ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to estimate and analyze the effects of out-of-pocket expenditure attributed to medicine on catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishment. Our study also explored the determinants of CHE for Tunisian households. METHODS: CHE and impoverishment were estimated using the representative sample of 25 087 households' survey of Budget, Consumption, and Living Standards in 2015. Logistic regression was applied to determine factors associated with the CHE. RESULTS: The occurrence of catastrophic expenditure on health and medicine from the total population was, respectively, estimated to be 18.4% and 8.0%, whereas the impoverishment was 2.8% and 1.8%. The catastrophic expenditure was high in households having a chronic disease, disability, elderly, and children younger than 5 years and those living in a rural area. The rich and insured households are also experiencing financial hardship. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket expenditure for medicine generates high levels of catastrophic and impoverishment in Tunisia. To achieve universal and affordable access to medicine, policy makers should remove fees at public facilities for patients with chronic diseases and disabilities, consolidate public procurement and distribution, and ensure effective reimbursement of health insurance.
Subject(s)
Catastrophic Illness , Health Expenditures , Aged , Child , Family Characteristics , Humans , Poverty , TunisiaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Out of pocket (OOP) payments for health are significant health financing challenges in Afghanistan as it is a source of incurrence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishment. Measuring and understanding the drivers and impacts of this financial health hardship is an economic and public health priority, particularly in the time of COVID-19. This is the first study that measures the financial hardship and determines associated factors in Afghanistan. METHODS: Afghanistan Living Conditions Survey data for 2016-2017 was used for this study. We calculated incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure by using different thresholds ranging from 5 to 40% of total and nonfood consumption and subsequent impoverishment due to OOPs. Logistic regression was used to assess the degree to which Afghan households are protected from the catastrophic household expenditure. RESULTS: Results revealed that 32% of the population in Afghanistan incurred catastrophic health expenditure (as 10% of total consumption) and when healthcare payments are netted out of household consumption, the Afghan population live in extreme poverty ($1.9 in 2011 PPP), increased from 29 to 36%. Based on our findings from logistic regression in Afghanistan, having an educated head or being employed are protective factors from financial hardship while having a female head, an elderly member, a disabled, or a sick member are the risk factors of facing catastrophic health expenditure. Moreover, the people living in rural/nomadic areas or facing an economic shock are more likely to face catastrophic health expenditure and hence to be impoverished due to direct OOPs on health. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of poverty and catastrophic health expenditure in Afghanistan emphasizes the need to strengthen the health financing system. Although Afghanistan has made great efforts to support households against health expenditure burden during the pandemic, households are at higher risk of poverty and financial hardship due to OOPs. Therefore, there is need for more financial and supportive response policies by providing a better and easier access to primary health services, extending to all entitlement to health services particularly in the public sector, eliminating user fees for COVID-19 health services and suspending fees for other essential health services, expanding coverage of income support, and strengthening the overall health financing system.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Catastrophic Illness , Afghanistan , Aged , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Strong primary health care (PHC) leads to better health outcomes, improves health equity and accelerates progress towards universal health coverage (UHC). The Astana Declaration on PHC emphasised the importance of quality care to achieve UHC. A comprehensive understanding of the quality paradigm of PHC is critical, yet it remains elusive in countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). This study used a multistep approach to generate a policy-relevant research agenda for strengthening quality, safety and performance management in PHC in the EMR. METHODS: A multistep approach was adopted, encompassing the following steps: scoping review and generation of evidence and gap maps, validation and ranking exercises, and development of an approach for research implementation. We followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for conducting scoping reviews and a method review of the literature to build the evidence and gap maps. For the validation and ranking exercises, we purposively sampled 55 high-level policy-makers and stakeholders from selected EMR countries. We used explicit multicriteria for ranking the research questions emerging from the gap maps. The approach for research implementation was adapted from the literature and subsequently tailored to address the top ranked research question. RESULTS: The evidence and gap maps revealed limited production of research evidence in the area of quality, safety and performance management in PHC by country and by topic. The priority setting exercises generated a ranked list of 34 policy-relevant research questions addressing quality, safety and performance management in PHC in the EMR. The proposed research implementation plan involves collaborative knowledge generation with policy-makers along with knowledge translation and impact assessment. CONCLUSION: Study findings can help inform and direct future plans to generate, disseminate and use research evidence to enhance quality, safety and performance management in PHC in EMR and beyond. Study methodology can help bridge the gap between research and policy-making.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Public district hospitals (PDHs) in Tunisia are not operating at full plant capacity and underutilize their operating budget. METHODS: Individual PDHs capacity utilization (CU) is measured for 2000 and 2010 using dual data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach with shadow prices input and output restrictions. The CU is estimated for 101 of 105 PDH in 2000 and 94 of 105 PDH in 2010. RESULTS: In average, unused capacity is estimated at 18% in 2010 vs. 13% in 2000. Of PDHs 26% underutilize their operating budget in 2010 vs. 21% in 2000. CONCLUSION: Inadequate supply, health quality and the lack of operating budget should be tackled to reduce unmet user's needs and the bypassing of the PDHs and, thus to increase their CU. Social health insurance should be turned into a direct purchaser of curative and preventive care for the PDHs.
Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational , Hospitals, District/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Budgets , Commerce , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospital Costs , Humans , Insurance, Health , Quality of Health Care , TunisiaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of health policy and systems research (HPSR) to support decision making in health systems is limited in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). This is partly due to the lack of effective initiatives to strengthen regional HPSR capacities and promote its use in decision making. This paper offers a structured reflection on the establishment and core functioning of a HPSR Nodal Institute for the EMR with specific focus on the approach used to support the conduct and use of HPSR. It seeks to gain better understanding of the activities conducted by the Nodal Institute, the methods by which the Nodal Institute implemented these activities, and the outcomes of these activities. METHODS: A multi-faceted approach was implemented by the Nodal Institute in collaboration with regional academic/research institutions, Sub-Nodes. The overall approach was a phased one that included the selection of Sub-Nodes, mapping of academic/research institutions in the EMR, stakeholders' meetings, and HPSR capacity building workshops, and culminated with a regional meeting. RESULTS: The mapping of academic/research institutions in the EMR resulted in the identification of 50 institutions, of which only 32 were engaged in HPSR. These institutions have the highest HPSR involvement in information/evidence (84%) and the lowest in human resources for health (34%). Their main HPSR focus areas included quality of healthcare services, patient safety, management of non-communicable diseases, and human resources for health. Regional HPSR challenges among these institutions were identified. The validation and ranking questionnaires resulted in the identification of country-specific HPSR priorities according to stakeholders in three countries. From these results, cross-cutting HPSR priorities among the countries related to primary healthcare, non-communicable diseases, human resources for health, as well as cross-cutting HPSR priorities among stakeholders and according to stakeholders of the countries, were extracted. CONCLUSION: The Nodal Institute in the EMR is a promising initiative to support the conduct and use of HPSR in health policies. The approach and findings reported in this paper allow for the development of opportunities towards the building of capacity for HPSR in the region and other countries and provide a roadmap for academic/research institutions interested in HPSR in the region.
Subject(s)
Academies and Institutes , Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care , Health Policy , Health Services Research , Universities , Decision Making , Developing Countries , Government Programs , Health Priorities , Humans , Mediterranean RegionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is rising in middle income countries. Population based strategies to reduce specific CHD risk factors have an important role to play in reducing overall CHD mortality. Reducing dietary salt consumption is a potentially cost-effective way to reduce CHD events. This paper presents an economic evaluation of population based salt reduction policies in Tunisia, Syria, Palestine and Turkey. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Three policies to reduce dietary salt intake were evaluated: a health promotion campaign, labelling of food packaging and mandatory reformulation of salt content in processed food. These were evaluated separately and in combination. Estimates of the effectiveness of salt reduction on blood pressure were based on a literature review. The reduction in mortality was estimated using the IMPACT CHD model specific to that country. Cumulative population health effects were quantified as life years gained (LYG) over a 10 year time frame. The costs of each policy were estimated using evidence from comparable policies and expert opinion including public sector costs and costs to the food industry. Health care costs associated with CHDs were estimated using standardized unit costs. The total cost of implementing each policy was compared against the current baseline (no policy). All costs were calculated using 2010 PPP exchange rates. In all four countries most policies were cost saving compared with the baseline. The combination of all three policies (reducing salt consumption by 30%) resulted in estimated cost savings of $235,000,000 and 6455 LYG in Tunisia; $39,000,000 and 31674 LYG in Syria; $6,000,000 and 2682 LYG in Palestine and $1,3000,000,000 and 378439 LYG in Turkey. CONCLUSION: Decreasing dietary salt intake will reduce coronary heart disease deaths in the four countries. A comprehensive strategy of health education and food industry actions to label and reduce salt content would save both money and lives.
Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/economics , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Health Promotion/economics , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/adverse effects , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Middle East/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Syria , Tunisia , TurkeyABSTRACT
Anecdotal evidence on hidden inequity in health care in North African countries abounds. Yet firm empirical evidence has been harder to come by. This article fills the gap. It presents the first analysis of equity in the healthcare system using the particular case of Tunisia. Analyses are based on an unusually rich source of data taken from the Tunisian HealthCare Utilization and Morbidity Survey. Payments for health care are derived from the total amount of healthcare spending which was incurred by households over the last year. Utilization of health care is measured by the number of physical units of two types of services: outpatient and inpatient. The measurement of need for health care is apprehended through a rich set of ill-health indicators and demographics. Findings are presented and compared at both the aggregate level, using the general summary index approach, and the disaggregate level, using the distribution-free stochastic dominance approach. The overall picture is that direct out-of-pocket payments, which constitute a sizeable share in the current financing mix, emerge to be a progressive means of financing health care overall. Interestingly, however, when statistical testing is applied at the disaggregate level progressivity is retained over the top half of the distribution. Further analyses of the distributions of need for--and utilization of--two types of health care--outpatient and inpatient--reveal that the observed progressivity is rather an outcome of the heavy use, but not need, for health care at the higher income levels. Several policy relevant factors are discussed, and some recommendations are advanced for future reforms of the health care in Tunisia.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Financing, Government/economics , Financing, Personal/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Financing , Cost Sharing , Family Characteristics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Insurance, Health/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , TunisiaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the medical direct cost of acute myocardial infarction. METHOD: Data are recorded through a prospective study in 7 wards of cardiology of the District of Tunis during one year: from November 2001 to October 2002. Cost of hospital stay, biologic analyses, drugs, functional investigations and possible non surgical cardiologic intervention (IC) was calculated. RESULTS: 632 AMI cases are recorded, the death rate is 7.8%. The average of hospital stay was 13.3 days. 49.1% of patients benefited from thrombolytic therapy, 55.5% benefited from a coronary angiography and 16.1% of an act of IC. The mean of direct cost (CGM) was 2171 Tunisian Dinars and the median was 1731 DT, of whom room costs 31.7%, 22.5% acts of IC, 7.2% drugs, 26.2% functional investigations and 12.4% biological analyses. The mean cost of IC was 3030 +/- 401 DT. CONCLUSION: The methodology of our study remains original in our country and can be used to assess the other aspects of AMI as other diseases cost management.