Pallidal and Cortical Oscillations in Freely Moving Patients With Dystonia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between the pallidal local field potentials (LFPs) activity and the cortical oscillations (at rest and during several motor tasks) in two freely moving patients with generalized dystonia and pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two women with isolated generalized dystonia were selected for bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. After the electrodes' implantation, cortical activity was recorded by a portable electroencephalography (EEG) system simultaneously with GPi LFPs activity, during several motor tasks, gait, and rest condition. Recordings were not performed during stimulation. EEG and LFPs signals relative to each specific movement were coupled together and grouped in neck/upper limbs movements and gait. Power spectral density (PSD), EEG-LFP coherence (through envelope of imaginary coherence operator), and 1/f exponent of LFP-PSD background were calculated. RESULTS: In both patients, the pallidal LFPs PSD at rest was characterized by prominent 4-12 Hz activity. Voluntary movements increased activity in the theta (θ) band (4-7 Hz) compared to rest, in both LFPs and EEG signals. Gait induced a drastic raise of θ activity in both patients' pallidal activity, less marked for the EEG signal. A coherence peak within the 8-13 Hz range was found between pallidal LFPs and EEG recorded at rest. CONCLUSIONS: Neck/upper limbs voluntary movements and gait suppressed the GPi-LFPs-cortical-EEG coherence and differently impacted both EEG and LFPs low frequency activity. These findings suggest a selective modulation of the cortico-basal ganglia network activity in dystonia.

Electric Fields Induced in the Brain by Transcranial Electric Stimulation: A Review of In Vivo Recordings.

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques, such as direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), cause neurophysiological and behavioral modifications as responses to the electric field are induced in the brain. Estimations of such electric fields are based mainly on computational studies, and in vivo measurements have been used to expand the current knowledge. Here, we review the current tDCS- and tACS-induced electric fields estimations as they are recorded in humans and non-human primates using intracerebral electrodes. Direct currents and alternating currents were applied with heterogeneous protocols, and the recording procedures were characterized by a tentative methodology. However, for the clinical stimulation protocols, an injected current seems to reach the brain, even at deep structures. The stimulation parameters (e.g., intensity, frequency and phase), the electrodes' positions and personal anatomy determine whether the intensities might be high enough to affect both neuronal and non-neuronal cell activity, also deep brain structures.

Double-blind cross-over pilot trial protocol to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of long-term adaptive deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: After several years of brain-sensing technology development and proof-of-concept studies, adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is ready to better treat Parkinson's disease (PD) using aDBS-capable implantable pulse generators (IPGs). New aDBS devices are capable of continuous sensing of neuronal activity from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and contemporaneous stimulation automatically adapted to match the patient's clinical state estimated from the analysis of STN activity using proprietary algorithms. Specific studies are necessary to assess superiority of aDBS vs conventional DBS (cDBS) therapy. This protocol describes an original innovative multicentre international study aimed to assess safety and efficacy of aDBS vs cDBS using a new generation of DBS IPG in PD (AlphaDBS system by Newronika SpA, Milan, Italy). METHODS: The study involves six investigational sites (in Italy, Poland and The Netherlands). The primary objective will be to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the AlphaDBS System, when used in cDBS and aDBS mode. Secondary objective will be to evaluate the potential efficacy of aDBS. After eligibility screening, 15 patients with PD already implanted with DBS systems and in need of battery replacement will be randomised to enter a two-phase protocol, including a 'short-term follow-up' (2 days experimental sessions during hospitalisation, 1 day per each mode) and a 'long-term follow-up' (1 month at home, 15 days per each mode). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved as premarket study by the Italian, Polish, and Dutch Competent Authorities: Bioethics Committee at National Oncology Institute of Maria Sklodowska-Curie-National Research Institute in Warsaw; Comitato Etico Milano Area 2; Comitato Etico IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta; Comitato Etico interaziendale AOUC Città della Salute e della Scienza-AO Ordine Mauriziano di Torino-ASL Città di Torino; De Medisch Ethisch Toetsingscommissie van Maastricht UMC. The study started enrolling patients in January 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04681534.

Influence of inter-electrode distance on subthalamic nucleus local field potential recordings in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate spectra and their correlations with clinical symptoms of local field potentials (LFP) acquired from wide- and close-spaced contacts (i.e. between contacts 0-3 or LFP03, and contacts 1-2 or LFP12 respectively) on the same DBS electrode within the subthalamus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD), before and after levodopa administration. METHODS: LFP12 and LFP03 were recorded from 20 PD patients. We evaluated oscillatory power, local and switched phase-amplitude coupling (l- and Sw-PAC) and correlation with motor symptoms (UPDRSIII). RESULTS: Before levodopa, both LFP03 and LFP12 power in the α band inversely correlated with UPDRSIII. Differences between contacts were found in the low-frequency bands power. After levodopa, differences in UPDRSIII were associated to changes in LFP03 low-ß and LFP12 HFO (high frequency oscillations, 250-350 Hz) power, while a modulation of the low-ß power and an increased ß-LFO (low frequency oscillations, 15-45 Hz) PAC was found only for LFP12. CONCLUSION: This study reveals differences in spectral pattern between LFP12 and LFP03 before and after levodopa administration, as well as different correlations with PD motor symptoms. SIGNIFICANCE: Differences between LFP12 and LFP03 may offer an opportunity for optimizing adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) protocols for PD. LFP12 can be used to detect ß-HFO coupling and ß power (i.e. bradykinesia), while LFP03 are optimal for low frequency oscillations (dyskinesias).

Proceedings of the 10th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: Advances in cutting edge technologies, artificial intelligence, neuromodulation, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, and women in neuromodulation.

The deep brain stimulation (DBS) Think Tank X was held on August 17-19, 2022 in Orlando FL. The session organizers and moderators were all women with the theme women in neuromodulation. Dr. Helen Mayberg from Mt. Sinai, NY was the keynote speaker. She discussed milestones and her experiences in developing depression DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank X speakers was that DBS has continued to expand in scope however several indications have reached the "trough of disillusionment." DBS for depression was considered as "re-emerging" and approaching a slope of enlightenment. DBS for depression will soon re-enter clinical trials. The group estimated that globally more than 244,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia, and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, closed loop DBS, DBS tele-health, neuroethics, lesion therapy, interventional psychiatry, and adaptive DBS.

A New Implantable Closed-Loop Clinical Neural Interface: First Application in Parkinson's Disease.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for the treatment of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, and has shown clinical benefits in other brain disorders. A natural path for the improvement of this technique is to continuously observe the stimulation effects on patient symptoms and neurophysiological markers. This requires the evolution of conventional deep brain stimulators to bidirectional interfaces, able to record, process, store, and wirelessly communicate neural signals in a robust and reliable fashion. Here, we present the architecture, design, and first use of an implantable stimulation and sensing interface (AlphaDBSR System) characterized by artifact-free recording and distributed data management protocols. Its application in three patients with Parkinson's disease (clinical trial n. NCT04681534) is shown as a proof of functioning of a clinically viable implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) for adaptive DBS. Reliable artifact free-recordings, and chronic long-term data and neural signal management are in place.

Eight-hours conventional versus adaptive deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

This study compares the effects on motor symptoms between conventional deep brain stimulation (cDBS) and closed-loop adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) in patients with Parkinson's Disease. The aDBS stimulation is controlled by the power in the beta band (12-35 Hz) of local field potentials recorded directly by subthalamic nucleus electrodes. Eight subjects were assessed in two 8-h stimulation sessions (first day, cDBS; second day, aDBS) with regular levodopa intake and during normal daily activities. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores, the Rush scale for dyskinesias, and the total electrical energy delivered to the tissues per second (TEEDs) were significantly lower in the aDBS session (relative UPDRS mean, cDBS: 0.46 ± 0.05, aDBS: 0.33 ± 0.04, p = 0.015; UPDRS part III rigidity subset mean, cDBS: 2.9143 ± 0.6551 and aDBS: 2.1429 ± 0.5010, p = 0.034; UPDRS part III standard deviation cDBS: 2.95, aDBS: 2.68; p = 0.047; Rush scale, cDBS 2.79 ± 0.39 versus aDBS 1.57 ± 0.23, p = 0.037; cDBS TEEDs mean: 28.75 ± 3.36 µj s-1, aDBS TEEDs mean: 16.47 ± 3.33, p = 0.032 Wilcoxon's sign rank test). This work further supports the safety and effectiveness of aDBS stimulation compared to cDBS in a daily session, both in terms of motor performance and TEED to the patient.

The Relationship Between Electrical Energy Delivered by Deep Brain Stimulation and Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesias in Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Preliminary Analysis.

