Overlapping repair and epitenon healing are more stable biomechanically than side to side repair and endotenon healing in achilles tendon lengthening with Z plasty.

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to compare biomechanical stability and healing process of side-to-side repair with overlapping repair after Achilles tendon lengthening with Z-plasty. METHODS: In our study, 22 Sprague Dawley male rats were used. Side-to-side repairs were classified as group 1 and overlapping repairs as group 2. The left and right legs of seven rats were used to compare early group 1 and early group 2 biomechanical test results at day 0. Seven rats were used to compare late group 1 and late group 2 biomechanical test results at day 28. Both the right and left tendons were tested from the four rats examined in the biomechanically in the untreated control group. The last remaining four rats were used for histopathological evaluation of tendon repair, at 28-days from the index procedure.The ultimate load to failure was compared between groups. RESULTS: At time 0, there were no measurable differences between group 1 (3.8 ± 1.4 N) and group 2 (3.7 ± 1.1 N), and both could endure less than one-tenth of the untreated control (49 ± 12). At 28 days, ultimate load to failure improved significantly in both group 1 (16.2 ± 3.5 N) and even more in group 2 (36 ± 8.1 N). While there was a significant difference between group 1 and group 2, neither were able to meet the untreated control (49 ± 12). Histopathological evaluation in the post-healing period showed that fibrosis, neovascularization, and inflammation increased in both groups. CONCLUSION: The overlapping suture technique and epitenon healing have more stability compared to side-to-side suture technique and endotenon healing. Human population trials may or may not exist, our study suggests it should be considered and further investigation needed before actual clinical application.

Sprengel Deformity: Comprehensive Evaluation of Concomitant Spinal and Extraspinal Anomalies in 90 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, case series. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the concomitant anomalies in patients with Sprengel deformity (SD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SD is the most common congenital anomaly of the shoulder. One or more associated anomalies may coexist in SD patients, similar to congenital scoliosis (CS); however, these anomalies and their relationship have not been studied in detail previously. METHODS: SD patients who have applied to our institution between 2005 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically. The patients were divided in two groups as SD patients with CS and without CS, to analyze if these anomalies are present due to CS or SD. Physical examination findings, MRI, CT, and USG reports were analysed for accompanying pathologies. Patients with missing data were excluded. Student-t and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the groups. Significance value was set as p = 0.05. RESULTS: Ninety patients met inclusion criteria. The most common spinal anomaly was omovertebra, followed by spina bifida and Klippel-Feil. Tethered cord and diastematomiyelia were associated with CS (P = 0.0026 and P = 0.0057, respectively). The most common extra-skeletal anomaly was rib anomalies, followed by urinary and cardiac system anomalies. Rib anomalies were associated with CS (P = 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Concomitant anomalies may accompany SD. The prognosis of SD may be affected by these anomalies. Therefore, patients should be evaluated for possible coexistent congenital anomalies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.