Search for effective oral adjuvants for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Disease prevention by vaccination is, on economic, environmental and ethical grounds the most appropriate method for pathogen control currently available to the aquaculture sector. However, vaccine administration in aquatic animals faces obvious technical problems not encountered in other land animals. Thus, oral vaccines are highly demanded by the aquaculture sector that requests alternatives to the labor-intensive injectable vaccines that require individual handling of fish, provoking stress-related immunosuppression and handling mortalities. Despite this, most previous attempts to obtain effective oral vaccines have failed both in fish and mammals. This could be a consequence of very restricted tolerance mechanisms in the intestine given the fact that this mucosa is at the frontline upon antigen encounter and has to balance the delicate equilibrium between tolerance and immunity in a microbe rich aquatic environment. In this context, the search for an optimal combination of antigen and adjuvant that can trigger an adequate immune response able to circumvent intestinal tolerance is needed for each pathogen. To this aim, we have explored potential of molecules such as ß-glucans, flagellin, CpG and bacterial lipopolysacharide (LPS) as oral adjuvants. For this, we have determined the effects of these adjuvants ex vivo in rainbow trout intestine tissue sections, and in vitro in leucocytes isolated from rainbow trout spleen and intestine. The effects were evaluated by analyzing the levels of transcription of different genes related to the innate and adaptive immune response, as well as evaluating the number of IgM-secreting cells. LPS seems to be the molecule with stronger immunostimulatory potential, and could safely be used as a mucosal adjuvant in rainbow trout. Moreover, the designed strategy provides a fast methodology to screen adjuvants that are suitable for oral vaccination, providing us with valuable information about how the intestinal mucosa is regulated in fish.

Metabolic engineering for high yielding L(-)-carnitine production in Escherichia coli.

BACKGROUND: L(-)-carnitine production has been widely studied because of its beneficial properties on various diseases and dysfunctions. Enterobacteria possess a specific biotransformation pathway which can be used for the enantioselective production of L(-)-carnitine. Although bioprocesses catalyzed by enzymes or whole cells can overcome the lack of enantioselectivity of chemical methods, current processes for L(-)-carnitine production still have severe disadvantages, such as the low yields, side reactions and the need of high catalyst concentrations and anaerobic conditions for proper expression of the biotransformation pathway. Additionally, genetically engineered strains so far constructed for L(-)-carnitine production are based on plasmids and, therefore, suffer from segregational unstability. RESULTS: In this work, a stable, high yielding strain for L(-)-carnitine production from low cost substrates was constructed. A metabolic engineering strategy was implemented in a multiple mutant for use in both growing and resting cells systems. The effect of mutations on gene expression and metabolism was analyzed to characterize the productivity constraints of the wild type and the overproducer strains. Precise deletion of genes which encode proteins of central and carnitine metabolisms were performed. Specifically, flux through the TCA cycle was increased by deletion of aceK (which encodes a bifunctional kinase/phosphatase which inhibits isocitrate dehydrogenase activity) and the synthesis of the by-product γ-butyrobetaine was prevented by deletion of caiA (which encodes a crotonobetainyl-CoA reductase). Both mutations led to improve the L(-)-carnitine production by 20 and 42%, respectively. Moreover, the highly regulated promoter of the cai operon was substituted by a constitutive artificial promoter increasing the biotransformation rate, even under aerobic conditions. Resting cells of the BW ΔaceK ΔcaiA p37cai strain produced 59.6 mmol l(-1) · h(-1) of L(-)-carnitine, doubling the productivity of the wild type strain. In addition, almost total conversion was attained in less than two hours without concomitant production of the side product γ-butyrobetaine. CONCLUSIONS: L(-)-carnitine production has been enhanced by strain engineering. Metabolic engineering strategies herein implemented allowed obtaining a robust and high yielding E. coli strain. The new overproducer strain attained almost complete conversion of crotonobetaine into L(-)-carnitine with growing and resting cells, and even under aerobic conditions, overcoming the main environmental restriction to carnitine metabolism expression. So far, this is the best performing L(-)-carnitine production E. coli strain described.

Modelling and analysis of central metabolism operating regulatory interactions in salt stress conditions in a L-carnitine overproducing E. coli strain.

Based on experimental data from E. coli cultures, we have devised a mathematical model in the GMA-power law formalism that describes the central and L-carnitine metabolism in and between two steady states, non-osmotic and hyperosmotic (0.3 M NaCl). A key feature of this model is the introduction of type of kinetic order, the osmotic stress kinetic orders (g(OSn)), derived from the power law general formalism, which represent the effect of osmotic stress in each metabolic process of the model.By considering the values of the g(OSn) linked to each metabolic process we found that osmotic stress has a positive and determinant influence on the increase in flux in energetic metabolism (glycolysis); L-carnitine biosynthesis production; the transformation/excretion of Acetyl-CoA into acetate and ethanol; the input flux of peptone into the cell; the anabolic use of pyruvate and biomass decomposition. In contrast, we found that although the osmotic stress has an inhibitory effect on the transformation flux from the glycolytic end products (pyruvate) to Acetyl-CoA, this inhibition is counteracted by other effects (the increase in pyruvate concentration) to the extent that the whole flux increases. In the same vein, the down regulation exerted by osmotic stress on fumarate uptake and its oxidation and the production and export of lactate and pyruvate are reversed by other factors up to the point that the first increased and the second remained unchanged.The model analysis shows that in osmotic conditions the energy and fermentation pathways undergo substantial rearrangement. This is illustrated by the observation that the increase in the fermentation fluxes is not connected with fluxes towards the tricaboxylic acid intermediates and the synthesis of biomass. The osmotic stress associated with these fluxes reflects these changes. All these observations support that the responses to salt stress observed in E. coli might be conserved in halophiles.Flux evolution during osmotic adaptations showed a hyperbolic (increasing or decreasing) pattern except in the case of peptone and fumarate uptake by the cell, which initially decreased. Finally, the model also throws light on the role of L-carnitine as osmoprotectant.

Redirecting metabolic fluxes through cofactor engineering: Role of CoA-esters pool during L(-)-carnitine production by Escherichia coli.

Cofactor engineering, defined as the purposeful modification of the pool of intracellular cofactors, has been demonstrated to be a very suitable strategy for the improvement of L(-)-carnitine production in Escherichia coli strains. The overexpression of CaiB (CoA-transferase) and CaiC (CoA-ligase), both enzymes involved in coenzyme A transfer and substrate activation during the bioprocess, led to an increase in L(-)-carnitine production. Under optimal concentrations of inducer and fumarate (used as electron acceptors) yields reached 10- and 50-fold, respectively, that obtained for the wild type strain. However, low levels of coenzyme A limited the activity of these two enzymes since the addition of pantothenate increased production. Growth on substrates whose assimilation yields acetyl-CoA (such as acetate or pyruvate) further inhibited L(-)-carnitine production. Interestingly, control steps in the metabolism of acetyl-CoA of E. coli were detected. The glyoxylate shunt and anaplerotic pathways limit the bioprocess since strains carrying deletions of isocitrate lyase and isocitrate dehydrogenase phosphatase/kinase yielded 20-25% more L(-)-carnitine than the control. On the other hand, the deletion of phosphotransacetylase strongly inhibited the bioprocess, suggesting that an adequate flux of acetyl-CoA and the connection of the phosphoenolpyruvate-glyoxylate cycle together with the acetate metabolism are crucial for the biotransformation.