Background: Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) is now considered as a new feasible and effective paradigm to deliver DBS to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in such a way that not only stimulation is personalized and finely tuned to the instantaneous patient's state, but also motor improvement is obtained with a lower amount of energy transferred to the tissue. Amplitude-controlled aDBS was shown to significantly decrease the amplitude-driven total electrical energy delivered to the tissue (aTEED), an objective measure of the amount of energy transferred by DBS amplitude to the patient's brain. However, there is no direct evidence of a relationship between aTEED and the occurrence of DBS-related adverse events in humans. Objective: In this work, we investigated the correlation of aTEED with the occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesias pooling all the data available from our previous experiments using aDBS and cDBS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data coming from 19 patients with PD undergoing surgery for STN-DBS electrode positioning and participating to experiments involving cDBS and aDBS delivery. Patients were all studied some days after the surgery (acute setting). The aTEED and dyskinesia assessments (Rush Dyskinesia Rating Scale, RDRS) considered in the Med ON-Stim ON condition. Results: We confirmed both that aTEED values and RDRS were significantly lower in the aDBS than in cDBS sessions (aTEED mean value, cDBS: 0.0278 ± 0.0011 j, vs. aDBS: 0.0071 ± 0.0003 j, p < 0.0001 Wilcoxon's rank sum; normalized RDRS mean score, cDBS: 0.66 ± 0.017 vs. aDBS: 0.45 ± 0.01, p = 0.025, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). In addition, we found a direct significant correlation between aTEED and RDRS (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.0032, Spearman's correlation). Conclusions: Our results provide a first piece of evidence that aTEED is correlated to the amount of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in patients with PD undergoing STN-DBS, thus supporting the role of aDBS as feasible and safe alternative to cDBS.

Eight-hours adaptive deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and clinical efficacy of local field potentials (LFPs)-based adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) during daily activities in an open-label, nonblinded study. METHODS: We monitored neurophysiologic and clinical fluctuations during 2 perioperative experimental sessions lasting for up to 8 hours. On the first day, the patient took his/her daily medication, while on the second, he/she additionally underwent subthalamic nucleus aDBS driven by LFPs beta band power. RESULTS: The beta band power correlated in both experimental sessions with the patient's clinical state (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.506, p < 0.001, and r = 0.477, p < 0.001). aDBS after LFP changes was effective (30% improvement without medication [3-way analysis of variance, interaction day × medication p = 0.036; 30.5 ± 3.4 vs 22.2 ± 3.3, p = 0.003]), safe, and well tolerated in patients performing regular daily activities and taking additional dopaminergic medication. aDBS was able to decrease DBS amplitude during motor "on" states compared to "off" states (paired t test p = 0.046), and this automatic adjustment of STN-DBS prevented dyskinesias. CONCLUSIONS: The main findings of our study are that aDBS is technically feasible in everyday life and provides a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment method for the management of clinical fluctuations. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with advanced PD, aDBS is safe, well tolerated, and effective in controlling PD motor symptoms.

Risk of Infection After Local Field Potential Recording from Externalized Deep Brain Stimulation Leads in Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) controlled by local field potentials (LFPs) is considered a promising treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The clinical research investigating aDBS functioning is performed using external deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems that require LFP recording through the temporary externalization of DBS leads. Although research examining LFP was first undertaken more than 20 years ago, only a few studies concern lead externalization and LFP recording safety. In the present retrospective study, we assessed the risk of infection related to these procedures. METHODS: A total of 105 patients with PD who underwent DBS surgery and lead externalization at our hospital from 2002 to 2014 were included in the present study. The medical records were used to collect clinical data and information concerning surgical site infections. We assessed the infection incidence in our cohort and the risk of infection related to the LFP recording procedure. RESULTS: The incidence of infections in patients who underwent lead externalization was 2.8%, which was consistent with the postoperative infectious risk reported in the literature (Wilcoxon signed rank test; P > 0.05). Moreover, the LFP recording procedure did not significantly increase the infection risk (LFP recordings vs. no LFP recordings: 2.5% vs. 4.2%; Fisher exact test; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DBS lead externalization and LFP recording are safe and do not increase the postoperative infection risk in patients with PD who undergo DBS surgery. Our retrospective study supported further clinical research in the field of LFP-based aDBS.

The adaptive deep brain stimulation challenge.

Sub-optimal clinical outcomes of conventional deep brain stimulation (cDBS) in treating Parkinson's Disease (PD) have boosted the development of new solutions to improve DBS therapy. Adaptive DBS (aDBS), consisting of closed-loop, real-time changing of stimulation parameters according to the patient's clinical state, promises to achieve this goal and is attracting increasing interest in overcoming all of the challenges posed by its development and adoption. In the design, implementation, and application of aDBS, the choice of the control variable and of the control algorithm represents the core challenge. The proposed approaches, in fact, differ in the choice of the control variable and control policy, in the system design and its technological limits, in the patient's target symptom, and in the surgical procedure needed. Here, we review the current proposals for aDBS systems, focusing on the choice of the control variable and its advantages and drawbacks, thus providing a general overview of the possible pathways for the clinical translation of aDBS with its benefits, limitations and unsolved issues.

An external portable device for adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) clinical research in advanced Parkinson's Disease.

