Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35742384

ABSTRACT

Post-marketing safety surveillance of new vaccines aimed to be administered during pregnancy is crucial to orchestrate efficient adverse events evaluation. This is of special relevance in the current landscape of new vaccines being introduced in the pregnant women population, and particularly due to the recent administration of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women. This multi-center prospective cohort study, nested within the WHO-Global Vaccine Safety-MCC study, involved two hospitals in the Valencia region. Hereby, the incidence rates of seven perinatal and neonatal outcomes in the Valencia region are presented. The pooled data analysis of the two Valencian hospitals allowed the estimation of incidence rates in the Valencia Region (per 1000 live births): 86.7 for low birth weight, 78.2 for preterm birth, 58.8 for small for gestational age, 13 for congenital microcephaly, 0.4 for stillbirth, 1.2 for neonatal death and 6.5 for neonatal infection. These figures are in line with what is expected from a high-income country and the previously reported rates for Spain and Europe, except for the significantly increased rate for congenital microcephaly. Regarding the data for maternal immunization, the vaccination status was collected for 94.4% of the screened pregnant women, highlighting the high quality of the Valencian Vaccine Registry. The study also assessed the Valencian hospitals' capacity for identifying and collecting data on maternal immunization status, as well as the applicability of the GAIA definitions to the identified outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Microcephaly , Premature Birth , Vaccines , Adolescent , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Morbidity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
2.
J Perinatol ; 41(10): 2482-2487, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34239042

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Early onset sepsis (EOS) remains a serious and potentially fatal illness. We aimed to demonstrate that serial clinical observation (SCO) is a feasible strategy associated with fewer laboratory evaluations and unnecessary antibiotic use. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the admissions and antibiotic therapy in neonates ≥35 weeks' gestation at risk for EOS in a prospective cohort after the implementation of a new protocol based on SCO (n = 381) with a historical cohort which received laboratory testing (n = 417). RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in admissions for suspected sepsis (7.2% vs 2.9%, p = 0.006) and the use of antibiotics (6.1% vs 0.7%, p = 0.000) in the cohort based on SCO. There was no delay in diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: SCO in neonates ≥35 weeks' gestation at risk for EOS, including chorioamnionitis-exposed infants, is a feasible measure that reduces laboratory evaluations and the overuse of antibiotics respecting the bonding mother-infant.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Sepsis , Sepsis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Sepsis/diagnosis , Neonatal Sepsis/drug therapy , Neonatal Sepsis/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL