The combination of covalent and ionic exchange immobilizations enables the coimmobilization on vinyl sulfone activated supports and the reuse of the most stable immobilized enzyme.

The coimmobilization of lipases from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and Candida antarctica (CALB) has been intended using agarose beads activated with divinyl sulfone. CALB could be immobilized on this support, while RML was not. However, RML was ionically exchanged on this support blocked with ethylendiamine. Therefore, both enzymes could be coimmobilized on the same particle, CALB covalently using the vinyl sulfone groups, and RML via anionic exchange on the aminated blocked support. However, immobilized RML was far less stable than immobilized CALB. To avoid the discarding of CALB (that maintained 90% of the initial activity after RML inactivation), a strategy was developed. Inactivated RML was desorbed from the support using ammonium sulfate and 1% Triton X-100 at pH 7.0. That way, 5 cycles of RML thermal inactivation, discharge of the inactivated enzyme and re-immobilization of a fresh sample of RML could be performed. In the last cycle, immobilized CALB activity was still over 90% of the initial one. Thus, the strategy permits that enzymes can be coimmobilized on vinyl sulfone supports even if one of them cannot be immobilized on it, and also permits the reuse of the most stable enzyme (if it is irreversibly attached to the support).

Effect of Concentrated Salts Solutions on the Stability of Immobilized Enzymes: Influence of Inactivation Conditions and Immobilization Protocol.

This paper aims to investigate the effects of some salts (NaCl, (NH4)2SO4 and Na2SO4) at pH 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0 on the stability of 13 different immobilized enzymes: five lipases, three proteases, two glycosidases, and one laccase, penicillin G acylase and catalase. The enzymes were immobilized to prevent their aggregation. Lipases were immobilized via interfacial activation on octyl agarose or on glutaraldehyde-amino agarose beads, proteases on glyoxyl agarose or glutaraldehyde-amino agarose beads. The use of high concentrations of salts usually has some effects on enzyme stability, but the intensity and nature of these effects depends on the inactivation pH, nature and concentration of the salt, enzyme and immobilization protocol. The same salt can be a stabilizing or a destabilizing agent for a specific enzyme depending on its concentration, inactivation pH and immobilization protocol. Using lipases, (NH4)2SO4 generally permits the highest stabilities (although this is not a universal rule), but using the other enzymes this salt is in many instances a destabilizing agent. At pH 9.0, it is more likely to find a salt destabilizing effect than at pH 7.0. Results confirm the difficulty of foreseeing the effect of high concentrations of salts in a specific immobilized enzyme.

Enzyme co-immobilization: Always the biocatalyst designers' choice or not?

The increasing relevance of cascade reactions in biocatalysis has sparked a great interest for enzyme co-immobilization. Enzyme co-immobilization allows access to some kinetic advantages that in some instances are necessary to get the desired product, avoiding side-reactions. However, the kinetic effect is very relevant mainly at the initial reaction rates, while it may be less relevant in the whole reaction course, depending on the kinetic parameters of the involved enzymes. This review not only critically discusses the advantages but also the drawbacks of enzymes co-immobilization: immobilization on the same support and surface, under similar conditions, discarding the whole biocatalyst when one of the co-immobilized enzymes is inactivated. We will discuss when co-immobilization is almost compulsory, when the advantages of co-immobilization may not be enough to compensate their problems and when it should be fully discarded. The co-immobilization of cofactors and enzymes bears special interest, as this can open up the opportunity to the building of artificial cells and extremely complex one-pot transformations. Finally, some recent strategies to overcome some the co-immobilization problems will be presented.

Use of polyethylenimine to produce immobilized lipase multilayers biocatalysts with very high volumetric activity using octyl-agarose beads: Avoiding enzyme release during multilayer production.

A strategy to obtain biocatalysts formed by three enzyme layers has been designed using lipases A and B from Candida antarctica (CALA and CALB), the lipases from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL), and the artificial chimeric phospholipase Lecitase Ultra (LEU). The enzymes were initially immobilized via interfacial activation on octyl-agarose beads, treated with polyethylenimine (PEI) and a new enzyme layer was immobilized on the octyl-enzyme-PEI composite by ion exchange, producing octyl-enzyme-PEI-enzyme biocatalysts. Except when using LEU, when the two-layer biocatalysts, a large percentage of the PEI-immobilized enzyme was released when a new batch of PEI was added. This was prevented by glutaraldehyde crosslinking. The enzyme modifications produced more active preparations in some cases while in other cases, the effect of the modifications was negative for enzyme activity. These effects of the enzymes modifications were also different when the enzyme was immobilized by interfacial activation or by ion exchange. In all cases, the 3-layer biocatalysts were more active than the single- or bi-layer biocatalysts with some of the assayed substrates. However, as the substrate diffusion problems increased when new enzyme layers were added, even a decrease in enzyme activity with some substrates was found after increasing the number of enzyme layers.