Compared to conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD), the newer approach of adaptive DBS (aDBS), regulating stimulation on the basis of the patient's clinical state, promises to achieve better clinical outcomes, avoid adverse-effects and save time for tuning parameters. A remaining challenge before aDBS comes into practical use is to prove its feasibility and its effectiveness in larger groups of patients and in more ecological conditions. We developed an external portable aDBS system prototype designed for clinical testing in freely-moving PD patients with externalized DBS electrodes. From a single-channel bipolar artifact-free recording, it analyses local field potentials (LFPs), during ongoing DBS for tuning stimulation parameters, independent from the specific feedback algorithm implemented. We validated the aDBS system in vitro, by testing both its sensing and closed-loop stimulation capabilities, and then tested it in vivo, focusing on the sensing capabilities. By applying the aDBS system prototype in a patient with PD, we provided evidence that it can track levodopa and DBS-induced LFP spectral power changes among different patient's clinical states. Our system, intended for testing LFP-based feedback strategies for aDBS, should help understanding how and whether aDBS therapy works in PD and indicating future technical and clinical advances.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Cortical Neuronal Activity in Alzheimer's Disease.

Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) showed that Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by increased theta power, decreased alpha and beta power, and decreased coherence in the alpha and theta band in posterior regions. These abnormalities are thought to be associated with functional disconnections among cortical areas, death of cortical neurons, axonal pathology, and cholinergic deficits. Since transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the temporo-parietal area is thought to have beneficial effects in patients with AD, in this study we aimed to investigate whether tDCS benefits are related to tDCS-induced changes in cortical activity, as represented by qEEG. A weak anodal current (1.5 mA, 15 min) was delivered bilaterally over the temporal-parietal lobe to seven subjects with probable AD (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE score >20). EEG (21 electrodes, 10-20 international system) was recorded for 5 min with eyes closed before (baseline, t0) and 30 min after anodal and cathodal tDCS ended (t1). At the same time points, patients performed a Word Recognition Task (WRT) to assess working memory functions. The spectral power and the inter- and intra-hemispheric EEG coherence in different frequency bands (e.g., low frequencies, including delta and theta; high frequencies, including alpha and beta) were calculated for each subject at t0 and t1. tDCS-induced changes in EEG neurophysiological markers were correlated with the performance of patients at the WRT. At baseline, qEEG features in AD patients confirmed that the decreased high frequency power was correlated with lower MMSE. After anodal tDCS, we observed an increase in the high-frequency power in the temporo-parietal area and an increase in the temporo-parieto-occipital coherence that correlated with the improvement at the WRT. In addition, cathodal tDCS produced a non-specific effect of decreased theta power all over the scalp that was not correlated with the clinical observation at the WRT. Our findings disclosed that tDCS induces significant modulations in the cortical EEG activity in AD patients. The abnormal pattern of EEG activity observed in AD during memory processing is partially reversed by applying anodal tDCS, suggesting that anodal tDCS benefits in AD patients during working memory tasks are supported by the modulation of cortical activity.

Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to modulate cortical excitability. Although increased/decreased excitability under the anode/cathode electrode is nominally associated with membrane depolarization/hyperpolarization, which cellular compartments (somas, dendrites, axons and their terminals) mediate changes in cortical excitability remains unaddressed. Here we consider the acute effects of DCS on excitatory synaptic efficacy. Using multi-scale computational models and rat cortical brain slices, we show the following. (1) Typical tDCS montages produce predominantly tangential (relative to the cortical surface) direction currents (4-12 times radial direction currents), even directly under electrodes. (2) Radial current flow (parallel to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy consistent with somatic polarization, with depolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (3) Tangential current flow (perpendicular to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy acutely (during stimulation) in an afferent pathway-specific manner that is consistent with terminal polarization, with hyperpolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (4) Maximal polarization during uniform DCS is expected at distal (the branch length is more than three times the membrane length constant) synaptic terminals, independent of and two-three times more susceptible than pyramidal neuron somas. We conclude that during acute DCS the cellular targets responsible for modulation of synaptic efficacy are concurrently somata and axon terminals, with the direction of cortical current flow determining the relative influence.

Axon terminal polarization induced by weak uniform DC electric fields: a modeling study.

Uniform steady state (DC) electric fields, like those generated during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can affect neuronal excitability depending on field direction and neuronal morphology. In addition to somatic polarization, subthreshold membrane polarization of axon compartments can play a significant role in modulating synaptic efficacy. The aim of this study is to provide an estimation of axon terminal polarization in a weak uniform subthreshold electric field. Simulations based on 3D morphology reconstructions and simplified models indicate that for axons having long final branches compared to the local space constant (L>4λ) the terminal polarization converges to Eλ for electric fields oriented in the same direction as the branch. In particular we determined how and when analytical approximations could be extended to real cases when considering maximal potential polarization during weak DC stimulation.