Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(3): 869-901, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688388

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of extrauterine adenomyoma (EA) and review all the cases of EA in the literature. METHODS: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar from 1807 to December 2022. All studies reporting the histologic diagnosis of an EA. We collected the following data: patient's age, size and location of adenomyoma, presence of endometriosis and adenomyosis, past gynecologic treatment, symptoms, diagnostic imaging, surgical intervention, alternative/adjuvant treatment, associated malignancy, and follow up. RESULTS: Sixty-seven studies with 85 patients were included. Pain was the most frequent symptom (69.5%). Among diagnostic examinations, ultrasonography was used in 60 out of 81 reported cases, with several radiologic features described. EA was located inside the pelvis in 77.6% of patients. Adnexa were the most frequent site of the disease (24, 28.2%). History of endometriosis or adenomyosis was described in 35 patients (35, 41.2%). Uterine tissue morcellation was reported in 6 of the 85 patients (7.1%). Associated malignancy was detected in 9 out of 85 patients with available data (10.6%). There were two recurrences of disease. CONCLUSION: Specific imaging features of EA are yet to be described in the literature. History of endometriosis and adenomyosis or uterine tissue morcellation may be suggestive of EA. Histologic examination can give a definitive diagnosis and exclude malignant transformation.


Subject(s)
Adenomyoma , Adenomyosis , Endometriosis , Uterine Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/surgery , Adenomyosis/diagnostic imaging , Adenomyosis/surgery , Adenomyoma/diagnosis , Adenomyoma/surgery , Uterus/surgery , Pelvis , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 308(4): 1341-1349, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433947

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: to compare the effects of Dienogest 2 mg (D) alone or combined with estrogens (D + ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg, D + EE; D + estradiol valerate 1-3 mg, D + EV) in terms of symptoms and endometriotic lesions variations. METHODS: This retrospective study included symptomatic patients in reproductive age with ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas. Medical therapy for at least 12 months with D, D + EE or D + EV was required. Women were evaluated at baseline visit (V1) and after 6 (V2) and 12 months (V3) of therapy. RESULTS: 297 patients were enrolled (156 in the D group, 58 in the D + EE group, 83 in the D + EV group). Medical treatment leaded to a significant reduction in size of endometriomas after 12 months, with no differences between the three groups. When comparing D and D + EE/D + EV groups, a significant decrease of dysmenorrhea was detected in the D group than in D + EE/D + EV group. Conversely, the reduction of dysuria was more significative in the D + EE/D + EV groups rather than in the D group. Regarding tolerability, treatment associated side effects were reported by 16.2% patients. The most frequent one was uterine bleeding/spotting, significantly higher in the D + EV group. CONCLUSION: Dienogest alone or associated with estrogens (EE/EV) seems to be equally effective in reducing endometriotic lesions mean diameter. The reduction of dysmenorrhea was more significative when D was administered alone, while dysuria seems to improve more when D is associated with estrogens.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Nandrolone , Humans , Female , Estrogens/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Endometriosis/complications , Dysmenorrhea/complications , Dysuria/complications , Dysuria/drug therapy , Estradiol , Nandrolone/therapeutic use , Nandrolone/pharmacology
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36767092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Deep Learning (DL) machine for the detection of adenomyosis on uterine ultrasonographic images and compare it to intermediate ultrasound skilled trainees. METHODS: Prospective observational study were conducted between 1 and 30 April 2022. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) diagnosis of adenomyosis was investigated by an experienced sonographer on 100 fertile-age patients. Videoclips of the uterine corpus were recorded and sequential ultrasound images were extracted. Intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees and DL machine were asked to make a diagnosis reviewing uterine images. We evaluated and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, F1-score, specificity and negative predictive value of the DL model and the trainees for adenomyosis diagnosis. RESULTS: Accuracy of DL and intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees for the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.48-0.54) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60-0.79), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and F1-score of DL were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.38-0.48), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85) and 0.46 (0.42-0.50), respectively, whereas intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees had sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.52-0.86), specificity of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58-0.79) and F1-score of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study DL model showed a lower accuracy but a higher specificity in diagnosing adenomyosis on ultrasonographic images compared to intermediate-skilled trainees.


