Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 621180, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34054515

ABSTRACT

Preclinical studies have suggested statins have antiproliferative and anti-metastatic effects on endometrial cancer cells. Similarly, most previous epidemiological studies have reported a better prognosis of endometrial cancer in patients who used statins. In this study, we explored the role of statins in the prognosis of endometrial cancer in women with type 2 diabetes in a hospital-based cohort. This retrospective cohort consisted of 119 women with type 2 diabetes who were diagnosed and treated for endometrial cancer at Oulu University Hospital, Finland, between 2007 and 2014. The patients were classified as statin users (n = 58) and nonusers (n = 61) based on the type of medication they were using at the time of endometrial cancer diagnosis. Statin use showed no association with progression-free survival or overall survival in the whole cohort nor the subgroups with type I or type II histology, in lower or higher body mass index groups, or at an early or advanced stage. The results remained similar in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for the patient's age, cancer stage, and histology. Furthermore, statin use seemed not to have any association with most of the prognostic factors at the time of endometrial cancer diagnosis.

2.
Anticancer Res ; 41(2): 821-828, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Preclinical studies on metformin use and endometrial cancer have been promising but epidemiological studies have reported variable results. This study aimed to assess if metformin use is associated with endometrial cancer aggressiveness and survival in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective hospital-based cohort consisted of women with T2D who were treated for endometrial cancer at the Oulu University Hospital, Finland, between 2007 and 2014. RESULTS: The sample size was 121 patients: 58 metformin users and 63 metformin non-users. Intriguingly, type 2 histology, deep myometrial invasion and the presence of lymphovascular invasion were more common in the metformin user group. However, metformin use showed no association with overall survival and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: Metformin use was associated with poorer prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with T2D.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Finland , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
3.
Anticancer Res ; 38(7): 4169-4178, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29970546

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in relation to the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to analyze the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC, two cohorts were obtained from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM); 57 non-endometrioid ECs were observed in a cohort of 92,366 women with newly-diagnosed T2D during the follow-up (1996 to 2011) to assess the incidence, and a retrospective cohort of 105 women with T2D diagnosed with non-endometrioid EC (1998 to 2011) was used to estimate cumulative mortality from EC and other causes of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC incidence were estimated in the full-cohort analysis and in the nested case-control analysis, matched for age and duration of T2D. Cumulative mortality was estimated by using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Cause-specific mortality rates were analyzed by using Cox models regarding the pre-diagnostic use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, the use of metformin was not associated with the risk of non-endometrioid EC (HR=1.09, 95% CI=0.59-2.00), whereas statin use was associated with a lower risk (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.26-0.84). The results from the full-cohort analysis supported these findings. Mortality from non-endometrioid EC was not different between users of metformin and other types of oral ADM (HR=1.56, 95% CI=0.40-6.07) but was observed to be lower in statin users (HR=0.41, 95% CI=0.20-0.82). CONCLUSION: Our findings were inconclusive regarding the association of metformin with the risk and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC. However, statin use was associated with a lower incidence and mortality from this disease.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk
4.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 767, 2018 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30055585

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have even poorer survival from it. We assessed the prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin, other forms of antidiabetic medication, or statins. METHODS: Study cohort consisted of women with T2D diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Finland 1998-2011. They were identified from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM), being linked to several national registers. Patients were grouped according to their medication in the three years preceding ovarian cancer diagnosis. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to describe cumulative mortality from ovarian cancer and from other causes in different medication groups. Mortality rates were analysed by Cox models, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated in relation to the use of different forms of medication. Main outcome measures were death from ovarian cancer and death from other causes. RESULTS: During the accrual period 421 newly diagnosed ovarian cancers were identified in the FinDM database. No evidence was found for any differences in mortality from ovarian cancer or other causes between different antidiabetic medication groups. Pre-diagnostic use of statins was observed to be associated with decreased mortality from ovarian cancer compared with no such use (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are inconclusive as regards the association between metformin and ovarian cancer survival. However, some evidence was found for improved prognosis of ovarian cancer with pre-diagnostic statin use, requiring cautious interpretation, though.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/complications , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
5.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 636-641, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28645427

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To gain further evidence of an association between the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) and the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 92,366 women with newly diagnosed T2D was obtained from a diabetes register (FinDM). 590 endometrioid ECs were observed during the follow-up time. Poisson regression was utilized to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the endometrioid EC in relation to the use of metformin, other oral ADM, insulin and statins. Nested case-control analyses were performed, where up to 20 controls were matched for age and duration of DM for each EC case. The HRs were estimated by conditional logistic regression for never/ever and cumulative use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the case-control analyses the use of metformin (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.51) and other oral ADM (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50) was associated with an increased incidence of endometrioid EC compared to no ADM use. No difference was observed between metformin users and those using other oral ADMs. The use of statins was inversely related to the incidence of endometrioid EC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94). Results from the full cohort analysis supported this finding. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the use of metformin or other oral forms of ADM was not associated with a lowered risk of endometrioid EC in women with T2D. Instead statins were observed to be inversely associated with endometrioid EC in this population.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Endometrioid/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Insulin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Poisson Distribution , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL