Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. optimal medical therapy--the other side of the coin: medication adherence.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Although many studies have examined medication adherence in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), no prospective trial has compared medication adherence between patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or with optimal medical therapy (OMT) in real life. This study sought to compare the adherence to evidence-based secondary preventive medications in patients with documented CAD treated with PCI and OMT, or OMT alone. METHODS: We evaluated adherence to statins, beta-blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) during a 6-month follow-up in 232 patients with documented CAD, comparing patients treated with PCI and those receiving medical therapy alone. Medication adherence was measured with reference to national reimbursement database records. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 232 patients who survived the 6-month follow-up, the percentages of adherent patients according to prescription records (prespecified primary endpoint) were 53·6% (n = 82) in the PCI group and 33·8% (n = 27) in the OMT group (P = 0·004). Analysis of the individual medication classes revealed similar results for beta-blockers (86·0% in PCI group vs. 72·5% in OMT group, P = 0·006) and statins (64·5% in PCI group vs. 44·0% in OMT group, P = 0·003). Adherence to ACEI was also higher in the PCI group, but the difference was not statistically significant (77·6% vs. 69·3%, P = 0·17). By logistic regression analysis, belonging to the PCI group was an independent predictor of medication adherence [B = 2·20 (1·06-4·50), P = 0·03)]. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In the present study we demonstrated that adherence to evidence-based medication therapies in patients treated with PCI is significantly higher than in patients treated with OMT alone. Medication adherence should be followed carefully in CAD patients treated with OMT.

Radiation-induced coronary artery disease.

Radiation-induced heart disease must be considered in any patient with cardiac symptomatology who had prior mediastinal irradiation. Radiation can affect all the structures in the heart, including the pericardium, the myocardium, the valves and the conduction system. In addition to these pathologies, coronary artery disease following mediastinal radiotherapy is the most actual cardiac pathology as it may cause cardiac emergencies requiring interventional cardiological or surgical interventions. Case A 36-year-old man was admitted to the clinic with unstable angina pectoris of one month duration. The patient had no coronary artery disease risk factor. The history of the patient revealed that he had mediastinal radiotherapy due to Hodgkin's disease at 10-year of age. Coronary arteriography showed total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery and 70% stenosis of the proximal right coronary artery. Both arteries are dilated with placement of two stents. Control coronary arteriography at the end of the first year showed patency of both stents and the patient is free of symptoms. Previous radiotherapy to the mediastinum should be considered as a risk factor for the development of premature coronary artery disease. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stent placement or surgical revascularization are the preferred methods of treatment. Preoperative assessment of internal thoracic arteries should be considered prior to surgery. As the radiation therapy is currently the standard treatment for a number of mediastinal malignancies, routine screening of these patients and optimal cardiac prevention during radiotherapy are the only ways to minimize the incidence of radiation-induced heart disease.