Subject(s)
Adenomyosis , Deep Learning , Endometriosis , Female , Humans , Adenomyosis/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 159(2): 505-512, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34995357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between sonographic findings at transperineal ultrasound (TPU) and chronic constipation (CC) in women with endometriosis. METHODS: An observational prospective cohort study was performed by enrolling all women with endometriosis scheduled for surgery between September 2019 and October 2020. Women underwent TPU at rest and during Valsalva maneuver evaluating levator-hiatal-area (LHA), antero-posterior diameter (APD), and levator ani muscle (LAM) coactivation. Ultrasound findings were compared between women with and without CC in the whole study population, and subsequently in two subgroups (only ovarian endometriosis and deep infiltrating endometriosis [DIE]). RESULTS: In all, 87 women were enrolled: 29 (33%) with CC and 58 (67%) without CC. Women with endometriosis and CC showed a smaller LHA during Valsalva, less LHA and APD enlargement from rest to maximum Valsalva, and a higher prevalence of LAM coactivation compared with women without CC. In the ovarian subgroup, women with CC had smaller LHA at Valsalva, less enlargement of LHA and APD from rest to maximum Valsalva, and higher prevalence of LAM coactivation compared with non-CC patients. In the DIE subgroup, TPU did not significantly differ between CC and non-CC patients. CONCLUSION: TPU signs of pelvic floor muscle hypertonia are more frequent in endometriosis patients with CC compared with those without constipation, particularly in women affected by isolated ovarian endometriosis.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Pelvic Floor , Constipation/diagnostic imaging , Constipation/etiology , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography
5.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 158(1): 179-186, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34606100

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Systematic placement of a ureteral stent before surgery for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) was previously recommended, but it could increase perioperative complications. We evaluate the role of preoperative ureteral stent in women requiring surgery for ureteral involvement (UI) with large posterior DIE nodules and/or grade I-II hydronephrosis. METHODS: Women undergoing minimally invasive surgery for DIE with UI having posterior nodules >3 cm and/or grade I-II hydronephrosis from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively included. We progressively changed our strategy from a systematic pre-operative stent insertion (S-PS, up to 2016) to a non-systematic one (NS-PS, from 2016). RESULTS: Eighty-eight women in the S-PS group and 96 in the NS-PS were included. Low urinary tract infections (UTI) were higher in the S-PS group (13.6% vs 2.1%, P = 0.003). Hospital stay was longer in women with S-PS (9.8 ± 5.3 days vs 6.7 ± 2.5 days, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis confirmed a significant association between NS-PS and low UTI (adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.81, P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Systematic placement of a ureteral stent before surgery in women requiring surgery does not reduce overall perioperative complication rate, but it is associated with a longer duration of hospitalization and a higher low UTI rate.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Hydronephrosis , Ureteral Diseases , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Hydronephrosis/etiology , Hydronephrosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Ureteral Diseases/complications , Ureteral Diseases/surgery
6.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(1): 135-143, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280565

