Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 38(4): 687-694, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38169088

ABSTRACT

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune form of non-scarring hair loss. It is usually characterized by limited areas of hair loss. However, the disease may progress to complete scalp and body hair loss (alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis). In patients with alopecia areata hair loss significantly impacts the quality of life. Children and adolescents with alopecia areata often experience bullying, including physical aggression. The disease severity evaluation tools used in clinical practice are: the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and the Alopecia Areata Scale (AAS). A SALT score equal to or greater than 20 constitutes a commonly accepted indication for systemic therapy in alopecia areata. When using the AAS, moderate to severe alopecia areata should be considered a medical indication for systemic treatment. Currently, the only two EMA-approved medications for alopecia areata are baricitinib (JAK 1/2 inhibitor) for adults and ritlecitinib (JAK 3/TEC inhibitor) for individuals aged 12 and older. Both are EMA-approved for patients with severe alopecia areata. Other systemic medications used off-label in alopecia areata include glucocorticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate and azathioprine. Oral minoxidil is considered an adjuvant therapy with limited data confirming its possible efficacy. This consensus statement is to outline a systemic treatment algorithm for alopecia areata, indications for systemic treatment, available therapeutic options, their efficacy and safety, as well as the duration of the therapy.


Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Adult , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Alopecia/drug therapy , Minoxidil/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
8.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(10): 2183-2197, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32840022

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing steadily over the last decades. Although there have been significant breakthroughs in the management of skin cancers with the introduction of novel diagnostic tools and innovative therapies, skin cancer mortality, morbidity and costs heavily burden the society. OBJECTIVE: Members of the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, International Dermoscopy Society, European Dermatology Forum, European Board of Dermatovenereology of the European Union of Medical Specialists and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force have joined this effort to emphasize the fundamental role that the specialist in Dermatology-Venereology has in the diagnosis and management of different types of skin cancer. We review the role of dermatologists in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and cutaneous lymphomas, and discuss approaches to optimize their involvement in effectively addressing the current needs and priorities of dermato-oncology. DISCUSSION: Dermatologists play a crucial role in virtually all aspects of skin cancer management including the implementation of primary and secondary prevention, the formation of standardized pathways of care for patients, the establishment of specialized skin cancer treatment centres, the coordination of an efficient multidisciplinary team and the setting up of specific follow-up plans for patients. CONCLUSION: Skin cancers represent an important health issue for modern societies. The role of dermatologists is central to improving patient care and outcomes. In view of the emerging diagnostic methods and treatments for early and advanced skin cancer, and considering the increasingly diverse skills, knowledge and expertise needed for managing this heterogeneous group of diseases, dermato-oncology should be considered as a specific subspecialty of Dermatology-Venereology.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Melanoma , Skin Diseases , Skin Neoplasms , Venereology , Dermatologists , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/therapy
11.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(1): 188-191, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 'Braun' is an illegal injectable dihydrocodeinone-enriched drug mixture of semi-synthetic opioids. It is prepared by palladium-catalysed hydrogenation from codeine-containing tablets. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the dermatologic consequences of long-term abuse of 'Braun'. METHODS: Skin biopsies of two long-term 'Braun' abusers were evaluated histopathologically, immunohistochemically and ultrastructurally. Palladium skin content was assessed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry. RESULTS: Both patients showed generalized diffuse dark blue-grey hyperpigmentation of the skin. In both, an abnormal population of cells containing intracytoplasmic brownish granular material was identified in the papillary dermis by light microscopy. Electron microscopy revealed a dense and minimally structured material that predominantly accumulated in macrophages, fibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells. XRF analysis confirmed elevated levels of palladium in the patient's skin in comparison to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Long-term abuse of palladium-contaminated dihydrocodeinone ('Braun') results in excessive accumulation of granular material in various dermal cell types and causes generalized diffuse skin hyperpigmentation.


Subject(s)
Hydrocodone/adverse effects , Hyperpigmentation/chemically induced , Illicit Drugs/adverse effects , Narcotics/adverse effects , Palladium/adverse effects , Synthetic Drugs/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/metabolism , Hyperpigmentation/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotic-Related Disorders/complications , Palladium/metabolism , Spectrometry, Fluorescence
12.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 33(5): 816-827, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963614

