Self-Reported Disability Type and Risk of Alcohol-Induced Death - A Longitudinal Study Using Nationally Representative Data.

BACKGROUND: Disability is associated with alcohol misuse and drug overdose death, however, its association with alcohol-induced death remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of alcohol-induced death among adults with different types of disabilities in a nationally representative longitudinal sample of US adults. METHODS: Persons with disabilities were identified among participants ages 18 or older in the Mortality Disparities in American Communities (MDAC) study (n = 3,324,000). Baseline data were collected in 2008 and mortality outcomes were ascertained through 2019 using the National Death Index. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the association between disability type and alcohol-induced death, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic covariates. RESULTS: During a maximum of 12 years of follow-up, 4000 alcohol-induced deaths occurred in the study population. In descending order, the following disability types displayed the greatest risk of alcohol-induced death (compared to adults without disability): complex activity limitation (aHR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3-2.3), vision limitation (aHR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0), mobility limitation (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.3-1.7), ≥2 limitations (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.3-1.6), cognitive limitation (aHR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0-1.4), and hearing limitation (aHR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.9-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of alcohol-induced death varies considerably by disability type. Efforts to prevent alcohol-induced deaths should be tailored to meet the needs of the highest-risk groups, including adults with complex activity (i.e., activities of daily living - "ALDs"), vision, mobility, and ≥2 limitations. Early diagnosis and treatment of alcohol use disorder within these populations, and improved access to educational and occupational opportunities, should be considered as prevention strategies for alcohol-induced deaths.

The risk of drug overdose death among adults with select types of disabilities in the United States - A longitudinal study using nationally representative data.

BACKGROUND: Disability is associated with increased risk of drug overdose mortality, but previous studies use coarse and inconsistent methods to identify adults with disabilities. This investigation makes use of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services disability questions to estimate the risk of drug overdose death among U.S. adults using seven established disability categories. METHODS: The longitudinal Mortality Disparities in American Communities study was used to determine disability status among a nationally representative sample of adults age ≥18 in 2008 (n = 3,324,000). Through linkage to the National Death Index, drug overdose deaths were identified through 2019. Adults in mutually-exclusive disability categories (hearing, vision, cognitive, mobility, complex activity, ≥2 limitations) were compared to adults with no reported disabilities using adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and controlling for demographic and socioeconomic covariates. RESULTS: The risk of drug overdose death varied considerably by disability type, as adults in some disability categories displayed only marginally significant risk, while adults in other disability categories displayed substantially elevated risk. Compared to non-disabled adults, the risk of drug overdose death was highest among adults with ≥2 limitations (aHR = 3.0, 95% CI = 2.8-3.3), cognitive limitation (aHR = 2.6, 95% CI = 2.3-2.9), mobility limitation (aHR = 2.6, 95% CI = 2.3-2.9), complex activity limitation (aHR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.8-2.9), hearing limitation (aHR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3-1.9), and vision limitation (aHR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: The examination of specific disability categories revealed unique associations that were not apparent in previous research. These findings can be used to focus overdose prevention efforts on the populations at greatest risk for drug-related mortality.

Drug and alcohol use disorders among adults with select disabilities: The national survey on drug use and health.

BACKGROUND: Deaths caused by drugs and alcohol have reached high levels in the US, and prior research shows a consistent association between disability status and substance misuse. OBJECTIVE: Using national data, this study quantifies the association between disability status and drug and alcohol use disorders among US adults. METHODS: The most recent pre-pandemic years (2018-2019) of the cross-sectional National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 83,439) were used to examine how the presence of any disability, and specific disabilities, were associated with past year drug and alcohol use disorders. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) controlling for potential sociodemographic confounders. RESULTS: Adults with any disability had increased odds of drug (aOR = 2.7; 95% CI = 2.5-3.0), and alcohol use disorder (aOR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.6-2.0), compared to adults without disability. Examining specific types of disabilities, adults with cognitive limitations only had increased odds of drug (aOR = 3.1; 95% CI = 2.6-3.6), and alcohol use disorders (aOR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.9-2.5), compared to adults without disability. Smaller associations were observed between vision and complex activity limitations and drug use disorder. Adults with two or more types of limitations had increased odds of drug (aOR = 3.7; 95% CI = 3.3-4.3), and alcohol use disorders (aOR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.6). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of disability, especially cognitive limitation only, or two or more types of limitations, is associated with elevated odds of drug and alcohol use disorder among US adults. Additional research should examine the temporal relationship between and mechanisms linking disability and substance misuse.

Psychological distress and the risk of drug overdose death.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown an association between psychological distress and overdose death among specific populations. However, few studies have examined this relationship in a large US population-based cohort. METHODS: Data from the 2010-2018 NHIS were linked to mortality data from the National Death Index through 2019. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler 6 scale. Drug overdose deaths were examined, and deaths from all other causes were included as a comparison group. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate mortality risk by psychological distress level. RESULTS: The study population included 272,561 adults. Adjusting for demographic covariates and using no psychological distress as the reference, distress level was positively associated with the risk of overdose death: low (HR = 1.8, 95 % CI = 1.1-2.8), moderate (HR = 4.1, 95 % CI = 2.5-6.7), high (HR = 10.3, 95 % CI = 6.5-16.1). A similar pattern was observed for deaths from all other causes: low (HR = 1.2, 95 % CI = 1.1-1.2), moderate (HR = 1.9, 95 % CI = 1.7-2.0), high (HR = 2.6, 95 % CI = 2.4-2.8). LIMITATIONS: Limited substance use information prevented adjustment for this potentially important covariate. DISCUSSION: Adults with psychological distress were at greater risk of drug overdose death, relative to those without psychological distress. Adults with psychological distress were also at increased risk of death due to other causes, though the association was not as strong.