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting early postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic shaving for rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: A single-center observational retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Third-level referral center for endometriosis. PATIENTS: A total of 294 patients were included in the study. All of them underwent elective laparoscopic shaving for rectosigmoid DIE. INTERVENTIONS: Postoperative CRP levels (assessed from day 3 onward, every 48 hours, until hospital discharge) and early postoperative complications were reviewed to assess CRP as a predictive marker of postoperative complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study outcomes were the association between early postoperative complications and CRP levels, the optimal CRP cutoff, and its predictive accuracy. Twenty-five patients (8.5%) experienced early postoperative complications. Five patients with postoperative complications within 2 days of surgery were excluded from the analysis. On postoperative day 3 the difference in the means of CRP levels between patients with and without complications was 2.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 1.0-4.1), whereas on day 5 the difference was 5.3 mg/dL (95% CI, 3.3-7.5), with a significant increase of 2.8 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.2-5.5). On postoperative day 7 the difference was 11.4 mg/dL (95% CI, 8.2-14.6), with an increase of 6.1 mg/dL (95% CI, 2.2-9.9) from day 5. The mean CRP level in the group with complications showed an increase of 1.2 mg/dL (95% CI, -1.3 to 3.8) from day 3 to day 5 and of 6.2 mg/dL (95% CI, 2.6-9.8) from day 5 to day 7. The optimal cutoff for the CRP level in predicting early postoperative complications was 3.1 mg/dL on postoperative day 3 and 5.2 mg/dL on postoperative day 5, with a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI, 52.9-97.8) and 80% (95% CI, 37.6-96.4), a specificity of 62.5% (95% CI, 52.1-71.9) and 91.2% (95% CI, 81.1-96.2), a positive predictive value of 17.5% (95% CI, 8.7-31.9) and 44.4% (95% CI, 18.9-73.3), a negative predictive value of 98.2% (95% CI, 90.6-99.7) and 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1-99.7), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 75.0% (95% CI, 61.9-80.1) and 85.6% (95% CI, 74.1-96.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: CRP on postoperative day 5 seemed to be a moderately accurate predictive marker of early postoperative complications in the patients who had undergone elective laparoscopic shaving for rectosigmoid DIE.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cohort Studies , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
7.
Fertil Steril ; 116(2): 470-477, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33962769

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether it is possible to predict the risk of ureteral endometriosis (UE) using a mathematical model based on preoperative findings. DESIGN: Prospective observational study conducted between January 2017 and April 2020. SETTING: Tertiary-level academic referral center. PATIENT(S): Three hundred consecutive women of reproductive age with a diagnosis of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) scheduled for laparoscopic surgery. INTERVENTION(S): Before surgery, anamnestic data and the severity of endometriosis-related symptoms were evaluated, and all patients underwent a complete gynecological examination. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound were performed to map the endometriotic lesion. Ureteral involvement was surgically and histologically confirmed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): To select important risk factors for UE and determine a suitable functional form for continuous predictors, we used the multivariable fractional polynomial. RESULTS: UE was surgically found in 145 women (48.3%). Based on our multivariable polynomial mathematical model, UE was significantly associated with adenomyosis, parametrial involvement, and previous surgery for endometriosis. A posterior DIE nodule with a transverse diameter >1.8 cm was associated with a higher probability of ureteral involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior DIE nodule with a transverse diameter >1.8 cm, adenomyosis, parametrial involvement, and previous surgery for endometriosis appear to be good predictors of UE.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Ureteral Diseases/surgery , Adult , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Models, Theoretical , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ureteral Diseases/diagnosis
8.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(9): 1740-1746, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999408

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has gained widespread application in several surgical specialties. Previous studies on the feasibility and safety of RALS vs standard laparoscopy (S-LPS) for rectosigmoid endometriosis are limited and reported conflicting data. This study aims to compare S-LPS and RALS in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis in terms of perioperative surgical and clinical data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicentric, observational, prospective cohort study including 44 patients affected by rectosigmoid endometriosis referred to two tertiary referral centers for endometriosis from September 2018 to September 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients underwent S-LPS, and 22 underwent RALS. Our primary outcome was to compare operative time (from skin incision to suture) between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included: operative room time (patient entry into operative room and patient out), estimated blood loss, laparotomic conversion rate, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and evaluation of endometriosis-related symptoms at 12-month follow up. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding preoperative and surgical data, except for higher rates of hysterectomies and bilateral uterosacral ligament removal procedures in the RALS group. Also after adjusting for these discrepancies, operative time was similar between S-LPS and RALS. Operative room time was statistically longer in the RALS group compared with that of S-LPS. No statistically significant difference was found concerning other study outcomes. Pain and bowel symptoms improved in both groups at 12-month follow up. CONCLUSIONS: If performed by expert teams, RALS provides similar perioperative outcomes compared with S-LPS in rectosigmoid endometriosis surgical treatment, except for longer operative room time.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Italy , Laparoscopy , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL