Meloxicam decreases the migration and invasion of CF41.Mg canine mammary carcinoma cells.

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression is positively correlated with malignant features in canine mammary carcinomas. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit COX activity and may therefore possess anticancer effects. Meloxicam is an NSAID that is widely used in human and veterinary medicine. High concentrations of meloxicam have been reported to be antitumorigenic in vitro; however, the effect of meloxicam at concentrations that are equivalent to those that can be obtained in vivo remains unknown. In the current study, the in vitro effects of low-dose meloxicam (0.25 µg/ml) on CF41.Mg canine mammary carcinoma cells were evaluated. The effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell migration and invasion, in addition to the expression of different molecules associated with tumor invasiveness were analyzed. No effect on cell viability and apoptosis were observed. However, cell migration and invasion were significantly reduced following treatment with meloxicam. MMP-2 expression and activity were similarly reduced, explaining the impaired cell invasion. In addition, ß-catenin expression was downregulated, while its phosphorylation increased. These results indicate that 0.25 µg/ml meloxicam reduces cell migration and invasion, in part through modulating MMP-2 and ß-catenin expression. Additional studies are required to elucidate the mechanism associated with the anti-invasive effect of meloxicam on CF41.Mg cells. The results of the present study suggest that meloxicam has a potential adjunctive therapeutic application, which could be useful in controlling the invasion and metastasis of canine mammary carcinomas.

Fine-scale mapping of the FGFR2 breast cancer risk locus: putative functional variants differentially bind FOXA1 and E2F1.

The 10q26 locus in the second intron of FGFR2 is the locus most strongly associated with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in genome-wide association studies. We conducted fine-scale mapping in case-control studies genotyped with a custom chip (iCOGS), comprising 41 studies (n = 89,050) of European ancestry, 9 Asian ancestry studies (n = 13,983), and 2 African ancestry studies (n = 2,028) from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We identified three statistically independent risk signals within the locus. Within risk signals 1 and 3, genetic analysis identified five and two variants, respectively, highly correlated with the most strongly associated SNPs. By using a combination of genetic fine mapping, data on DNase hypersensitivity, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays to study protein-DNA binding, we identified rs35054928, rs2981578, and rs45631563 as putative functional SNPs. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that FOXA1 preferentially bound to the risk-associated allele (C) of rs2981578 and was able to recruit ERα to this site in an allele-specific manner, whereas E2F1 preferentially bound the risk variant of rs35054928. The risk alleles were preferentially found in open chromatin and bound by Ser5 phosphorylated RNA polymerase II, suggesting that the risk alleles are associated with changes in transcription. Chromatin conformation capture demonstrated that the risk region was able to interact with the promoter of FGFR2, the likely target gene of this risk region. A role for FOXA1 in mediating breast cancer susceptibility at this locus is consistent with the finding that the FGFR2 risk locus primarily predisposes to estrogen-receptor-positive disease.

Five polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.

Previous studies have suggested that minor alleles for ERCC4 rs744154, TNF rs361525, CASP10 rs13010627, PGR rs1042838, and BID rs8190315 may influence breast cancer risk, but the evidence is inconclusive due to their small sample size. These polymorphisms were genotyped in more than 30,000 breast cancer cases and 30,000 controls, primarily of European descent, from 30 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) as a measure of association. We found that the minor alleles for these polymorphisms were not related to invasive breast cancer risk overall in women of European descent: ECCR4 per-allele OR (95% CI) = 0.99 (0.97-1.02), minor allele frequency = 27.5%; TNF 1.00 (0.95-1.06), 5.0%; CASP10 1.02 (0.98-1.07), 6.5%; PGR 1.02 (0.99-1.06), 15.3%; and BID 0.98 (0.86-1.12), 1.7%. However, we observed significant between-study heterogeneity for associations with risk for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CASP10, PGR, and BID. Estimates were imprecise for women of Asian and African descent due to small numbers and lower minor allele frequencies (with the exception of BID SNP). The ORs for each copy of the minor allele were not significantly different by estrogen or progesterone receptor status, nor were any significant interactions found between the polymorphisms and age or family history of breast cancer. In conclusion, our data provide persuasive evidence against an overall association between invasive breast cancer risk and ERCC4 rs744154, TNF rs361525, CASP10 rs13010627, PGR rs1042838, and BID rs8190315 genotypes among women of European descent.

Genetic analysis of the vitamin D receptor gene in two epithelial cancers: melanoma and breast cancer case-control studies.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D serum levels have been found to be related to sun exposure and diet, together with cell differentiation, growth control and consequently, cancer risk. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes may influence cancer risk; however, no epidemiological studies in sporadic breast cancer (BC) or malignant melanoma (MM) have been performed in a southern European population. In this study, the VDR gene has been evaluated in two epithelial cancers BC and MM. METHODS: We have conducted an analysis in 549 consecutive and non-related sporadic BC cases and 556 controls, all from the Spanish population, and 283 MM cases and 245 controls. Genotyping analyses were carried out on four putatively functional SNPs within the VDR gene. RESULTS: An association with the minor allele A of the non-synonymous SNP rs2228570 (rs10735810, FokI, Met1Thr) was observed for BC, with an estimated odds ratio (OR) of 1.26 (95% CI = 1.02-1.57; p = 0.036). The synonymous variant rs731236 (TaqI) appeared to be associated with protection from BC (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.64-0.99; p = 0.047). No statistically significant associations with MM were observed for any SNP. Nevertheless, sub-group analyses revealed an association between rs2228570 (FokI) and absence of childhood sunburns (OR = 0.65, p = 0.003), between the 3'utr SNP rs739837 (BglI) and fair skin (OR = 1.31, p = 0.048), and between the promoter SNP rs4516035 and the more aggressive tumour location in head-neck and trunk (OR = 1.54, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: In summary, we observed associations between SNPs in the VDR gene and BC risk, and a comprehensive analysis using clinical and tumour characteristics as outcome variables has revealed potential associations with MM. These associations required confirmation in independent studies.

Heterogeneity of breast cancer associations with five susceptibility loci by clinical and pathological characteristics.

A three-stage genome-wide association study recently identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five loci (fibroblast growth receptor 2 (FGFR2), trinucleotide repeat containing 9 (TNRC9), mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 K1 (MAP3K1), 8q24, and lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1)) associated with breast cancer risk. We investigated whether the associations between these SNPs and breast cancer risk varied by clinically important tumor characteristics in up to 23,039 invasive breast cancer cases and 26,273 controls from 20 studies. We also evaluated their influence on overall survival in 13,527 cases from 13 studies. All participants were of European or Asian origin. rs2981582 in FGFR2 was more strongly related to ER-positive (per-allele OR (95%CI) = 1.31 (1.27-1.36)) than ER-negative (1.08 (1.03-1.14)) disease (P for heterogeneity = 10(-13)). This SNP was also more strongly related to PR-positive, low grade and node positive tumors (P = 10(-5), 10(-8), 0.013, respectively). The association for rs13281615 in 8q24 was stronger for ER-positive, PR-positive, and low grade tumors (P = 0.001, 0.011 and 10(-4), respectively). The differences in the associations between SNPs in FGFR2 and 8q24 and risk by ER and grade remained significant after permutation adjustment for multiple comparisons and after adjustment for other tumor characteristics. Three SNPs (rs2981582, rs3803662, and rs889312) showed weak but significant associations with ER-negative disease, the strongest association being for rs3803662 in TNRC9 (1.14 (1.09-1.21)). rs13281615 in 8q24 was associated with an improvement in survival after diagnosis (per-allele HR = 0.90 (0.83-0.97). The association was attenuated and non-significant after adjusting for known prognostic factors. Our findings show that common genetic variants influence the pathological subtype of breast cancer and provide further support for the hypothesis that ER-positive and ER-negative disease are biologically distinct. Understanding the etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer may ultimately result in improvements in prevention, early detection, and treatment.

Polymorphisms in TRAIL receptor genes and risk of breast cancer in Spanish women.