A methodological assessment of privacy preserving record linkage using survey and administrative data.

BACKGROUND: The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) links data from surveys to administrative data sources, but privacy concerns make accessing new data sources difficult. Privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) is an alternative to traditional linkage approaches that may overcome this barrier. However, prior to implementing PPRL techniques it is important to understand their effect on data quality. METHODS: Results from PPRL were compared to results from an established linkage method, which uses unencrypted (plain text) identifiers and both deterministic and probabilistic techniques. The established method was used as the gold standard. Links performed with PPRL were evaluated for precision and recall. An initial assessment and a refined approach were implemented. The impact of PPRL on secondary data analysis, including match and mortality rates, was assessed. RESULTS: The match rates for all approaches were similar, 5.1% for the gold standard, 5.4% for the initial PPRL and 5.0% for the refined PPRL approach. Precision ranged from 93.8% to 98.9% and recall ranged from 98.7% to 97.8%, depending on the selection of tokens from PPRL. The impact of PPRL on secondary data analysis was minimal. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest PPRL works well to link patient records to the National Death Index (NDI) since both sources have a high level of non-missing personally identifiable information, especially among adults 65 and older who may also have a higher likelihood of linking to the NDI. CONCLUSION: The results from this study are encouraging for first steps for a statistical agency in the implementation of PPRL approaches, however, future research is still needed.

Assessing Linkage Eligibility Bias in the National Health Interview Survey.

Background Linking health survey data to administrative records expands the analytic utility of survey participant responses, but also creates the potential for new sources of bias when not all participants are eligible for linkage. Residual differences-bias-can occur between estimates made using the full survey sample and the subset eligible for linkage. Objective To assess linkage eligibility bias and provide examples of how bias may be reduced by changes in questionnaire design and adjustment of survey weights for linkage eligibility. Methods Linkage eligibility bias was estimated for various sociodemographic groups and health-related variables for the 2000-2013 National Health Interview Surveys. Conclusions Analysts using the linked data should consider the potential for linkage eligibility bias when planning their analyses and use approaches to reduce bias, such as survey weight adjustments, when appropriate.

Drug overdose mortality is associated with employment status and occupation in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study.

BACKGROUND: Since 1999, over 702,000 people in the US have died of a drug overdose, and the drug overdose death rate has increased from 6.2 to 21.8 per 100,000. Employment status and occupation may be important social determinants of overdose deaths. OBJECTIVES: Estimate the risk of drug overdose death by employment status and occupation, controlling for other social and demographic factors known to be associated with overdose deaths. METHODS: Proportional hazard models were used to study US adults in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study with baseline measurements taken in the early 2000s and up to 6 years of follow-up (n = 438,739, 53% female, 47% male). Comparisons were made between adults with different employment statuses (employed, unemployed, disabled, etc.) and occupations (sales, construction, service occupations, etc.). Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income and marital status. RESULTS: Adults who were disabled (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.96 (95% CI = 6.81-7.12)), unemployed (HR = 4.20, 95% CI = 4.09-4.32) and retired (HR = 2.94, 95% CI = 2.87-3.00) were at higher risk of overdose death relative to those who were employed. By occupation, those working in service (HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.97-2.13); construction and extraction (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.64-1.76); management, business and financial (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.33-1.44); and installation, maintenance and repair (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.25-1.40) occupations displayed higher risk relative to professional occupations. CONCLUSIONS: In a large national cohort followed prospectively for up to 6 years, several employment statuses and occupations are associated with overdose deaths, independent of a range of other factors. Efforts to prevent overdose deaths may benefit from focusing on these high-risk groups.

Doctor hopping and doctor shopping for prescription opioids associated with increased odds of high-risk use.

PURPOSE: Early detection of risky behaviors involving prescription opioids can assist prescribers in implementing safer prescribing. Patient-to-prescriber travel patterns may indicate potential opioid misuse. We introduce doctor hopping, patients bypassing nearby prescribers in favor of more distant ones, as a new spatial estimation of potentially risky behavior, and compare with traditional doctor shopping metrics. METHODS: We examined all filled opioid prescriptions between 2015 and 2016 from the Arkansas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. We calculated patient-to-prescriber travel times and number of prescribers bypassed for each prescription, adjusted for payment method. Opioid recipients traveling further than the nearest urban area and bypassing more prescribers than 99% of other recipients from the same zip code were identified as doctor hoppers. We calculated odds ratios to evaluate how doctor hopping and doctor shopping correspond to high-risk opioid uses. RESULTS: Approximately 0.72% of all opioid recipients in Arkansas engaged in doctor hopping two or more times during the study period. Rates of doctor hopping varied spatially but were more common in rural areas. Doctor shopping was more common in urban areas. Both hopping and shopping were significantly associated with higher odds of engaging in high-risk opioid use. The combination of doctor hopping and doctor shopping metrics can predict high-risk use better than either metric alone and may allow for earlier detection than doctor shopping alone. CONCLUSIONS: Doctor hopping is positively associated with high-risk opioid use and is distinct from and complementary to doctor shopping. We recommend Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) vendors incorporate similar spatial analyses into their systems.