Effects of Enzyme Loading and Immobilization Conditions on the Catalytic Features of Lipase From Pseudomonas fluorescens Immobilized on Octyl-Agarose Beads.

The lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens (PFL) has been immobilized on octyl-agarose beads under 16 different conditions (varying pH, ionic strength, buffer, adding some additives) at two different loadings, 1 and 60 mg of enzyme/g of support with the objective of check if this can alter the biocatalyst features. The activity of the biocatalysts versus p-nitrophenyl butyrate and triacetin and their thermal stability were studied. The different immobilization conditions produced biocatalysts with very different features. Considering the extreme cases, using 1 mg/g preparations, PFL stability changed more than fourfolds, while their activities versus pNPB or triacetin varied a 50-60%. Curiously, PFL specific activity versus triacetin was higher using highly enzyme loaded biocatalysts than using lowly loaded biocatalysts (even by a twofold factor). Moreover, stability of the highly loaded preparations was higher than that of the lowly loaded preparations, in many instances even when using 5°C higher temperatures (e.g., immobilized in the presence of calcium, the highly loaded biocatalysts maintained after 24 h at 75°c a 85% of the initial activity, while the lowly loaded preparation maintained only 27% at 70°C). Using the highly loaded preparations, activity of the different biocatalysts versus pNPB varied almost 1.7-folds and versus triacetin 1.9-folds. In this instance, the changes in stability caused by the immobilization conditions were much more significant, some preparations were almost fully inactivated under conditions where the most stable one maintained more than 80% of the initial activity. Results suggested that immobilization conditions greatly affected the properties of the immobilized PFL, partially by individual molecule different conformation (observed using lowly loaded preparations) but much more relevantly using highly loaded preparations, very likely by altering some enzyme-enzyme intermolecular interactions. There is not an optimal biocatalyst considering all parameters. That way, preparation of biocatalysts using this support may be a powerful tool to tune enzyme features, if carefully controlled.

Coimmobilization of different lipases: Simple layer by layer enzyme spatial ordering.

This paper shows the step by step coimmobilization of up to five different enzymes following two different orders in the coimmobilization to alter the effect of substrate diffusion limitations. The enzymes were the lipases A and B from Candida antarctica, the lipases from Rhizomocur miehei and, Themomyces lanuginosus and the phospholipase Lecitase Ultra. The utilized strategy was a layer by layer immobilization, coating the immobilized enzymes with polyethylenimine followed by the crosslinking of the enzyme and PEI with glutaraldehyde to prevent enzyme release, and them adding a new lipase layer. The use of previously inactivated biocatalysts (using diethyl p-nitrophenylphosphate) permitted to visualize the immobilization of each enzyme layer, which was later confirmed by SDS-PAGE. This also confirmed the successful and complete covalent crosslinking of the glutaraldehyde treated enzyme layers. Activity of the combibiocatalysts was followed using diverse substrates. The protocol was successful and permitted to immobilize in an ordered way the 5 different enzymes in a down-up distribution.

Modulating the properties of the lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus immobilized on octyl agarose beads by altering the immobilization conditions.

The lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL) has been immobilized on octyl-agarose beads via interfacial activation under 16 different conditions (changing the immobilization pH, the ionic strength, the presence of additives like calcium, phosphate or glycerol) and using a low loading (1 mg/g support). Then, the properties of the different biocatalysts have been evaluated: stability at pH 7.0 and 70 °C and activity versus p-nitro phenyl propionate, triacetin and R- and S- methyl mandelate. Results clearly indicate that the immobilization conditions determine the final enzyme properties, altering enzyme stability (by 10 folds), activity (by 8 folds using R- methyl mandelate) and specificity (VR/VS changed from 0.7 to 2.3 using mandelate esters). For instance, the enzymes immobilized at pH 7.0 using 5 mM buffer were the most stable preparations, while the presence of 250 mM sodium phosphate greatly decreased the final enzyme stability. The biocatalyst stability of TLL increased with increasing NaCl in the immobilization buffer at pH 5. Fluorescence studies confirmed that the conformation of the different immobilized enzymes were different, despite being a physical and reversible immobilization method. Thus, the immobilization of TLL on octyl agarose beads under different conditions produced biocatalysts with different properties, the optimal condition depends on the studied reaction and condition.

Immobilization of lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens on glyoxyl-octyl-agarose beads: Improved stability and reusability.

The lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens (PFL) has been immobilized on glyoxyl-octyl agarose and compared to the enzyme immobilized on octyl-agarose. Thus, PFL was immobilized at pH 7 on glyoxyl-octyl support via lipase interfacial activation and later incubated at pH 10.5 for 20 h before reduction to get some enzyme-support covalent bonds. This permitted for 70% of the enzyme molecules to become covalently attached to the support. This biocatalyst was slightly more stable than the octyl-PFL at pH 5, 7 and 9, or in the presence of some organic solvents (stabilization factor no higher than 2). The presence of phosphate anions produced enzyme destabilization, partially prevented by the immobilization on glyoxyl-octyl (stabilization factor became 4). In contrast, the presence of calcium cations promoted a great PFLstabilization, higher in the case of the glyoxyl-octyl preparation (that remained 100% active when the octyl-PFL preparations had lost 20% of the activity). However, it is in the operational stability where the new biocatalyst showed the advantages: in the hydrolysis of 1 M triacetin in 60% 1.4 dioxane, the octyl biocatalyst released >60% of the enzyme in the first cycle, while the covalently attached enzyme retained its full activity after 5 reaction cycles.

New applications of glyoxyl-octyl agarose in lipases co-immobilization: Strategies to reuse the most stable lipase.

Lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB), lipase from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and phospholipase Lecitase Ultra (LEU) were immobilized via interfacial activation and their stabilities were compared. Immobilized CALB was much more stable than immobilized RML or LEU. That meant that, if they were coimmobilized, after the inactivation of the least stable lipases, CALB should be discarded even though it may maintain full activity. This could be solved by sequential coimmobilization on octyl-glyoxyl (OCGLX). First, CALB was immobilized on OCGLX getting some covalent bonds between most of the CALB molecules and the support. Then, after reduction of CALB immobilized on OCGLX, RML or LEU can be immobilized on the support via interfacial activation. These enzymes could be released from the support just by using detergents, without affecting CALB activity. After optimization of the lipase desorption conditions, the bi-combilipases CALB/RML and CALB/LEU or the triple-combilipase CALB/RML/LEU could be submitted to several cycles of immobilized biocatalyst inactivation, desorption and enzyme reloading keeping the activity of the immobilized CALB almost intact. This way, by using OCGLX and a stepwise immobilization protocol, discarding all coimmobilized lipases when one becomes inactivated is no longer required. Thus, the most stable ones can be reused in several cycles.

Immobilization on octyl-agarose beads and some catalytic features of commercial preparations of lipase a from Candida antarctica (Novocor ADL): Comparison with immobilized lipase B from Candida antarctica.

Lipase A from Candida antarctica (CALA, commercialized as Novocor ADL) was immobilized on octyl-agarose, which is a very useful support for lipase immobilization, and coated with polyethylenimine to improve the stability. The performance was compared to that of the form B of the enzyme (CALB) immobilized on the same support, as both enzymes are among the most popular ones used in biocatalysis. CALA immobilization produced a significant increase in enzyme activity vs. p-nitrophenyl butyrate (pNPB) (by a factor of seven), and the coating with PEI did not have a significant effect on enzyme activity. CALB reduced its activity slightly after enzyme immobilization. Octyl-CALA was less stable than octyl-CALB at pH 9 and more stable at pH 5 and, more clearly, at pH 7. PEI coating only increased octyl-CALA stability at pH 9. In organic solvents, CALB had much better stability in methanol and was similarly stable in acetonitrile or dioxane. In these systems, the PEI coating of octyl-CALA permitted some stabilization. While octyl-CALA was more active vs. pNPB, octyl-CALB was much more active vs. mandelic esters or triacetin. Thus, depending on the specific reaction and the conditions, CALA or CALB may offer different advantages and drawbacks. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 35: e2735, 2019.

Further Stabilization of Alcalase Immobilized on Glyoxyl Supports: Amination Plus Modification with Glutaraldehyde.

Alcalase was immobilized on glyoxyl 4% CL agarose beads. This permitted to have Alcalase preparations with 50% activity retention versus Boc-l-alanine 4-nitrophenyl ester. However, the recovered activity versus casein was under 20% at 50 °C, as it may be expected from the most likely area of the protein involved in the immobilization. The situation was different at 60 °C, where the activities of immobilized and free enzyme became similar. The chemical amination of the immobilized enzyme or the treatment of the enzyme with glutaraldehyde did not produce any significant stabilization (a factor of 2) with high costs in terms of activity. However, the modification with glutaraldehyde of the previously aminated enzyme permitted to give a jump in Alcalase stability (e.g., with most than 80% of enzyme activity retention for the modified enzyme and less than 30% for the just immobilized enzyme in stress inactivation at pH 7 or 9). This preparation could be used in the hydrolysis of casein at pH 9 even at 67 °C, retaining around 50% of the activity after 5 hydrolytic cycles when the just immobilized preparation was almost inactive after 3 cycles. The modified enzyme can be reused in hydrolysis of casein at 45 °C and pH 9 for 6 cycles (6 h) without any decrease in enzyme activity.