Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurophysiol ; 123(6): 2201-2208, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32347161

ABSTRACT

Nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is a protective reaction to a noxious stimulus, resulting in withdrawal of the affected area and thus preventing potential tissue damage. This involuntary reaction consists of neural circuits, biomechanical strategies, and muscle activity that ensure an optimal withdrawal. Studies of lower limb NWR indicate that the amplitude of the NWR is highly modulated by extrinsic and intrinsic factors, such as stimulation site, intensity, frequency, and supraspinal activity, among others. Whether the predictability of the stimulus has an effect on the biomechanical strategies is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate how the predictability of impending noxious stimuli modulate the NWR reaction in the lower limb. NWR was evoked on fifteen healthy participants by trains of electrical stimuli on the sole of the foot and was measured in one distal (tibialis anterior) and one proximal (biceps femoris) muscle. The predictability was manipulated by giving participants prior information about the onset of the stimulus trains and the number of delivered stimuli per train. Results showed that the predictability of the incoming stimuli differentially modulates the muscle activity involved in the NWR reaction. For the most unpredictable stimulus train, larger NWR at distal muscles were evoked. Furthermore, the stereotyped temporal summation profile to repeated stimulation was observed when the stimulus train was completely predictable, while it was disrupted in proximal muscles in unpredictable conditions. It is inferred that the reflex response is shaped by descending control, which dynamically tunes the activity of the muscles involved in the resulting reaction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Innate defensive behaviors such as reflexes are found across all species, constituting preprogrammed responses to external threats that are not anticipated. Previous studies indicated that the excitability of the reflex arcs like spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) pathways in humans are modulated by several cognitive factors. This study assesses how the predictability of a threat affects the biomechanical pattern of the withdrawal response, showing that distal and proximal muscles are differentially modulated by descending control.


Subject(s)
Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Foot/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Nociception/physiology , Reflex/physiology , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0134127, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26258532

ABSTRACT

The agreement between humans and algorithms on whether an event-related potential (ERP) is present or not and the level of variation in the estimated values of its relevant features are largely unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the categorical and quantitative agreement between manual and automated methods for single-trial detection and estimation of ERP features. To this end, ERPs were elicited in sixteen healthy volunteers using electrical stimulation at graded intensities below and above the nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold. Presence/absence of an ERP peak (categorical outcome) and its amplitude and latency (quantitative outcome) in each single-trial were evaluated independently by two human observers and two automated algorithms taken from existing literature. Categorical agreement was assessed using percentage positive and negative agreement and Cohen's κ, whereas quantitative agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and the coefficient of variation. Typical values for the categorical agreement between manual and automated methods were derived, as well as reference values for the average and maximum differences that can be expected if one method is used instead of the others. Results showed that the human observers presented the highest categorical and quantitative agreement, and there were significantly large differences between detection and estimation of quantitative features among methods. In conclusion, substantial care should be taken in the selection of the detection/estimation approach, since factors like stimulation intensity and expected number of trials with/without response can play a significant role in the outcome of a study.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Automation , Evoked Potentials , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Young Adult
3.
J Neurosci Methods ; 240: 1-12, 2015 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25455345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have combined the simultaneous acquisition of nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWR) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). In fact, it is unknown whether the combination of these two signals acquired simultaneously could provide additional information on somatosensory processing at spinal and supraspinal level compared to individual NWR and SEP signals. NEW METHOD: By using the concept of mutual information (MI), it is possible to quantify the relation between electrical stimuli and simultaneous elicited electrophysiological responses in humans based on the estimated stimulus-response signal probability distributions. RESULTS: All selected features from NWR and SEPs were informative in regard to the stimulus when considered individually. Specifically, the information carried by NWR features was significantly higher than the information contained in the SEP features (p<0.05). Moreover, the joint information carried by the combination of features showed an overall redundancy compared to the sum of the individual contributions. Comparison with existing methods MI can be used to quantify the information that single-trial NWR and SEP features convey, as well as the information carried jointly by NWR and SEPs. This is a model-free approach that considers linear and non-linear correlations at any order and is not constrained by parametric assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: The current study introduces a novel approach that allows the quantification of the individual and joint information content of single-trial NWR and SEP features. This methodology could be used to decode and interpret spinal and supraspinal interaction in studies modulating the responsiveness of the nociceptive system.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Information Theory , Nociceptive Pain/physiopathology , Reflex/physiology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Brain/physiopathology , Computer Simulation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electroencephalography/methods , Electromyography/methods , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Models, Neurological , Monte Carlo Method , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Nociception/physiology , Nonlinear Dynamics , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...