Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy via Turbuhaler versus fixed-dose budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline in patients with asthma: phase III study results.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol as maintenance and reliever therapy versus budesonide/formoterol maintenance plus terbutaline in adults with persistent asthma not adequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy alone. METHODS: In this 12-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III study (NCT00839800), patients (age ≥ 16 years; receiving maintenance ICS; ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the 12 months prior to study entry) were randomized to either budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg 1 inhalation twice daily plus budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg as-needed or budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg 1 inhalation twice daily plus terbutaline 0.4 mg as-needed for 12 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME: time to first severe asthma exacerbation; secondary outcomes included: lung function, asthma symptom variables and tolerability. RESULTS: Two thousand and ninety-one patients were randomized: 170 (16%) receiving budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy experienced 259 severe exacerbations versus 229 patients (22%) receiving budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline who experienced 363 severe exacerbations. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy prolonged the time to first severe exacerbation versus budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline (P = 0.0007) and reduced the instantaneous risk of an exacerbation by 30% (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.85, P = 0.0003). Times to first oral steroid use, first hospitalization and first emergency room treatment were all significantly prolonged in the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever group versus budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline. Both treatment groups were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy provided more effective asthma control, including a prolonged time to first severe asthma exacerbation, than budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline and was well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy also improved lung function and asthma symptoms.

A randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of AZD9668, an oral inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with tiotropium.

AZD9668 is a fully reversible, selective, oral inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, a protease implicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD9668 (5, 20 and 60 mg bid) were compared with placebo in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week, Phase IIb trial (NCT00949975: approved by an Investigational Review Board), in patients with symptomatic COPD receiving maintenance tiotropium. The primary endpoint was pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Secondary endpoints included forced vital capacity and inspiratory capacity, peak expiratory flow, Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale score, exercise capacity, quality of life (QoL), exacerbation assessments, safety and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints included inflammatory and tissue degradation biomarkers. A total of 838 patients were randomised to AZD9668 5 mg bid (212 patients), 20 mg bid (206 patients), 60 mg bid (202 patients) or placebo (218 patients). AZD9668 showed no effect on lung function, respiratory signs and symptoms, QoL or biomarkers. At end of treatment, the change in mean pre-bronchodilator FEV1 for AZD9668 60 mg bid compared with placebo was 0.00L (95% confidence interval: -0.05, 0.04; p = 0.873). Overall, AZD9668 was well tolerated; the numbers of patients with adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were similar in each of the four study groups. AZD9668 60 mg bid showed no clinical benefit and no effect on biomarkers of inflammation or tissue degradation when added to tiotropium in patients with COPD. These results raise important questions for future investigation of anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying agents in patients with COPD.