ABSTRACT

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Oriented Outcomes, Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) present a review of the literature and position statement on health-related (HR) QoL assessment in skin cancer patients. A literature search was carried out to identify publications since 1980 that included information about the impact of SC on QoL. Generic, dermatology-specific, cancer-specific, SC-specific, facial SC-specific, NMSC-specific, basal cell carcinoma-specific and melanoma-specific QoL questionnaires have been used to assess HRQoL in SC patients. HRQoL was assessed in the context of creation and validation of the HRQoL instruments, clinical trials, comparison of QoL in SC and other cancers, other diseases or controls, HRQoL assessment after treatment, comorbidities, behaviour modification, predictors of QoL and survival, supportive care needs, coping strategies and fear of cancer recurrence. The most widely used instruments for HRQoL assessment in SC patients are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), Skin Cancer Index (SCI), Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The TFs recommend the use of the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30, especially in late stages of disease, and the melanoma-specific FACT-M and SC-specific SCI questionnaires. These instruments have been well validated and used in several studies. Other HRQoL instruments, also with good basic validation, are not currently recommended because the experience of their use is too limited. Dermatology-specific HRQoL instruments can be used to assess the impact of skin-related problems in SC. The TFs encourage further studies to validate HRQoL instruments for use in different stages of SC, in order to allow more detailed practical recommendations on HRQoL assessment in SC.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Skin Neoplasms/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Europe , Humans , Treatment Outcome
13.
Acta Chir Plast ; 59(3-4): 149-155, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29651855

ABSTRACT

Malignant melanoma is a serious disease, the incidence of which rises. Since the most important treatment method is sufficient wide skin and subcutaneous tissue excision, plastic surgeon is often the only specialist who is able to close the resulting defect. This paper deals with recommendations and treatment options for malignant melanoma from the point of a plastic surgeon. The primary width of excised safety rim of healthy tissue with regards to the depth of melanoma invasion differs. Safety margin is 0.5 cm for melanoma in situ, 1 cm in Breslow up to 2 mm and 2 cm in Breslow over 2 mm. Furthermore, there is indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy, which should be performed in melanoma with Breslow over 1 mm, and in risky melanoma in Breslow above 0.75 mm. Every patient with stage IIB malignant melanoma and above according to TNM classification should undergo adjuvant therapy in a specialized centre. Ideal condition for the patient is a permanent and close cooperation between a dermatologist, oncologist and plastic surgeon, who supplement each other in diagnostics, therapy and follow up of the patients.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Margins of Excision , Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
16.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31 Suppl 5: 13-17, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805940

ABSTRACT

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a characteristic skin lesion on skin areas of subjects with mainly phototype I and phototype II, or with specific genetic factors and who are exposed to prolonged ultraviolet radiation. AK may be considered a precursor of in situ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), a type of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). However, it is still not possible to predict which AK lesions will develop into SCC. Early treatment of AK is therefore recommended. Despite the increasing number of patients with AK developing into SCC, to date, there is still no clear suggestion of therapeutic strategy for AK. Current treatment consists of a multitude of topical lesion-directed or field-directed therapies or a combination of both. Recently, orally administered nicotinamide has shown to significantly reduce rates of new NMSC and AK in high-risk patients. This study aims to provide an update on the most relevant information about AK and to provide an insight into current and new treatment options.


Subject(s)
Keratosis, Actinic/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/prevention & control , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Keratosis, Actinic/pathology , Keratosis, Actinic/prevention & control , Male , Niacinamide/pharmacology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Ultraviolet Rays , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamin D/pharmacology
18.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(2): 252-259, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27557295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel immunotherapy modalities significantly improve survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, CTLA-4-blocking monoclonal antibody ipilimumab is effective only in a small proportion of patients. Biomarkers for prediction of treatment response are indispensably needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of multimarker detection of circulating melanoma cells as prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab. METHODS: Patients (n = 62) with metastatic melanoma in unresectable stage III or metastatic stage IV treated with ipilimumab were recruited prospectively. The values of four melanoma markers on circulating cells Melan-A, gp100, MAGE-3 and melanoma inhibitory antigen prior to the treatment and within the therapy were compared to the data collected at baseline - after the melanoma surgery. RESULTS: The immunotherapy pretreatment marker level was found to be prognostic of overall survival; lower levels were linked to longer survival time. Moreover, longitudinal follow-up of melanoma markers in patients treated with ipilimumab correlates with therapy response. A decline of marker levels by >30% at week 6 (in 83% of the responding subjects) to week 9 (in all responders) of ipilimumab administration was associated with response to therapy. Elevation of the tumour markers during the treatment precedes clinical progression and gives an early warning of treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Melanoma circulating cells hold potential as predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarker of immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Melanoma-Specific Antigens/blood , Melanoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy , Ipilimumab , Male , Melanoma/immunology , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...