Reossification of Bone Defects After Surgical Correction of Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: A Review and An Original Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical correction of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) aims to restore cranial shape. Reossification of bone defects is paramount for the best aesthetic prognosis. However, the literature on the quantitative evaluation of bone defects after NSC surgery is scarce. This study aimed to quantify and analyze the surface area of bone defects after NSC surgery and establish a threshold value for predicting persistent defects. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and a prospective study of 28 children undergoing surgical treatment for NSC. We analyzed 426 defects on the first computed tomography scan (1 year postoperative) and 132 defects on the second computed tomography scan (4.6 years postoperative). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Youden's J statistic. RESULTS: Our systematic review identified three studies reporting on bone defects' surface area and reossification rate. In our study, we found no statistically significant differences in the number or size of defects between sex or type of NSC. The threshold value for the surface area of bone defects above which there was a higher probability of persistent defects was 0.19 cm2 (Youden point), with an 89.47 % probability of persistence. Defects with a surface area below 0.19 cm2 had a considerably lower probability, only 15.07%, of persistence over time. CONCLUSION: Our study provides valuable quantitative data for managing bone defects after NSC surgery. Defects with a surface area above 0.19 cm2 should be monitored with radiological imaging because of the risk of persistence. Our findings highlight the importance of developing robust and reproducible methods for the quantitative analysis of bone defects after NSC surgery.

Mechanical Complications of Sophysa SM8 Shunt in Adult Hydrocephalus: A Monocentric Experience.

BACKGROUND: Sophysa SM8 is widely used by neurosurgeons in France. Published studies report shunt malfunction rates in adults between 18% and 29%. However, these studies included multiple valve types and thus entailed a serious confounding factor. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the incidence the Sophysa SM8 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt malfunctions in adults. METHODS: We present a retrospective series of adult patients who underwent CSF shunt placement between 2000 and 2013 with Sophysa SM8. RESULTS: In total, 599 patients (329 males and 270 females) were included. The mean age at surgery was 64.15 years (19-90) (SD 16.17; median 68.0). The causes of hydrocephalus were normal pressure hydrocephalus (49%), traumatic hemorrhages (26.5%), tumors (15.7%), cerebral aqueduct stenoses (3%), and arachnoid cysts (2%). The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (0-16) (SD 4.10; median 3 years). The rate of complications was 22.04% (132 of 599). Most frequent causes of complications were disconnection (25%), migration (12.9%), overdrainage (9.1%), and proximal obstruction (6.8%). In 17 cases (12.9%), no failure was diagnosed during revision. Seven infections (5.3%) were reported. The mean delay for the first revision was 1.70 years (0-13.93) (SD 2.67, median 0.35). The risk of shunt failure was 36% at 10 years. Seventeen percent of revisions occurred during the first year after shunt placement. CONCLUSION: Disconnections are a very frequent complication of Sophysa SM8 valve. They are related to the 2-connector system of this valve. Based on these results, we recommend using 1-piece valves.

Management of Giant Thoracic Disc Herniation by Thoracoscopic Approach: Experience of 53 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Giant thoracic disc herniation (gTDH) is a rare condition. It is defined by a herniation that occupies at least 40% of the thoracic spinal canal and is usually calcified. Several surgical techniques have been described to date but this surgery remains a technically difficult procedure. OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term outcome of 53 patients with myelopathy due to gTDH who were operated on by a thoracoscopic approach. The technical details of the preoperative assessment and the surgical procedure are presented. METHOD: We present a retrospective study of a database of 53 patients operated for symptomatic gTDH by a thoracoscopic approach. The following clinical parameters were assessed initially and used during follow-up: Frankel grade and JOA score adapted to the thoracic spine (mJOA), pain in the lower limbs and limitation of the walking perimeter to less than 500 meters. The quality of spinal cord decompression was assessed postoperatively by magnet resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 78.1 mo (SD 49.4). At the last follow-up visit, clinical examination showed a mean improvement of 0.91 Frankel grade (P < 0.001) and 2.56 mJOA score respectively (P < 0.001). Lower limb pain and walking perimeter were also improved. Postoperative MRI revealed that the resection was complete in 35 cases, subtotal in 13 cases, and incomplete in 5 cases. CONCLUSION: gTDH is a condition that often evolves favorably after surgery. The thoracoscopic approach is a feasible alternative technique.

The Barrow Neurological Institute Grading Scale as a Predictor for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Data From a Nationwide Patient Registry (Swiss SOS).

BACKGROUND: The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale is a novel quantitative scale measuring maximal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) thickness to predict delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). This scale could replace the Fisher score, which was traditionally used for DCI prediction. OBJECTIVE: To validate the BNI scale. METHODS: All patient data were obtained from the prospective aneurysmal SAH multicenter registry. In 1321 patients, demographic data, BNI scale, DCI, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score up to the 1-yr follow-up (1FU) were available for descriptive and univariate statistics. Outcome was dichotomized in favorable (mRS 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6). Odds ratios (OR) for DCI of Fisher 3 patients (n = 1115, 84%) compared to a control cohort of Fisher grade 1, 2, and 4 patients (n = 206, 16%) were calculated for each BNI grade separately. RESULTS: Overall, 409 patients (31%) developed DCI with a high DCI rate in the Fisher 3 cohort (34%). With regard to the BNI scale, DCI rates went up progressively from 26% (BNI 2) to 38% (BNI 5) and corresponding OR for DCI increased from 1.9 (1.0-3.5, 95% confidence interval) to 3.4 (2.1-5.3), respectively. BNI grade 5 patients had high rates of unfavorable outcome with 75% at discharge and 58% at 1FU. Likelihood for unfavorable outcome was high in BNI grade 5 patients with OR 5.9 (3.9-8.9) at discharge and OR 6.6 (4.1-10.5) at 1FU. CONCLUSION: This multicenter external validation analysis confirms that patients with a higher BNI grade show a significantly higher risk for DCI; high BNI grade was a predictor for unfavorable outcome at discharge and 1FU.