearfoot radiographic measurements that are commonly used. The results of this investigation bring into question the routine use of radiographic measurements to categorize deformity, select treatments, and measure surgical outcomes, between surgeons, because the validity of these measurements appears to be threatened by weak inter-rater reliability. In order for these measurements to be considered useful, it may be necessary for surgeons to more rigorously define and practice making standard radiographic measurements.