TRAIL is a potent inducer of apoptosis in malignant but not in normal cells. TRAIL binds to the proapoptotic death receptor DR4 and DR5 as well as to the decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2. To evaluate the involvement of TRAIL receptor genes in breast cancer, we carried out a case-control study of eight selected polymorphisms in a large sample of Spanish women. Three of the eight selected SNPs (626G/C and 1322G/A in DR4 and 2699A/G in DcR2) showed some evidence of different genotype distributions in a random selection of 535 cases and 480 controls and were therefore studied in our entire sample (1008 cases and 768 controls). For the two DR4 polymorphisms, no differences in genotype or haplotype distribution were found between cases and controls. Interestingly, allele 2699G in the decoy receptor DcR2 appears associated with reduced breast cancer risk (P=0.05). Given that it is located in the 3' UTR, its effect might be related to DcR2 mRNA instability, or linkage disequilibrium with a functional variant residing in either DcR2 or neighbouring genes. A decreased efficiency of DcR2 to work as decoy receptor for TRAIL, would facilitate the apoptotic pathway in cells at risk.

Microstructure and crystallographic-texture of giant barnacle (Austromegabalanus psittacus) shell.

Barnacle shell is a very complex and strong composite bioceramic composed of different structural units which consist of calcite 15 microcrystals of very uniform size. In the study reported herein, the microstructural organization of these units has been examinated in detail with optical and scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction techniques. These analyses showed that the external part of the shell has a massive microstructure consisting of randomly oriented crystals. Toward the interior, the shell became organized in mineral layers separated by thin organic sheets. Each of these mineral layers has a massive microstructure constituted by highly oriented calcite microcrystals with their c-axes aligned [(001) fibre texture] perpendicular to the organic sheets and the shell surface. Interestingly, in another structural unit, the shell shield, the orientation of the c-axis calcite crystals shifts from being perpendicular to being parallel to the shell surface across its thickness. This study provides evidence that the organic matrix is responsible for the organization of the shell mineral and exterts strong a strict control on the polymorphic type, size and orientation of shell-forming crystals.

[Clinical and biological differences between infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast in women over 70 years-old and those aged 60-70]. / Carcinoma ductal infiltrante de mama. Diferencias clinicobiológicas entre mujeres mayores de 70 años y aquéllas de entre 60 y 70 años.

BACKGROUND: There is discrepancy in the literature regarding the behavior of breast cancer in elderly women. For this reason we decided to study the possible clinical and biological differences of infiltrative ductal breast carcinoma between women over 70 years and those aged between 60 and 70 years. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study group included 181 women with infiltrative ductal carcinomas (IDCs) who were referred from a breast clinic (BC) and a breast cancer screening campaign (BCS). 67 of them were older than 70 and 114 were between 60 and 70 years old. Estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), pS2 and cathepsin D cytosolic levels were determined, as well as levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in cell surfaces. Likewise, size, axillary lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, histological grade, ploidy and cellular S-phase fraction were also considered as variables of the study. RESULTS: IDCs in women older than 70 had greater size (p<0.001), global S-phase (p = 0.009) and number of axillary lymph nodes involved (p = 0.002). Likewise, these tumors showed more frequently distant metastasis (p = 0.001) and S-phase values >14% (p = 0.093). However, when we considered only women referred from BCS, no differences in the parameters studied between women older than 70 and those aged between 60 and 70 years were observed. When only patients coming from BC were considered, women older than 70 had a greater number of axillary lymph nodes involved (p= 0.027). Patients older than 70 years from BC showed greater size (p= 0.054) and more common distant metastasis (p= 0.075) than those from BCS. Also, patients between 60 and 70 referred from BC had tumors with greater size (p <0.001), nodal involvement (p= 0.022), number of lymph nodes involved (p= 0.022) and distant metastasis (p= 0.048) than those from BCS with the same age. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that IDCs in women older than 70 years show clinical and biological features associated with a worse behaviour. However, this is only observed in women referred from BC but not in those coming from BCS. For this reason, the patient's referral site seems to be essential for the observed clinical and biological differences of breast carcinomas in the elderly.