ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a common chronic disorder of childhood and adolescence. T1DM induced cardiomyopathy has a different entity than T2DM as it relies on different pathophysiological mechanisms, and rarely coexists with hypertension and obesity. Evaluation of right ventricular (RV) function in diabetic patients has been neglected despite the important contribution of RV to the overall cardiac function that affects the course and prognosis of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). OBJECTIVE: To assess RV myocardial performance in asymptomatic T1DM using speckle tracking and standard echo parameters and correlate it with functional capacity using treadmill stress test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with TIDM (Group 1, mean age 18.2±1.7y, BMI=26.2±3.9kg/m2), without cardiac problems and 15 apparently healthy matched subjects as a control group (Group 2, mean age 18.8±2.3 y, BMI=22.8±3.3kg/m2) were enrolled. RV function was evaluated using conventional, tissue Doppler and 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). The peak RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) was obtained. Functional capacity was assessed by treadmill exercise test and estimated in metabolic equivalent (METs). RESULTS: In this study; the diabetic group showed statistically highly significant decrease in the average RV-GLS (-14.0±6.9 in group 1 vs. -22.7±2.5 in group 2, P<0.001), significant decrease in RV S velocity (9.5±2.2 in group 1 vs. 11.5±1.8 in group 2, P<0.05), significantly reduced E/A ratio (1.0±0.2 in group 1 vs. 1.1±0.1 in group 2, P<0.05), and highly significant increased E/Em ratio (7.9±3.2 in group 1 vs. 5.2±0.7 in group 2, P<0.001). We did not found any significant differences between the two groups regarding the other echocardiographic or functional capacity parameters. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients with T1DM, in addition to RV diastolic dysfunction, early (subclinical) RV systolic dysfunction is preferentially observed with normal RV and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). 2D-STE has the ability to detect subclinical RV systolic dysfunction.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , Echocardiography, Doppler/methods , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnosis , Ventricular Function, Right/physiology , Adolescent , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/complications , Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/epidemiology , Egypt/epidemiology , Exercise Test , Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Female , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prognosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulceration is a preventable long-term complication of diabetes. In the present study, peak plantar pressures (PPP) and other characteristics were assessed in a group of 100 Egyptian patients with diabetes with or without neuropathy and foot ulcers. The aim was to study the relationship between plantar pressure (PP) and neuropathy with or without ulceration and trying to clarify the utility of pedobarography as an ulceration risk assessment tool in patients with diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients having diabetes were selected. All patients had a comprehensive foot evaluation, including assessment for neuropathy using modified neuropathy disability score (MNDS), for peripheral vascular disease using ankle brachial index, and for dynamic foot pressures using the MAT system (Tekscan). The studied patients were grouped into: (1) diabetic control group (DC), which included 37 patients who had diabetes without neuropathy or ulceration and MNDS ≤2; (2) diabetic neuropathy group (DN), which included 33 patients who had diabetes with neuropathy and MNDS >2, without current or a history of ulceration; and (3) diabetic ulcer group (DU), which included 30 patients who had diabetes and current ulceration, seven of those patients also gave a history of ulceration. RESULTS: PP parameters were significantly different between the studied groups, namely, forefoot peak plantar pressure (FFPPP), rearfoot peak plantar pressure (RFPPP), forefoot/rearfoot ratio (F/R), forefoot peak pressure gradient (FFPPG) rearfoot peak pressure gradient (RFPPG), and forefoot peak pressure gradient/rearfoot peak pressure gradient (FFPPG/RFPPG) (P < 0.05). FFPPP and F/R were significantly higher in the DU group compared to the DN and DC groups (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between DN and DC. FFPPG was significantly higher in the DU and DN groups compared to the DC group (P < 0.05). RFPPP and FFPPG/RFPPG were significantly higher in the DU and DN groups compared to the DC group (P < 0.05) with no significant difference between the DN and DU groups (P > 0.05). FFPPP, F/R ratio, FFPPG, and FFPPG/RFPPG correlated significantly with the severity of neuropathy according to MNDS (P < 0.05). These same variables as well as MNDS were also significantly higher in patients with foot deformity compared to those without deformity (P < 0.05). Using the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-point of PPP for ulceration risk, as determined by a balance of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was 335 kPa and was found at the forefoot. Multivariate logistical regression analysis for ulceration risk was statistically significant for duration of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8), smoking (OR = 9.7), foot deformity (OR = 8.7), MNDS (OR = 1.5), 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (2 h-PPG) (OR = 0.9), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (OR = 2.1), FFPPP (OR = 1.0), and FFPPG (OR = 1.0). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, persons with diabetes having neuropathy and/or ulcers have elevated PPP. Risk of ulceration was highly associated with duration of diabetes, smoking, severity of neuropathy, glycemic control, and high PP variables especially the FFPPP, F/R, and FFPPG. We suggest a cut-point of 355 kPa for FFPPP to denote high risk for ulceration that would be more valid when used in conjunction with other contributory risk factors, namely, duration of diabetes, smoking, glycemic load, foot deformity, and severity of neuropathy.